Labour: Soft on Crime, Soft on the Causes of Crime, Soft on Punishment of Crime.

Well, Labour are making good on their promise of letting prisoners out of jail early. 

It would be nice if we had more details to reassure the public what type of prisoners, serving what type of sentence were being released, but instead it seems to be a blanket release.

Hopefully the sort of people being released are the sort of soft crimes like people sent to prison for non-payment of the TV licence. Why that's a crime punishable by prison time I don't know.

But soft crime I can sort of agree with.

But if we're talking about assault or murder, then nope, they should stay in. Any sort of offence that has an element of violence, aggression or lack of respect should not be shortened.

Are LGBTQ+ Flags Signs of Occupied Territory?

 Suella Braverman said in New York that LGBTQ+ flags on government building are signs of occupation.

Of course she'll get slagged off as being transphobic or whatever, but this is the whole issue with the Marxist takeover of our institutions.

The flag itself, may have been designed with peaceful intent in mind, but as with all things, it has been co-opted by the Marxists to mean something else. But they hide behind the good intentions of the thing they co-opted.

"How dare you criticise an LGBTQ+ Flag Outside a Government Office?" full well knowing it's not the flag itself that is the issue, but the subversion by the ideology using the flag as cover. 

Just as with the decade-old meme of "thing of the children" when applying the latest draconian measure to limit or intrude into the lives of adults, so the LGBTQ+ flag is now a sign of Marxist ideology wherever it flies.

Sadly the people that do not understand never will. They cannot understand how they have been co-opted for a purpose far different than the laudable ideals they have. 

Just as the the once-noble ecological movement has been co-opted by big government to impose ever heavier taxes and restrictions on the population through the bogeyman of climate change, many other movements that once were good-natured have been taken over to impose authoritarian rule.

Just remember this when you utter the words "The Government needs to do something...". When government gets involved, you can bet the population won't benefit.

ID Cards back on the Agenda

Now Labour is back in power, who rolls into the fray but the ancient warmonger Tony Blair.

He wants ID cards to be deployed as a way of tackling the immigration issue. 

But Tony, you started the fucking crisis in the first place! Yes, the inept, clueless Tories made it worse, but you set the steps in train to get to this point. I point that I'm sure was engineered.

After we rejected your idea of ID cards back in your premiership, I'm sure your globalist mates said "fuck 'em, lets start a scenario where they'll be screaming for ID cards". 

Yeah, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, a fair percentage of whom have absconded into the population later, I'm still not convinced about ID cards. How about having a non-porous border in the first place so the numbers entering the country illegally can be controlled.

It's funny how the Left lover controlling things, like your life, but not immigration.

Anyway, ID cards. Fuck off. Do your job properly and secure our border. Send anyone who arrives here back to France (a safe country). 

Eliminate any extra-national obstacle placed in our way of doing that, like the ECHR.

Legal Immigration: Who Wins With the Current Status Quo?

We know legal immigration is at an all-time high, but why? There has to be a reason.

Well, the first one is education. In order to keep the University fee gravy train running, the Universities have to import more people. The downturn in the economy of late has put a dent into the University intake, plus kids have realised they can just go straight into retail jobs without the hassle of another 2 or three years at school and end up with a huge debt. 

So the Universities turn their attention to the wider world, importing scholars from abroad. Not only that, but for some stupid reason the UK allows the dependents of students to come over with them. So it's not just the student, it could also be their mum and/or dad coming with them. 

That's the first reason for the bump in immigration.

The second is global corporations not wanting to spend on training. Instead of actually paying for trainees, they would rather the kids stump up the cash and get into debt in University. Then they'll cherry-pick the people they want after they have been trained. Sadly, the UK Universities don't always supply the sort of talent the global corporations crave (in other words that degree in Fashion Psychology isn't work shit) and instead trawl the world for decent graduates that have been educated in an old-school non-woke environment.

So the UK workforce ends up working in a retail environment, whatever their education status, while global corporations import talent from the rest of the world.

The Conservatives plan to stem this didn't work. Increasing the amount of earnings the person was required to earn before they could come to the UK only disadvantaged those coming over as Wives and Girlfriends of UK citizens. 

The people being imported by Global Corporations are earning the sort of sums way above the arbitrary government limit because they are worth it to those corporations. The sort of non-woke, unindoctrinated people that are actually worth the salary our own students were promised, but never achieve thanks to the failure of the University system in the UK. 

Lots needs to be done. The Universities need to be put on notice to stop spewing out unemployable people. Farage has it right when he says that he'd waive fees on S.T.E.M. subjects. We need to start concentrating on getting back to the Universities providing employable people and not Political activists.

Finally as an incentive, I'd be "fining" the global corporations with extra N.I. for anyone imported from abroad. I'd be tripling or more the employer's N.I. for that person as a way of disincentivising the employer and clawing back some money for the loss to the economy. If it could be that with additional tax costs elsewhere the cost to the corporation was equal to training a person up in the UK, that would be a worthwhile solution because then you could argue the reliance on imported labour would be short-term until we have a tranche of employable people in the UK paid for by the corporations. That would pay for the STEM-subject UK student to get their skills for free.

Of course the Brick-Wall treatment of getting Non-Doms and global corporations to pay all of their tax in the UK and not abroad would be the ideal solution, but I doubt the rich political donors would want the party they paid for to do anything against their interests.