The One-World-Government Globalists Fight against the UK public After Brexit.

Since the end of World War 2, there has been a pressure from the elites towards a one-world government.

Both World Wars had proved to the elites that although war provides lots of opportunities to make money, it would be a better idea not to ride the peaks and troughs of war and peace and instead have a long period of peace and expand markets to unify the trading world.

The great depression was the wake up call that solidified their desire to sort the world out as soon as they could.

The birth of the United Nations was a step towards the goal of one-world government as all Nations signed up and effectively became subservient to it. It also spawned other organisations to standardise regulations, standards and the like. 

Initially it sounds like a good idea and most of the time it is, or was.

For instance global standards make global trade easier (think shipping containers, they are the same all over the world) and any new market that wanted a piece of the action had to fall in line, because if they came up with their own standards their market would fail. No one wants to try and fit a 15 or 25 foot container onto a ship designed to take 20 and 40 foot containers. No one wants to have to buy a new mobile phone when they arrive in a new country because they work differently. See, it's convenient.

Other regional organisations like the EU were formed and countries joined and benefitted from shared standards, measurements, legal procedures, etc. trade could flow seamlessly everywhere.

But, where the elites went too far is political unions. To them it's the next logical steep. First you become a trading union, then in order to solve disputes across borders, you layer a legal union on top to regulate it all.

And that's where the EU was up to the Nineties. Then at the end of the eighties and early nineties there was a call for a political union. after all, the trading and legal unions had been successful, so why not political union?

But here's where the elites went too far. They decided that getting (say) the whole of Europe to vote for a European parliament, with twenty or thirty different countries wanting different things, they would engineer a solution that would.... smooth out the process and remove pesky democracy and accountability from the equation.

Thus the European parliament didn't have any real power to create laws. Instead a higher organisation called the European council, made up of representatives put forward by European politicians would make the laws, to then be handed down to the Parliament to discuss and eventually ratify. Effectively beaurocrats, not elected politicians created the legislation and laws, they got handed to the Parliament to accept and then they would be signed into law by the member countries.

But this irked the people of the United Kingdom, because their tradition of common law is entirely different than that in most European countries. In Europe they tend to sign up to Napoleonic or permissive law, which means that everything is illegal, except that which the government allows you to do. In the UK the tradition is you are free to do anything you like except that which the government (elected by the people) deems to be harmful to the majority. 

The UK system of law is more flexible than the European one, and the UK has gained competitive advantages by having such a system. By comparison the EU legal model seems clunky and overbearing. You have to wait to get permission for something before it can be considered legal and you risk committing money to it.

The British never felt easy with the European legislative model. The lack of direct accountability, the inability to vote for the people making the laws, the fact that the legal framework was restrictive and peered into ever more areas of our lives, when we had been used to just getting on with things without government interference, came to a head in 2016.

In the years running up to 2016, a certain Mr Nigel Farage had run a successful subversive campaign to disrupt the EU by using their own rules against them. The elections to the European parliament were done by proportional representation. So all he had to do was get a proportion of the people to vote for his party (UKIP) and he would get seats allotted to it in the European Parliament.

While there he highlighted the futility of the Parliamentary organisation. The lack of real democratic accountability by the council the inability to refuse laws provided to the EU Parliament. In effect it was a talking shop, a façade providing an illusion of democracy. 

As an aside, this is how the elites control things. They provide the illusion of democracy, but when you peer closely at what is happening, you see behind the facade  and you don't see democracy. Not as we know it in the English legal sense.

Anyway, Ol' Nige puts so much pressure on the UK government with news of a European Army, an Eu-wide tax, etc. that the UK government takes a risky move. They announce a referendum on EU membership. A referendum they believe they can win. After all they have control of the media, most of the politicians are in favour of the EU political edifice and well, Nigel Farage is just a windbag and doesn't have the support of the nation. He's tried to get elected to parliament a number of times and failed. The elites thought they could manipulate the result without anyone knowing.

And then we voted in the referendum.

The shock on the faces of the Politicians was clear. The people in the media reading out the result were ashen. Whet was supposed to be a foregone conclusion was turned against them. Not by much: 52% for leaving, 48% for remaining. 

The elites didn't like it. Something, anything had to be done. So, there followed months of plots against Brexit and the people of the UK.

In Parliament there was unprecedented behaviour as Politicians tried to get a second referendum agreed. A second referendum in which we would vote the correct way. The shenannigans inside and outside Parliament caused a constitutional crisis. The Government was taken to court again and again, in order to try and force it not to enact Brexit.

The people saw this rightly as undemocratic.

Theresa May, the Prime Minister at the time, appointed a Brexit negotiator, David Davis. He was so good he negotiated a Brexit deal very favourable to the UK.

Theresa May eventually called a summit at Chequers and instead of enacting Davis' carefully crafted and skilfully negotiated Brexit deal, she decided to go with a deal decided behind Davis' back in a few days. It was horrific. MPs were called to chequers to sign off on the terms of the May deal. If they didn't they would be sacked and would have the ignominy of ministerial cars removed from them. They would have to walk down the mile-long drive of Chequers to the road, where hundreds of reporters were waiting.

Davis resigned that evening after taking the trip home in the ministerial car.

The cat was out of the bag and the terms of the May deal so far negotiated effectively handed power in the UK over to Europe. Northern Ireland was effectively annexed by the EU so it didn't quite belong to the UK any more.

Luckily enough there were enough Conservative MPs in Parliament that supported Brexit to oust Theresa May and install Boris Johnson as PM.

He promised a better Brexit deal. The people believed him and in 2019 the people gave him a landslide victory in the election with an 80-seat majority. 80 seats. That majority allowed him to get any legislation liked through parliament.

But instead the globalist EU lovers immediately started plotting against him. I'm even convinced his then girlfriend and eventual wife was installed deliberately in order to give him bad advice.

Numerous stories of his previous infidelities hit the news - none stuck. Ministers that he had installed were likewise compromised and removed from office, leaving him only globalists to pick from to fill the cabinet.

Then Covid hit. The whole time Boris was given unsound advice. Initially the health "experts" prattled on about natural immunity and kept the borders open. Only after Covid was established inside the UK was natural immunity was a taboo subject. The UK government saw the death toll in Italy unaware that the virus had been in that country for months and locked the country down.

Globalist chancellor Rishi Sunak began borrowing money to pay people to sit at home. A radical idea that initially saved and then later ruined the country.

Boris and the UK muddled through Covid, but then once the dust had settled and the virus was almost beaten, the briefing against him started again. This time he had had a party in number 10 whilst he had enacted laws that kept everyone else in their homes and away from loved ones in hospital. 

When his chancellor Rishi Sunak failed to support him, Boris eventually resigned and we endured last summer's tortuous and orchestrated Tory party leadership contest. Orchestrated so that the final two candidates were: The Globalist Rishi Sunak and the politically naïve Liz Truss. 

Liz Truss pledged to reduce taxes and and return to Conservative values. Sunak promised more free money.

Truss won the contest, became PM and almost immediately the globalists started briefing against her. The only respite being the two weeks of mourning after the Queen died.

As soon as the Queen was buried, the plotting restarted.

Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng, her chancellor came up with a radical emergency budget. They would freeze energy prices for two tears by paying the difference between the price being paid now and the price being charged by the supplier. They also stopped a raise in corporation tax, a measure that would have helped small to medium businesses recover after Covid.

Then Truss and/or Kwarteng made a mistake. They listened to their globalist partners. The globalists said they wanted a cut in the top rate of tax. If they got that, they would ease the pressure and Truss could continue helping those in dire straits due to rising energy prices.

It was a trap. Immediately they implemented the budget, the dropping of the top rate of tax was used as a cudgel to beat Kwarteng and Truss. Under pressure she fired her chancellor. In his place was  put the globalist Jeremy Hunt. Then it was quite clear that Truss was doomed. She'd fallen for the trap and been outmanoeuvred by the globalists. Then the home secretary Suella Braverman also went, replaced by globalist Grant Schapps.

It was quite clear that Truss had been beaten politically. A couple of days ago she resigned as well.

Now the Tories are having another leadership contest. The contenders are Globalist Rishi Sunak (again), Boris Johnson (again) and Globalist Penny Mordaunt.

See the picture emerging?

Since 2016 and their miscalculation, the globalists have burned this country to the ground politically in order to try and get us back on their globalist track. 

We are now left with two globalists and Boris, whom they've already outmanoeuvred once. 

I'm sorry to say the Brexiteers, the ordinary folk may have lost the political war. Since 2016 the political elites and their friends in the media have fought tooth and nail to reverse Brexit. They have schemed and plotted for six years now.

If you wonder why it feels like politics isn't working for the little guy, the ordinary person and even working against you, this is why. You are not mad, you are not alone. 

We will most likely find in a couple of weeks we have a globalist Prime Minister and a Globalist cabinet. I've a feeling we will see amnesties for illegal immigrants, we'll see wages suppressed, inflation will be bad and we'll be bled dry. 

The government will help, but will require it's pound of flesh in return. That's what the globalists want. they want you to be ever thankful for their intervention. All they want in return is your freedom.

How to Squander a Commons Majority

 Back in 2019 when the Tories won the election with an 80-seat majority, I had hoped they would put that majority to good use.

Yes, we got the pandemic, which put thing on hold for a couple of years, but straight out of the pandemic the Tories started infighting.

An 80-seat majority. Just think what a true Conservative could've done with that. Instead the Tories squandered the opportunity. 

They could have repealed Labour's IR35 tax laws. They didn't.

They could have reduced the overall tax burden for lower paid workers. They didn't.

They could have helped small businesses and reduced corporation tax. They didn't.

Now outside the EU, they could have closed the loophole that allows international companies to pay corporation tax outside the UK. They didn't.

Out of the EU, they had the freedom to cut VAT on energy bills. They didn't.

They could have removed the UK from the ECHR in order to sort the migrant crisis. They didn't. Not even temporarily.

Once it was clear that energy was going to be a serious issue, they could have halted the stupid net zero ideology. They didn't. Not even temporarily.

They had any number of chances to implement proper, decent Tory policies, they had chances to repeal unfair/unjust legislation enacted during previous administrations. They didn't.

I can't count how many chances this government squandered. On infighting and petty vindictiveness. 

To be honest I can't see how they can survive now let alone have the time to use that majority, because I think the mainstream opinion for a new election is so definite we'll have a huge Labour majority in Parliament after the next election, which I assume will happen in the Spring.

"I Cannot Deliver the Mandate I was Elected On"

The words in Liz Truss' resignation speech should chill us to the bone. A serving Prime Minister, the senior political position in the country has been usurped. 

By whom exactly. Who has the power to remove a Prime Minister?

Yes MPs plotted against her, but who is directing them?

Who are the kingmakers, the plotters, the directors, the svengalis in the shadows? Because it's quite clear they are outside the party, they have not been elected and they have no authority. But here we are, a PM has been forced out, briefed against from day one.

Labour will be no different 

Vote for a completely different party in the next election. One that hasn't been tainted by the corruption in the corridors of power.

Civil War.

Right now there is a war going on within the UK. It's not reported, it's not on the radar of the mainstream media, and only those with any political nous really understand. 

Nigel Farage gets it, Suella Braverman gets it, other Conservative MPs are slowly realising it. Especially after last night's commons fiasco.

We are at war between forces outside the democratic process and the general public.

Let's look at a timeline:

Boris Resigns and the Conservative party request applications for party leaders.

The selection process starts and it's apparent that there are two sides: The globalists, working on behalf of global corporations and Supra-national organisations and the party membership.

The Globalists control the contest and it's whittled down to a choice of The Globalist candidate (Rishi Sunak) and the least strong membership candidate (Liz Truss).

Liz wins, but from day one she's hamstrung as the globalists brief against her constantly. The media, complicit in their globalist support also start on the Liz-hating.

Liz is installed and selects a chancellor with similar views. Together they put together a budget that would (a) save the majority of the public from serious energy costs and (b) reduce costs for small businesses. 

But in a miscalculation, or a deliberate misdirection from the globalists in the party, she also cuts the tax for rich people. They give her the policy that they then use to beat her with. And with that they took away control of the Parliamentary Party from her.

Within weeks her chancellor was gone. The globalist-supporting Jeremy Hunt is installed. Days after that, Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary that actually deported some Albanians that arrived by dinghy last week, was ratted out and resigned. 

There's chatter about whether she resigned deliberately because of pressure from the globalist wing of the party, or that Liz Truss was told to give Suella the option. But it's quite clear from her resignation letter that she wasn't happy with the effective coup that was going on within the party to usurp the wishes of the membership.

Within hours another Globalist, Grant Shapps is installed and in his acceptance speech he mentions Liz Truss zero times and Jeremy Hunt at least twice. Now we know who he's giving thanks to and who actually has power in the cabinet.

Then we have what some might say is a deliberately engineered farce last night in the commons. 

Tory MP Charles Walker was almost in tears last night in an interview. Listen to his words carefully. He's talking about Parliamentary Party members who engineered this situation. The people that ensured the final candidates would be the globalist that the membership wouldn't vote for and the membership candidate that the globalists could control or sideline. Sadly by calling for Truss to resign, he's playing into the globalist's hands.

Nothing about the Conservative party currently is about the National Interest. Instead it's serving vested interests, globalists that want a cosy atmosphere to work in, they want competition stifled and Brexit neutered. 

Hence why the raise in Corporation Tax was re-introduced by Hunt. The big corporations want no competition. They hate small businesses taking even a fraction of their business. They killed something that would have helped small businesses across the country. As little as it was, it was something to help.

Global corporations have tax breaks, or the option of paying corporation tax in a different country, so it doesn't affect them. But it does make it harder for small-medium UK businesses. 

The budget support for energy prices for two years took a lot of pressure off people. With it now ending in April thanks to Hunt, the uncertainty for ordinary people is back. Another fear for the globalists to exploit.

Right now the globalists have the upper hand. They have Jeremy Hunt in place as Chancellor and they have Rishi Sunak in the wings.

If Truss resigns, they could just install Rishi as leader in some sort of concocted second-choice option, or Hunt could slide over from number 11 to number 10 and be caretaker leader. But then they could say it's too close to an election to spend months on a leadership contest, so either becomes de-facto leader of the party. 

Either way the globalists win and the ordinary people lose. They have played the political game well. 

But if enough Conservative MPs defected to Reform, then there could be a case to promote Reform as the true, new home of Conservatism and to get Tory party members to vote for them instead of the globalist Tories.

Hopefully that will happen and the war has a chance of swinging back in favour of the ordinary person and the globalists will lose control.

Here's hoping.

They want ALL Your Money.

 The tax cut u-turns by the government prove an unsettling point that I've had for a long time. That the government basically want ALL your money. They want you to be a wage-slave, a serf, a drone. You work essentially for nothing but the state then provides all your needs. You will own nothing but you will be freed from responsibility and be happy.

Sound familiar? It's the Great Reste writ large. 

We are currently paying the highest amount in tax for several decades, but we are receiving a lot less in return.

As an example back when we were paying this level of tax as a percentage of GDP was the Fifties and Sixties. Back then we had a huge standing Army in Germany and around the World. We had a huge Navy and Airforce. We had a civil defence network across the country and government funded R&D was at an all-time high.

Look to today and what do we get for our money? A drastically reduce Navy that cannot support all of it's commitments, an Airforce a fraction of the size it was, with no strategic bombing capability and no air defence network within the UK. The standing Army in Germany is long gone. We have a few tanks and troops now stationed further East in Estonia or Latvia (another bone of contention for Putin no doubt). 

The civil defence network is long gone. If we had a nuclear attack in the UK, I doubt we would be able to respond. Hopefully the sub skippers have instructions based on loss of communication and verification of attack by independent means before they launch a retaliation.

The NHS currently hoovers up the bulk of revenue, but as front-line workers opine all the time, that money isn't getting to the front line. Instead, virtually half of the NHS budget is going towards lawsuits created by mistakes made affecting patients. Tony Blair's launch of the "no-win, no-fee" system means that more than ever ambulance chasing accident/malpractice lawyers are bleeding the NHS dry. 

There really needs to be a full in-depth review of where taxpayer's money goes and how it's being used.

Then we can start to form a strategy on how we best spend that money, rather than keep spending ever larger amounts for ever reducing services.

But the push now by government is that these limited services will be funded by ever more taxation until everyone is on a 99% or even 100% tax rate. 

We have to start resisting this high taxation. Government is a monster that will not stop devouring ever larger amounts of money 

How to beat Asylum Claims.

Okay, here's the plan. The UK government unilaterally declares which countries it will accept "refugees" from. 

It states which countries it will accept refugees from directly.

That means if they come from a safe country like France, they immediately get repatriated, no fuss.

If that means we have to remove ourselves temporarily from the ECHR then so be it. But when the ECHR conflicts with the rights of the majority and costs the country billions under pain of default of their rules, then it can no longer be tolerated and the UK should, as long as the faux migrant crisis exists, remove itself from membership. 

Then, once the crisis has subsided, then we can rejoin.

We still support the UN regulations on refugees, so long as they are processed within their country legally, or they arrive directly from a country that they have evidence is persecuting them. 

Blood on the Cabinet Room Floor.

So in an emergency broadcast by the chancellor, he's stated that he's reversing the tax cuts, so corporation tax will stay high (except for those global corporations that can negotiate lower rates or pay it offshore), he's abandoning the 1p cut to income tax and the energy price is only capped until April, not for two years.

Basically the Prime Minister's authority is now hugely undermined.

Like I've said previously, outside forces are telling the government what to do, the government is not telling the markets or the vested interests that they should support the people. The p[eople at the bottom of the pile are being abandoned.

Right now people are saying that Liz Truss should call a snap general election. As happy as the Labour leadership would be at that prospect, all that would happen is we'd vote Labour in and the same vested interests would be advising the Labour leadership that they should have virtually the same policies as we have now.

If we could guarantee a none of the mainstream parties could win the election, I'd say yes. We need to break the link between Parliament and the vested outside interests that advise and effectively control it.

We need a new party in power, free from the lobbyists, the cosy relationships, the vested interest, the big money men, the Davos set and the WEF.

We need a fresh start, a party working for the people, not the elites.

Huge Problems with Online Payments as Banks Demand Customers Authenticate Payments

 Well, this weekend is a bit of a fuck-up for most online retailers.

Last Friday we got a message that all payments done online and over the phone had to be authenticated with Secure Card Authentication.

That's the service where you have a mobile phone and the bank texts you a authorisation code every time you make a payment.

Except... what happens when people don't have a mobile phone and/or computer?

For instance an elderly person that has no need or desire to own such a device?

They are Donald Ducked, because from this weekend they are denied access to online retailers and also from making telephone orders. They will have to be physically in the retailer's premises. Some retailers may be able to enter card details on PDQ card machines, if they have one available by the phone, but for a lot of retailers that don't take calls and only do business online, then a significant proportion of people are currently being denied access.

We have a had hundreds of failed order requests over the weekend, and today things are so bad the payment provider's servers have gone down.

This is indicative of the attitude of the banks to customer's money: they don't think of it as the customers.

I do understand the need for secure payments, but this is really a step too far as it starts to deny people from accessing their own money and services which they should have access to. It also shows a level of incompetence as they can't handle the amount of traffic they themselves created. They also haven't yet provided work arounds, or instructions on how this should all be accomplished by vendors.

I ranted previously on the card providers forcing pay at pump petrol pumps to make a charge of £99 on pay at pump transactions. Some people don't have £99 in their account, so they are denied pay at pump services.

This is not an insignificant issue. It's making a two-tier society: the haves and the have-nots. The people the card providers will willingly do service with and provide a seamless, effortless experience (as long as they comply and have the latest gadget for security) but deny those less fortunate in society that don't have access to smart phones and the like.

It's a similar mentality to PayPal and their statement they were going to fine users for indiscretions on the internet.  They're a fucking payment provider, not an internet Police service. 

They fail to forget it's OUR money we are trusting them with. It's not their money to begrudgingly provide services for us to access. 

My mother tried to send me some money for my Birthday. We bank at different banks and being 90, she deals with cash mostly. So, we walked into my bank branch and asked to deposit some cash into my bank account. She was refused. Now how fucked up is that? A bank that refuses to accept cash into one of their accounts?

Warped priorities or what?

And this is what you get when everything becomes political. When CEOs of companies decide they want top "benefit society" by nudging them in a particular direction. 

It's not up to banks and payment providers to be social engineers. It's their job to allow us to mayke payments effortlessly and seamlessly, no matter what our social standing, no matter how rich or poor we are.

But successive governments and the Bank of England that are supposed to regulate such things are complicit in their failure to push back and tell the banks and payment providers that social engineering is up to the politicians, not them.