Thje Problem for Ukraine using Starlink.

There's a row going on betwwen Urkraine, Starlink, Elon Muskm and the U.S. government.

It appears Starlink is being throttled. That has a huge effect on the First Person Vision (FPV) drones that Ukraine use against Russia. Slow response means that the camera feeds from the drones are useless. A flying drone needs instantaleous video so the pilot can fly it.

So currently Ukraine cannot reliably fly it's long-range drones, instead having to rely on the relatively short range battlefield drones guided by optical cable.

No more drones targetting Russian territory, Russian refineries, fuel dumps, or airfields.

Now the blame is being bounced between Elon Musk, who says the throttling must be governental. The U.S, government laying the blame on Elon.

I'll go into the whys and wherefores of the throttling in a minute, but let's look at where Ukraine is at the moment. They military is relying on a satellite network owned by a private company based in a completely different country. This is not a military-grade asset. I'll sure Starlink the company has decent security, but it never will be the highest of the high. It is not protected by an official secrets act, backed by the full force of the government for instance. It doesn't have NSA-level encryption.

So Russia themselves could have hacked the Starlink network.

Russia themselves have military-grade assets in space. They have tested satellite killer satellites. It could have been a call from a Russian asset to Starlink to warn them that if they keep up supplying hight speed internet to Ukraine, they will be targetted. Unless they start making Starlink unable to support long distance real time video, then they may find the Starlink network turning into a shell of high speed dust around the planet.

The U.S government or Trump himself may have thought himself slighted by Ukraine during the several attempts to creat a peace deal. A number of times we've been told it is close, only for it to fall down. Trump himself could have ordered the slowdown, in an effort to make Ukraine see reason and settle for peace. 

Who knows. But I do know that a military force in the middle of a war relying on civillian assets controlled from a thrid country is buikding on foundations of sand. Never have your military rely on assets it cannot itself control. 

By all means use it, but don't rely on it.

But for now, the Ukraine military needs to restrict their ambitions. The weak point in their ambition has been exposed.

Explaining the Strange Socialist/Islamist Alliance.

I've blogged a number of times about the Socialist/Islamist alliance and how it's worked out in other countries. 

Essentially it ends up bad for the Socialists, because once the alliance gains power, the Islamists have the monopoly on violence and eradicate the Socialists. I mean, you can see it here in the UK: can you imagine the Soy-Latte Liberals in the Green party fighting against a bunch of tooled-up Islamic fundamentalists? 

No, neither can I. The Greenies would be wiped out, screaming "I'm with you, I'm your friend, I voted for you!"

Much like that woman outside the shop in France the other day, except with knives and guns.

But why do the Liberals in the Greens align themselves with the Fundamental Islamists? I mean, it's obviously not a relationship that would last, because the greens support Gay Rights, Women's rights, LGBTQ+++ rights. Basically the Greens support people's rights to do anything they want, screw anyone they want, dress up as anyone they want, take drugs if they want, the full liberal shtick.

And they're cosying up to Islamists who hate everything they stand for? Why?

The answer is Power.

Right now, on their own, neither side can gain traction and win elections. The Greens are a batshit crazy party that would only gain single digit percent of the vote. The Islamists might do better, but they are still a one trick pony.

The Denton and Gorton By-election was an aberration, with Starmer at his Zenith approval-wise, with Labour fielding a European immigrant with an accent no-one could understand. 

The Greens won 40% of the vote. In an area with an Islamic immigrant population close to that. 

In effect the Greens won, where they would normally be obliterated. Labour lost with 25% of the vote, because they lost the Islamic voter base. 

In that by-election the green/Islamic alliance worked. And so it will in other elections, as the Islamists Ally with the Greens and Labour Party, depending on which has the better chance of winning and gaining power.

And that's the name of the game. It's just about Islamists using the useful idiots in the Green Party and the Labour Party to gain power. Where they can't gain power themselves, they can certainly influence the rule-makers, claiming oppressed minority status and using that to close down dissent.

Where the Islamic community on it's own can win elections, we then get "Independent" Islamic candidates. Not yet brave enough to claim membership of a full Islamic party, but just "Independent" yet when they get power they align with Pro-Islam Labour and  The Greens. 

Then the Islamists can start to restrict non-Islamic movements, give Islam special protection, the list goes on. 

And that's what it's all about. 

Are European Governments Schizophrenic?

I've been talking online recently about Europe and European governments and their inability to govern in the interests of their citizens. 

I've said previously that I thought our government were delusional. The signs are there, believing in a different reality than the reality we can see in front of our eyes.

I think I blogged about it a year ago, when a Labour MP went on question time and when asked about the small boats arriving, went on about how these boatloads of men women and children deserve our hospitality. And he was mortified when confronted with the fact that 90% of the immigrants were men. You could see on his face, that was not the reality he saw. 

I now think that I've come to understand our government and other European governments. They are Schizophrenic. 

The definition of Schizophrenia is:

Schizophrenia is a long-term mental health condition that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, often causing them to lose touch with reality.

So far, so good. It seems to describe our government to a tee.

Lets have a look at the symptoms:

Symptoms are generally grouped into three main categories: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive issues.

Okay, so there's a bit going on. But let's have a look at positive (in individuals) Symptoms.

Positive Symptoms (Experiences Added to Reality)

These involve a loss of touch with reality or new features not present before: Yeah, out of touch with reality. Sounds like a typical European cabinet, or the European Commission. Seeing families in boats that don't exist, diversity being a strength, immigrants not adding to crime. 

• Hallucinations: Sensing things that are not real. Hearing voices is the most common form, though people can also see, smell, taste, or feel things that are not there. I think I could substitute this for voices from outside government: the voices nudging the government to do the things they do. like "Just do this and I'll donate 10 Mil to the cause..." 

• Delusions: Strong, false beliefs that do not change even when shown clear evidence or facts. Examples include paranoia, feeling like someone is plotting against you, or believing you have special powers. Here's a good one: false beliefs. That would include Diversity is a strength, a man can be a woman, immigrants are a net benefit, immigrants don't need to assimilate, net zero isn't ruining the country to reduce global carbon by less than one percent. Special powers: how about believing you are a saint, and everyone else is a monster. Believing someone is plotting against you? Well, was a real fear if your name was Kier Starmer.

• Disorganised Thinking and Speech: Difficulty organizing thoughts, leading to jumbled speech, jumping between unrelated topics, or speech that is hard for others to understand ("word salad"). Aha! Word Salad. Has anyone hard a politican recently? Word Salad describes exactly the words that come out of their mouths as they deny reality and try to sound convinciing.

• Disorganised or Catatonic Behavior: Unpredictable movements, awkward body postures, or staying completely still for long periods Just two words here: Kier Starmer. Let me be clear, the son of a toolmaker was as catatonic when making speeches as he could possibly be. 

If that's the positive symptoms, what the hell are the negative ones? A propensity to press the nuclear launch button? Lock up people for tweeting opinions?

Negative Symptoms (Capabilities or Emotions Taken Away)

These represent a reduction or loss of normal functions and emotions:

• Flat Affect: Speaking in a dull tone, showing little facial expression, or seeming emotionless. Yep, we're back to Kier Starmer again, aren't we. 

• Social Withdrawal: Losing interest in spending time with friends, family, or social activities. Oh, come on! Stop with teh Starmer-bashing! He left for...reasons. Mainly because bully Burham was going to kick his butt 

• Avolition (Lack of Motivation): Trouble starting or finishing daily tasks, work, or goal-oriented activities. Now this could describe any Labour cabinet member videoed walking into number 10. None of them look particularly motivated. And none of them seem to stay in a job for any length of time and if they do, they're pretty piss-poor at the job. 

• Neglect of Personal Care: Difficulty maintaining hygiene, grooming, or everyday routines. Have you seen Angel Rayner? Looks like she's been on a bender for the last 18 months. And Burham has aged a decade in only 3 months. 

• Anhedonia: Inability to feel pleasure or joy in activities previously enjoyed. Well, as the Left now see jokes as hate speech, I'd say that symptom was spot on. 

Cognitive Symptoms Now it gets good. Just look at the list below and apply it to any Labour cabinet member. 

These affect mental processing and everyday functioning:

• Trouble concentrating or paying attention.

• Memory problems (difficulty with short-term or working memory).

• Difficulty making decisions, planning, or understanding everyday situations 

I'm afraid the diagnosis is clear. Schizophrenia. Our government is mentally ill. Literally mentally ill. 

It's pretty clear to me now that the whole political class of Europe is also just as mentally ill as the UK government. Except Poland. Hungary is in the early stages after the elections earlier this year.

For Hungary, look up the Schizophrenic Prodromal Phase.  

Unfortunately, I don't know how you treat group schizophrenia. I assume education, getting the patient to identify their condition and accept treatment for it. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, getting them to think correctly, and gradually bring them back to accept actual reality than some ideologically induced fantasy. 

Or you could just kick them out at the next election and induce a hard reset of government.