The Trans issue: The Extremist Hijacking of a Legitimate Issue.

Okay, I've held back on this for a while, but I think I've formulated a decent article on the current issues around the Trans phenomenon.

I've often alluded to my past, intimating that I've been involved in alternative cultures. Let's just say that I'm pretty clued up on the subject and I've seen over the decades alternative sexualities struggle for acceptance and normalisation. As a child I knew what being gay was as my mother had a gay friend who lived with his partner.  Back in the sixties and seventies that was a pretty brave thing to do. 

Later in life I was also involved in the fetish "scene" and I've also known trans people and heard their stories. So I've seen first hand how all of the following evolved. I also knew about the idea of gender-fluidity before it was a thing. I used to dress pretty androgynously back in my youth and still at 60 my dress sense doesn't always conform. 

I've also been brought up to be pretty tolerant but I do get upset when you bully or tread on the rights of others. 

Lets go way back to the early years of transitioning. 

There were a small number of men and women that for whatever reason felt they were in the wrong body. That they really, truly felt that they were the opposite sex. 

Up until the sixties, there wasn't the ability medically to appear relatively convincingly as the opposite sex. But medical science brought about hormone treatments and physical surgery to implant breasts and alter sexual organs to look like the real deal. 

The difficult process back then filtered out all but the most determined of transitioners. They were so determined, quite a few lived successful lives in their new identities. 

Over the decades transitioning became easier thanks to medical science. The operations necessary have become routine, alongside advances in cosmetic surgery. 

Those transitioning fully have never had a problem until pretty recently. They went about their transition quietly, respectfully.

In parallel, there has always been a subset of the trans community that doesn't want to fully transition. They don't want to lose their original sexual organs. In fact they may not want to appear as the opposite of their true sex full time. But for them the appearance is the thing, not the actual sexual transition.

Crossdressers, for instance are a fetish embodiment of the phenomenon of wanting to be the opposite sex.

Those into Forced Feminisation and Female domination are similarly part of the fetish scene.

Drag Queens/Kings are more involved in the entertainment industry.

She-males have in the past been linked more to the porn industry. 

There have always been those streams of opposite-sexness that have not really been involved in the transitioning debate because they don't want to fully transition. Up until fairly recently they haven't been part of the trans movement either. It's only in the last 5-10 years that these other streams have now been incorporated for whatever reason into the trans movement.

And this is where the problem with the trans movement now stems from the inclusion of these "not-quite transitioning" elements. Along with a side order of  some elements of the Gay community.

As an example, prior to the inclusion of these elements, a male for instance would go through the difficult process of transitioning. Living for a time as their chosen sex and eventually moving to surgery to then be fully transitioned in appearance. They realised that while in the transitioning phase whilst appearing as a woman they were using women's spaces very much as a guest. They were using those spaces very much secondary to those who actually owned the space: women. 

Once fully transitioned, they became full members of the female club. In appearance they were the same, in attitude they already were the sex they had chosen to be. Because by definition they were psychologically female. 

But around the late 90's and early 2000's the Gay activist community came to the fore. The "Out Loud And Proud" mantra along with serious activist organisations like Stonewall pushed the Gay agenda like never before. The Labour Government of Blair and Brown quite rightly helped Gay rights and eventually introduced Civil Partnerships in 2005. This positive evocation of Gay rights eventually ended up with full equality and Gay Marriage. 

But this positive evocation , the "Loud and Proud" movement also brought in it's coat tails and helped radicalise the trans community. Now the trans community also wanted recognition. 

But instead of recognising the rights of women to have safe spaces, that those transitioning were guests in the spaces they wanted to use, the Trans community in it's zeal to ape what the Gay community eventually after decades won has trampled over women's rights. 

The crux of the matter is the wish to have instant gratification. The inference that a man can instantly identify as a woman without putting in the hard work. The years of hormone treatment, living as a woman for years before surgery. Understanding until they fully transition they are guests in the female space.

No, the current trans extremists want it all now and to hell with the rights of others.

Well sugar, your rights don't usurp the rights of others. I have a problem with that. Not you, but your attitude and lack of respect. Women have the right not to see a man with a beard call himself a woman, a woman has the right not to see a penis in a female changing room, and has the right not to be raped in a female space by a man calling himself a woman, the right not to be offended by a man denigrating what a woman is to just a set of physical features. A woman is a magnitude more than that. But extremists and fetishists are incapable of understanding that, or deliberately ignore it in order to further their selfish cause.

To be a woman, lose the beard, lose the penis, Understand that to BE A WOMAN you need to do some work and then you can call yourself a woman. 

There's an interesting question on how far body dysmorphia or whatever the medical term involved goes. I would have thought a person with a medical condition would want to fully become the sex their brain is telling them they are. Some half-assed transition with a dangly bit still in place wouldn't suffice.

The trans extremists don't understand how they are shitting all over the legacy of the people that have transitioned before them. The people that did the work, the campaigning, being guinea pigs for the medical procedures...  

The trans extremists don't care who they upset. They want instant gratification, very, very similar to the fetish streams of the trans community.

These extremists and activists promoting their rights over others are the same adult children that act up in supermarkets, that road-rage, that demand that they have everything for nothing. They have never been told no, never been denied anything by their parents. They are as emotionally stable as young children. They have never grown up. They have no respect.

In my opinion, their claim is not valid. It's people claiming their rights usurp the rights of others. I have a real problem with that. Their wish for instant gratification is not a legitimate human right, it does not trump other people's rights. 

Their claim to female spaces and to legitimate recognition is as legitimate as a child stamping it's feet or throwing itself to the floor in the supermarket and demanding that bag of sweets even though they didn't behave properly. 

And now we come to the "straight" involvement in the trans issue. The promotion of trans in the leftist ideology. Yet again a worthy cause has been hijacked, stirred up, poked, prodded and weaponised by the left. Now we're seeing gay kids being funnelled into transitioning because supposedly being trans trumps any other sexuality. 

This is yet another offensive aspect to the extremist trans ideology. It's now saying that it's not okay to be gay. Be trans instead. Appear like the opposite sex instead of embracing same sex attraction. I do wonder why the Gay community puts up with that and doesn't speak out against it.

If the trans community can't see how offensive that is, how offensive that their other claims are, then they really need to look in the mirror and have a word with themselves. The trans community has to be introspective and really see how much damage they are doing to their cause. They have to say to those outside the community that they are wrong to do hijack it for their own ideologies. They need to state they will uphold the rights of others and understand their claim to spaces are given, not taken. 

That's the way the gay community did it and they took the nation along with them. The forceful trampling of non-trans rights and the silencing of dissenting voices is not the way to go. The trans extremists need to understand the damage they are doing to the reputation and the image of trans people. They need to understand the disservice they are doing to the people they purport to represent.

There needs to be a social debate and a consensus on when a trans person has the right to claim to be the opposite sex. Slapping a wig on a bearded man is not that point. An analogy is slapping a wig on a pig and calling it human.

The other interesting feature is that this is all caused by the Male to Female side of Trans. There seems to be no issue with the Female to male Trans side. It's almost as if there's an element of misogyny creeping in. Like women had just better put up with it or else.. That's a really ugly attitude. That's the attitude of an abuser, a woman-beater, a rapist. All of which we have seen come out of the trans activist community and their followers.

But of course me being offended by extremist trans activists is just trans-phobia. 

Yeah, of course it is you simple childish twats. 

Burn, Baby, Burn...

 It's quite clear the elite ideologues will stop at nothing in order to further their agenda. Whether it's the "great reset", or "zero carbon", their zealousness know no bounds. Literally.

They will literally watch the world burn as they tear it all down and rebuild their twisted vision of utopia. 

They have already crashed the Western economy, they are now attacking a UK government attempting to mitigate the effects of the disastrous rise in energy prices wrought by their illogical ideological focus on zero carbon.

Way back when, governments would have been prudent: they would follow a plan, but would have made sure that (a) it was affordable for everyone and (b) there was a backup plan should anything go wrong.

Instead we had the rush to renewables, every GigaWatt of which had to be backed up by a fossil-fuelled energy source. But instead of replacing the fossil-fuelled energy with renewables and having them run side by side and let the renewables take over organically as costs reduce, we instead had the idiotic green levies that just line the pockets of the energy companies. It's not like they actually use the money for it's intended purpose.

Then we also had the idiotic linking of renewable energy to fossil-fuelled energy prices. So the supposed benefit of renewables i.e. cheap or almost free energy was negated. The whole reason for the green levies was that their "free" energy wouldn't generate the revenue needed for further investment.

So the renewable energy companies claim a double-bonus: levies and the bonus of receiving higher prices for their energy than it costs to generate.

Not only were renewables badly managed to the benefit of the energy companies and not the consumer, but the backups to renewables were destroyed too. Instead of keeping the coal-fired power stations just in case of a situation like we find ourselves in now, we instead installed gas-fired electricity generation plants. These plants are required because they can come on-stream quickly, exactly matching the peaks and troughs of renewable energy generation. 

The coal-fired plants are slower to bring on-line, but they would have provided a bigger and cheaper backup to renewables. Instead they were demolished. Erased from the landscape. If anything illustrates zealous ideology, it is this. We have no way of going back. We have no way of generating cheap energy. 

Successive governments painted us into a corner, with no way out. We are now slave to the machinations of the gas price spot market. We can't say "screw that, we'll go back to using coal", because those coal-fired plants are gone.

Nope, we are dependent on natural gas, like some methane addicted junkie. We have to pay top dollar, just like everyone else.

Governments did that. Their advisors, the zealots told them to. 

Tory and Labour governments. They are all the same, they listen to the same advisors, the same high priests, follow the same zealous ideology. 

Shame on you if you vote for them ever again.

Hang On, Who's in Charge Here?

I see in the News that the chancellor is receiving criticism for not informing the markets about his mini budget. Excuse me, but who is in charge here? Is it the government or the markets? Is it the Government or the Globalists? Is it the Government or those with huge financial interests?

Why should he inform the markets? He's in the government and wouldn't tipping the markets off before his announcement constitute insider trading or leaking information prior to a budget, which is also a no-no?

After all if he only informed certain parts of the market, couldn't they gain an advantage, having prior knowledge? If the treasury had informed one trading firm and another an hour later, the trading firm with an hour's prior knowledge could make a killing in that hour until the whole market had caught up. An hour is a very long time in these technological times. 

Billions are made on making fractions of a percent profit over billions of pounds. Just a few minutes of advance warning can provide such an advantage that a trading house could  could earn a substantial amount of money.

It's yet more nonsense to bash the Truss cabinet with. 

I think the globalists really wanted Rishi Sunak as the PM and are continuing to press for "their man" to be in place to do their bidding instead of working for the people of this country.

If that isn't proof of outright corruption in UK politics, I don't know what is.

Secondary to this is the fact that the Labour party are also pushing this mantra. In lock step with the anti-worker globalists. I say shame on the Labour party. It shows that if you voted them into power instead of the Tories, you'd just get more of the same globalist corruption and the workers of this country would be screwed for an additional 5 years.

Vote for someone else for fucks sake. Not the Tories, not Labour, not the traitorous Liberals nor the Fucking disastrous Greens.

Do not believe the globalist agenda that everyone not supported by them is a fascist.  It's such a worn out cliché just like "Far-Right" or "Extremist" that it's almost a badge of honour these days. 

Vote Reform. Do what Sweden and Italy have done. Vote for the anti-woke anti-globalists if you know what's good for you. I'd say vote UKIP, but unfortunately I doubt they have the funds to mount a decent campaign at the next election.

If it comes to it vote for your local independent candidate. Someone who isn't a professional politician. Even the least best option puts a career globalist-supporting politician out of a job and puts a normal person in parliament in their place, giving a decent paying job to one of us, someone who deserves it.

The Great Reset in Motion.

I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories, but the Great Reset as Defined by Klaus (you will own nothing and be happy) Schwab. but I'm thinking about how you could "own nothing" and be grateful.

Well, it's looking like energy prices will continue to go through the roof and now with rampant inflation, interest rates are certain to go the same way.

At which point, governments will be trying to prop up the system by borrowing billions in order to plug the gap between affordability and actual costs.

You can't normally bankrupt Western economies, but you can make the situation untenable for them. You can make borrowing so expensive that the interest rates on any more loans would be eye-wateringly expensive to service.

At that point the country effectively become bankrupt as it cannot continue to service it's debts.

And then strides onto the landscape, a saviour: what form it will take is currently speculation, but I assume it will be a global mega-corporation.

It will buy up assets that people will willingly give in order to shed their crippling debt burden.

For instance, let's say interest rates go up to 20 or 30%. What dos that do to mortgages? It makes them unaffordable. It's like paying off a half a million pound debt with credit-card-like interest rates. 

As an example lets say a global corporation comes along and says it will buy your house below market value and you can continue to live in it and pay rent. You pay a single easy payment per month and you get your room, board and utilities supplied. If the corporation is cash-rich enough to buy the house outright and then make money in the form of rental, then why wouldn't it? You'd be out of a hole, the corporation gets a perpetual repayment on their investment with hopefully minimal maintenance. You wouldn't own a home but you be grateful to release yourself from the massive debt burden you've been artificially saddled with. 

Global corporations are getting as powerful as medium-sized countries. So why wouldn't they use that financial power and effectively take over massive tracts of land? Buy up farms, control food production. Buy up houses and control the population.

I've already blogged about the lady that was refused a wood-burner installation by her housing association, so what's to stop this global corporation determining what you can and can't do under threat of being homeless? Buy products from these companies, not any competitors. Use this much energy and no more, monitored by the corporate-installed smart meter. Don't own a vehicle, travel by public transport to keep your carbon usage low. Or else eviction. 

I'm not sure I'd be happy in a Schwab-led dystopia. It would be more of a nightmare.

But then I'm sure I'd be classed as one of the deplorable, the undesirables, the people that refuse to comply and live a corporation-led life. I'd be one of the first wave of undesirables cleansed from the planet, on the way to the Post-Reset Utopia. 

Lefty Snowflakes Up in Arms That Italy has Voted a Right-Wing Party into Power.

As we speak Jeremy Vine is prattling on about how bad it is that Italy has voted a supposedly "Far-Right" party into power in Italy.

So what? At a basic level, the BBC have no right to criticise a country that has voted a party into power during democratic elections. 

At a basic level, that is what the people of Italy have declared is their wish. The rest of you can fuck off with your criticism and your baseless smears. Give the party and their female leader (the first female leader in Italy incidentally) a chance. 

Is it because she rejects the current leftist globalist narrative? Is it because she rejects the EU? What is it exactly that makes her democratic election into power so heinous?

Who are you to criticise? 

As it is at the moment anyone slightly to the left of Stalin is considered "Far-Right" by the leftist loonies on the internet, at the BBC and in the Guardian. 

The more you read the various articles, they eventually moderate from "Fascist", "Far-right", to "Hard-Right" or "Right-of-Centre". Indeed "Hard-Right" could describe Margaret Thatcher. Was she a fascist then? 

The nonsense that is peddled about politicians that don't fit the leftist, globalist agenda is close to obscene. In every Western country the agenda is the same: divisive, corrupt, pitting minority groups against each other in order whilst reducing Policing to cause continual chaos so that they can manufacture the legislation to crack down on the population. 

Eventually the population will see through the veil and the lies and as with Italy, start to vote for parties that reject the globalist agenda, reject incessant immigration, reject the capture of the left by huge global corporations. 

They will start to vote for parties other than those supported by the globalist media, corporations and NGOs. 

But, the important thing is they are elected democratically. That is the will of the people. Tough luck if it doesn't align with your values, or political ideology, that's what the majority have voted for. 

Democracy. Live with it. Or are you saying "something should be done" about populations voting "far-right" parties into power just because you don't like them? Because if you are, then what you are advocating is tyranny.