The Farage Farrago Isn't About Farage. Lefties Miss the Point. Again and Again and Again.

 There are several tweeters on twitter (Xers on X?) that are gloating  about Farage being debanked. 

"But the Bank has a right to withdraw service" they joyfully say. 

Yes guys, it's okay if it happens to someone else.

But what if you went to ASDA and they refused you access? Then you went to TESCO and they did the same? Then Morrisons, Sainbury's, Aldi, Lidl?

Just because you had ideas they didn't agree with. 

What happens if you can't get a gas supplier, water supplier, electricity is denied to you? 

These are all private companies and they all have the right to deny you service.

But would your opinion change if it was YOU? 

That's why like him or not, the point Farage is making IS IMPORTANT. 

By all means deny you service if you've been abusive to staff, courts have proved you have used your account for criminal activity, but not for just having the wrong opinions.

It's not just Farage being debanked. It's small businesses that deal in cash, it's the single Mum using her TickTock or OnlyFans account to make ends meet because she can't get benefits, it's a whole host of ORDINARY PEOPLE BEING DEBANKED.

The lefties need to understand that. 

NatWest CEO Bullied? Oh Really?

In this report, it reports the shadow chancellor Rachael Reeves says that the NatWest CEO Alison Rose was bullied out of her job. 

Really?

So if a normal NatWest worker released private information against bank policy and was summarily dismissed, is that bullying? 

No it isn't. What a stupid fucking moron Rachael Reeves is. 

Just makes me wonder what connection to Alison Rose Rachael Reeves has and if that's a conflict of interest for a shadow chancellor, protecting a bank worker who was (let's not forget) allowed to resign and keep her million pound payout, rather than being immediately dismissed like any normal bank worker would be. 

This is exactly why the Labour party is not the alternative to the Tories. They may talk an (ever so slightly) different talk, but they are all peas in the same corrupt pod. 

As a Labour MP who should support the workers, Rachael Reeves should be asking why Alison Rose was treated differently than a normal bank worker and not accusing people of bullying.

"British Miracle Meat" is Supposedly Satire, but is it a Gateway? Softening us up for Genocide?

I've blogged before about how the trail we are following leads to the forced elimination of "useless" individuals.

The WEF and it's accolytes have also let slip that useless people are useless and the question is, what do you do with them? 

Now we get Channel 4's program "British Miracle Meat", which is supposedly a satire, where famous chefs eat meat ostensibly grown from human meat. 

Yeah, did you just see that nudge there? 

All our meat worries can be solved, if only people would "donate" their flesh so that it could be grown in tanks. Hmmm. No need to donate, the state can take it all, to reduce the tax burden. Let's go all "Soylent Green".

And the most worrisome "fact" out of this satire? The flesh of children tastes the best.

Yeah, given the track record of the media, this is definitely a drama the BBC couldn't air. 

I don't begrudge Ch4 doing this programme, but why now? Especially given the pieces in play at the moment, it's a bit close to the edge for me.

But, given that there is an underclass, a net drain on the economy who refuse to work uncertain hours on zero hours contracts, or for wages that pay less than welfare (not like those luuvely bearded immigrant types who'll work for peanuts and sleeps 50 to a house).

So what do you do with a population that cannot be made to make profits and are a net drain on the economy? How would you start to change public opinion? Jaunty semi-docu-drama programs that "challenge" opinions? That would be one way.

I'm not waiting for the associated ever so worthy and compassionate gateway docu-drama on State Assisted Suicide morphing into State Assisted Death and making killing mandatory. "It's just a change of terminology", or "It's to relieve your suffering, don't you want that?" or "Surely you don't want to live in a tent for the rest of your life?".

I see what you are doing guys. 

I'll be watching for the drip, drip, drip feeding of other messages in future. And I will point them out.

Max Shrek "Powerplant" Proposed in Manchester.

 Who doesn't love a Batman reference? 

Well, it appears that Manchester are proposing to build a huge battery in order to capture wind and solar power and store it ready for when the wind don't blow and the sun don't shine.

The very thing that Max Shrek proposed in Batman and that almost cost Selina Kyle her life and turned her into catwoman in the film.

Back then I suppose the idea of a battery sucking up cheap energy, storing it and then delivering it when demand (and energy prices) are high was a bad thing back in the Eighties. Now, it seems that its a wonderful thing.

You see, the thing Max didn't do back in Batman was to spend a couple of decades moving public opinion in his favour. Now it's all greenwashed and acceptable.  Mainly because green renewable energy is so piss-poor at delivering bulk load energy.

But that's not stopped the idiots in power relying on it though, has it?