Was The Satanic Panic Nonsense?

The more that gets released about the perverted and evil things being done by the elites, the more it seems that the Satanic Abuse conspiracies of the 80s and 90s were actually true.

I mean, what better way to hide actual pedophillia than to dress it up as some satanic ritual, so the kids, if they were able to notify the authorities would not be believed.

The same for the stories around the time of Saville, of kids being driven in expensive cars to large country homes, to be abused by senior government figures.

One gets the impression that they are not so far fetched. Especially as Lord Mandleson has been caught in the Epstein morass. I just wonder how many other Lords have been involved in these various pedophile rings 

It's pretty clear now that there's an overwhelming amount of credible evidence that the great and the good are none of the sort. They are a risible bunch of sexual predators that need taking down a peg or two.

They need reminding they are not above the law. 

And don't get me started on the links between the elite child sex rings and the Pakistani rape gangs. Again, there is credible evidence the two are linked, which is why the great and the good won't investigate. Because Turkeys don't vote for Christmas and pedos don't vote for an inquiry into pedos. 

Prove me wrong.

Lets have a full investigation with statutory powers that has no terms of reference and is able to poke into every rabbit hole it finds. 

The top of the greasy pole is a cesspit of sexual depravity. The cliche of an MP visiting a Madam, or a Dominatrix for a bit of sexual action is quite tame and innocent in comparison to the reality of what went on.

These people are the worst of humanity.

Finally, Dragon Has Sailed.

HMS Dragon has finally left Portsmouth, a week after receiving orders to prepare to go to sea.

Two full days on the ammunition pontoon suggests she is taking a full load-out with her. She is apparently expecting action. 

I'm glad the Captain and the Admirals in charge are taking no chances, but it does give an indication of what paper tigers we have for Warships under normal circumstances. Warships with no weapons are not warships. They are just training barges. 

The government's whole attitude to defence needs a complete bloody shakeup. These are weapons of war, not gin palaces. They are not floating exhibition centres either.

The MOD needs to give it's head a wobble and start being the Ministry of DEFENCE. At the very least, it should be able to defend this country from any and all threats external. 

As a side task, it should also be ready to defend the public from larger internal threats that the Police cannot control.

3-5 years. I give them 3-5 years before they will be called on.

I Called it: MODs Lack of Air Defences in Clear View.

Well, the Iranian attack on Akrotiri Airbase has shown, in clear view, the lack of Air Defences at UK airbases.

I predicted this last year: Delphius' Debate: British Military Wargamers Panic About Lack of Anti-Air Assets in the UK.

I also predicted that the only option we would have would to be deploy Type 45 Destroyers in the path of any incoming air threat, because that's the only assets we have capable of air defence. We have no land-based air defence assets capable of taking out drones.

Today HMS Dragon, a type 45 Destroyer, leaves Portsmouth headed for Cyprus. A multi-billion pound asset, designed to defend a carrier fleet, sent to defend an island against drones that cost hundreds of thousands of pounds. 

A single Sea Ceptor missile costs around two million pounds. 

This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut. 

The MOD really needs to get on the case procuring a cheap, reliable air defence system capable of defending against drones. 

Ideally a layered system, with small, cheap guided missiles providing longer range defence, then for close in work, we can have laser weapons mounted on mobile units (so they are not set in fixed, attackable positions) that can be moved around an airfield. 

There are already systems available that can intercept ballistic missiles. Luckily the UK is too far away from Iran to be concerned with those (although it's not beyond the Iranians to develop the facility to launch missiles (say) from a beached ship).

But again, it would be prudent to look at procuring an air defence system capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, because we will require a defence against them eventually. 

And the 6 type 45 destroyers we have won't protect the UK indefinitely. They can't defend two carriers at sea and the UK as well, all at the same time. 

The UK and it's military bases at home and abroad are inadequately defended. It's time that changed in response to the increased threat from cheap drone-type threats.