Wednesday, 19 August 2020

The Channel Illegal Immigrants - Let's not Sugar Coat it, It's a National Security Crisis.

 The left is making much lightness of the migrants coming across the channel, saying how could we be so heartless as to stop all of these pregnant mothers and families with kids coming across the channel?

All very twee and ever so unthreatening. What's to worry about? These families will assimilate into our culture and before you know it will be model citizens...

Except that I know they won't. I've seen what happens first hand. I've lived through mass immigration. I've seen neighbourhoods become ghettos and for the immigrant communities to close ranks, close doors, close their own borders, even as the left insist we keep ours open.

I lived in a multicultural area. I have said this many times. Back in the 60's on our street you could find Poles, Romanians, Indians, Yugoslavians. Those from the Eastern Bloc displaced when the iron curtain fell were happy to be here. The Indians likewise wanted to be here to make a better world for their kids. They understood the benefits of being here and were grateful.

In the 70's we received a wave of different immigrants. They were unsure why they were here. Sure, they were shopkeepers, they took opportunities. But as more and more came, they became resentful. They installed enclaves and isolated themselves, establishing closed borders. Where the Poles and the Romanians and the Indians had happily shared their culture, their homes and their lives, the immigrants from Pakistan and other parts of the Muslim world thought their religion superior, their way of life better, they refused to integrate, except for a small percentage. Mainly those who had to deal with the world outside the community. Those within the community live isolated lives, insulated from Western values and as they see it Western imprudence. The isolated core that gives rise to the us/them extremist murderers and hides the child rapists. The other communities were pushed out, sometimes forcibly by the new, resentful neighbours.

Those people not intercepted by Border Force and get to the beaches melt away into the countryside. Mobile phone in hand they contact cousins who direct them to the isolated enclaves. There they can live and earn a living without the British authorities ever knowing about their existence. They are off the books, illegal. Driving cars insured in the names of cousins, holding driving licences in other names. Woe betide you meet one on the road.

The people arriving on the beaches are the most organised, the most resourceful, but not quite the most dangerous. That moniker is left for those that make the crossing at night. Those are the people smuggling not only people, but people of fighting age, with an ideology imbued in them. They run up the beaches and into the night to be picked up in vans. Sometimes they carry other things. They carry drugs, or weapons, and pass them to their brothers waiting in the white vans that drive to the coast of an evening.

Going back to the lefties, they say only 5000 have arrived, hardly a threat, hardly a drop in the Ocean, why can 't we accept them with open arms?

Because dear leftie, 805 of those 5000 are of fighting age and male. That's 4000 young men in the country illegally from who knows where.

Let's be hypothetical and assume that a low number, possibly 5 or 10% of those young males are not looking for employment, but are looking to cause mayhem. To use those smuggled weapons?

That's 200 men. Just think what a group of 200 organised men could accomplish. They can recruit, they can organise, they can attack. 

Even if only 10 percent of those men attacked a shopping centre as we have seen in other countries, that's 20 men. They can cover all the exits in a shopping centre and go on a shooting spree. 20 men is plenty enough to cause major carnage, cause more than 20 deaths. The trade off would be worth it for them. There would still be 90 percent of them available to continue and they could recruit more.

We can't keep those 200 men under surveillance.  Not all the time. And we already have more terrorist-grade radicals and extremists than we can keep an eye on. So why would we want to allow more in?

I hope that when the first atrocity occurs that involves an illegal immigrant or a significant number of organised immigrants that the left and the Labour party especially will eat humble pie. I would hope that they won't blame the government when they, the left were the apologists for terrorists.

This is a National Security threat. It threatens every single one of us. I'm not scared of Muslim extremists, I have no irrational fear of Muslims in general. I have had Muslim friends, I have Muslim family. But I have also experienced the extremists, I have knowledge of them and I know how they live, isolated amongst the Muslim community. I know how they manipulate not only their own community, but manipulate outsiders.

If you can't see the threat, then I suggest you have been manipulated buy the very people that despise you, are too trusting and cannot see what is very obvious.






COVID-19: Waiting for The Discrimination Card to Be Pulled.

 As we move from panic/pandemic mode, to more measured test, track and trace, I can see issues arising.

When we move to random testing, where we see who's had the virus and which communities still have the virus circulation, I'm waiting for the race card to be hoisted high.

Why?

Because the BAME communities can't help themselves, even when something as serious as a pandemic is ongoing. Because they can't help themselves even though testing shows their community to be a hotspot, somehow highlighting the fact will be racial.

Nothing at all to do with the huge numbers of Muslims lining up outside Mosques with no face masks and no social distancing and nothing at all to do with the lack of both within the Mosques. Sharing of washing basins with no disinfection between users, no social distancing, it'll be Allah's will if they get infected and die.

But pointing out this fact that no precautions against infection spread will probably classed as racist. 

As will pointing out the fact that BAME communities are more likely to have a number of generations families in a household, so that the older family members are more likely to catch COVID-19 from younger members of the household. It's not about poverty, it's about social norms. Even the most affluent BAME families have been affected by COVID because younger family members share a household with elderly, more at risk family members. But hey, pointing that out will also most likely be called as racist.

As for the most supposedly racist thing: pointing out that illegal migrants coming over the channel are not subject to 14 day isolation on arrival, but instead are being put up in hotels (4-star ones no less) with other migrants. Without any form of isolation and with no security they are able to mingle amongst the general population.

But... this is all racist nonsense and nothing at all to do with the extra lockdowns and the higher R numbers in locations where the population has a high percentage of minority (especially Muslim of Pakistani origin) population in the area. Populations that accept illegal migrants and where they can live, sleep and work without ever interacting with UK laws, completely isolated and outside the wider non-Muslim community.

I've seen it with my own eyes. I've been sent pictures by mates. No masks, no social distancing, carry on as normal, no virus here.

I've said before these areas are a breeding ground for extremism, they are also a breeding ground for COVID.

If these communities do actually get on board with testing (doubtful) then I'll just wait for the race card to be hoisted when extra lockdown measures are applied to their community specifically.

And just wait when the vaccine comes out... Haram or Hallal? Seeing as other vaccines are classed as Haram, I don't hold out much hope.

But hey, I'll probably be called a racist for pointing it out.