I watched Some Interesting Videos This Week.

I watched a few interesting videos this week. 

The first was on Theo Von's channel and featured John Kiriakou as a guest. He was asked about 911 and if it was preventable and if America had prior knowledge. I have a lot of time for John, I like his analysis and he basically talks the talk. You can't get much more authentic: he was jailed for whistleblowing on illegal CIA activity. So provably CIA ands not some Walter Mitty wannabe.
The link is to a short clip from the video. I might watch the full video this weekend.

His answer ties in very nicely with my analysis. He mentioned the al-Saud connection and the funding of terror plots by high-level individual in Saudi Arabia. He did say that the CIA never got to interrogate the individuals, they all mysteriously died days after America flagged them up to the Saudi Government as persons of interest. So they couldn't be interrogated and implicate the Saudi Government?

But this is where it gets murky, because you have private individuals with immense wealth bestowed to them by the state, funding (supposedly privately) terrorist organisations that support the extremist Wahabbi sect of Islam (that is the Islam of Saudi Arabia). In John's words, there was no smoking gun. But you know that it's just a set-up to avoid a direct link between the Saudi government and international terrorism. That money won't be moving without approval from someone.

And that's where the link is with my story about the assault on the compound in Afghanistan that went a bit pear-shaped on the night of Operation Rhino, the parachute drop into Afghanistan.  I'm convinced the senior Taliban and al-Qaida figures that were at that compound were meeting with individuals from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and possibly one other Gulf state to discuss matters of funding and the impending political situation regarding America and the imminent arrival of ground troops in strength (special forces had been in Afghanistan for weeks prior).

I believe that's why the (normally lightly armed) compound was so well armed that and why the defence of that compound was so fierce. As the West train the Saudi army amongst others, I would love to talk to someone that was at the compound that night and hear if they got "Western vibes" from the fighters inside the compound.
It's still coming to light the number of casualties from that particular operation that night. Initially The Yanks said one person injured, the tally has now risen to half a dozen injured as the truth slowly came out. But the real figures on casualties have yet to be made public. 

But, it's nice to see correlation kind of leaching into the public domain. 

The second video was on Chris Williamson's channel, he interviewed Ex_seal DJ Shipley. DJ has some unorthodox ideas about the war with Iran and how to solve the Iran problem. It involves nukes. 

Which is my take on things. If I was PM, I'd be ruthless. The advantage of being a sociopath. 

Iran is a problem because the leadership is dispersed and hard to hit with conventional weapons. The only solution is to eradicate the leadership by eradicating whole cities. Do you want to win the war or not? War is fought using any means necessary to win. There is no second place, no compromise.

If I was fighting the war, I'd be dropping tactical nukes along the Iranian and Yemeni coast to eliminate the missile and drone launch sites. I'd drop a nuke on each launch site after they had launched. It removes the launch site and any supporting infrastructure and personnel around the site. 

If I'd been PM during the time of 911 and I'd found out that Saudi individuals flew the planes into the Twin towers and that Saudi individuals were financing the Taliban and al-Qaida? I'd be having a serious talk with the Saudi government on how it would be a pity if Mecca disappeared in a mushroom cloud. And that I would lose zero sleep over it's loss. 

I might not need to do it, but I'd make damn sure the person I was talking to believe I would do it.

Which make you think that's the game Trump is playing. Except I don't think the death cultists in Iran believe him, or are that bothered. They're continuously push the boundaries, as they always do. 

If I were Trump, I'd target something far enough away from civilians, something important to the regime. possibly one of their facilities to make nukes, or ballistic missiles. And I would nuke it. A small tactical nuke. Just enough to make the place unusable for a couple of decades. 

On Ann Widdecombe And The Leftist Hate

Ann Widdecombe's killing has opened a debate on the Right about online Lefist hatred.

Guido Fawkes Reported that Hope Not Hate have deleted a web page attacking her.

There are other very hateful pages still available to view in the online leftiverse. And I genuinely mean quite hateful of her opinions. That's the stuff posted before she was murdered. The stuff after is hideous.

It's this sort of article that eggs on the weak of mind to commit hateful acts. The articles are borderline incitement, calling her views monstrous, calling her a bigot, transphobe, homophobe, etc.

She was opinionated, sure. Her religious beliefs guided her opinions and she was quite firm on them. But although she didn't agree with Gay Marriage, she still interacted and worked with Gay people. She didn't exclude them because their opinions differed from hers.

But that's where sane people leave opinions and beliefs. They are just that. It doesn't stop them being friends with people that have differing opinions.

However, it's the insane left that want everyone to have exactly the same opinions and beliefs they have and want to eradicate everyone who doesn't. 

And it's that sort of worldview, where people with different opinions should be silenced, or cancelled, or worse that is becoming increasingly dangerous.

And you have to ask yourself: what motivates a man to get in his car, drive 300 miles to the house of an elderly woman he doesn't know, who's personal circumstances he doesn't know, and batter her to death.  Given that it takes several hours to complete the journey, where he must have had many opportunities to recant, turn back, calm down and understand the lunacy of his anger, what gets that anger stoked up to the level that a 4 hour drive isn't enough to calm you down?

The only answer is the toxic ideology of the online leftiverse. Some might argue the ideas on the right are toxic, but the left major in personal attacks rather than attacks on ideas or ideology. 

The right do not attack people individually. The left do, with such venom that people are now dying because of it.

Finally, because I don't think it's sane to infer that a man can be enraged for a full four hour drive and not go through the various scenarios outlined above, lets add a little conspiracy theory. There must have been a third party supplying intelligence on Ann's circumstances to the murderer. He must have known she would be alone, unprotected. He must have been given that information in advance. As an example, I live a lot closer to Ann's house than the murderer, but I couldn't tell you where she lived even though it's now been widely reported.

In special ops and intelligence, you go into an operation with as much intel as you can as up to date as you can get it. Even to the point of scrubbing if anything changes on the journey to the delivery point. 

Ann's murder is the same. All other concerns must have been taken care of, so the murderer could concentrate on the task at hand. So that rage could be focused over that car journey. 

So along with who stoked up the guy to a point he wanted to murder the target, who exactly was supplying that on-site information to the murderer? 

And as I type this, it's reported that Zak Polanski has been reported by Nigel Farage to the Police for incitement. Good. Leftist hateful incitement needs calling out and stopping.

Burnham...

I've just come back from a week in the Welsh Mountains. A house full of Kids and grandkids.

Enjoyed myself so thoroughly and was distracted enough not to worry about the King of the North becoming PM. 

The first impression I get is he's a phenomenal talker. He can charm the birds out of the trees. How else can you explain the financial drain of the Northern Number 10 being pitched as a positive?

I man, how much is it going to cost to move the Prime Ministerial entourage up there once a week? Is that a justifiable cost in the current economic climate? Is that something a prudent Prime Minister would set up when the country is on it's knees and borrowing hand over fist? 

Of course not.

The financial stability of the country isn't something the Socialist elites worry themselves about. 

Burnham's plans involve more spending, more borrowing and divvying out backhanders to the mates that helped him into Downing Street. Not much different than a Tory to be honest.

I have provisionally named him Burnham the money-burner.