Explaining the Strange Socialist/Islamist Alliance.

I've blogged a number of times about the Socialist/Islamist alliance and how it's worked out in other countries. 

Essentially it ends up bad for the Socialists, because once the alliance gains power, the Islamists have the monopoly on violence and eradicate the Socialists. I mean, you can see it here in the UK: can you imagine the Soy-Latte Liberals in the Green party fighting against a bunch of tooled-up Islamic fundamentalists? 

No, neither can I. The Greenies would be wiped out, screaming "I'm with you, I'm your friend, I voted for you!"

Much like that woman outside the shop in France the other day, except with knives and guns.

But why do the Liberals in the Greens align themselves with the Fundamental Islamists? I mean, it's obviously not a relationship that would last, because the greens support Gay Rights, Women's rights, LGBTQ+++ rights. Basically the Greens support people's rights to do anything they want, screw anyone they want, dress up as anyone they want, take drugs if they want, the full liberal shtick.

And they're cosying up to Islamists who hate everything they stand for? Why?

The answer is Power.

Right now, on their own, neither side can gain traction and win elections. The Greens are a batshit crazy party that would only gain single digit percent of the vote. The Islamists might do better, but they are still a one trick pony.

The Denton and Gorton By-election was an aberration, with Starmer at his Zenith approval-wise, with Labour fielding a European immigrant with an accent no-one could understand. 

The Greens won 40% of the vote. In an area with an Islamic immigrant population close to that. 

In effect the Greens won, where they would normally be obliterated. Labour lost with 25% of the vote, because they lost the Islamic voter base. 

In that by-election the green/Islamic alliance worked. And so it will in other elections, as the Islamists Ally with the Greens and Labour Party, depending on which has the better chance of winning and gaining power.

And that's the name of the game. It's just about Islamists using the useful idiots in the Green Party and the Labour Party to gain power. Where they can't gain power themselves, they can certainly influence the rule-makers, claiming oppressed minority status and using that to close down dissent.

Where the Islamic community on it's own can win elections, we then get "Independent" Islamic candidates. Not yet brave enough to claim membership of a full Islamic party, but just "Independent" yet when they get power they align with Pro-Islam Labour and  The Greens. 

Then the Islamists can start to restrict non-Islamic movements, give Islam special protection, the list goes on. 

And that's what it's all about. 

Are European Governments Schizophrenic?

I've been talking online recently about Europe and European governments and their inability to govern in the interests of their citizens. 

I've said previously that I thought our government were delusional. The signs are there, believing in a different reality than the reality we can see in front of our eyes.

I think I blogged about it a year ago, when a Labour MP went on question time and when asked about the small boats arriving, went on about how these boatloads of men women and children deserve our hospitality. And he was mortified when confronted with the fact that 90% of the immigrants were men. You could see on his face, that was not the reality he saw. 

I now think that I've come to understand our government and other European governments. They are Schizophrenic. 

The definition of Schizophrenia is:

Schizophrenia is a long-term mental health condition that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, often causing them to lose touch with reality.

So far, so good. It seems to describe our government to a tee.

Lets have a look at the symptoms:

Symptoms are generally grouped into three main categories: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive issues.

Okay, so there's a bit going on. But let's have a look at positive (in individuals) Symptoms.

Positive Symptoms (Experiences Added to Reality)

These involve a loss of touch with reality or new features not present before: Yeah, out of touch with reality. Sounds like a typical European cabinet, or the European Commission. Seeing families in boats that don't exist, diversity being a strength, immigrants not adding to crime. 

• Hallucinations: Sensing things that are not real. Hearing voices is the most common form, though people can also see, smell, taste, or feel things that are not there. I think I could substitute this for voices from outside government: the voices nudging the government to do the things they do. like "Just do this and I'll donate 10 Mil to the cause..." 

• Delusions: Strong, false beliefs that do not change even when shown clear evidence or facts. Examples include paranoia, feeling like someone is plotting against you, or believing you have special powers. Here's a good one: false beliefs. That would include Diversity is a strength, a man can be a woman, immigrants are a net benefit, immigrants don't need to assimilate, net zero isn't ruining the country to reduce global carbon by less than one percent. Special powers: how about believing you are a saint, and everyone else is a monster. Believing someone is plotting against you? Well, was a real fear if your name was Kier Starmer.

• Disorganised Thinking and Speech: Difficulty organizing thoughts, leading to jumbled speech, jumping between unrelated topics, or speech that is hard for others to understand ("word salad"). Aha! Word Salad. Has anyone hard a politican recently? Word Salad describes exactly the words that come out of their mouths as they deny reality and try to sound convinciing.

• Disorganised or Catatonic Behavior: Unpredictable movements, awkward body postures, or staying completely still for long periods Just two words here: Kier Starmer. Let me be clear, the son of a toolmaker was as catatonic when making speeches as he could possibly be. 

If that's the positive symptoms, what the hell are the negative ones? A propensity to press the nuclear launch button? Lock up people for tweeting opinions?

Negative Symptoms (Capabilities or Emotions Taken Away)

These represent a reduction or loss of normal functions and emotions:

• Flat Affect: Speaking in a dull tone, showing little facial expression, or seeming emotionless. Yep, we're back to Kier Starmer again, aren't we. 

• Social Withdrawal: Losing interest in spending time with friends, family, or social activities. Oh, come on! Stop with teh Starmer-bashing! He left for...reasons. Mainly because bully Burham was going to kick his butt 

• Avolition (Lack of Motivation): Trouble starting or finishing daily tasks, work, or goal-oriented activities. Now this could describe any Labour cabinet member videoed walking into number 10. None of them look particularly motivated. And none of them seem to stay in a job for any length of time and if they do, they're pretty piss-poor at the job. 

• Neglect of Personal Care: Difficulty maintaining hygiene, grooming, or everyday routines. Have you seen Angel Rayner? Looks like she's been on a bender for the last 18 months. And Burham has aged a decade in only 3 months. 

• Anhedonia: Inability to feel pleasure or joy in activities previously enjoyed. Well, as the Left now see jokes as hate speech, I'd say that symptom was spot on. 

Cognitive Symptoms Now it gets good. Just look at the list below and apply it to any Labour cabinet member. 

These affect mental processing and everyday functioning:

• Trouble concentrating or paying attention.

• Memory problems (difficulty with short-term or working memory).

• Difficulty making decisions, planning, or understanding everyday situations 

I'm afraid the diagnosis is clear. Schizophrenia. Our government is mentally ill. Literally mentally ill. 

It's pretty clear to me now that the whole political class of Europe is also just as mentally ill as the UK government. Except Poland. Hungary is in the early stages after the elections earlier this year.

For Hungary, look up the Schizophrenic Prodromal Phase.  

Unfortunately, I don't know how you treat group schizophrenia. I assume education, getting the patient to identify their condition and accept treatment for it. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, getting them to think correctly, and gradually bring them back to accept actual reality than some ideologically induced fantasy. 

Or you could just kick them out at the next election and induce a hard reset of government. 

Thoughts on France.

I'm watching the riots in France and especially Paris with some interest, mainly because I'm due to take a trip over there in the next few weeks.

Is this the start of the civil war we've been told is imminent? 

It certainly feels like the start of an "Arab Spring" style uprising. It always starts with teenagers throwing rocks and breaking stuff, setting fire to shit and then it escalates, because it's been planned in advance.

We've been told civil war is some way away, The experts cite some arbitrary critical mass like when migrants reach a majority, or significant minority.

Yet in every other country where the Muzzies have taken over, all they needed was a substantial minority, because they were aided by the useful idiots, the Socialists and Communists. Between them, they made up a significant minority and were able through force and violence to take control.

And then once they take power, the Muzzies eliminate the Socialists, because the Socialists don't expect their fraternal friends to turn on them. But they do, every single time.

This happens especially in a country where the majority neither had the expectation of civil war (due to the small minority of immigrants/anti Westerners), nor the means to defend themselves against it (no access to weapons for defence). I notice the French countryside is currently peaceful, mainly because the French countryside still have a lot of guns and hunters able to use them.

A substantial minority with weapons and the will to use them with force can quite easily take control of an unarmed majority. I suspect that we'll see French cities fall first, setting up anti-Western areas and road blocks, 

It all really depends on if the Muslim Brotherhood think the time is right to make a move. Or if this is just testing the water to see how useful the Socialists are and how far they can go without serious pushback from the French Government. 

Currently France is finding out they are really close to the limit of what is possible from the Muslim/Socialist alliance. And it's all thanks to French Socialist/Communist extremists and their ability without any sense of irony to join a cause that wants their extermination.

Thanks to the Socialists aiding the Muzzy minority Civil war is closer than you think here in the UK too. Thankfully not as close as France. Over there there are a huge number of socialists. Over here, not as many as you think, because our socialists used to grow up and become Capitalist adults.

Well they did, when they were locked into capitalism by buying a house, getting a well-paid job and having a family. These days, that's a lot less possible, so socialist students tend to stay embittered socialists well into adulthood. 

But you may think the antagonists in the UK don't have any weapons, how can they start and more importantly win a civil war?

Well, you don't think the traffickers just smuggle people, do you? Networks like that also smuggle drugs and weapons. It's just that they use the people smuggling dinghies to overwhelm the agencies tasked to fly over the channel in reconnaissance aircraft and check on the boats coming across. So the expensive fast boats carrying the good stuff get across unchallenged.

And yes, we do have aircraft flying over the channel almost 24/7. Border force are leasing a couple of De Haviland Canada Dash-8 ISR aircraft, and when they are done doing a 10 hour shift, we're getting Coastguard aircraft flying down from Yorkshire, Cumbria and Scotland to fill in, especially overnight.

Except the aircraft are grounded when there's too much of a swell and the dinghies stop crossing. But not the fast ribs...

It's virtually impossible to Police the channel while Border Force are busy being a taxi service. There are plenty of leisure craft that sail or motor from France to the UK unchallenged. 

If we did actually have a hot civil war, how would it be fought? 

The UK Army, the people trained in using guns measures some 70,000 people. But that's including the people that are not front-line personnel. That's the cooks, the logistics people, the transport drivers, dentists, nurses, doctors. Even the 70,000 number is surpassed just by the number of illegal immigrants. Let alone the extremist Muslims that are citizens of the UK and their Socialist friends. 

But which side would the Army be on? Because it's certainly clear that the Government and the Police are not friends of those that oppose immigration, so it could well be the people vs The Armed Forces, Police and all the agencies of Government that have a monopoly on violence alongside the Muslims and the weapons stashes they have in Mosques.

Whatever form the civil war takes, it won't be along the usual alliances or partitions. 

How many of the armed forces will defect and align with the people? The unarmed Police, probably first in the firing line will be irrelevant. The armed Police may side with the government. But their numbers are pitifully small and easily eliminated, after which we descend into lawlessness.

So it would be difficult at the moment to see what alliances would form and how they would pan out into the meaty part of the war, beyond the initial skirmishes.

I see three main groups. The mainly Christian majority (Aligned with anti-Muslim immigrants like Sikhs and Hindus) , the government and the Muslims. The Socialists may align with the government or the Muslims. I have a feeling the government would align with the Muslims against the Christian majority, just because that's where they will be told to align from their Gulf-State sponsors. 

Although you may break it down even further into two groups depending on their backers. The Muslims backed by Gulf money and the Christians backed (hopefully) by America. 

Anyhow, I'm getting ahead of myself. No civil war here. Yet.

I will watch France with interest. And possibly I'll have a front-row seat when I'm in Paris.