Vote-Winning Policy for UK Political Parties.

Okay, looking realistically at the current government, we're now stepping into the campaign for the next election. This "Conservative" government couldn't manage the proverbial in a Brewery, so they're done. They're toast.

The thing is, what would a true Conservative party offer?

Well, smaller government is one thing. Previous governments have required ever more tax revenue in order to provide fewer services. Because the cost of those services increases year-on-year. Now we are looking at paying more tax than we did in the Fifties, with smaller armed forces than back then, no civil defence force than back then, you get the picture.

Then there's the "invisible" or indirect taxation: pay and display parking in towns, paying small fees for local council services like registering to use refuse dumps, libraries, prescription fees, etc.

A true Conservative party would reduce the size of government. Cut the civil service down to the bare essentials. It would star a campaign to reduce public sector administrative pay. All those senior "executives" in councils getting six-figure salaries needs to be stopped. The money should go to those at the sharp end, not those at the top. You go into public service to serve, not to feather your nest or line your pockets.

A true Conservative party would end illegal immigration. By any and all means. If it requires us to leave the ECHR, then so be it. The easy response is the ECHR cares more for the rights of those outside the country rather than the rights and wellbeing of those that live here. We shouldn't be "required" to pay billions to house these migrants because of their rights. Instead, those billions should be spent on those already here. Families in poverty, those with disabilities. 

We certainly shouldn't be putting up with the lawsuits that make out that army barracks aren't good enough for the asylum seekers. They've apparently come from distress and hardship, so they should be glad of any support, not demand four-star accommodation. That is taking the piss. Especially when the best that homeless families get is B&B accommodation. 

Another thing a Conservative party should offer is less intrusion into our lives. Less regulation, less nosey-parkery. There are aspects of my life that the government do not need to know about or get involved in.  

The same goes for the Banks. My colleague just bought a car. The bank denied the Bank Transfer. Whgen he phoned up they asked him all sorts of questions: what colour is it? Is it MOT'd,? Where did you find it? I'd have told them to bugger off. 

I had a similar situation a few years ago when I wanted to withdraw a grand in cash from the Bank. No, they didn't have that much money in the bank.... Can you believe that? My mother wanted to deposit £500 into my account at my branch. Not somewhere else, or a different bank. Nope My Bank and my branch. They refused to accept the money.

This intrusion has to stop.

A true Conservative party will champion less intrusion and more concentration on what really matters: Crime, Education, Health and Welfare. Everything else: fuck off out of my life.

A true Conservative party will champion help for those that help themselves: it will make it easier for people to start up small businesses. It will abolish the heinous IR35 rules, so that anyone that wants to take the risk can work self-employed. There will be no blurring of "Gig economies" and PAYE. If you are self employed, you do not expect to be paid holiday pay, sick pay etc. But by the same token, the remuneration will be enough to cover that. Companies employing contractors would need to pay a decent rate and not use self-employment as an excuse to pay lower than the minimum wage.

Not one mainstream party is promoting the policies above. None of them, including the current so-called Conservative party actually support Conservative policies. They are all big-state, big-government, Big-tax parties. They want more of your money and more control. In effect you are paying more money for them to interfere in your life more. 

You must be a little bit mad to vote for that.

Russia Pledges to Withdraw from Kherson. To Nuke it?

As above. If I was a citizen in Kherson I would leave the city. There has been talk of Nukes on both sides and some sort of nuclear event in Kherson would deny it to Ukraine.

Alongside that Russia could blame the West, probably saying the West had supplied nukes to Ukraine in defiance of previous agreements.

This can't be a simple withdrawal by Russian forces. 

Hypocritical "Stop Oil" Types Should Take a Look at Themselves.

The "Stop Oil" protests keep happening, despite them not getting any traction with the general population, who just think of them as entitled cunts.

I mean, every one of them appears to be middle class, most likely studying sociology, or some other useless degree at Uni. Being middle class, Mummy and Daddy can probably afford to ride out the current financial and energy crisis. They might have (God forbid) have to sell one of their soul-salving Teslas, but hey, sacrifices have to be made. At least they can still afford meat-free meat to show how virtuous they are.

Not one of them is working class. Because they would quite rightly get a slap from their families, or be told in no uncertain terms not to be such a cunt for daring to suggest that fuel and energy should be cut so the price goes up even more. Poor Granny is already struggling on her pension, she doesn't need Kevin gluing himself to a road and suggesting she should pay more to heat her flat.

I dare to suggest that they are on a hiding to nothing. But as we know, if they made enough noise, or follow the WEF agenda that 0.00000001% of the population can affect government policy. Fuck those that actually vote for politicians.

Right now, the majority of the country want the government to stop being compliant sheep, tell Klaus Schwab and the UN to fuck right off and we'll not entertain ANY of their demands to reduce carbon production if it affects jobs, quality of life and living standards. 

You want lower carbon, go tell China. Actually Kevin, go glue yourself to a Chinese motorway and see how you fare, you fucking knob.

Republican Red Wave Fails to Swamp the Democrats in the USA Elections

Yet again, the Republicans have over-egged their chances prior to elections and once again their predictions have failed to materialise.

Just like in the Presidential elections, the predicted "Red Wave" in the samate and house have failed to materialise.

The reasons are many. It could be that Republican voters thought it was such a certainty that they didn't bother to vote. It's pretty sure that the Democrats have a better way of galvanising voters and getting them into voting stations, citing the "threat" of Trump and stating rather insanely that if the Republicans get in they will kill children.

Of course, we all know about Democrat confession through projection. So watch out America!

Anyhoo, the Republican supporters only have themselves to blame. Instead of predicting the Red Wave, they should have been telling Republican voters the horrors that await America if the Democrats stay in control. 

The recent Republican successes around abortion law may also have put off more moderate Republicans. 

Who knows. All I know is the Republicans look like they have egg on their face. Again.  And the excesses of the Biden administration may be allowed the continue unchecked.

And the Republicans only have themselves to blame.

Trans Rights Charity Upsets the LGBTQ+ Applecart with Lawsuit.

 I was reading this Telegraph article with some interest. 

In a nutshell the Children's Trans Rights charity Mermaids has taken the LGB Alliance charity to court, ostensibly to strip them of their charitable status because it spreads "Transphobia".

The Radical Conservative opinion is cheering along because it shows the LGBTQ+ community, the wokerati and the radical left eating itself as different factions vie for their " 'uman rights ".

But the reality is slightly more subtle.

Basically, the LGB Alliance is of the view that you can't change biological sex. A pretty sound scientific base to stand on I would have thought. But Mermaids doesn't like that because it goes against their ideology.

I'd have thought science and biology trump ideology any day. But we'll see. Courts are very strange places these days.

This is a lot to do with the ideological fight for children. That Mermaids are of the opinion that anyone professing an attraction to the same sex is trans and should therefore transition. LGB Alliance saying that's harmful to the child and same sex attraction should be supported because the kid might not be trans. 

At the very least, there shouldn't be glib assumption either way, but a very detailed investigation should be made into the child's psychology and the reasons for their attraction to the same sex. Transitioning "just because" is provably harmful, especially when it goes against the actual psychology of the child.

The child may be trans, it may be Gay. But the child should be supported and allowed to become whatever they desire without political or ideological pressure from a supposed charity.

The LGB alliance seem to be taking a more supportive and relaxed stance on this. Basically let the child decide, all in good time.

Mermaids appear to me to be taking a more ideologically activist stance, trying to actively win the hearts and minds of children in order to "swell the ranks", normalise transitioning and I suppose justify their charitable status. Anyone in their way (for instance saying why can't the kid be gay?) gets trampled or sued.

I know which stance I'd prefer to support.

Mainly because forced transitioning by any means reminds me of the forced transitioning of gay men to women in the Middle East and elsewhere. It's an ideology that should have long since been abandoned.

Just another example of Trans Radical Activists trying to gain ideological dominance. You have to ask yourself why that is. Why not just let children and adults decide organically whether to transition? Why do organisations like Mermaids and the now discredited Tavistock centre have to push the trans agenda so radically? It's almost like they are being told to do it. And then that makes you think why? and by Whom?

Yet another example of the Trans Rights Activists kicking the doors in of established science and human rights. You don't gain rights by trampling on the rights of others. Doing so instantly removes your legitimacy in my book. Have some respect.