It seems that some scientists are being castigated by the climate change lobby. It appears the paper hadn't been properly peer reviewed or published in a publication that deals in climate change amongst other things.
Which of course seems rank hypocrisy considering the climate change lobby get up to the same themselves.
It just goes to show the power of money poured into the scientific community and the level that the religion of climate change has risen to, despite the lack of concrete proof.
Posts
Could there be two separate issues involved in the Clancy trial?
-
Both issues deserving attention, but not in a "zero sum" way?
I (JH) have been puzzled about the depth of feeling on both sides of the
Clancy trial … what,...
1 day ago
