On Reform's Chances in the Denton and Gorton by-election.

I was up in t'North at the weekend. It being the 2nd anniversary of the passing of my mother. We visited her grave and also did some shopping in Denton.

Talking to friends and relatives, you'd think that Reform would romp away with the seat. 

However, I know the Northern voter. They're the sort of person that would vote for a pig in a wig wearing a Red Rosette (cue Angela Rayner jokes). 

So things aren't as clear cut as the National polls would suggest. 

I do perceive a sense of frustration with Labour and especially the complete inability to move the political pointer to any shade other than red. Most thinking people would vote Reform, just because they are a hail Mary in an attempt to break the Labour monopoly that has allowed corruption to flourish in the North with little or no pushback.

Just look at the lack of enquiry into the rape gangs. Labour councillors have been implicated by various low-level informal enquiries. Councillors that have now gained high office as MPs. 

No wonder Labour are reluctant to investigate.

Anyway, I will look with some interest upon the by-election. 

On the Epstein Files...

The first observation is that Bill Gates is fucked (not in the biblical sense this time) but the financial sense.

If Melissa Gates didn't already know what was going on and divorced him for that, then the new Epstein revelations should ensure a lawsuit ensues.

The second observation is: how the hell can the people in the Epstein files tell us how to live our lives? They are most powerful, yet the most depraved people in existence. How can they claim the moral ground to tell us all what to do?

I mean, I've done my bit of semi-public pervery, but I don't force people to lead pious lives under threat of arrest and prison.

ANYONE holding high office mentioned in the Epstein files and that has provably had extramarital sex, or sex with a minor, should immediately resign from office or be forced out of office.

First UK scalp is Lord Mandleson. But I just wonder who else still in place in the Labour hierarchy is mentioned in the Epstein documents? Who else will  be tainted by the debauchery on the Island? Is anyone else in Parliament mentioned?

Still no confirmation of who was benefitting from the Epstein operation. It doesn't have the smell of a CIA operation. The whiff is distinctly of Mossad, although there could be a curveball in there and it turn out to be Russia or China. Both are equally evil and up to the task of running an operation like this.

I mean, why would Mossad compromise an ally? Or for instance a member of our Royal Family?

That still doesn't make sense to me. Other than they are influencers, and may allow Mossad access to more influential figures, but I'm scratching my head as to why they would do that to an ally. Especially going to the lengths they went to and the numbers of people involved.

The 4D chess answer is that it was Russia or China posing as Mossad running the operation. But that's a bit of a stretch.

We already know that China directly finances academics in our universities. They seem to prefer the direct approach.

 

The Evil of the Left in America.

People are getting into a shouting match about the latest shooting by ICE Agents in America. Let's be clear. If the woman that was pushed didn't intervene in the ICE operation, if the guy that was unfortunately shot didn't intervene in the ICE action as well, then he would be alive.

The left want these people to be killed. To prove a point. That is how evil they are. The left are whipping up tensions, agitating activists to get involved and directly confront ICE agents, with as seen, possibly lethal consequences. 

If the left backed off, If they stopped whipping up people to impede federal agents from doing their duty, then at least two people would be alive today.

But no, the left want the tension, the agitation, the aggression, so ICE agents will make mistakes and someone will get shot. 

They can't have people peacefully protesting and just holding placards at a safe distance, because that doesn't meet their requirements. 

And isn't it typical of the Left that they whip up tensions in other people, so it's other people that get shot, not the people at the top?