Who Knew Being an AfD Politician Could be That Lethal?

It seems that a number of (currently 7) Alternative for Deutschland politicians have recently died. 

Very recently, very suddenly.

That's the news being broadcast by right-wing bloggers and vloggers on YouTube.

But the real news is that actually 16 politicians or political activists from various parties and groups have died in mysterious circumstances in Germany in recent weeks.

7 from The AfD.

One from the SPD

One from the Social democratic Alternatives 

One from the FPD

One from The Greens

One from the Animal Welfare Party

Then one each from the Free Voters, Referendum Party and a Voter's Group.

This is in the State of North Rhine-Westphalia. 16 political candidates in one German state. 

Interestingly looking at the Federal Sate election dates, NR-W is not due to have elections until Spring 2027, so the death of so many people so far away from the election is a bit of a mystery.

Statistically, this is not a coincidence, there is something else at play here. What that is, can only be speculation at the moment. 

Interestingly the overwhelming majority are centrist or centre-right leaning, but there are socialists amongst the dead. Whether the people weren't sufficiently left enough is anyone's guess.

But the large number from the AfD suggest that (if the deaths are not natural) that whoever did it is interested in centre-right and supposedly hard-right political activists.

I did say that Europe was in the grip of Communists and Communist ideology and this is straight out of the Communist playbook, offing your opposition.

I shall be watching Germany with interest. 

No Joke: The Stasi Infiltrated European Governments.

With the benefit of hindsight, was it a good idea to reunify Germany and to allow ex-Communists into positions of power in the unified Germany and from there wider Europe?

Because, since the reunification of the 90s, it seems that Communist ideology has infiltrated into the European political Elites. They may call themselves Socialists, or even Marxists, but they really are Communists. They uphold ideology well past the point of Socialism, they abhor Capitalism. That is the true capitalism of the middle class shop keepers of Europe. They are however in lock-step with the corporate totalitarian corporatism that destroys competition and uses any means to obliterate it.

As an example, name me one one right-wing member of the European parliament that is actually right wing. You can't. Those they label as far-right, we would have called conservative 20 years ago. Those they label as right-wing, are what we would have called middle of the road liberals back them. The whole spectrum of European politics has shifted massively to the left.

And it's all been since German reunification. The Communists have infiltrated and once in power, they have promoted those that are useful to the progress of their ideology. That's what they mean by being progressive. 

Not the progressive ideology of the typical liberal, what THEY mean by progressive is progressing the Communist ideology. 

That's how the words and the political lexicon have been changed by the Communists. Progressive means useful to the progress of their ideology. 

Over the past few decades, political policy in Europe has gone further and further to the left, past what people would call Socialism, past what most would identify as Marxism, towards Communist ideology. 

In Europe we see politicians outright lying to their constituents. Typical Communist activity, because they are so ideologically captured.

And that's what we see in the UK labour party. No longer Socialist, they are now more Communist in their ideology of totalitarian control. No freedoms for you. You will be controlled. Your thinking will be checked. You online posts will be monitored for dissent.

And it all started when the Berlin wall came down.

You could almost think it was planned. I mean, if you can't beat them, you may as well join them (and once joined, shift their politics massively to the left).

The Danger of Vague Legislation.

Way back, I argued against creating unbelievably vague legislation, or using legislation for purposes it wasn't designed for.

In 2010 I also argued about using the communications act for internet posts: Delphius' Debate: Think Happy Thoughts.... or Else

All I have to say on teh subject is in that post. I'd forgotten about it, but it has become quite prescient over the past 15 years.

I also argued against the unbelievably vague violent porn laws back in the Blair days, before this blog existed. The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act was so vague, it could, if applied in a particularly obtuse way, ensnare any publication. The wording of the act effectively prohibiting any publication the government or the Police deemed unfit.

The same argument was applied in the "Think Happy Thoughts" post from 2010. The Police at the time were hamstrung in prosecuting someone for a fake bomb threat, until after ( I assume weeks of trawling through legislation to find a way to prosecute him ) the Police decided to use the communications act.

An act that has now been twisted and bent and amalgamated with other legislation that what I said back in 2010 has come to pass with bells on. 

I fail to see how a post made in America, on an American website, by a foreign national can in any way be investigated by the UK police, let alone prosecuted.

If anyone in America failed to understand the dystopian nightmare unfolding in the UK, the Graham Lineham arrest is an abject illustration.

For one, it means that a foreign national of ANY country, if they make a comment online that falls foul of UK law, is then under threat of being arrested if at some point in the future they attempt to enter the UK. 

Let that sink in.

A citizen of a different country.

Making a post in a different country. 

Is now subject to UK law. 

The UK government now thinks it can Police the people of the world. How arrogant is that.

I would advise anyone from a country that upholds true free speech should not come to the UK. Because it could be that in the future, you may visit the UK and find yourself liable for prosecution for an intemperate tweet from decades ago.

Because that's the other thing: UK legislation has no time limit. There is no statute of limitations. UK law is unlimited from a timescale perspective. 

You could have even made the tweet before the UK legislation came into force, but that's no defence, because the legislation has no clause in it preventing prosecution for retrospective activity.

So being unaware of a law that has not been enacted yet is not a defence in UK law.

Is this the insanity of the UK judiciary, government and civil service.

I mean, if a foreign national, making a tweet in a foreign country is subject to arrest for breaching UK law if they set foot in the UK, what would that do to the tourist industry?

It's not hard to imagine someone controversial like Charlie Kirk, making a comment, or a post online that upsets a trans  activist. 

Charlie Kirk is an American citizen, making posts primarily in America. But he occasionally does make visits to the UK.

Is he now at risk of being arrested at a UK airport for those posts he made in his own country? 

How does that apply to more ordinary Americans? Are tourists that use X or Facebook at risk of arrest for intemperate or offensive (to some) tweets they made way back when twitter wasn't X?

That's how stupid UK legislation is becoming. They are trying to Police everyone everywhere for anything they have ever posted online. It's unworkable. And hugely arrogant.

The State is Now The Enemy of The People

There can be no denying it now. The State is the enemy of the people. It is using violence against those that speak the truth and do not adhere to government ideology.

When a dozen armed Police kick your door in at 6am for a tweet, that is state-sanctioned violence. Especially when a single ordinarily uniformed Policeman coming to your door would suffice.

When armed Police pick you up at an airport for hurty words, that is state-sanctioned violence.

When you are held at an airport for hours and interrogated for the umpteenth time, that is state-sanctioned harassment.

When the Police raid your house and charge you under terror legislation, where you have no right to silence, that is state-sanctioned harassment with menaces.

When the government explicitly state that they favour immigrants above those that already live, work and pay taxes here, there is a huge disconnect between the government and the people.

When the government actively persue policies that make the lives of it's citizens worse, then that is a blatant attack on the people.

When the government demand ever more taxes and give fewer and fewer services in return, all the while using the power of the state to compel payment, is that not indentured servitude or extortion?

The state is not your friend, the government are not your friend, the Police are not your friend. Hopefully if it ever came to the crunch the Army would be your friend and refuse to fire on it's own citizens. 

It's time we understood all of the above and acted accordingly.

Do not offer information to the Police. They are not your friend. Do not co-operate with them or offer them assistance in any way. 

We need large demonstrations, simultaneously, across the country. Some people can't afford to travel far, so to get the numbers, let's have demonstrations on the same day in multiple cities.

The next thing we need to do is organise a general strike. The unions are in the pocket of the big corporations. They will not help us nor will they support action against their friends in government. 

We need to be visible, we need to be loud and we need to push back against the tyrants in charge.

Hi Hi, Hi Ho, It's Off To The IMF We Go....

Talks are afoot within government regarding IMF involvement in the economic "recovery" of the UK.

Last time it took a brake new government fronted by Margaret Thatcher to pull us out of the IMF hole. Sadly she did it by asset-stripping the UK. 

Successive government's have continued her legacy, by closing down various institutions in order to save money.

This time we have no assets to sell, no money down the back of the national sofa.

Gordon Brown sold all the gold at the bottom of the market back in 1999, so we can't rely on that. The government has sold off virtually all the buildings it used to own.

This time the IMF involvement will not be short, nor sweet. It will be long-term, it will be ruinous for most, a-la Greece. The welfare gravy train is about to come to a shuddering halt. If you are on benefits, start honing your shanty-building skills. 

For homeowners, start to consider your options to liquidate your asset (house) and move abroad permanently. There will be a raid on the perceived wealth based on the value of your home.

For savers, start to look at buying gold. 

The list of measures the government are considering, look like a list of financial measures from a seventies banana republic. No taking money out of the country, taxing of minimal wealth, taxing heavily anything that makes money, taxing interest on savings and taxing the primary savings themselves. 

The list goes on. 

By 2028 the UK will look like a banana republic in virtually every sense.

I'm just wondering how far to the left the government will end up by then.

Comrades.