We know there are two tiers to everything in this country, not just Policing. It's provision of services, Welfare, housing... the list goes on. You name it, the White Working class, so privileged by the colour of their skin (by the far-left) are put to the back of the queue.
The reasons are many-fold. Whether it's the UK signing up to various international treaties that make the government support refugees and immigrants with statutory instruments, to their own ideology that still thinks the immigrants are somehow oppressed in the UK.
I have started to see moderate commentators explain that the far-left see any minority as oppressed and therefore put them on a pedestal, enshrined in law, so that they get a leg up.
This is the equity (rather than equality)_ doctrine, where the oppressed get more stuff, more help, more of everything in order to make up for their misfortune at being a minority.
But I always reduce human nature to the parenting model. Would you favour one child over another? Would you give one child more of everything? What do you think that would do to the relationships in the family?
It would quickly become dysfunctional.
The child that gets less would resent the child that gets more AND it would resent the parents for being so unfair.
The child that gets more will be so full of himself and feel so emboldened, because he's the chosen one, the favourite. He would resent the other child, but would also not respect the parents because he expects ever more preferential treatment.
In a functional family, the parents are always fair. Each child gets equal resources, equal time, equal love. They are taught to share and not to be mean.
And that is where government are going wrong with their treatment of communities and their feeble excuses to explain it all.
Equality means equality. No matter if you agree with the community, you must treat each one with equal measure. No preferential treatment even with the pressure from treaties. Everyone gets the same help up the same ladder. If a treaty means an immigrant has statutory rights, then the incumbent population must also have the same rights enshrined in law.
Similarly, if one community has limited rights, then the rights of the other community should also be limited.
You don't play favourites. That way only lies a bloody mess, in every term of the phrase.
Right now, the government is not parenting even-handedly. One community is getting preferential treatment. Mainly because it is carrying a bigger stick than the other.
The Muslim community carries advantages that form the stick: It votes as a block, so has more influence on winning or losing elections. It acts as a single mass: if you harm one Muslim, you have the whole local community to answer to. The Muslim countries of the Gulf own quite a lot of our land, companies and our national debt. They have friends in high places with big wallets.
If you were a parent with a psychotic kid with a big stick and a few hundred mates willing to back him up, would you let him beat up the other child? Take things from the fridge without permission? Demand more pocket money? Well, according to government, their answer is "you betcha!".
That's the mountain the white working class have to climb.
They have to find some way to equalise the playing field, otherwise they will continue to be oppressed.
The ballot box has long since failed to save them. They have voted for support for 30 years, but none has been forthcoming. Not since Margaret Thatcher has the white working class had any government do anything FOR THEM.
John Major didn't.
Mr Major started the decrease in living standards.
Tony Blair didn't.
In fact he started the preferential treatment of one child over the other.
Gordon Brown didn't.
But to be fair to Gordon he gave the kid's pocket money to his banker mates down the pub and pissed it up against the wall. So that's akin to equal treatment, if you class equal misery as equality.
David Cameron didn't.
And witnessed the one time the oppressed child lashed out when they had the only opportunity to voice their angst, when we voted for Brexit, against the wishes of that unfair parent, our government. Effectively we did something to piss the neighbours off to get attention.
Teresa May didn't.
In fact Teresa tried to placate the neighbours and ignored both kids while she tried to get in the neighbour's good books again.
Boris Johnson didn't
Despite promising much and delivering very, very little.
Rishi Sunak didn't.
Rishi was very much the Dad parachuted into a dysfunctional family. He had a WTF look on his face the whole time.
And now Kier (Two-Tier) Starmer actively beats the oppressed child and makes them submit to the spoiled one.
How do you think that will work out Kier?
I fear it will work out very badly.
At some point the oppressed kid will act up. He will do something outrageous in order to get attention and highlight his plight.
Never forget it is the white working class that stock your armed forces with bodies. We know where the weapons are, we know how to use them. Think it will end well, when the oppressed child really gets angry?
You ain't seen nothing yet Kier.
You've got 5 years to get this parenting lark right Kier. Use the years wisely and do not every, just sit back and do nothing.
Posts
