Lee Anderson Islamist Story: Quick Political Condemnation a Sign of Corruption?

 I'm intrigued about the Lee Anderson Islamist affair. Not because of the comments he made, but more about the fallout around it and the people condemning Mr Anderson, including his own colleagues in the Conservative Party.

I've long since alluded to the amount of Gulf Money Invested in our Economy and how much influence that might have over our politicians. I mean, if someone owns 20% of the money invested in your economy, be it money in the City of London or in real estate, or both, they would have tyhe power to severely cripple our economy if they had the will to withdraw that money.

And Muslims and especially the Gulf states act as a bloc and can have that influence over the actions of our politicians. 

That's the downside of allowing foreign i9nfluence into your country that don't have your country's best interests at heart. It goes further that just making profits. It's making profits without returning some reward back to the country you are exploiting. It's even worse if you extort the country for your own benefit.

And that's where we are at right now.

Even worse, you can see the people directly influenced by these bad actors. The corrupt people in the pockets of the actors that extort us for their gain.

In the Lee Anderson case, it's the Gulf States, Muslims and especially Islamists or Islamic Fundamentalists (a euphemism for Saudi Arabia).  I cannot make the accusation of direct payments without proof, but we all know the way it works with indirect payment. You scratch my back, I'll look after your interests. A free holiday for my Family means I'll have your back in Parliament. Keep the money rolling in for arms deals and we'll turn a blind eye to you funding extremist Mosques. Donate to my foundation and I'll lobby on your behalf in Parliament.

But it need not be state actors: for instance global corporations also exploit us for their benefit, with no return. In the cases of corporations like Google, eBay, Amazon and the like, it's taking profits and then making agreements with HMRC on how much tax they want to pay, or paying corporation tax outside the UK so none of the profits they earn as a result of doing business here actually gets returned to the UK exchequer.

It needs to stop. 

We need to have the confidence to tell the truth and be transparent. These bad actors need to be identified and exposed to the public, so we can say cast them out, despite the cost. 

State actors need to be expelled and if necessary they money seized. The corporate actors need to be told to work within UK law and not get beneficial treatment. If the law allows a loophole, then it needs to be closed.

During his campaign Hilary Clinton criticised Donald Trump for making millions and not paying any tax. He retorted he used the same rules her donors were using. He challenged her to close the loopholes that allowed him to avoid paying taxes. 

And that needs to be done here. No more extortion from states or corporations. No more corruption.

Suella Braverman, Palestinians and the Met Police: Exposing Gulf State Extortion.

 The Met Police's refusal to ban Palestinian marches on Remembrance Sunday has highlighted the protected status of Muslims in the UK. The head of the Met says he has no power to stop any protest which is clearly untrue, otherwise all of those miners prevented from protesting in the Eighties, the EDL more recently and the lockdown protesters that were intercepted and turned away can sue the Met for abusing or exceeding their powers. In those protests did the Met act unlawfully?

Interesting question.

Suella Braverman has jumped in with her size nine stilettos and said the this refusal to ban the Palestinian protests, but an overt willingness to ban others indicates that the Met Police are biased. Well, we know that because the Met has acted overtly to stop several protests that are "against the narrative" of government and globalist interests. Just stop oil is another protected protest, a protest which promotes the globalist agenda of increased consumption in the name of saving the earth.

And of course Muslims. An apparently protected religion and section of society. They can rape children with impunity and only when the numbers of victims climb into several thousands, do the Police grudgingly swing into action years later. There are active child rape gangs working in the towns and cities of the UK today, but the Police refuse to act still. The Kebab shop child trafficking network is still in full swing. Just visit the eateries in any city or major town and you'll see young girls in the back rooms suspiciously past what you'd consider a decent time. 

But the Police fail to investigate and fail to prosecute time and time again. Until the number of victims is impossible to ignore.

But why you ask, do Muslims seem to be so protected, why do the Police act with kids gloves for Palestinians but bring out the batons for anti-lockdown protesters?

Money. Lots of money. The backers of the Palestinians, the Gulf States, have billions of pounds worth of investment in the UK. Both in land, commercial and residential property, and the stock market. It's a huge sum of money estimated a few years ago to amount to around 20% of the UK economy. It may be more.

Gulf state money owns all of our container ports. Gulf state money owns swathes of inner London, it's invested in a large number of our companies, it's invested in our stocks and shares. It has a large shareholding in sport, like the Formula One circus. and International Football. 

Witness the Qatar world cup, or the Arab names at the top of Formula One.

That money, if withdrawn would cause financial chaos throughout the West. Because Gulf State money is invested in such depth in all Western countries, our society would collapse if withdrawn.

We are being extorted. The actions of our government and our Police is being to an extent controlled by the threat of removal of that money. The threat of financial collapse. 

Don't ever say the Met is not biased. It is, for a good reason. Don't say Muslims are not protected, because they are.