Giving Away Secrets.

So, the UK is to supply a dozen Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine. Too few to make a difference but just enough to get captured by the Russians so they can evaluate our armour.

Why is the UK doing this? Why are we giving our primary main battle tank away to a third party? One that is in no way  secure in their ability to manage such an asset?

I don't understand. To me, it's a bad idea and is just virtue signalling to the world.

Just how Russia views the escalation is another thing.

Minor Attracted Person.

There have been many attempts to legalise paedophilia. 

Decades ago the Labour party had amongst their ranks the Paedophile Information Exchange. It took the Marxist terminology and used it to create a name for the organisation that disguised it's true purpose.

It was not created to exchange information about the illegal activity of paedophiles, as you would assume by the name. It was exactly the opposite: it was a network of Paedophiles using the organisation to exchange pornographic images of children whilst at the same time promoting a positive agenda towards the sexualisation of children and the lowering or scrapping of the age of consent.

This naming convention by Marxist organisations is a topic I may go into in a following post. It really is a marker that instantly identifies an organisation as extreme left in ideology.

Eventually PIE was broken up and members arrested for their criminal activity.

However, the ideology still pervades the left. Most recently it has co-opted the trans radicals in order to push the gender reassignment of children. By involving children in their sexual identity, it's involving children in thoughts about sex and is being used by paedophiles and their supporters as a wedge to gain acceptance more widely of the sexualisation of children.

The argument goes: Well, you talk about kids in a sexual way when it comes to trans rights, so why not other forms of sexuality?

As the trans rights movement came to the fore on the coat-tails of the successes made by the Gay Rights movements of the seventies and eighties, the paedophiles are now using the successes made by the trans rights movement to push their agenda.

Which now brings us to the term "Minor Attracted Person". This is a term now being used by the Left as a "less abusive" term to describe someone sexually attracted to children. 

Basically the thinking behind the term is to lump in those who actively have sex with children or trade indecent images of children (i.e. illegal activity) with those that think about having sex with kids but don't do anything about it. In effect it's a sexual preference or sexuality to be given protection like being Gay, or being Trans. 

If you see the shift, it's about de-escalating the issue. It's a way of saying "See, there are lots of people that think about having sex with kids, but don't actually do it", a way to make the activity appear more mainstream and therefore make it appear less fair if the activity is made illegal.

It's about normalising child sexual activity with adults. 

The current controversy regarding Police Scotland's use of the term Minor Attracted Person (MAP) on a recent report by the Chief Constable. The fact they then backtracked and gaslighted the public by saying they never use the term MAP. Except the term is in black and white on the CC's report. 

It's a worrying trend, if now the Police don't understand the ramifications of the use of the term. From locking up paedophiles for exchanging indecent pictures of kids, in five years we could have the Police bending the knee to MAPs as a protected characteristic of their sexuality.

Will a MAP be diagnosed as having a mental illness. Much like addiction, would they then be excused because "they can't help it"? 

Like alcoholics, will they then be able to collect benefits because their illness makes them unemployable?