George Galloway Win In Rochdale: The Power of the Muslim Block Vote.

 I've said before that I've seen the power of the Muslim block vote. The George Galloway win in Rochdale is a classic example of how a minority like the Muslims can get their candidate in office against the main parties.

The turnout was just under 40%, so a minority demographic can win under those circumstances, especially when they ALL vote the same way. 

The news is about how the Labour Party assumed the Muslim bloc vote would be for them. But they can't compare with Galloway, the Muslim champion that has criticised the various Western campaigns in Muslim countries.

You're now seeing the power of the Muslim minority for real. They can win elections in all the major cities of the country. 

Unless the white majority starts to vote in numbers, the Muslim minority will have a undue affect un the politics of the country. I've been warning about this for over a decade, where the Muslim bloc vote starts to outweigh the power of the white majority and their disparate voting intentions.

The only way to sty the Muslims from gaining ever more power over policy is to introduce Mandatory voting. Making sure that EVERYONE votes so that the lazy majority don't fail in their duty to keep this country working for them and not get taken over by a minority. 

Galloway has played a very good game. Naming his party the Worker's party disguises it's true intentions. He talks the talk of people at the bottom being raised up and given back power. But it's all a front.: Galloway always backs the Muslims over the poor white working class. Just listen to his words. He talks much of the war in Gaza, not so much about globalist corporations exploiting the poor. 

Much has been said of introducing proportional representation. I'm not sure that will work, especially with low turnout. Mandatory voting is the only way to restore the primacy of the majority and vote the way the majority of the public want and therefore empower polices that the majority want.

Lee Anderson Islamist Story: Quick Political Condemnation a Sign of Corruption?

 I'm intrigued about the Lee Anderson Islamist affair. Not because of the comments he made, but more about the fallout around it and the people condemning Mr Anderson, including his own colleagues in the Conservative Party.

I've long since alluded to the amount of Gulf Money Invested in our Economy and how much influence that might have over our politicians. I mean, if someone owns 20% of the money invested in your economy, be it money in the City of London or in real estate, or both, they would have tyhe power to severely cripple our economy if they had the will to withdraw that money.

And Muslims and especially the Gulf states act as a bloc and can have that influence over the actions of our politicians. 

That's the downside of allowing foreign i9nfluence into your country that don't have your country's best interests at heart. It goes further that just making profits. It's making profits without returning some reward back to the country you are exploiting. It's even worse if you extort the country for your own benefit.

And that's where we are at right now.

Even worse, you can see the people directly influenced by these bad actors. The corrupt people in the pockets of the actors that extort us for their gain.

In the Lee Anderson case, it's the Gulf States, Muslims and especially Islamists or Islamic Fundamentalists (a euphemism for Saudi Arabia).  I cannot make the accusation of direct payments without proof, but we all know the way it works with indirect payment. You scratch my back, I'll look after your interests. A free holiday for my Family means I'll have your back in Parliament. Keep the money rolling in for arms deals and we'll turn a blind eye to you funding extremist Mosques. Donate to my foundation and I'll lobby on your behalf in Parliament.

But it need not be state actors: for instance global corporations also exploit us for their benefit, with no return. In the cases of corporations like Google, eBay, Amazon and the like, it's taking profits and then making agreements with HMRC on how much tax they want to pay, or paying corporation tax outside the UK so none of the profits they earn as a result of doing business here actually gets returned to the UK exchequer.

It needs to stop. 

We need to have the confidence to tell the truth and be transparent. These bad actors need to be identified and exposed to the public, so we can say cast them out, despite the cost. 

State actors need to be expelled and if necessary they money seized. The corporate actors need to be told to work within UK law and not get beneficial treatment. If the law allows a loophole, then it needs to be closed.

During his campaign Hilary Clinton criticised Donald Trump for making millions and not paying any tax. He retorted he used the same rules her donors were using. He challenged her to close the loopholes that allowed him to avoid paying taxes. 

And that needs to be done here. No more extortion from states or corporations. No more corruption.

New Balloon a Load of Hot Air, or is There More to the Story?

Yet another balloon entered U.S. airspace last week. Apparently it has now left U.S. airspace and everyone can breathe a sigh of relief that the embarrassing spectacle of a Billion dollar fighter and a hundred thousand dollar missile being sent to dispatch a spy balloon costing thousands of dollars to build are not repeated.

Notice I didn't say thousands to operate. Such a spy balloon, if it was relaying data back to China in real-time that would require satellite communications: something that costs as much as the F-22 fighter to achieve.

Anyhoo, the new balloon has drifted off I assume over Canada so it's now someone else's problem. Someone with less capability in high-altitude interception: Sorry, no capability in high altitude interception or interdiction.

Strangely, the U.S. government are downplaying this latest balloon incursion into U.S. airspace. Why exactly would they do that, given the balloon that was shot down previously was confirmed to be a data-gathering device. i.e. a spy balloon. The only thing the U.S. could verify was if it had the ability to relay that data back to Beijing in real time. 

Which, given the strength and number of Chinese space assets is probably a foregone conclusion. I assume that the U.S. authorities know it was transmitting real time data, it's just that they couldn't verify the satellite network the Chinese were using to intercept the signals and transmit them back to Beijing.

Even if the new balloon didn't fly over the U.S. it still could gather intelligence on radar signals used to pick up the balloon, the readiness of assets used to identify the balloon and the type of assets used, etc. Intelligence gathering doesn't have to be blatant and obvious. 

I think I've said previously that the Huwawei affair is tied up with the spy balloons being launched by China. It sort of confirms that the Chinese did have software within Chinese-made routers that were syphoning off data to China. The raid on the Solar Observatory near White Sands Missile Range also reinforces the issue of Chinese espionage.

Now it's come to light the Chinese are buying up Farmland close to strategic military assets such as testing grounds for new tech. Also airbases operating the latest tech like the B-2 stealth bomber.

It wouldn't be an issue if the Chinese were buying land all over the U.S. but they are not. The majority of the land is clustered close to U.S. military assets. 

Again, what the Chinese are doing with that land has not yet been verified. They may just be being good landlords for American farmers. They could be installing intelligence-gathering assets. Currently there is no confirmation by U.S. intelligence regarding this issue. 

It seems that without the spy routers, the Chinese are finding other ways to try and spy in the signals around the U.S. in order to gather intelligence. And don't think that land that is not close to military bases has not intelligence value. There may be communications between bases that has value if intercepted.

It sort of reminds me of the U.K. intelligence services tapping into telephone conversations between England and Northern Ireland during the "troubles".

M.I.5 built a tower at Capenhurst when they found out the government nuclear facility there was in between two microwave towers that transmitted all the telephone conversations between England and Northern Ireland. Unwilling to arouse suspicion by applying for a formal tap of the telephone calls, they built a tower at capenhurst that intercepted the microwave beams and listened in to the conversations.  No need for a formal request to tap individual channels, they had the whole lot. Thousands of telephone conversations could be listened into by that tower.

The tower could be explained as something to to with the Nuclear facility. It was a secret for years.

It has long since been decommissioned and demolished, but it shows you have to be aware of signal security and also the attempts by bad actors to intercept those signals. Signals intelligence should work both ways.

It would be interesting if the grain silos on these Chinese Farms all started to look the same and come from the same supplier in China...