The shambles in Parliament the other day over the Government's welfare reforms are another indication that the Government of the day aren't really in charge of the country.
I mean we vote them in and they have ideas about what policy changes they want to make, but when it comes down to it that policy doesn't actually materialise.
I mean, who would have thought a LABOUR government would trash the winter fuel payments? Who thought they would go on to try and push through welfare reforms in order to cut welfare payments?
Then we had the spectacle of Rachael Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the front bench crying.
We've seen this play out before. With Brexit, we had years of successive attempts to either ignore or reverse the referendum.
We had it with Liz Truss as well.
We also had it with Boris During Covid. The pandemic protocols set out before Covid were rapidly thrown out the window once civil service "advisers" got involved.
So, what is going on?
The Civil Service. It has now departed from advising the government of the day, to being the de-facto government.
That's why you get, despite changes at the top of political policy, ideology, identity, and personality, the same polices enacted by "Government" (Big G).
So that's why you get the Labour party trying to cut welfare, why you get the Tories trying to increase it. Why you get different ideologies enacting essentially the same policies.
The civil service is now the government. No matter what you do, the unelected officials in the civil service control policy and legislative progress.
The supreme court is always going to side with the civil service, even against the government. So successive government's will be blocked from changing policy, as they have been ever since Tony Blair (that wrecker of British constitutionality) created institutions like the Supreme Court without separation of the executive and legislative processes.
You can't have a Government unable to institute policy they have been voted into power to enact.
But we are where we are and Rachael Reeves ran head-first into the brick wall of the civil service hegemony. Hance the tears at PMQs. Kier Starmer the sociopath has a more legalistic head on his shoulders and I assume has a more pragmatic and less enthusiastic attitude to the road blocks put in place thwarting government policy.
God help Reform when they get in power. There has to be a wholesale bonfire of Blairist encumbrances put upon the business of government. I wish them well and hope they have a thumping majority so they can enact primary legislation to gut the civil service, disband the supreme court, remove ourselves from the ECHR and other such organisations that deign to put themselves above an elected government.