More on the Psychopathic Woman.

The link to Female Psychopathy and woke was a kind of revelation. It answered quite a lot of basic questions. 

Questions that didn't have answers in a sane world. But to add Psychopathy into the mix and then it becomes clear.

As I've said, Female Psychopathy has a major influence on Woke. The Psychopathic female uses fake empathy for a cause to hide her own lack of empathy and signal her virtue and status to others. Factors she covets above all others and uses as a screen or shield against criticism from others.

But female Psychopathy also then answers the phenomenon of Trans kids. Children of a very young age being transitioned. BY THEIR PARENTS.

Again, the empathy towards their children is not real, it's manufactured to again gain status and virtue. Things the Psychopathic Woman doesn't possess. 

A normal nurturing woman will most likely take a child that is saying they wany to be the opposite sex, or a cat, or something that is clearly fantasy, and let them play with it. But only in the terms of play, understanding that at some point the child will tire of the notion and revert back to normality.

Not the Psychopathic Woman. She will latch onto that difference and process that the child is unhappy not being a cat and therefore they must be a cat, must actually be a cat, in order to make them happy.

And so the Psychopathic Woman will take the child's fantasy to a point above and beyond a level that any sane person would. I reckon that if there was some way to surgically change the child into an actual cat, then she's force the child through that procedure. Because making the child happy is a mother's job isn't it? Look at how good a mother I am, by surgically altering my child to be the thing they want to be.

As it stands, the only recourse available to the Psychopathic Woman with a cat-child, is to force EVERYONE ELSE to accept that her child is actually a cat. Family, the school, doctors, and other professionals that interact with the child.

Because denying the unreality of the situation would make her child unhappy.

Psychopathy also answers in some way the rise of what is colloquially known as the Karen. Basically a woman who will interfere and claim some fake superiority over their victim.

I'm not yet at a point to understand what has caused the rise of this psychopathy. It's possibly because it has allowed to rise. The freedom of women to express themselves has allowed the number of psychopathic women able to express themselves or be in a position to impose those views and beliefs on the wider world has occurred.

It's possible that in this modern world, the Psychopathic Woman has never been told No, or has had her "stranger" tendencies suppressed in childhood. 

And to be clear, this is not a misogynist rant. I'm quite comfortable with women in general. This is an observation I've made, looking at the modern phenomenon of woke and the conclusions I've made.

I like all women, even the Psychopathic ones, but the observation is there are distinct types of women, as there are distinct types of men. But you never see the nurturing type of woman involved in activism, or the manipulation of society.

I have a feeling the nurturing type of woman would understand that suicidal empathy, of signaling virtue to the detriment of wider society is lunacy. 

Because it is.

Woke: The Product of Psychopathic Women?

Okay,  I've had an insight into the reason that the country and the West in General is in the Fucking Mess it's in right now.

Psychopathic Women.

More generally, we have let Psychopathic Women into positions of authority and power. 

Let me explain. 

Psychopathic women are more likely to be career women and are more likely to compete with men directly in a men's world. They are driven, competitive, all the things required to succeed in a competitive, dog-eat-dog male dominated space.

Most women are nuturing, and don't really care for all the elbows-out edgy competition of the boardroom. You're not likely to see a nurturing type of woman in a boardroom. They're happy to be at home looking after kids. Or if they have to, take a small job, possibly as a care worker, or maybe a assistant at school. In my day they were dinner ladies.

But, oh boy, the other end of the spectrum is the Psychopathic Woman. She revels in the competition, she'll bury her competition, destroy them, usually through reputational damage. She is totally ruthless and you can rate her success on the number of bodies she leaves in her wake.

You find them on the board of large corporations, charities, local government, the post office and the civil service. See also female MPs. Generally they are useless at the job they are employed to do, because they priority is their reputation. They use other people to do their job for them. She uses underlings to bolster her status and gladly burns them out and casts them aside to maintain it.

I met one once, when I went for a job interview. All the terms of the job were agreed in interview, I was a good fit and was offered the job. A week later I was contacted by her and told I could have the job only if I accepted a 25% pay cut. 

I'm not a huge pussy, so I told her where to go. It was an absolute no from me and she was welcome to go and find someone elsewhere who could do the job for that money. 

And that's the sort of woman I'm talking about: deceptive, manipulative, ruthless, and without a shred of morality or decency. If you offered someone a job at a certain salary, and that was the salary offered before the interview, it was agreed and shaken on in the interview, who in their right mind would then phone up a week later and say "actually, I was thinking of paying you considerably less money than we agreed on".

That's not etiquette, that's not how you build loyalty. But the Psychopathic woman doesn't care, doesn't value those things. You're just another body in her wake to the top. She's crushed the souls of so many people to get to that point, you're another victim.

But where does woke come into this, I hear you ask?

Well, the Psychopathic woman uses virtue signaling to cover her lack of natural empathy. She will virtue signal HARD.

Her lack of true empathy means she will virtue signal a company into the ground (sound familiar?).

Her lack of empathy means she will virtue herself out of existence. And here comes woke. The Psychopathic woman will virtue signal men into women's spaces, will virtue signal rapists into those spaces and berate the woman who was raped for highlighting the problem, because it interferes with her virtue.

Another example being the Rape Gangs. How a woman can argue against the wrongness of the rape of another woman staggers me. But we have huge numbers of women excusing the rape of children, because the virtue afforded by the promotion of diversity trumps (in their mind and their social spaces) the virtue of saving kids from being gang raped. 

Another example is the woman who blocked the ICE convoy in America and was surrounded by ICE agents with guns. Any normal woman would have stopped and complied once the agents drew their guns. But not the Psychopathic woman. She will continue past the point that any sane person would. She got shot in the face for it. 

There are plenty of instances of clearly Psychopathic women being interviewed and you get the sense they would insist that black is white in order to secure some tenuous virtue or reputational point over their interviewer. The same applies if the Psychopathic woman is the interviewer: she will do her utmost to trap the person she is interviewing in some sort of gotcha moment, in order to raise her social status and virtue.

For instance calling someone a racist for enquiring about the reasons and mechanisms why a large proportion of Pakistani men are child rapists. There's that social status hierarchy at play again. Raped working class kids aren't half as valuable in the virtue stakes as promoting the importation of families from war torn countries. And even if you try to burst the Psychopathic bubble and show evidence they aren't families, they are 90% fighting age male coming into the country, they will refuse to believe it.

Psychopathic. Up to to the point of eradicating all that affords them the comfort of their cushy (usually middle-class) societal bubble. Even as the Muslim hoards are wrapping the Burka round her head and enforcing it by beatings, as the female rights her grandmothers and great-grandmothers won by protesting even to the point of death are eroded, the Psychopathic woman will be trumpeting the how eradicating all of those hard-won rights affords HER some higher status above her peers.

Psychopathic women, I feel are responsible for the rise of woke. They are also responsible for a lot of other new malaises that have started to corrupt society.

The thing to look out for is that claim of a raise of status above her peers. The latest efforts to "think of the Children" and censor the internet, ban kids off it, and now to ban VPNs because the kids can use them to get around the laws the adults created. 
All are the result of some form of fake virtue, some claim for faux status to raise her up compared to her peers.

New Land Tax: We've Been Here Before.

Thatcher came up with the poll tax. A tax based on the value of your property and payable, divided between the adults in the house.

When that happened, we had riots in the streets. The Poll tax riots of 1990

The Socialists revolted, because they had to pay part of the bill that their parents typically paid.

The government then relented and although notionally based on the value of your property (set in bands) council tax was per household. The bands created a reasonable variation between upper and lower bands. Because we're all paying for the same services, it's reasonable to expect to pay a similar amount, with those better off paying a slightly higher cost. With this new system, how can government justify demanding 300 quid from one household and 48 grand from another for the same service?

It wasn't a percentage of the value of the property up to an unlimited value, there was at least an upper limit, controlled by the tax bands.

Now we have the idea of a land tax, based on a percentage of the value of the property, with no upper limit.

If I had a house worth £1 million, my tax liability would be £48,000, more than any wage I've ever earned in my life. In fact I currently earn half that figure. So for me, owning a million pound house is completely out. Thanks Labour.

So how do Labour intend to limit the land tax based on the ability to pay? 

Or is this a way of freeing up expensive properties by seizing them from people that can't pay? New HMOs for the migrants?

Also, I can't say that the charity Omaze and similar charities are happy about this. They buy high value properties, and raffle them off for charity. 

Now currently, you could aspire to owning such a property, because the council tax on it wouldn't be higher than your annual earnings. It won't even be close to rental costs. So it makes sense to have a punt on the charity and hopefully live the high life in a million pound mansion.

A land tax kills that model instantly. Why would you want to be saddled with a tax liability that takes years of salary to earn? 

It kills aspiration. Which is a typical socialist scumbag move. Let's drag everyone down to our level of misery, because they're jealous of your wealth.