The Labour Party Don't Care if You Can Afford Their Policies Or Not.

Not happy with increasing the financial burden for taxpayers by increasing indirect tax and reducing job opportunities, Labour are pressing ahead with measures that will increase Council Tax by up to 25%.

Yep, 25% which probably mans on an extra £250 a year or more for the average home occupier. I don't understand the Labour party. The Party supposedly supporting the poor working class, the people at the bottom of the pile hardest hit by energy increases.

I can't understand it, unless you look at it from the point of Labour don't care if you can afford their policies or not. They will plough on with them regardless and if you can't pay, that's just tough luck.

Like the Terminator, they will roll on regardless, stepping on your frozen body as they march relentlessly onwards to their virtuous nirvana.

They will continue net zero and if necessary double-down on net zero policies, which will make energy more expensive and in some cases, out of the reach of the very poor. But the Labour party doesn't care about the situation they are creating for their poor people. As long as they can brag about how they have saved 0.000000001 of the world's Carbon Dioxide to their friends at the next Davos Death Cult meeting, they don't care and you don't matter.

Basically it boils down to: Can you donate a Million pounds to the Labour Party? No? Then the Labour party is not interested in your opinion or your predicament.

Small business? Tough, Google and eBay outspend you a million times over when it comes to political donations. 

Billionaire with big pockets? Welcome in, Labour would like to talk to you about how much of your disposable cash you can donate to their pockets... sorry, political cause.

If the past year has shown anything, it's shown in great detail how fucked British politics are. It's all about the wants of the Billionaire donors and supra-national organisations.

I've yet to see Labour enact a policy that is requested by the people or has popular public backing.

Never again must we continue this two-party closed political shop. It needs to be smashed and rebuilt with control by the majority population in mind.

Paedophiles in High Places: The Push to Sexualise Children.

The many people that have claimed to be child victims of senior figures, or those that say there are cliques of senior figures in the shadows having illicit sex with minors has long been classed as a conspiracy theory.

But the more you look in detail, the more to start to wonder if it is in fact a conspiracy. 

For instance the acceptance of senior figures that minors should be able to decide their gender and go through drug therapy and even corrective surgery is just one back-door way to sexualise children.

Because if kids as young as five they can decide on their gender and have corrective surgery of their sexual organs, then surely they are old enough to decide if they want a sexual relationship with an adult? 

The push by the leftists to call paedophiles "Minor Attracted Persons" is just another nudge to trying to normalise the activity, by alleging that the majority of people are attracted to minors, but don't actually go through with their fantasies and have sex with kids. 

Most people wouldn't see the connection, but I do.

The same goes for this week's debate on making having a relationship with first cousins illegal. If this, one of the last taboos was given the green light by government and not made illegal, then the next sexual taboo might fall. The taboo of having sex with minors. 

I'm sure that a certain diaspora that is currently arguing against making relationships with first cousins illegal would once they have won that argument, would then start to argue about reducing the age of sexual consent to comply with their religious beliefs.

All of these pressures come from the left of politics. The left of politics that in the UK was during the 70s and 80s associated with PIE (The Paedophile Information Exchange). An organisation that called itself an information exchange to make it easy to explain as an organisation that shared information on paedophiles and their activity. When in fact it was an organisation that promoted and campaigned for the legalisation of paedophilia.

The Wikipedia page for PIE makes interesting reading, there being several historical allegations of friends in high places. Or an amazingly clueless politicians, either in their previous work lives or as actual politicians.

This is where  the LGBTQ+ now comes in. It may be that the people advocating trans rights and the rights of children to affirm their gender don't know the history of where that pressure comes from, but it's quite clear the history comes out of gay rights activism and once that battle was won, certain factions that were still in the shadows of that activism are now using trans rights as a way to prove the rights of children to determine their sexual orientation and thence normalise the sexual rights of children.

I see it, but again there is an enormous blind spot on behalf of the virtue-signalling public as to what they are aligning with. 

The government is also implicit in this, but unfortunately the figures associated with the PIE activity decades ago still have influence in Parliament. So again, there is a reluctance to clean house and put a line in the sand to stamp this activism out once and for all. 

Let's be clear, minors are minors. Society has determined that children are off limits sexually. That should stand as a tenet for eternity. There is no scenario where sexual activity with a minor should be excused. Sure, there's the grey area of sex between minors which should be treated with education and sympathy, but between adults and minors should stay illegal  

Hopefully readers will understand why there individual pressures from individual activist groups should be resisted and pushed back against. The activists themselves may think they are advocating for perfectly admirable reasons, but they have failed to understand where the pressure is coming from and really understand where that activism would take the country if taken to its conclusion. Selfish activism (i.e. excluding future consequences) is not honest activism. 

Hopefully I've explained why I believe the things I do regarding this subject. Unfortunately there are still vehement radicals advocating trans rights who are quite happy to destroy lives on the altar of that activism. Sadly there are plenty of gullible people that advocate alongside them. 

Whoy do The Governments of The West Do the Things They Do?

I do lie asleep at night wondering why the West is so fucked up. Why for instance do we keep importing more people from other countries to the point the original population will be replaced?

I've already hinted the cause could be blackmail, especially by the Gulf states, but what if it's purely the City of London and their incessant need for money?

For instance no matter how many houses you build, if you keep demand for those houses high, the prices will be higher and you can earn more in interest on mortgages. What if you had the ear and the pocket of those in power? What if you said to them that they needed to keep stuffing the country with people to keep house prices artificially high and to keep the money machine rolling in readies?

The same goes for those fat retails donors. The incessant need for year-on-year growth requires a never-ending stream of new bodies entering and staying in the country to keep the tills rolling. Except the demographics are changing, so legacy companies that made stuff the original inhabitants of the country wanted and once-upon-a-time were in high enough numbers to satisfy the greedy corporations have gone to the wall, to be replaced by new companies that cater for the "diverse" population.

So we see the choice in retail changing to suit the changing demographics, we see spicier food in restaurants , strange food in supermarkets, we see whole sections devoted to foreign food. 

The list goes on. the old companies go to the wall and new, unrecognisable companies replace them. Shopping is online, away from the bustle of the city centre and the attention of Romanian pickpockets and homeless people cluttering up the closed shop-fronts. 

There is so much wrong with current government policy, actively promoting incomers to an unprecedented level. 

Of course the people voting the parties into power aren't the people being affected. The people at the coal face are told they don't have any power, that they don't matter. The people that do vote, the middle class either have not been directly affected by the changes - yet, or are signalling their virtue to the world by ignoring common sense and rubber-stamping insane government policies. Policies that will see the end of the West. They will virtue-signal away the benefits that the West historically afforded their families and instead will condemn their children and grandchildren into poverty or worse. 

No change like the change we have seen in the last 15 years has gone forward without bloodshed. I will bang on about this until I'm blue in the face, but no transition from the control of one religious or social group to another has happened peacefully. But the virtue-signallers don't care if their foppish offspring, so clovenly cossetted won't be able to protect the social and religious standards their grandfathers fought for. 

The virtue-signallers are the most evil people imaginable. They are giving away the advantages the West afforded their generation at the expense of future generations.

It's the future generation that will be spilling their blood in English soil, it will be future daughters that will lose the rights that English women have gained in the past 100 years. It will be future generations that will be killed for not converting to a hideous ideology. 

I cannot begin to express the evil I see stalking this country. I'm not trying to demonise immigrants. They have been invited in by willing participants.

They say that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Hell is in our future. The virtue-signallers have seen to that.

Syria: Be Careful What You Wish For...

I hear plenty of people crowing about the fall of the Asaad regime in Syria. Don't be too hasty.

First off, it's not clear which of the many anti-Asaad factions will win the overall conflict and take control of Syria. It's pretty clear the pro-Asaad factions are failing, but there are about a dozen different factions controlled by different paymasters and ideologies that it's not yet clear who will win.

One of the anti-Asaad factions is ISIS. If they win the overall game, then the West is in for yet another Middle-Eastern shitshow.

Another is a remnant of Al-Kaeda, called HKS. And I hear on the news there is talk of lifting the proscription on HKS because they may take power. FFS! No! 

If the Iran-backed factions like Hezbollah take control, then we face another similar shit-show with Israel facing the only option of taking Syrian territory to protect itself. Yet another reason for the U.N. to throw sanctions at Israel, yet if they do take territory, it will help stabilise the Middle East.

The best of the bunch may be the ex-Asaad forces that rebelled against him and started fighting against him. Sadly, the spectre of the Muslim Brotherhood stalks these forces if they get in power. But at least they may not be as radically anti-West as the more extreme fundamentalist forces. I use "May" optimistically, but I don't know about them to comment on what the end game would be for the ex-Asaad forces. 

Lets be clear, the fall of Asaad is not a good thing. As bad as he was, being a dictator like he was is the only way to keep the peace in a Muslim country. Look at what has happened in the Middle-East since Sadam Hussein and Gadhafi were neutralised. Chaos. 

One glint of light in the distance is Russia. The Naval and Air bases they have in Syria (the only bases they have with direct access to the Mediterranean) are currently under threat. The main reason the Asaad regime fell is Russia's inability to support it with weapons and expertise. Russia is expending too much blood and treasure in Ukraine. 

Now would be a good time to approach Putin for a ceasefire and peace deal in Ukraine, so he can then concentrate on saving his Mediterranean bases. That way he can claim an honourable reason for the retreat from Ukraine.

You scratch my back, I scratch yours, sort of thing. Maybe a caveat with the deal would be that Ukraine stays out of  NATO as long as Russia helps a mutually-agreed preferred faction in Syria that is favourable to both sides. In the end both countries becoming neutral between the superpowers.

That would be the best outcome, but right now the Biden regime would fuck it up. Hopefully Trump the deal maker has seen the opportunity and his team have started making the approach to Putin.

Unfortunately I've not mentioned the Kurds. The homeless Kurds on the Syrian/Turkish border will I assume be left out (again) from any support and peace deal. The Kurds seem to be the forgotten fighters, supported by no-one and oppressed on all side by Turkey and the Asaad regime. 

Kier Starmer: Pathological Liar?

I've already blogged about how easily the untruths slip from Kier Starmer's tongue.

Now the details of the rumours around the alleged super-injuction are swirling around the internet.

Basically if true, Kier Starmer is living a lie. Whether those close to him know the truth I don't know, but if the allegations are rue, everything about ghd public persona of Kier Starmer is a lie.

So it's no wonder lies trip so easily from him and why he's unaffected and unapologetic about them.

He's a sociopath, the affect of his actions on other ppeople are of little concern to him. He has to empathy, no remorse.

4000 pensioners will freeze to death? Collateral damage, but they don't vote Labour so he doesn't care.

Fewer jobs due to increase in employer's N.I.? Tough luck.

The Starminator will absolutely not stop, or divert from his mission to ruin the country and put his donors first.