The Foiled Attack on RAF Fairford USAF Base.

There are pictures circulating the internet showing the alleged terrorists being arrested. Someone seemed to get a drone up pretty quick to document things. That in itself smells fishy.

But I'm womdering about the attack. The men themselves look too well -groomed for your average illegal immigtant. Rhether that's deliberate to fit in and cause confusion during the attack, I don't know. 

But it seems strange that what could be an Islamic attack would have purely African origins. Not a single man looked to be Middle-Eastern.

Could this be a false-flag attack? If so, by whom? Who would benefit from the attack? If created by the British, how would a group of African men help their push against the supposed "Far-Right"? 

Or would it help the Communists in power to sever ties with America?

If America, how would they use the attack?

I have a theory about the attack. I'm not going to share just yet. But I have blogged about it already. Fair play Yanks!

Migrants: The Cost Before They Enter the UK.

I've been looking at FlightRader24 more and more since I learned of the converted Dash-8 airliner that border force are using to overwatch the channel.

It did a 10 hour shift over the channel yesterday. I assume it had maxxed out its crew hours and possibly maintenance as well, because after it landed, a coastguard aircraft flew down from Hull to take over.

See here:

 

Note the time: 22:49. There are still UK assets flying over the channel at that time. 

Now, don't get me wrong, there may have been no dinghies, but it seems more than a little suspicious that the "rescue" vessels in the channel all withdrew. Because the dinghies full of migrants stopped.

Is Thursday night "Drug and Weapons Night". Because it seems a bit sus to just suddenly stop after a number of days sending dinghies across. The sea conditions were the same as before. But is this the night that the proper serious fast boats launch from France and drop their goods?

Are the surveillance aircraft working? Are they spotting migrants on the beaches and stopping them from getting to the water? Or is this an accord with the traffickers?

But if the answer is either of those, at what cost?

We are not only putting large boats out to sea on a regular basis to pick up the migrants, but we're also paying the French several hundred million pounds to stop the dinghies and at the same time we're running something akin to a military operation to surveil the channel and the French coast.  

Before the migrants arrive, before they are processed by Border Force, before they are housed during and after processing, before we go through the machinations of the legal system of claims and counter claims for asylum, before we count the cost of Policing the criminal activity the migrants are bringing to our shores. 

How much is all of this costing?

And if we really, really put an effort in and changed the law so that we just refused ALL asylum claims from ANYONE not using legal routes, how quickly would the dinghies stop and how much money would we save from not having to do all of the surveillance and "rescue" operations?

Conscription: A Flaw in the Plan.

I do wonder if the Government are really serious about conscription and if they have really thought it through.

Let me explain:

The government are going to recruit by force, a cohort of people that for the past 30 years the government have essentially abused. That cohort has been the last in the line for benefits of any kind, social housing, role models in media... you name it, the cohort have been browbeaten for decades.

But the government think it's a good idea to train this cohort up militarily and give them guns. Real guns. 

The government think they can manipulate the cohort into pointing the guns at the government's enemy. 

It's quite possible the cohort won't see the government's enemies as their enemies. As they say, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. 

The government may find the guns pointing back at them, much like the elites of Russia did in 1917. 

And as the government is quite obviously shitting it's pants at the recent events around the migrant crisis, especially the mental leaps it's making to jail Tommy Robinson and now Danny Tommo, I think the government are slowly coming to reaslise the reality now.

Luckily, for now, the irregular forces coming back from Ukraine haven't yet transferred their weapons expertise to the common man. But The more come back and share knowledge around cooking up explosives and weaponising commercial drones, you can bet your bottom dollar that issues will start to arise. 

I mean, it doesn't take much for a FPV drone carrying a couple of grenades to fly into the middle of the channel and dispatch a dinghy load of migrants. Or to convert an old jetski into a high sped floating Kamikaze weapon. The technology is readily available and the expertise is in Ukraine learning.

The government really need to start treating their working class better and providing opportunities for enrichment, rather than just a life on benefits. Because all it takes is one tech-savvy squaddie to come home from Ukraine and become disgruntled at their treatment and then you'll quite literally have a war on your hands.

Maybe that's the war the government is expecting and it's not war with Russia after all.