Bonfire of The Independent Thinkers.

 No matter what criticisms you have of Boris Johnson or Nicola Sturgeon, the thing they has was charisma. They also bucked the trend of bland, unthinking robotic politicians.

But, that bravura caught up with them eventually.

There was a point I defended Boris as originally the "PartyGate" scandal was essentially a bunch of workers having a drink at work. They were at work and it doesn't matter what you do if you're an essential worker whether you're there working, or having a sherry to toast a colleague as they leave for pastures new. 

The Covid rules allowed essential workers to be at work. Anything else is semantics and splitting hairs out of jealousy.  It appears that the dispute is what constitutes an essential worker, or a person that was allowed to be on the premises under the Covid rules. 

I was an essential worker and we had Pizza delivered the bosses ordered as a thank you for working through the pandemic. It wasn't much of a party, but it was a nice gesture as we stopped work for a bit and collectively took a break. We were sensible and distanced as much as we could., but still if you want to get extremely nit-picky there were occasions where it just wasn't possible. Carrying a two-person heavy load, for instance. 

In the end we chose to work as much as we could within the rules within reason and common sense. That's all you can do, otherwise you might as well say even essential workers should have gone home. Because at the end of the day if you make enough disparate o rules or make the rules especially vague, then you 're going to fall foul of one eventually.

It's an old Soviet tactic: keep watching someone for long enough and with enough rules around they'll eventually break a rule and you'll be able to prosecute.

In Boris' case I think this is what has happened. The knives have been out from the start and this is the thing they pinned on him. It's a bit like Al Capone: the only thing they eventually pinned on him was tax evasion, which was just enough to put him in jail, despite the heinous acts he masterminded over the years.

Sturgeon is a completely different case. There looks to be definite evidence of fraudulent activity. Enough to warrant charges and arrests. Whether she was directly involved is not yet proven, but it's not looking good for at least her husband and others in the SNP financial apparatus.

In both cases however, I get the feeling there was a concerted effort to remove them and replace them with other, less headstrong replacements. In the UK we eventually got Rishi because the establishment didn't like the people's choice of Liz Truss. Don't forget that Rishi didn't even win the confidence of his own party's members, let alone win a general election.

In Sturgeon's case I think she was led down a path that she followed which led to her demise. 

In both cases we got inferior replacements. Rishi the Billionaire accountant and that bloke in Scotland whose name I can't remember. 

Bland placeholders, no agenda, no plan. 

And that's what the globalists want: people they can influence and get results. Rishi will not rock the boat like Liz Truss and Boris did. They will not stir up trouble and keep pressing the independence button like Nicola Sturgeon did. The globalists right now want open borders, not fragmentation. They want seamless trading, not customs barriers. Just look how quickly the original Northern Ireland agreement was modified, when both sides realised they'd reduced profits for the globalists.

Just remember we used to be their employers, their masters. That appears to be no longer the case. I've been banging on for over a decade that modern governments have been corrupted and co-opted to serve the global corporations. They no longer serve the best interest of the people, the voters that vote them into power. 

Removal of Dissent to One World Government and a Realisation of Who Globalists Really Are.

For a long time I've suspected that the Powers that drive the "One World Government" Globalist agenda are financing dissenting voices, but only on their terms.

A new example of this is Mark Steyn on the GB News channel and his refusal to return based on new contract terms handed to him that basically make him liable for the outcome of any "wrong-speak".

I've seen a trend for various actors to pop up as the "True Voice of Conservatism" and sound like they mean it, but several times when they come close to delivering a true alternative to the OWG/WEF, fail to deliver. 

GB News is just the latest in a long line of fake Conservative platforms and political parties.

I'd lump in Nigel Farage in with that, because when he came so close to winning, he quit. I understand he wanted Brexit, but after getting the referendum vote, he just up and quit. He could have ridden that wave all the way to the 2019 election and could and should have had an MP in Parliament, especially after the actions of MPs after the Brexit vote to weaken it with second referendums, constitutional malfeasance, etc.

Nope, he copped out and left. Then he created a new party, the Brexit (later Reform) party in competition with UKIP. Splitting the Brexit vote further. That's not the actions of a person that wants to win.

Now we have UKIP, Reform and Reclaim all vying for the same votes, weakening the anti-Globalist vote. Even David Kurten (ex-UKIP) has jumped in and formed the Heritage party FFS.

Not one party has bitten their tongue and agreed to form an anti-Globalist alliance. Too many egos? No idea, but the sponsors of these parties, if they really believed in the cause would knock heads together and push for a unified party.

It's almost like it's a deliberate policy to keep those of us wanting an end to globalism tied up and forever muted, because our split vote will never overcome the pro-globalist united front of the Labour, Liberal and Tory parties. (Yes, whichever one of the main parties you vote for, neither of them will change the course of the country).

Well GB News viewers, UKIP, Reform and Reclaim voters, enjoy the prison your globalist sponsors have created for you. A prison where various actors promise sunny uplands, better times ahead and a dissenting voice to the globalist narrative. But never, ever deliver their promise. Almost like the carrot on the stick in front of the Donkey. You never get the prize.

Don't forget, Turkeys don't vote from Christmas, and very rich political donors are very likely to be Globalists, not anti-globalists.

Oh you might say, we got Brexit done. And it's true, the Globalist's eyes were like saucers on the day of the result. 

But now I believe Brexit has been given some ulterior motive for the globalists. I haven't quite worked it out yet, but the detail is in the various agreements made with the EU. I suspect that for some Globalists a United Ireland and an end to the issues there would be an advantage. Also fomenting the separatist movement of the SNP in Scotland is another way to neuter the UK. 

By watering down Brexit and making it as bad as it can be, it forces us to either re-enter the globalist cabal, or we end up torn apart and neutered. 

Why would a neutered UK be of interest to the one-world-government types? Could it be revenge?

Globalism and Globalists in general are very dangerous people and you need to understand how dangerous they are. They are willing to kill millions of people, they are willing to crush major countries. They want the World. One World, One Party, One Government. 

Now that sounds familiar.... where have I heard something like that before?

Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer!

Ah, that's where. Definitely revenge then...

I understand why the acolytes of the globalists follow them. It was an attractive ideology back in the 1940s and it's an attractive ideology now. The idea that you are above all, you belong to the elite, a super-race, among the supposed super-intelligent. Back in the Germany of the 1930's the Germans put themselves as a race above others in a similar way. 

Germany had superior ideas, superior scientists, superior technology. Sound familiar to the Globalist ideology? The science is settled, we own the science, do as we say...

As I said, VERY dangerous people, these Globalists.

The One-World-Government Globalists Fight against the UK public After Brexit.

Since the end of World War 2, there has been a pressure from the elites towards a one-world government.

Both World Wars had proved to the elites that although war provides lots of opportunities to make money, it would be a better idea not to ride the peaks and troughs of war and peace and instead have a long period of peace and expand markets to unify the trading world.

The great depression was the wake up call that solidified their desire to sort the world out as soon as they could.

The birth of the United Nations was a step towards the goal of one-world government as all Nations signed up and effectively became subservient to it. It also spawned other organisations to standardise regulations, standards and the like. 

Initially it sounds like a good idea and most of the time it is, or was.

For instance global standards make global trade easier (think shipping containers, they are the same all over the world) and any new market that wanted a piece of the action had to fall in line, because if they came up with their own standards their market would fail. No one wants to try and fit a 15 or 25 foot container onto a ship designed to take 20 and 40 foot containers. No one wants to have to buy a new mobile phone when they arrive in a new country because they work differently. See, it's convenient.

Other regional organisations like the EU were formed and countries joined and benefitted from shared standards, measurements, legal procedures, etc. trade could flow seamlessly everywhere.

But, where the elites went too far is political unions. To them it's the next logical steep. First you become a trading union, then in order to solve disputes across borders, you layer a legal union on top to regulate it all.

And that's where the EU was up to the Nineties. Then at the end of the eighties and early nineties there was a call for a political union. after all, the trading and legal unions had been successful, so why not political union?

But here's where the elites went too far. They decided that getting (say) the whole of Europe to vote for a European parliament, with twenty or thirty different countries wanting different things, they would engineer a solution that would.... smooth out the process and remove pesky democracy and accountability from the equation.

Thus the European parliament didn't have any real power to create laws. Instead a higher organisation called the European council, made up of representatives put forward by European politicians would make the laws, to then be handed down to the Parliament to discuss and eventually ratify. Effectively beaurocrats, not elected politicians created the legislation and laws, they got handed to the Parliament to accept and then they would be signed into law by the member countries.

But this irked the people of the United Kingdom, because their tradition of common law is entirely different than that in most European countries. In Europe they tend to sign up to Napoleonic or permissive law, which means that everything is illegal, except that which the government allows you to do. In the UK the tradition is you are free to do anything you like except that which the government (elected by the people) deems to be harmful to the majority. 

The UK system of law is more flexible than the European one, and the UK has gained competitive advantages by having such a system. By comparison the EU legal model seems clunky and overbearing. You have to wait to get permission for something before it can be considered legal and you risk committing money to it.

The British never felt easy with the European legislative model. The lack of direct accountability, the inability to vote for the people making the laws, the fact that the legal framework was restrictive and peered into ever more areas of our lives, when we had been used to just getting on with things without government interference, came to a head in 2016.

In the years running up to 2016, a certain Mr Nigel Farage had run a successful subversive campaign to disrupt the EU by using their own rules against them. The elections to the European parliament were done by proportional representation. So all he had to do was get a proportion of the people to vote for his party (UKIP) and he would get seats allotted to it in the European Parliament.

While there he highlighted the futility of the Parliamentary organisation. The lack of real democratic accountability by the council the inability to refuse laws provided to the EU Parliament. In effect it was a talking shop, a façade providing an illusion of democracy. 

As an aside, this is how the elites control things. They provide the illusion of democracy, but when you peer closely at what is happening, you see behind the facade  and you don't see democracy. Not as we know it in the English legal sense.

Anyway, Ol' Nige puts so much pressure on the UK government with news of a European Army, an Eu-wide tax, etc. that the UK government takes a risky move. They announce a referendum on EU membership. A referendum they believe they can win. After all they have control of the media, most of the politicians are in favour of the EU political edifice and well, Nigel Farage is just a windbag and doesn't have the support of the nation. He's tried to get elected to parliament a number of times and failed. The elites thought they could manipulate the result without anyone knowing.

And then we voted in the referendum.

The shock on the faces of the Politicians was clear. The people in the media reading out the result were ashen. Whet was supposed to be a foregone conclusion was turned against them. Not by much: 52% for leaving, 48% for remaining. 

The elites didn't like it. Something, anything had to be done. So, there followed months of plots against Brexit and the people of the UK.

In Parliament there was unprecedented behaviour as Politicians tried to get a second referendum agreed. A second referendum in which we would vote the correct way. The shenannigans inside and outside Parliament caused a constitutional crisis. The Government was taken to court again and again, in order to try and force it not to enact Brexit.

The people saw this rightly as undemocratic.

Theresa May, the Prime Minister at the time, appointed a Brexit negotiator, David Davis. He was so good he negotiated a Brexit deal very favourable to the UK.

Theresa May eventually called a summit at Chequers and instead of enacting Davis' carefully crafted and skilfully negotiated Brexit deal, she decided to go with a deal decided behind Davis' back in a few days. It was horrific. MPs were called to chequers to sign off on the terms of the May deal. If they didn't they would be sacked and would have the ignominy of ministerial cars removed from them. They would have to walk down the mile-long drive of Chequers to the road, where hundreds of reporters were waiting.

Davis resigned that evening after taking the trip home in the ministerial car.

The cat was out of the bag and the terms of the May deal so far negotiated effectively handed power in the UK over to Europe. Northern Ireland was effectively annexed by the EU so it didn't quite belong to the UK any more.

Luckily enough there were enough Conservative MPs in Parliament that supported Brexit to oust Theresa May and install Boris Johnson as PM.

He promised a better Brexit deal. The people believed him and in 2019 the people gave him a landslide victory in the election with an 80-seat majority. 80 seats. That majority allowed him to get any legislation liked through parliament.

But instead the globalist EU lovers immediately started plotting against him. I'm even convinced his then girlfriend and eventual wife was installed deliberately in order to give him bad advice.

Numerous stories of his previous infidelities hit the news - none stuck. Ministers that he had installed were likewise compromised and removed from office, leaving him only globalists to pick from to fill the cabinet.

Then Covid hit. The whole time Boris was given unsound advice. Initially the health "experts" prattled on about natural immunity and kept the borders open. Only after Covid was established inside the UK was natural immunity was a taboo subject. The UK government saw the death toll in Italy unaware that the virus had been in that country for months and locked the country down.

Globalist chancellor Rishi Sunak began borrowing money to pay people to sit at home. A radical idea that initially saved and then later ruined the country.

Boris and the UK muddled through Covid, but then once the dust had settled and the virus was almost beaten, the briefing against him started again. This time he had had a party in number 10 whilst he had enacted laws that kept everyone else in their homes and away from loved ones in hospital. 

When his chancellor Rishi Sunak failed to support him, Boris eventually resigned and we endured last summer's tortuous and orchestrated Tory party leadership contest. Orchestrated so that the final two candidates were: The Globalist Rishi Sunak and the politically naïve Liz Truss. 

Liz Truss pledged to reduce taxes and and return to Conservative values. Sunak promised more free money.

Truss won the contest, became PM and almost immediately the globalists started briefing against her. The only respite being the two weeks of mourning after the Queen died.

As soon as the Queen was buried, the plotting restarted.

Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng, her chancellor came up with a radical emergency budget. They would freeze energy prices for two tears by paying the difference between the price being paid now and the price being charged by the supplier. They also stopped a raise in corporation tax, a measure that would have helped small to medium businesses recover after Covid.

Then Truss and/or Kwarteng made a mistake. They listened to their globalist partners. The globalists said they wanted a cut in the top rate of tax. If they got that, they would ease the pressure and Truss could continue helping those in dire straits due to rising energy prices.

It was a trap. Immediately they implemented the budget, the dropping of the top rate of tax was used as a cudgel to beat Kwarteng and Truss. Under pressure she fired her chancellor. In his place was  put the globalist Jeremy Hunt. Then it was quite clear that Truss was doomed. She'd fallen for the trap and been outmanoeuvred by the globalists. Then the home secretary Suella Braverman also went, replaced by globalist Grant Schapps.

It was quite clear that Truss had been beaten politically. A couple of days ago she resigned as well.

Now the Tories are having another leadership contest. The contenders are Globalist Rishi Sunak (again), Boris Johnson (again) and Globalist Penny Mordaunt.

See the picture emerging?

Since 2016 and their miscalculation, the globalists have burned this country to the ground politically in order to try and get us back on their globalist track. 

We are now left with two globalists and Boris, whom they've already outmanoeuvred once. 

I'm sorry to say the Brexiteers, the ordinary folk may have lost the political war. Since 2016 the political elites and their friends in the media have fought tooth and nail to reverse Brexit. They have schemed and plotted for six years now.

If you wonder why it feels like politics isn't working for the little guy, the ordinary person and even working against you, this is why. You are not mad, you are not alone. 

We will most likely find in a couple of weeks we have a globalist Prime Minister and a Globalist cabinet. I've a feeling we will see amnesties for illegal immigrants, we'll see wages suppressed, inflation will be bad and we'll be bled dry. 

The government will help, but will require it's pound of flesh in return. That's what the globalists want. they want you to be ever thankful for their intervention. All they want in return is your freedom.

Civil War.

Right now there is a war going on within the UK. It's not reported, it's not on the radar of the mainstream media, and only those with any political nous really understand. 

Nigel Farage gets it, Suella Braverman gets it, other Conservative MPs are slowly realising it. Especially after last night's commons fiasco.

We are at war between forces outside the democratic process and the general public.

Let's look at a timeline:

Boris Resigns and the Conservative party request applications for party leaders.

The selection process starts and it's apparent that there are two sides: The globalists, working on behalf of global corporations and Supra-national organisations and the party membership.

The Globalists control the contest and it's whittled down to a choice of The Globalist candidate (Rishi Sunak) and the least strong membership candidate (Liz Truss).

Liz wins, but from day one she's hamstrung as the globalists brief against her constantly. The media, complicit in their globalist support also start on the Liz-hating.

Liz is installed and selects a chancellor with similar views. Together they put together a budget that would (a) save the majority of the public from serious energy costs and (b) reduce costs for small businesses. 

But in a miscalculation, or a deliberate misdirection from the globalists in the party, she also cuts the tax for rich people. They give her the policy that they then use to beat her with. And with that they took away control of the Parliamentary Party from her.

Within weeks her chancellor was gone. The globalist-supporting Jeremy Hunt is installed. Days after that, Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary that actually deported some Albanians that arrived by dinghy last week, was ratted out and resigned. 

There's chatter about whether she resigned deliberately because of pressure from the globalist wing of the party, or that Liz Truss was told to give Suella the option. But it's quite clear from her resignation letter that she wasn't happy with the effective coup that was going on within the party to usurp the wishes of the membership.

Within hours another Globalist, Grant Shapps is installed and in his acceptance speech he mentions Liz Truss zero times and Jeremy Hunt at least twice. Now we know who he's giving thanks to and who actually has power in the cabinet.

Then we have what some might say is a deliberately engineered farce last night in the commons. 

Tory MP Charles Walker was almost in tears last night in an interview. Listen to his words carefully. He's talking about Parliamentary Party members who engineered this situation. The people that ensured the final candidates would be the globalist that the membership wouldn't vote for and the membership candidate that the globalists could control or sideline. Sadly by calling for Truss to resign, he's playing into the globalist's hands.

Nothing about the Conservative party currently is about the National Interest. Instead it's serving vested interests, globalists that want a cosy atmosphere to work in, they want competition stifled and Brexit neutered. 

Hence why the raise in Corporation Tax was re-introduced by Hunt. The big corporations want no competition. They hate small businesses taking even a fraction of their business. They killed something that would have helped small businesses across the country. As little as it was, it was something to help.

Global corporations have tax breaks, or the option of paying corporation tax in a different country, so it doesn't affect them. But it does make it harder for small-medium UK businesses. 

The budget support for energy prices for two years took a lot of pressure off people. With it now ending in April thanks to Hunt, the uncertainty for ordinary people is back. Another fear for the globalists to exploit.

Right now the globalists have the upper hand. They have Jeremy Hunt in place as Chancellor and they have Rishi Sunak in the wings.

If Truss resigns, they could just install Rishi as leader in some sort of concocted second-choice option, or Hunt could slide over from number 11 to number 10 and be caretaker leader. But then they could say it's too close to an election to spend months on a leadership contest, so either becomes de-facto leader of the party. 

Either way the globalists win and the ordinary people lose. They have played the political game well. 

But if enough Conservative MPs defected to Reform, then there could be a case to promote Reform as the true, new home of Conservatism and to get Tory party members to vote for them instead of the globalist Tories.

Hopefully that will happen and the war has a chance of swinging back in favour of the ordinary person and the globalists will lose control.

Here's hoping.

Hang On, Who's in Charge Here?

I see in the News that the chancellor is receiving criticism for not informing the markets about his mini budget. Excuse me, but who is in charge here? Is it the government or the markets? Is it the Government or the Globalists? Is it the Government or those with huge financial interests?

Why should he inform the markets? He's in the government and wouldn't tipping the markets off before his announcement constitute insider trading or leaking information prior to a budget, which is also a no-no?

After all if he only informed certain parts of the market, couldn't they gain an advantage, having prior knowledge? If the treasury had informed one trading firm and another an hour later, the trading firm with an hour's prior knowledge could make a killing in that hour until the whole market had caught up. An hour is a very long time in these technological times. 

Billions are made on making fractions of a percent profit over billions of pounds. Just a few minutes of advance warning can provide such an advantage that a trading house could  could earn a substantial amount of money.

It's yet more nonsense to bash the Truss cabinet with. 

I think the globalists really wanted Rishi Sunak as the PM and are continuing to press for "their man" to be in place to do their bidding instead of working for the people of this country.

If that isn't proof of outright corruption in UK politics, I don't know what is.

Secondary to this is the fact that the Labour party are also pushing this mantra. In lock step with the anti-worker globalists. I say shame on the Labour party. It shows that if you voted them into power instead of the Tories, you'd just get more of the same globalist corruption and the workers of this country would be screwed for an additional 5 years.

Vote for someone else for fucks sake. Not the Tories, not Labour, not the traitorous Liberals nor the Fucking disastrous Greens.

Do not believe the globalist agenda that everyone not supported by them is a fascist.  It's such a worn out cliché just like "Far-Right" or "Extremist" that it's almost a badge of honour these days. 

Vote Reform. Do what Sweden and Italy have done. Vote for the anti-woke anti-globalists if you know what's good for you. I'd say vote UKIP, but unfortunately I doubt they have the funds to mount a decent campaign at the next election.

If it comes to it vote for your local independent candidate. Someone who isn't a professional politician. Even the least best option puts a career globalist-supporting politician out of a job and puts a normal person in parliament in their place, giving a decent paying job to one of us, someone who deserves it.

The Rise of the Corporates: Fascism in a Velvet Glove.

Very slowly and gently, over the past 5 decades or so, the big corporations have taken over the world. 

This is just not evident from the current debate about Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google manipulating the debating space, but it's been going on for decades with the big arms corporations, the petrochemical industry, the city traders and the banks.

Once the corporations attain critical mass and a percentage of the country becomes dependent on their industry, then governments become sensitive to their requests. It's a pretty damn obvious statement really: the corporation become big enough to influence a proportion of GDP, the government is going to bend over backwards to avoid losing that revenue.

And this is where the corporate power has risen from. Such that certain corporations can dictate to HMRC how much (if any) tax revenue they will pay to government. With us normal plebs, it's the other way round: HMRC tell you.

Now they have control of public debate in the form of the online tech Giants, the machinations of the big corporates is more public than ever. Yet government seem powerless to enforce some sort of moratorium or enact legislation to protect free speech.

In fact we're seeing a movement of young people cosseted by the corporate cabal that actively protest AGAINST free speech! They might think they are independent thinkers, but when you trace the tenuous lines back to the source of the money that props them up, it ALWAYS links back to the big corporations or their owners. The obvious name seemingly with fingers in dozens of anti-democratic corporatist authoritarian "peoples" movements is of course George Soros. Yep, the guy that almost bankrupted the UK during the ERM fiasco.

If only those independent thinkers would look up the dictionary definition of corporatism..

corporatism

NOUN

1. the control of a state or organization by large interest groups.

   "fascism was the high point of corporatism."

That last statement hits the nail on the head. The level of control the corporations have over the state, their ability to stand up against the democratically elected government, the influence they have directly over normal people, is tantamount to Fascism. Especially this new wave of authoritarian corporatism, encapsulated by the extinction rebellion and the push to prevent Brexit and gain freedom from the antidemocratic EU.

 

These are indications of the way the corporates want things to go in the future: no borders, no barriers to global trading, one world government, one currency, no dissenters, no free speech, no pointing out the strings being pulled around the world.

 

This is fair warning as to what awaits the young if they keep doing what they are told and don't start to think for themselves.

 

All those cosy benefit you get with Apple products, while surfing the web checking Facebook and posting YouTube videos while drinking your coffee from Starbucks whilst protesting that the government should have more control over what people do and calling for an end to hate speech....

 

All of those are leading you into an authoritarian, fascist world of the future.  Don't blame us oldies for ruining your life. We voted to leave the EU so we could get away from corporate control of politics and the appointed crony commission. We wanted freedom, you want the opposite.