Kings Speech: Globalists Win. Again.

I can see that in the Kings speech there will be reform of planning law, making it easier to build where permission has been previously denied. That frees up swathes of land for new housing estates on green belt. 

Restrictions on wind farms in rural areas have been removed, meaning wealthy landowners and global energy companies can start the industrialisation of the countryside and start to earn big bucks. 

Along with the Great British Energy Bill, I'm sure the global energy companies will be rubbing their hands with glee. I only hope that Rolls Royce can get some of that cash to develop SMRs.  Keep the cash and the expertise in the UK.

Rail Nationalisation seems to be back on the cards, when the Railways aren't the most egregious of the formerly public companies flouting their responsibilities. The water companies should be first in line for Nationalisation, to stop them borrowing money to pay shareholders rather than invest in the company.

I could go on, but the salient point for working class people is the Pension Schemes Bill, which i don't doubt will be a vehicle to enable the government to reduce the state pension and/or increase the pension age again.

The Budget Responsibility Bill also has the ring of shaving money from welfare. 

This list (taken from the Order-Order Guido Fawkes website give a bit more detail.

• Committed to two-state solution. Isn't everyone? Except importantly the Palestinians.
• “Reset” of relations with EU. Closer ties to the EU through the back door. Increased Security and Defence co-operation.
• Strategic Defence Review. Scrapping Trident on the cards?
• House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill – Less hereditary peers and more cronies. Why not have a jury-type system employing normal people instead?
• Northern Ireland Legacy Legislation – More support for the IRA and less support for our armed services no doubt.
• Council of the Nations and Regions for collaboration. More WEF nonsense invading government.
• Draft Equality (Race and Disability) Bill Is that "equality" or "equity"? I have my suspicions.
• Armed Forces Commissioner Bill  Creating a Fall Guy for when Putin's nukes get through.
• Hillsborough Law A new law with which to crucify the people we catch doing things we don't like. Of course the ones we like will get away with stuff. A vehicle for political blackmail.
• Draft Conversion Practices Bill Ban C onversion therapy, replace it with Trans ideology. The "You're not Gay, you're a Woman" Bill.
• Tobacco and Vapes Bill makes a return. Remove choice from people. Government gets involved in something they don't need to.
• Mental Health Bill. A new set of rules to be able to lock away political and ideological opponents. Off to the re-education camps first and if that doesn't work, the Gulag.
• Football Governance Bill – Not sure why this is a thing. Does football need protecting? From whom? Sop to the working class? 
• Draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill I'm sure that rather than protect ordinary people from greedy companies buying leaseholds and charging extortionate ground rent, instead this will just enshrine the ability of greedy companies to charge extortionate ground rents.
• Renters’ Rights Bill A bill to dissuade ordinary people from becoming landlords, because you'll need tons of dosh to evict problem tenants. Removes competition in the rental market against the like of Blackrock.
• Skills England Bill I'm sure this will be a Bill to train immigrants rather than ordinary people who live here.
• Private school VAT. Ah, the jealousy & envy tax. It's Labour, there had to be at least one.
• Children’s Wellbeing Bill Rather than what it sounds like I'm sure this is a bill to give teachers more rights over children and the expense of parents rights. Possibly the end of home schooling so they can indoctrinate EVERYONE. 
• Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill Yeah, like that'll work. Unless it's a bill to fence off Parliament and prevent the proles from visiting or lobbying MPs.
• Crime and Policing Bill, Victims, Courts and Public Protection Bill Means less power to the people, easier to jail the uppity working class.
• Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Will be as useful as a chocolate fireguard. Successive governments have tried and failed. I'm convinced all it will do is just green-lights amnesties for immigrants. More cheap labour for global companies.
• Water (Special Measures) Bill Will do absolutely nothing.
• Sustainable Aviation Fuel (Revenue Support Mechanism) Bill Yay! More expensive air travel is our destiny. Get to stay home more.
• Great British Energy Bill More money for wealthy landowners and global corporations.
• Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill, Rail Reform Bill – Railway nationalisation. Half of it is already nationalised because the private companies can't make a profit despite charging huge fares. It's cheaper to fly than take the train. This is where the government take over nice new rolling stock and fail to invest in maintaining it. Again.
• Better Buses Bill Ah well, at least my bus pass will work further afield if this happens.
• English Devolution Bill More power to Khan and the other inner city Labour Crony Mayors. Pay per mile definitely on the cards.
• Employment Rights Bill Charter for lazy people. Employers can only contact you in office hours, no overtime. A lot like Union working practices. Supposedly giving employees the right to work at home irrespective of the requirements of the job. Gateway to 15 minute cities/ghettos/open prisons.
• Planning and Infrastructure Bill Less expense for big Corporate building firms and less green belt. 
• Industrial Strategy Council to be established. Well I suppose the decline of manufacturing has to be managed by/blamed on someone.
• Draft Audit Reform and Corporate Governance Bill, Pension Schemes Bill Ah, the raid on people's pensions. The pot of gold that the Tories are happy to leave alone. No fear from Labour though. A further raise of the retirement age on the cards? Scrapping of state pensions altogether?
• Budget Responsibility Bill Green light for fiscal irresponsibility.

Head of The American Secret Service Not Fit for the Post.

Kimberly Cheatle, the current head of the American Secret Service has gone on record saying that the roof where the Trump shooter fired from had too steep an incline for secret service staff to be positioned on.

She went on to say the slope of the roof was too much and too dangerous for snipers to be positioned on.

Yet the snipers protecting Trump were actually positioned on a different sloped roof, with a steeper incline.

So either she's deliberately lying, doesn't know what she is talking about or has been mis-informed. Either way, it doesn't look good for her. Better not to open your mouth and wait until you have all the facts. 

A simple "I don't know why security staff weren't placed on the roof" would suffice. But here we are again, some clueless staffer has been dropped into a position she has no clue about. And instead of deferring to experts or people with experience, she just shoots her mouth off as though what she is saying is the truth.

It may well be that the roof is not designed to bear the weight of a person and was rejected on that basis, but the slope was not a factor. But again, brainless Kimberly should really have got her facts straight before speaking to a national news outlet. However I don't think that weight was a factor either, because there are pictures of half a dozen officers on the roof "securing" the body of the shooter. So it could bear the weight of at least that many.

In her world and her management team, I'm sure her arrogantly stupid suggestions become policy, but unfortunately when it comes to the real world, outside the management bubble, she loses all credibility.

Clueless, Ill-Prepared, inexperienced, arrogant, I'd wager that she was all of those and more.

For her own sake she should resign, before she stuffs another Jimmy Choo in her big fat overpaid and underqualified gob. 

More on the Trump Shooter.

Some interesting snippets around the 20-year-old shooter that very nearly killed Trump.

First, the left are making big noises about him being registered as a Republican. It means nothing. Many people in the US are registered as one thing, but vote another way. In fact, in 2018 a lot of Democrats registered as Republicans deliberately. 

The shooter allegedly had links to Antifa. No real confirmation yet on that and possibly there won't be any confirmation, Antifa being such a nebulous organisation.

Apparently the kit he had cost a lot of money, possible a few thousand dollars. One has to ask how a 20-year-old got the money to invest in such equipment. How those sums of money being invested in a rifle didn't arouse suspicion with his parents. Or was there an outside influence at play?

The ladder that the shooter climbed was supposedly already placed there. Now I've not seen pictures of whether it was a fixed ladder, or a portable ladder that just happened to be set up on that building on the day of Trump's rally. If there was no fixed ladder then the security detail might have not bothered securing the roof because a previous sweep of the area showed the roof wasn't normally accessible. But somehow it had been made accessible on the day. And this 20-year-old who just happened to be radicalised enough to want Trump dead, just happened to turn up to the rally, just happened to come across an unsecured rooftop within clear sight of the stage with a means of easy access, and just happened to have all his sniper gear with him and just happened to take advantage of a roof top that was unsecured on the day of the rally and just happened to be able to get off a few shots before the security services retaliated with prejudice. What are the chances eh?

The security services have some questions to answer, mainly the amount of time they allowed the shooter to get into place and set up ready for a shot. I would assume the Police marksmen had him in their sights. Word is, the government snipers weren't given the go-ahead to shoot. Possibly they have to wait for the shooter to shoot first? In that case shouldn't standard operating practice be to secure the possible target (Trump) first, then assault the shooter, secure them and then ask questions. But it seems the Trump security details weren't given notice of the shooter, they didn't remove him from the stage or deploy ballistic shields to protect him whilst he's removed to the armoured vehicle parked at the side of the stage, 

Instead, the SOP seems to be not to notify the stage crew, dither about a bit watching the guy with a rifle crawl the length of a building, keep informing some central control about the situation, not get clearance to fire unless fired upon, yadda, yadda... You get the picture. Hardly the picture of the super-efficient and overly protective secret service we've come to expect. I assume the B or C team were on shift that day?

Trummp Assassination Attempt: Lack of Self-Awareness from the Left is Staggering

 Only the day before the assassination attempt of Trump, Nancy Pelosi was saying that only a couple of days ago that Trump was a danger or a threat to America. I can't remember if she went as far as to say he musty be stopped at all costs, but funnily enough that video on YouTube has disappeared.

Biden has already been quoted as saying pin a target on Trump.

Of course they say the comments are now being taken out of context. Yeah, the left, the people that take EVERYTHING out of context, even jokes. Have a taste of your own medicine, fuckers!

That sort of language has only one message. take Trump out. If we can't do it politically, if we can't do it legally, then help us and take him out in the literal sense.

Much is being made of the shooter being a registered Republican, however there were a number of Democrats in the last election that registered as Republicans and then voted Democrat. It was their way of skewing the polls and raising expectation in the Republican camp. They think it's a clever deception. Just like anything the left does, it's just plain childish.

But it's always interesting that the Left gaslight the right by saying it's all the right's fault, that the right are violent, that they use hurty words. The left use words like the right should be "crushed", or "obliterated", or worse.

The violence and the violent rhetoric always comes from the left.

It has to stop.

The left need to start living up to their own expectations of others. If they reckon words are violence, then violent words should not be uttered by them. To do otherwise is hypocrisy.