Migrant Watch - a New Page

I want to keep a record of how many resources are used and how often to support the dinghy crossings of the channel. It gives you an idea of the vast amounts of money and resources being used in the operation in the channel. 

I will be monitoring wave height in the channel, any French, Spanish or Portuguese (Yes, it's not just French) vessels in the channel shadowing the dinghies to the UK border in the channel. UK vessels are trickier to identify because they have a habit of turning off their AIS systems, so you can't see them to track them. 

So for instance:

Tuesday 27/10/2026 Time 12:34 No likelihood of dinghy traffic today due to weather.

Wind 20Knts

Wave Height 8Ft

Border Force Aircraft on station and registration: No 

Coast Guard Aircraft on station, registration and origin: No 

Vessels Attending in the channel.

European:

Abeille Normandie 10 miles off Boulogne. Speed: 14Knts

British:

Dungeness Lifeboat active but not launched.

Newhaven Lifeboat active but not launched.

No likelyhood of dinghy traffic today due to weather.

The Problem for Ukraine using Starlink.

There's a row going on betwwen Urkraine, Starlink, Elon Muskm and the U.S. government.

It appears Starlink is being throttled. That has a huge effect on the First Person Vision (FPV) drones that Ukraine use against Russia. Slow response means that the camera feeds from the drones are useless. A flying drone needs instantaleous video so the pilot can fly it.

So currently Ukraine cannot reliably fly it's long-range drones, instead having to rely on the relatively short range battlefield drones guided by optical cable.

No more drones targetting Russian territory, Russian refineries, fuel dumps, or airfields.

Now the blame is being bounced between Elon Musk, who says the throttling must be governental. The U.S, government laying the blame on Elon.

I'll go into the whys and wherefores of the throttling in a minute, but let's look at where Ukraine is at the moment. They military is relying on a satellite network owned by a private company based in a completely different country. This is not a military-grade asset. I'll sure Starlink the company has decent security, but it never will be the highest of the high. It is not protected by an official secrets act, backed by the full force of the government for instance. It doesn't have NSA-level encryption.

So Russia themselves could have hacked the Starlink network.

Russia themselves have military-grade assets in space. They have tested satellite killer satellites. It could have been a call from a Russian asset to Starlink to warn them that if they keep up supplying hight speed internet to Ukraine, they will be targetted. Unless they start making Starlink unable to support long distance real time video, then they may find the Starlink network turning into a shell of high speed dust around the planet.

The U.S government or Trump himself may have thought himself slighted by Ukraine during the several attempts to creat a peace deal. A number of times we've been told it is close, only for it to fall down. Trump himself could have ordered the slowdown, in an effort to make Ukraine see reason and settle for peace. 

Who knows. But I do know that a military force in the middle of a war relying on civilian assets controlled from a third country is building on foundations of sand. Never have your military rely on assets it cannot itself control. 

By all means use it, but don't rely on it.

But for now, the Ukraine military needs to restrict their ambitions. The weak point in their ambition has been exposed.

Explaining the Strange Socialist/Islamist Alliance.

I've blogged a number of times about the Socialist/Islamist alliance and how it's worked out in other countries. 

Essentially it ends up bad for the Socialists, because once the alliance gains power, the Islamists have the monopoly on violence and eradicate the Socialists. I mean, you can see it here in the UK: can you imagine the Soy-Latte Liberals in the Green party fighting against a bunch of tooled-up Islamic fundamentalists? 

No, neither can I. The Greenies would be wiped out, screaming "I'm with you, I'm your friend, I voted for you!"

Much like that woman outside the shop in France the other day, except with knives and guns.

But why do the Liberals in the Greens align themselves with the Fundamental Islamists? I mean, it's obviously not a relationship that would last, because the greens support Gay Rights, Women's rights, LGBTQ+++ rights. Basically the Greens support people's rights to do anything they want, screw anyone they want, dress up as anyone they want, take drugs if they want, the full liberal shtick.

And they're cosying up to Islamists who hate everything they stand for? Why?

The answer is Power.

Right now, on their own, neither side can gain traction and win elections. The Greens are a batshit crazy party that would only gain single digit percent of the vote. The Islamists might do better, but they are still a one trick pony.

The Denton and Gorton By-election was an aberration, with Starmer at his Zenith approval-wise, with Labour fielding a European immigrant with an accent no-one could understand. 

The Greens won 40% of the vote. In an area with an Islamic immigrant population close to that. 

In effect the Greens won, where they would normally be obliterated. Labour lost with 25% of the vote, because they lost the Islamic voter base. 

In that by-election the green/Islamic alliance worked. And so it will in other elections, as the Islamists Ally with the Greens and Labour Party, depending on which has the better chance of winning and gaining power.

And that's the name of the game. It's just about Islamists using the useful idiots in the Green Party and the Labour Party to gain power. Where they can't gain power themselves, they can certainly influence the rule-makers, claiming oppressed minority status and using that to close down dissent.

Where the Islamic community on it's own can win elections, we then get "Independent" Islamic candidates. Not yet brave enough to claim membership of a full Islamic party, but just "Independent" yet when they get power they align with Pro-Islam Labour and  The Greens. 

Then the Islamists can start to restrict non-Islamic movements, give Islam special protection, the list goes on. 

And that's what it's all about.