It's Nice to be Proven Right (2).

Yesterday it was reported by the BBC that asylum seekers were falsely claiming to be gay in order to strengthen their claim, because they said they would be persecuted back home.

Yep, been saying that for years. Claimants are playing the system, just like they play the benefits system and get help from so-called interpreters (who are basically advocates). 

Now, today it's reported asylum seekers are falsely claiming domestic violence in order to strengthen their asylum claim as well. 

Not only the two cases above, but the BBC have reported there's a whole raft of abuses of the system, including falsely claiming you're an atheist or have converted to Christianity.

Yep, been saying that immigrants have been lying on applications for years. 

Look, I've seen it first hand. 

Waaaaay back in 1980 I was made redundant and had to claim dole money. One of the things I immediately noticed was the Asian lady next to me had an interpreter with her. From the jist of the conversation I was overhearing, the interpreter was doing all the heavy lifting regarding the lady's claim. My first ever glimpse into the industry that supports immigrants and runs rings round the systems we have in place. That was 46 years ago. 

Just imagine how sophisticated and entrenched the system of cheating and gaming the system is now, after 50 years of not being investigated and stopped.

In my booth, I was getting short shrift. No help, no top-ups, not entitled to anything extra. Such was the icy reception, I rather facetiously asked, "can I have an interpreter", because I pointed up that the interpreter next door knew the system better than I and I would like an advocate to tell me what I could and couldn't claim for, rather than the icy reception and the "It's not my job to tell you what you're entitled to" response to my questions from the lady opposite.

I got the job centre death stare for pointing this out.

So, it doesn't surprise me in the least, that immigrants are gaming the system and people are helping them to do it. It's been going on for decades. They are gaming the system because it can be gamed. The people running the system are gullible enough to allow advocates into the system, rather than keep it the same for everyone. 

If solicitors are advising client to lie on their asylum claims, they should be struck off. End of. 

If those advising the claimants are interpreters, the answer is simple: no more interpreters. 

It's not racism, it's not hate against the asylum seekers, it's closing loopholes they are using to game the system and making it a level and truthful playing field for all. Where there is genuine need, then we should help. But our hospitality has been abused for over half a century.

But it's nice that finally the BBC of all people is now asking to close off these false claim loopholes.

It's nice to be Proven right

Back in 2019 I posted the following post on why I would never vote Labour. Even back then.

The reasons why not have become predictions. I was spot in the money.

Raises in tax for the low-paid, raises in National Insurance, pressure on employers such that  unemployment has increased under the current government, virtue signalling, open borders, it's all there. 

Back then, it was entirely predictable.

Thursday, 7 November 2019

Why as a Low-Paid Working Class Male I will not vote for the Labour Party.

First off, let me state I'm low Paid. Under 20 grand, which puts me way under the average wage. I'm not on minimum wage (although if the Conservative pledge to bump it up to £10.50 an hour happens, I may well be).

So, I'm working class, low paid. Yet I will not vote for the Labour Party, the traditional home of the low paid working class.

If there is anyone out there reading this that wants to attempt to convince me that voting Labour would benefit me, please do put it in a comment. I'd love the debate.

The reasons are many, but the overall reason is that the Labour Party and it's policies do not represent me. It does not champion the working class. It does not fight for us.

Instead it concentrates on platitudes and virtue signalling.

"More money to the NHS"... which means more taxation of my already meagre wages.

"Better Welfare"... which means even more taxation of my already meagre wages to pay benefits.

"Employers and the Rich should pay more tax"... which means there's a high likelihood that thanks to the already huge pressures on retail companies thanks to increased rates, higher employer N.I. or higher business rates or corporation tax will tip retail companies over the edge into closure. I high chance then that I'll end up jobless and on benefits then.

"Open Borders and Free Movement".... which means more competition for jobs, especially low-paid jobs. Which means there's a higher risk of me and other people like me staying on benefits.

"Free NHS treatment for non-UK nationals"... means that the NHS will not be able to cope as it tries to treat the world's sick and ill. The clamour to pay even more tax money to the NHS will increase and taxation of even low wages like mine will increase. The alternative is to borrow more now and then get the kids and grandkids to pay off the debt.

We had that with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, that cynically borrowed massively to fund their supposed boom. The tax credits system or Tony Blair job creation scheme as I call it. The scheme that rather than reduce taxes at source, set up a huge administration to take a portion of tax to give back to working families and also pay the wages of the new administrators set up to administer it. So wasteful and so cynical as it allows companies to pay even lower wages to families while relying on taxpayers to make up the shortfall. Genius!

As it stands, I cannot see how the Labour party's policies would benefit me. Conversely, all I see is more negativity in my future if Labour get into power.

Nope, I will not vote for Labour.

The Real Reason Trump has Blockaded Iranian Ports.

Ok, bear with me. This will take some explaining. 

The media is pecking away at the shallow assessment of the Trump actions with Iran. Basically they are saying he is blockading ports in retaliation at Iran charging a toll for ships to pass though the straight of Hormuz. 

And looked in isolation, that's exactly what it would look like. 

However, if you look globally, things start to piece together. One of Iran's biggest customers for oil is China. China takes over 80% of Iranian oil exports and has been building up war reserves of fuel for a couple of years now. 

Intelligence assessments put a date for China maxing it's reserves and therefore it's capability to invade Taiwan at either late 2026 or some time in 2027. It's reserves of war fuels like diesel were working up to such a high level just prior to that. 

Trump could be blockading Iran with the cover that he is dealing with Iran, but simultaneously he is dealing with the problem of China and Taiwan. With no oil from Iran, China will be forced to use it's reserves to supply it's everyday requirements. It will have to draw down on those war reserves, making an invasion of Taiwan less likely.

Yes, the lack of supply from Iran could force China to jump now and use what reserves it has now to instigate the invasion of Taiwan. But China will be hamstrung, because it won't be able to import more oil to refine and use during the invasion. All it would have are it's reserves and what's in the ships already loaded and bound for China. 

And those ships crossing the Indian Ocean from the Gulf are very vulnerable, just like the Iranian warship that was sunk by an American sub. 25 miles off the coast of Sri Lanka. Did you miss that was a message of intent to China as well? 

The danger with Trump's strategy is that China could just lash out now, but how long could it last? Would it escalate to nukes, or an attack on Diego Garcia? Is this a repeat of Pearl Harbour? Could they, would they supply nukes to Iran to allow them to defend themselves? Not without America knowing. 

Who knows. If the Trump administration plays it smart, it can involve China in talks with the Iranians, to persuade them to negotiate in good faith with the Americans. But being Islamists, in my experience good faith is not something they ever negotiate with

Time will tell if this is a huge bit of 4D chess by the Trump administration, or if it's the precursor to World War 3. Lets hope they know how to play chess eh?

Europe is an Organised Crime Continent.

I work for a company that imports and exports items all over the world. Since Brexit, it has become very clear that the EU customs process is a very protectionist one, or one that requires a huge investment on the part of the company importing into Europe to comply with all the petty rules. 

For instance when Brexit first started, we had terrible trouble getting items through customs because the address the person used on their order, their "informal" address, didn't exactly match the "formal" address EU customs had on file for that location. 

Many order were rejected and returned until customers inside the EU learned to look up their formal address and use it as the destination. 

But even then, it became so petty: for instance if a comma was missing, or in the wrong place, it was rejected and returned. 

Even up until a couple of months ago, Ireland was especially petty. An order would be arbitrarily returned for no reason, then if resent, would be accepted. It seemed to be just up to the mood of the individual customs officer that looked at the package. That issue seems to have largely been sorted by an addition to the invoice.

Spain was another egregious rejector of packages. Packages were rejected for being illegal to import into Europe, or restricted, or some similar reason. On items that were originally made in Europe and exported to us in the UK. 

I do remember one item being a solid metal gear knob. I'm not sure what they thought it was, considering it was manufactured in Poland, delivered to a company in Germany who then sold it to us in the UK and we then exported it to a customer in Spain. Maybe they thought it was a weapon?

What I'm getting at is the whole process of selling into the EU from outside is a lottery. Brexit has opened my eyes up to the arbitrary nature of EU officialdom and processes. 

There is no "official" process that can be followed which will guarantee the process flows correctly. There is always the upstart officer in customs or an official department policy that wants to penalise UK companies for exiting the EU. 

That's the way it looks, because the process is so arbitrary. If there was an official process that could be followed that guaranteed entry, then it would look less vindictive and less like criminal activity and more like a professional organisation.

But no. We have to join a club, pay dues sign up to agreements, in order to guarantee trade. The alternative is to fall foul of a complex, unregulated, unprofessional system. 

To me it just looks like more organised crime. Do we slip Euros in the document wallet to grease the palms of the customs officer to guarantee importation? 

It does make you wonder.

Spying.

Fuck. Are we doing this? Again? Reeeeaaally?

I assume for comments.

Just ask. It's that simple.

I am approachable. 

Sloppy, so I assume UK-based?

Kanye West: More Two-Tier Justice from Kiers Cabinet.

Yesterday, Shabbbbana MacMooud, the Home Secretary banned Kanye West from entering teh UK to perform at a festival. 

The reason he was banned are comments he made a couple of years ago supporting Hitler. 

Far enough, you'd think, supporting Hitler is a pretty bad position to be in, ideologically. You know, hating Jews and stuff.

But then why aren't other Jew-hating bands banned from performing in the UK? For instance Kneecap.

Why aren't the crowds on the weekly anti-Israel marches also prosecuted for calling for death to Jes?

By then why aren't extremist Imams that spout anti Israel and anti-Jew rhetoric in Mosques banned? 

If one form of antisemitism is bad, then why not another? All are equally as abhorrent as the others. 

More two-tier justice from the Government I guess. 

The End of the Economy?

We've had skirmishes in the Middle East before and the Strait of Hormuz has been threatened by Iran before. 

So why are things so dire right now and looking into the future?

It's because European governments have abrogated their responsibilities to their citizens with respect to security.

They have reduced their armed forces to a point where they are pointless, they have followed a net zero ideology and made energy supply insecure. 

The UK has shut down all it's refineries, so we have to import petrol and diesel from abroad. We import LNG when we could get it from the north sea. We import electricity because we don't have the capacity to make enough ourselves. 

This is Trump's way of proving a point. You want petrol, go get it, secure it's shipment with your navy. Can't do that because you don't have the ships? Tough. Trump warned Europe, and now after the verbal warning, he's supplying a practical demonstration. 

He's treating European governments like the shallow-thinking children they are.

UK Government Policy Causing Energy Insecurity.

The government have the ideology or rhetoric that renewables are the answer to fuel insecurity. The idea being that if we can generate all our energy from wind and solar, we won't be beholden to the world energy market.

But that's not true is it?

For every single watt of renewable energy capacity that is created, so an identical watt of fossil fueled generation has to be installed as well. That's because every watt of renewable energy has to have a reliable back-up for when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. 

Energy demand doesn't suddenly stop when the renewables can't deliver. There has to be something else available top fill the void, otherwise the lights go out and people freeze to death in winter.

That back-up generation is now predominantly gas-powered. That's why renewable energy is linked to the spot price for gas. 

Because essentially the system is gas-powered and we pay the gas-powered price for the energy, from which the energy providers make a profit. However, if the conditions are right, we switch to renewables.

Now, if we are gas-powered, you'd think the government, in order to stabilise the price of energy would look to bring the production of gas into the country's borders, reducing the reliance on foreign supplied gas. 

But no, the UK government is shutting down gas production from the UK-owned  gas and oil fields, and instead we are taking gas from the Norwegian-owned North Sea gas and oil fields. Let me state that again. We are paying the Norwegians money for oil and gas we could be extracting ourselves. 

It's most likely actually the same oil and gas we could be extracting, because we do have shared gas fields with the Norwegians. So they are extracting our gas for us and charging us for the privilege. 

So no matter what the Government say about renewables, not matter how much of our energy is generated by renewables, in contrast to what the government say, we will still be hostage to world gas spot prices. 

To get away from world spot price, we need reliable non-gas powered baseload. Nuclear would be a good basis for baseload. But the UK decimated the home-grown nuclear industry so much that we have to buy in nuclear power plants from abroad. 

Part of our mix of energy is biomass, which is chipped trees transported by ship to the UK and then shipped to inland power stations. Yeah, that's surely more economical than coal sourced in the UK. 

It just makes you think whoever is making UK energy policy is insane. These are insane policies, they do not make sense. They do not make sense even in terms of net zero. They only make sense in terms of destruction of UK energy security and the destruction of heavy industry. Heavy industry that creates the weapons to keep us safe. 

Madness, utter insanity.

UK in the Firing Line?

Over the Weekend, Iran targeted the US air base at Diego Garcia with ballistic missiles. 

They fired two successfully, one broke up on re-entry into teh atmosphere, but one did make it to the island and was intercepted by anti-missile batteries on DG.

Now, it's unclear how Iran did what it did. Whether this is some new technology they have developed and are using experimentally, or if they are using something already available but in a new way, like an orbital rocket used as a ballistic missile.

However, what is clear, is that Iran has the capability, should it develop it, to strike within a 3-4000 mile radius. 

That brings Europe into it's range, as well as the South of the UK. 

It was bed enough when Russia was a threat, but now the death-cult in charge of Iran has the ability to target large swathes of Europe, this should signal to European leaders to get off teh fence and deal with the Iranian leadership once and for all. 

This is not a question of colonialism, this is a question of eliminating a regime that would quite easily rain nuclear bombs down on the infidels in Europe. It would also quite happily rain down dirty bombs - nuclear material that would make areas of the country uninhabitable, creating our very own Chernobyl.

It's quite clear the nutters in charge of Iran need to be eliminated, and in quick order. And any new nutters that spring up need to also be eliminated, and the next batch and the next batch, until there are no nutters in charge and we get the regime in charge we desire. 

How Do I Know The Shit I Know?

I wish I could tell you. I suppose I have good memory recall. 

For instance I just watched a video mentioning 77th Brigade. (Hi chaps1). 

From the mists of my memory I remembered one of the senior guys was a chap called Chris.

So I did a Grok search as to who are the members of 77th Brigade:

The public information is:

Brigadier Alastair Aitken (initial commander around formation in 2015).

Brigadier Chris Bell (commander from around 2017).

Gordon MacMillan (reported in 2019 as a reservist lieutenant in the brigade; at the time, a Twitter executive—now former).

Mark Lancaster (former MP; reported as deputy commander in some sources).

Alex Aiken (promoted in Army Reserve to Honorary Colonel role related to the brigade's media/comms group in 2019).

Historical predecessor unit figures (pre-2015 formation from merged groups like Media Operations Group, 15 Psychological Operations Group) include names like Captain Lisa Irwin, Captain Lorna Ward, Major Paul Smyth, Lieutenant Colonel Vickie Sherieff, Commander Steve Tatham, Stephen Jolly, and Colonel Colin Mason—but these are not current 77th Brigade specifics.

So how did I know, from memory, that a guy called Chris was running the show? Where did I hear that? I must've heard it somewhere? I doubt very much that he is currently in charge now. The name that I recall is now Timothy. Who? No idea. 

There are many such instances of me just "remembering" information, 

It's almost as if I lead a completely separate past life and every now and again it bubbles to the surface. 

Is this the point I do a sly <wink> to camera? 

Was The Satanic Panic Nonsense?

The more that gets released about the perverted and evil things being done by the elites, the more it seems that the Satanic Abuse conspiracies of the 80s and 90s were actually true.

I mean, what better way to hide actual pedophillia than to dress it up as some satanic ritual, so the kids, if they were able to notify the authorities would not be believed.

The same for the stories around the time of Saville, of kids being driven in expensive cars to large country homes, to be abused by senior government figures.

One gets the impression that they are not so far fetched. Especially as Lord Mandleson has been caught in the Epstein morass. I just wonder how many other Lords have been involved in these various pedophile rings 

It's pretty clear now that there's an overwhelming amount of credible evidence that the great and the good are none of the sort. They are a risible bunch of sexual predators that need taking down a peg or two.

They need reminding they are not above the law. 

And don't get me started on the links between the elite child sex rings and the Pakistani rape gangs. Again, there is credible evidence the two are linked, which is why the great and the good won't investigate. Because Turkeys don't vote for Christmas and pedos don't vote for an inquiry into pedos. 

Prove me wrong.

Lets have a full investigation with statutory powers that has no terms of reference and is able to poke into every rabbit hole it finds. 

The top of the greasy pole is a cesspit of sexual depravity. The cliche of an MP visiting a Madam, or a Dominatrix for a bit of sexual action is quite tame and innocent in comparison to the reality of what went on.

These people are the worst of humanity.

Finally, Dragon Has Sailed.

HMS Dragon has finally left Portsmouth, a week after receiving orders to prepare to go to sea.

Two full days on the ammunition pontoon suggests she is taking a full load-out with her. She is apparently expecting action. 

I'm glad the Captain and the Admirals in charge are taking no chances, but it does give an indication of what paper tigers we have for Warships under normal circumstances. Warships with no weapons are not warships. They are just training barges. 

The government's whole attitude to defence needs a complete bloody shakeup. These are weapons of war, not gin palaces. They are not floating exhibition centres either.

The MOD needs to give it's head a wobble and start being the Ministry of DEFENCE. At the very least, it should be able to defend this country from any and all threats external. 

As a side task, it should also be ready to defend the public from larger internal threats that the Police cannot control.

3-5 years. I give them 3-5 years before they will be called on.

I Called it: MODs Lack of Air Defences in Clear View.

Well, the Iranian attack on Akrotiri Airbase has shown, in clear view, the lack of Air Defences at UK airbases.

I predicted this last year: Delphius' Debate: British Military Wargamers Panic About Lack of Anti-Air Assets in the UK.

I also predicted that the only option we would have would to be deploy Type 45 Destroyers in the path of any incoming air threat, because that's the only assets we have capable of air defence. We have no land-based air defence assets capable of taking out drones.

Today HMS Dragon, a type 45 Destroyer, leaves Portsmouth headed for Cyprus. A multi-billion pound asset, designed to defend a carrier fleet, sent to defend an island against drones that cost hundreds of thousands of pounds. 

A single Sea Ceptor missile costs around two million pounds. 

This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut. 

The MOD really needs to get on the case procuring a cheap, reliable air defence system capable of defending against drones. 

Ideally a layered system, with small, cheap guided missiles providing longer range defence, then for close in work, we can have laser weapons mounted on mobile units (so they are not set in fixed, attackable positions) that can be moved around an airfield. 

There are already systems available that can intercept ballistic missiles. Luckily the UK is too far away from Iran to be concerned with those (although it's not beyond the Iranians to develop the facility to launch missiles (say) from a beached ship).

But again, it would be prudent to look at procuring an air defence system capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, because we will require a defence against them eventually. 

And the 6 type 45 destroyers we have won't protect the UK indefinitely. They can't defend two carriers at sea and the UK as well, all at the same time. 

The UK and it's military bases at home and abroad are inadequately defended. It's time that changed in response to the increased threat from cheap drone-type threats.

Where Next for the Muslim Bloc Vote?

Labour lost the Muslim Bloc Vote (MBV) and therefore lost the Denton & Gorton by-election. 

The MBV landed with the Greens and they won. The interesting thing is that Labour didn't really see it coming. They were still pandering to Muslims during the campaign.

You have to ask why they didn't see it. Were they lied to by the Muslim community?

The reasons for the desertion is clear. Starmer the Sociopath doesn't care who he pisses off. He'll quite easily lock up a concerned mother posting on X. He's pissed off the pensioners, the freedom lovers, the wealthy and the poor, but he's also pissed off his main voting bloc. 

When it comes to Muslims, he's had the Police raiding the money laundering fronts like barbers. It's not been made very public, but quietly there have been big raids in some areas where it's got too fucking obvious to ignore. When every other shop is a barbers, there's no way they're doing 100Ks worth of business. 

So the Police go in, with dogs and not only do they find cooked books, they find drugs. There's always a sub plot, be it drugs, under the counter baccy or whatever. 

But the raids have got so big, the criminal gangs that run the Islamic community have disassociated themselves from Labour. 

The real threat of a grooming gang enquiry has also ruffled some feathers. Mainly because huge numbers of Muslim men were involved, include clan leaders. It's unacceptable that they would be investigated. They are above the law, in their eyes.

So, the MBV has switched to the Greens. Time was, the main focus of Green Party policy was whether we were recycling enough. Now, it's all about Gaza, a war that has nothing to do with the Denton and Gorton constituency. There are no major arms factories supplying Israel located there. There are no airfields launching strikes into Gaza there. 

But that's the Green party's main focus in Denton & Gorton. 

Green party policy has morphed into pro-Islamic rhetoric, because it bestows them votes. 

And yet Green Party supporters say that there has been no shift towards being an Islamic party. So where were the Green policies during the by-election? Support for a Tram link from Manchester City Centre through Reddish to Gorton and Denton? Support for Andy Burham's re-invention of bus operation with Bee Network buses?

Nope. Gaza, Gaza, Gaza. 

Restore Britain has a hard task ahead. 

Denton and Gorton Result in one Word.

Predictable.

I blogged previously about Labour and the Greens scrabbling for Muslim votes. 

We know the Green party did an advert entirely in Urdu. They won. That's what it takes now. It's a game-changer. And a warning.

The Muslim vote know Labour are done and they have switched to the Greens. The Greens are the party with the best pandering to the Muslim bloc vote. The Greens have realised that capturing the Muslim bloc vote ensures success.

There should be no doubt now that UK politics is a sectarian battlefield. Sectarianism has reached the House of Commons. The Greens were voted in for no other reason than they pandered to the Muslim vote.

In seats like Denton and Gorton, the Christian indigenous vote has to come out massively and decisively in order to defeat the Muslim bloc vote, otherwise they lose. The numbers are so finely balanced.

I heard people in interviews saying they wouldn't vote. Well, good luck with that. Because you'll get a what you deserve, something that doesn't serve your interests. You'll get a council that installs Muslim officials, (eventually) Muslim MPs, and eventually you'll get nothing, because it will all be diverted to the Muslims. I've seen it happen. 

This is the battleground Restore Britain has to fight on. It has to unite the non-Muslim vote. 

Importing ex-Tories, as Reform have done is not the answer. Straight away you have lost the ex-Labour vote. 

Restore Britain has to be clean of Toryism, cronyism, and has to resist the urge to allow the taint of past political mistakes stick. 

Restore Britain needs to be a new broom, a clean broom, sweeping away the previous malaise. 

Colonialist BBC

Well, strike me as confused. The dear old befuddled, BBC, the proto-Communist broadcaster with the leftist of left leanings, actually produces websites in colonial languages. 

I thought it was a joke at first, but no. 

The BBC actually go to the trouble and expense of translating articles and publishing them online on separate websites. Not only that, they translate to colonial languages, like African pidgin English. 

Another is BBC Afrique, which translates to African colonial French. 

Have a look at Domot - BBC News Pidgin

and Accueil - BBC News Afrique

In fact the BBC, through the BBC World Service, supply web articles and more in the following:

Pidgin, Hausa, Yoruba, Igbo, Afaan Oromoo, Amharic, Somali, Tigrinya, Gahuza, Bengali, Dari, Gujarati, Marathi, Nepali, Pashto, Punjabi, Sinhala, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu, Burmese, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese, Azerbaijani, Kyrgyz, Polish, Russian, Serbian, Ukrainian, Uzbek, Brasil, Mundo, Persian, and Turkish.

And as far as I'm aware, we are paying for that through our TV licence.

The thing that gets me, is why? I understand that the government may want to get the British side of any story out there, but why are we paying essentially for propaganda?

I spy a saving there, unless someone can give me a bloody good financial reason not to just cut the lot.

UK Has Become an Organised Crime State.

Much has been said about Venezuela being a Narco-State and that directly related to the kidnap and extradition of Maduro by the US authorities.

But something akin to that has happened in the UK. 

The UK would collapse if it wasn't for the revenue from organised crime and organised crime is deeply intertwined with the political elite.

Let me explain.

It's common knowledge that the many Turkish barbers that have sprung up in the last 10 years are fronts for money laundering.

It's common knowledge that the many Nail Bars that have sprung up in the last 10 years are fronts for money laundering.

Along with the Kebab shops that are fronts for grooming gangs, or the hand car washes that are staffed by illegal immigrants, there is always an illegal aspect to these businesses.

In fact they are probably the ONLY businesses that have sprung up in the last 10 years that survive the current climate in the high street. In fact most of the successful businesses in the last 10 years have been fronts for illegal activity in some form or other.

Because you need to be bent in order to survive. No legitimate business can make enough profit to pay rent, business rates, and taxes and at the same time comply with all the required legislation placed on businesses. 

And then there's the direct illegal activity: drug distribution, illegal tobacco; you name it, it's going on.

Our high street is a hotbed of organised crime. 

So is the property market. It's long been a way for organised crime to launder their profits. 

The political parties have donors or MPs that are involved in this organised crime matrix, so local and national government policy is shaped by this, to favour the organised crime laundering operations. 

Ever higher business rate, ever higher rents, basically government is squeezing legitimate business out of operation. It's come to the state of affairs that only fronts for illegal activity can afford to operate.

That's no way to run an economy. 

The economy should be run in a way that encourages legitimate business to thrive, so anyone can have a go and try and rune a business, to be their own boss. 

Right now the financial and regulatory framework disincentivises the creation of new businesses, and instead benefits established large businesses that can afford the overheads, or illegal front businesses that see the expenses as a cost off laundering money.

Then we get to the revelations that local and national government officials, Police and members of the judiciary are involved in child sex trafficking rings, or grooming gangs. 

Yet more evidence of organised crime within the establishment. 

The whole thing is just an organised crime racket. Those that benefit from the racket are ok. Those of us that aren't involved are just getting by.

As the US set a precedent with Maduro, if evidence could be found that our own government is involved in illegal activity, surely the precedent has now been set and our own government can be removed?

Warning: Terrorist Incident Alert

The risk of a terrorist incident in the UK is currently at an all-time high rate. 

It seems Rupert Lowe has rattled the Hornet's nest and there may be a show of force by the Islamic side in response to Rupert's "I don't care" rhetoric regarding remigration. Especially due to the rapid take up of membership. Restore Britain actually poses a threat to the Muslim Brotherhood. 

Just be careful out there.

Hopefully MI.5 is on the case, although reports are it's difficult working through the endemic wokeness of the higher-ups. 

Epstein and Scientists Shows It Wasn't About the Sex.

While the media focus on the sex predators that visited Epstein Island, it's interesting to note there were a bunch of very noble scientists that attended Epstein parties in the US.

Now, you may ask what Epstein wanted with scientists?

Well, it's a bit like the UK intelligence service back in WW2. They put a bunch of Luftwaffe pilots up at some huge country house, feed them well and let them talk. While every inch of the house is bugged.

Eventually the pilots became so comfy, they started discussing Luftwaffe secrets. 

It's the same with Epstein and the Scientists. Feed them well, give them alcohol and let them talk shop. After all one scientist loves to talk to another. It's very rare a scientist gets to talk to a peer, someone that understands their research. And from their conversations, you get insider information. 

What are the next big things in science that are about to go to market? What are useful scientific discoveries to other nations? 

Useful information if you are a broker. You can invest before the hordes push up the price.

You can use the information directly if you haven't used it already, or you can sell it. 

Epstein was an intelligence asset. He gathered intelligence from everyone. Guests were shmoozed so they could produce useful information.

That's the prime goal of the Epstein Operation: useful intelligence.

The paedophilia was incidental. I really believe that. It wasn't just that Epstein provided it, he provided it because that's what the uber-rich want. 

You get scientists to talk with good food, a bit of alcohol and providing someone who understands the science for them to interact with.

You get the uber-rich to talk by providing every perverted service they are used to receiving. 

Either way, you are getting the target into their comfort zone in order for them to elicit information. You're not browbeating them, they are offering the information because they are in a zone where they feel able to elicit that information. That information could just be who is in the close network of the perv you are shmoozing. But that gives you more targets to shmooze, more information, evidence of a larger network, evidence that it exists. And with that, it can be compromised, cajoled, captured.

That's why I believe Epstein isn't the end. Kids go missing around the world all the time, and if the Epstein files and my own personal experience are to be believed, those kids end up being tortured and raped (or even worse) for the entertainment of the uber-wealthy. The royalty of Europe, the old money, the secret societies.

The uber-wealthy have huge estates where the evidence can be buried, where they have big enough buildings to entertain and still not be overlooked. 

They own huge swathes of land, islands, estates. They control whet happens on that land. They are also wealthy enough to destroy the majority of people on this planet. 

They own private armies, have personal security, if they are not Royalty already, they have the wealth of royalty. They have all the trappings. 

Their perverted practices are not stopping any time soon. I think they were happening before Epstein and they continue after Epstein. He just provided a new venue for the entertainment.

It Didn't End With Epstein

The internet is awash with more new revelations about Epstein every day. Now we're getting to reports of child torture. 

I've already disclosed in a post I wrote back in 2021 I was approached years earlier by someone through a BDSM chat online if I would torture kids. Of course I refused. You don't say yes to some random weirdo on the internet asking you on yahoo messenger if you'd actually torture kids.

That was in late 2006, not long before Epstein went to jail the first time. The indictment for that conviction was in 2007. 

The timing makes me wonder if the Epstein "club" had got word they were burned and was looking for new staff around that time to set up anew.

The initial investigation into Epstein that led to his prosecution started in 2005. The grand jury convened in 2007. He was prosecuted in 2008. 

That's what makes me think that there is a connection. 

It also makes me think that this wasn't  some random weirdo and there were efforts to set up a new club in the UK if Epstein got badly burned. In the end, he served just 13 months and the media never picked up on the extent of the crimes being committed by Epstein and his club. It was back to business as usual. Ish.

I just wonder if that new club was set up after he did/did not kill himself. I wonder if the same acts are still carrying on somewhere else and theres a new Epstein facilitating it all.

A Solution to the Reform/Restore Conundrum.

I have a fix for those people that are conflicted about whether to join Reform or Restore Britain (with apologies to Ben Habib). 

The easy solution is to Join Restore Britain, because Rupert Lowe has proved himself to be nothing but honest and straightforward. A true Brit with grit and gumption. His policies go further than Farage's Reform and are what the country requires.

There are three years to go, but if Restore don't get the traction before the next election, then vote Reform. 

Just a Quick One on The Denton and Gorton By-Election..

It seems both the Labour party and the Green party are scrabbling for the Muslim block vote. There are videos online with both trying their best to convince Muslim voters to vote for them. 

Of course it depends on whoever makes the best, most generous offers to the Muslim community. Not necessarily bribery, but it's quite reasonable for the Muslim community to ask, "what's in it for us?"

Which they are able to ask and are entitled to ask. That's the power of a bloc vote.

Which is why I think it will be closer than most think. The Muslim bloc vote has been powerful in Tameside for a long time, close to 3 decades.

The result will be interesting. Will Labour and Tory voters both jump on the Reform bandwagon as a way of sticking two fingers up to the power of the bloc vote? 

Now voters have a chance to upset the status quo, will they take it? 

I'll Be Gone a While.

I have to do my thing again. 

Back in a while. 

If you see anything, it wasn't me, alright?

On The Dark Lord, Peter Mandleson.

Keir Starmer is trying to load the blame for appointing Perter Mandleson as Ambassador to the US firmly at the door of.... Peter Mandleson.

Despite warmings from intelligence services about the nature of Mandleson, and his past transgressions and his relationship with Epstein, Starmer went ahead and appointed him. 

Starmer's excuse was that Mandleson lied. In  his speech, Starmer said Mandleson continually lied when questioned and when asked to pinky promise he was telling the truth and nothing would go come back to bite Kier, it seems that Mandleson had his fingers crossed behind his back all the time. 

As if Starmer doesn't lie and deflect all the time. It's Standard Operating Practice for Labour, it seems.

It's like watching a bunch of schoolkids running the country. 

"Peter promised he never bullied other kids, and he would be a good boy, but he lied, Miss..."

Fuck. These are the people running the country. 

I should have put a bet on that vote of no confidence.

Although I bet the odds of Starmer being out by the end of the year wouldn't have been worth a bet.

On Algorithms

Just recently I've been directed down, or shown some interesting rabbit holes conspiracy-wise. On the internet, that is. Literally in the last couple of days, things have gone a bit bonkers with the links and stuff that Facebook, YouTube and the like have started showing me. 

Now, of course some of the shit I look at and say online might bring one to conclude that's the sort of thing that might push me over the edge and radicalise me. But I'm a bit more complex than that. 

But I can see how, if you're not savvy to this sort of attempt at manipulation, you could be going down some very dark paths. 

The thing is: Is it algorithms guiding your path and it's all a result of zeros and ones doing their thing, or is it human manipulation?

And why all of a sudden? Literally, this week. 

I know I've been up North over the weekend and scarily for some people I've been in the exact area where a hotly contested by-election is to be held. 

But this week, most of my usual favourite watch list stuff has been replaced. 

Makes you wonder if my phone was close to another phone and someone put two and two together and got five. 

But it does show you there is a huge element of manipulation going on when it comes to the content the algorithms offer up to you and the information that's collected in the background doesn't always produce a benign result like showing you more of the content you like.

There seems to be a hint at manipulation with this latest tranche of content. Obviously so. Someone or something is using hobnail boots and isn't at all subtle. 

On Reform's Chances in the Denton and Gorton by-election.

I was up in t'North at the weekend. It being the 2nd anniversary of the passing of my mother. We visited her grave and also did some shopping in Denton.

Talking to friends and relatives, you'd think that Reform would romp away with the seat. 

However, I know the Northern voter. They're the sort of person that would vote for a pig in a wig wearing a Red Rosette (cue Angela Rayner jokes). 

So things aren't as clear cut as the National polls would suggest. 

I do perceive a sense of frustration with Labour and especially the complete inability to move the political pointer to any shade other than red. Most thinking people would vote Reform, just because they are a hail Mary in an attempt to break the Labour monopoly that has allowed corruption to flourish in the North with little or no pushback.

Just look at the lack of enquiry into the rape gangs. Labour councillors have been implicated by various low-level informal enquiries. Councillors that have now gained high office as MPs. 

No wonder Labour are reluctant to investigate.

Anyway, I will look with some interest upon the by-election. 

On the Epstein Files...

The first observation is that Bill Gates is fucked (not in the biblical sense this time) but the financial sense.

If Melissa Gates didn't already know what was going on and divorced him for that, then the new Epstein revelations should ensure a lawsuit ensues.

The second observation is: how the hell can the people in the Epstein files tell us how to live our lives? They are most powerful, yet the most depraved people in existence. How can they claim the moral ground to tell us all what to do?

I mean, I've done my bit of semi-public pervery, but I don't force people to lead pious lives under threat of arrest and prison.

ANYONE holding high office mentioned in the Epstein files and that has provably had extramarital sex, or sex with a minor, should immediately resign from office or be forced out of office.

First UK scalp is Lord Mandleson. But I just wonder who else still in place in the Labour hierarchy is mentioned in the Epstein documents? Who else will  be tainted by the debauchery on the Island? Is anyone else in Parliament mentioned?

Still no confirmation of who was benefitting from the Epstein operation. It doesn't have the smell of a CIA operation. The whiff is distinctly of Mossad, although there could be a curveball in there and it turn out to be Russia or China. Both are equally evil and up to the task of running an operation like this.

I mean, why would Mossad compromise an ally? Or for instance a member of our Royal Family?

That still doesn't make sense to me. Other than they are influencers, and may allow Mossad access to more influential figures, but I'm scratching my head as to why they would do that to an ally. Especially going to the lengths they went to and the numbers of people involved.

The 4D chess answer is that it was Russia or China posing as Mossad running the operation. But that's a bit of a stretch.

We already know that China directly finances academics in our universities. They seem to prefer the direct approach.

 

The Evil of the Left in America.

People are getting into a shouting match about the latest shooting by ICE Agents in America. Let's be clear. If the woman that was pushed didn't intervene in the ICE operation, if the guy that was unfortunately shot didn't intervene in the ICE action as well, then he would be alive.

The left want these people to be killed. To prove a point. That is how evil they are. The left are whipping up tensions, agitating activists to get involved and directly confront ICE agents, with as seen, possibly lethal consequences. 

If the left backed off, If they stopped whipping up people to impede federal agents from doing their duty, then at least two people would be alive today.

But no, the left want the tension, the agitation, the aggression, so ICE agents will make mistakes and someone will get shot. 

They can't have people peacefully protesting and just holding placards at a safe distance, because that doesn't meet their requirements. 

And isn't it typical of the Left that they whip up tensions in other people, so it's other people that get shot, not the people at the top?

her Tory Defection to Reform.

With the Defection of Suella Braverman to Reform, I just wonder what the likelihood is of enough MPs moving to set Reform up as the opposition. Are we likely to see Nigel across the Isle sparring with Kier at PMQs instead of Kemi?

Could enough Tories defect before the next election I wonder?

Thoughts on WEF Guff...

I've been struck down with ManFlu since the middle of last week. Most of Social media was awash with the World Economic Forum and the Donald wanting his slice of Greenland. 

But in the dim dark corners, were a few talks by CEOs of technology companies. Including surprisingly, Elon Musk. I thought he was no friend of the WEF.

I was interested in what the various "experts" had to say about A.I. and robotics. 

Now, I know what my thoughts on the two are, but I was interested to see what they were predicting. 

Nothing but sunny uplands. Even if the A.I. and robots did all the jobs, all it would do is free us from the drudgery of everyday work.  

Except, there was no discussion of the mechanism of how that would come about. If there was any discussion, it seemed uneasy, stilted and very careful. 

You could see the WEF-class see the use of A.I. and robotics as a utopia, where robots would supply their every need. Unwavering, unchallenging, unquestioning, loyal, protective, servile robots. I imagine It's something like a Romanesque idyl, with robot slaves feeding the elites with grapes, whilst they recline on chaise lounges.

But if you have an A.I. and robot workforce, how do you feed the peasants that have been displaced from the job market? All those inconvenient, unworthy, unproductive, people.

Well, the real, stark answer that guests on the various panels avoided saying out loud is: you don't. 

Those of us that understand what's coming is that every A.I. and every Humanoid Robot introduced needs to be treated as a human worker from a Social Welfare aspect. So every company and every individual using these tools needs to pay as if they are employing an actual human. Thus the government should impose a tax similar to national insurance for each unit in use.

But then the fear is that will impose a drag on development. Any tax imposed on this new technology would reduce the ability of corporations to use it, and we all know that corporations get their way, so you can see that there is a very high chance that the scenario isn't Sunny uplands and huge benefits of cheap robotic labour for those of us at the bottom of the pile. The future is redundancy in the starkest meaning of the word. Not just from the job market, but from society.

I mean, the experts did say that some form of universal credit scheme should be introduced, with no detail on how that should be financed. I'm sure in the minds of the CEOs, the idea would be that someone else finances the payments to the plebs.

But this is where the intellectual pygmies of the WEF always falter: very lofty ambitions, without doing the deep dive into the implications and eventual outcomes. 

I for one am appalled every year by the WEF and what I hear coming out of it. 

Their original idea was to have a global workforce. Which then depressed wages across the globe as corporations moved work to the cheapest workforce.

Then there have been various cover stories like climate change in order to smokescreen what is actually going on, which is the de-industrialisation of the West. 

Than they had the great idea of bringing the cheap workforce into the West to depress wages for jobs that couldn't be offshored. Which has led to mass immigration and with it the societal change of the West. 

Now, the great idea is to scrap all that and go for a digital workforce. With the unsaid outcome that the majority of people without independent wealth starve to death.

Such nice people, the WEF people.

Oh, and while we're on the subject of the WEF, what was with all the old ladies in leather? Lots of power dressing going on by the ladies. Looks to me as a sign of insecurity. 

On the Raising of The Military Service Reservist Age to 65

It's ridiculous. But an acceptance by the government that the size of the military has shrunk too far.

There are many posts on Facebook espousing the fact that the government did it to themselves: by doing down Britain and country as a concept, by making out that Britain is evil, it has put off a generation of youngsters from joing.

But that's not the real reason. 

I can have some sympathy with the fact middle-class youth have been brainwashed, but there are still swathes of the working class that understand loyalty to family, community and country. 

The left might hate the opinions and actions within the many council estates around the country, but those are the people the middle class rely on to do the fighting and dying in order to keep them safe. 

But even that isn't the reason. 

Silently, the number of illegal immigrants, men of fighting age, has risen above the number of personnel serving in the UK armed forces. You now have a block of fighting age men, allied to a single cause, a single religion, a cause and religion that opposes the very country that offers them a bed. 

There is now an army within the country, that outnumbers the ACTUAL Army of the UK. 

That has sent alarm bells throughout the halls of the MOD. Just what are they supposed to do if this imported army starts to rebel, to declare areas of the country independent of UK law? How would the government enforce UK law in that case?

They don't have the manpower to commit to such a task. Unless....

On Iran...

Sadly, I don't have much intel on the uprising in Iran. The Middle East has not been my favourite place and the wife still fails to understand why I find the whole region erm, displeasing.

She still wants me to visit family in Bahrain, but even with a sweetener of watching a Grands Prix I am inclined not to go. Steadfastly inclined.

Not that I can go into detail why, but I don't like the heat and sand.

We did visit Dubai, the city state being quite impressive, if you have the money to imbibe the lifestyle.

Anyway, I do feel that the Iranian uprising will go the way of Warsaw. People will be urged to rebel, with very little support from those who urge it. 

America has made big noises, but with little application. I don't see US Special Forces being committed to Iran to help destabilise the regime there. 

Israel may, but more likely may not help the revolution along. Because they know all too well that when it comes to Islamic revolutions, what comes out of them is usually not freedom, democracy and tolerance towards non-Muslim nations. 

Better the devil you know... 

Pssst! You Didn't Hear it Here, But Starmer May be Gone by The End of The Year.

Rumblings are that the latest Starmer U-turn (on Digital ID) is straining (if not yet breaking) the Camel's back of the Labour party.

Basically, the Labour faithful are being asked to got out into the public and justify the latest Starmer scheme against what turns out to be pretty solid and sensible criticism, only to have Starmer go "Oh Yeah" and do an about-turn three months later. 

Let's not forget that the whole government machine has been on-side with the government since September when he announced it. So all policies since then have been guided by the fact that Digital ID will be a reality. Then Poof!, it's gone. 

That's millions of pounds of government and civil service effort wasted. 

Let that sink in. The government that has raised the tax take to a historical high, is simultaneously wasting said tax hikes at an eye-watering rate.

The Labour faithful have had enough. 

Enough of the in-out, in-out shake it all about nature of Starmer's announcements. Too many kites flown, too much money wasted,  too embarrassing. 

Rumblings are that there will be at least a challenge for the leadership. 

Some are going further and threatening a seventies-style vote of no confidence. Because, for the good of the country this cannot continue and if what we have seen of the last 18 months is Labour's policy and a change of leader is just more of the same, then it may as well go. 

The thinking is, trigger an election now, while Reform is not fully fleshed out and let them fail spectacularly when they are voted into power. Then the next election will reinstate the status quo and signal the end of the public's experiment with alternative parties.

This is my warning to Reform: stop being the cult of Nigel. Get a credible shadow cabinet team in place and in the mind of the public. Let us see who is going to be in the positions of power so we can judge their character. NOW. 

Get the policies and actions ready NOW. 

Then if Labour trigger a snap election, you'll have a team ready to walk into power and start to dismantle the globalist charter started by Tony Blair. Eradicate the restrictive political straightjacket he placed on Parliament and let's get back to the freedom and accountability we had back in the 1990s.

Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart Illustrating my Point Perfectly.

I just saw this short in YouTube. Two seriously deluded old duffers completely missing the point and reinforcing my point that the political elite in Europe see themselves not as an ally of America.

It just reinforces the opinion of the Trump administration that Europe isn't the steadfast ally it used to be. 

They're actually talking about putting troops on Greenland in order to protect it from the Americans. Yeah, using tech that the Yanks make unserviceable at a moment's notice? 

Good Luck with that.

This rhetoric surprises me, because Rory Stewart was in the Military. He should know the realities of Warfighting and should know better given his tenure in the Foreign Office and his proximity to military intelligence..

But both are committed Socialists. They live in the Socialist bubble. They are indicative of the thinking inside the Political Elite in Europe. Utterly ideologically captured.

"OrangeMan Bad" therefore they are willing to scrap a decades old alliance against Russia, go to war with what should be an ally. I'm beginning to think they really prefer Communism to Capitalism.

This is what happens when the Left swing too far to the left. People that stay in the middle of politics suddenly look like the extremists. But it's the far left that have moved to extremism, not the moderates.

America is sat there scratching it's head asking why Europe is turning into a Socialist authoritarian shithole.

What's Going on With Greenland?

The media make Trump out to be some cartoonish despot intent on ripping Greenland from the hands of poor Denmark.

The slightly more informed make out that this is an attack by Trump on NATO and the alliance.

In reality, there's a lot more in the background going on.

The main reason for Trump's claim on Greenland, is it's of huge strategic significance in the North American geographic area. It provides land for bases that America uses to defend itself against the Russian threat.

Under normal circumstances, Greenland under Danish control is a friend to the Americans and gladly accedes to any requests for land for American requirements.

Trump's claims reflect the breakdown in the relationship between American and the European Elites.

It's quite clear that the European political class is no friend of Trumps. 

We have seen it with the comments by David Lammy and other European political leaders. The European political elite is staunchly socialist (Communist) in it's political outlook (the reasons for which I've already blogged about) and hate Trump. 

Trump is airing in public in his typical way that he regards Europe not as a political ally. He regards Denmark and their leadership not as political allies also. He's stating that if the attacks on Trump, America and American companies (especially tech companies) and the First Amendment continue, he will use American force to "stabilise" the Greenland situation.

Right now, Greenland under Danish control is not considered as an allied administration by the Trump government.   

What does America do when it sees effectively hostile forces in close proximity? It neutralises them. Greenland is fast becoming the new Cuba.

All I'm hearing at the moment on the media is that Europe must band together against America. 

Bad Move guys.....

And just think, if Europe succumbs to the Muslim influx in 10 or 20 year's time, all the nukes, all the weapons, territory and manpower that Europe possesses will be in alignment against America. By then NATO is just a note in a history book anyway. 

Trump is just ahead of the curve.

Why Asylum Seekers Get Preferential Treatment

 ,,, And if you think they don't, you are an idiot.

I have commented on many post on X, YouTube regarding asylum seekers getting preferential treatment when it comes to housing, and why that is the case, and I think I need to flesh it out here to sort of put a pin in it, so to speak.

Anyone who says asylum seekers don't get preferential treatment is delude, lying, or just plain misinformed. Our government has, by the treaties it has signed up to, given asylum seekers statutory status, which means legally they are bound to provide services to them. Where no such statutory duties exist for normal citizens born here.

The first, is the 1951 Refugee Convention:

Core principles of the 1951 Convention

The core principle of the 1951 Convention is non-refoulement, which asserts that a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom.

The document outlines the basic minimum standards for the treatment of refugees, including the right to housing, work and education while displaced so they can lead a dignified and independent life. It also defines a refugee’s obligations to host countries and specifies certain categories of people, such as war criminals, who do not qualify for refugee status.

In addition, it details the legal obligations of the States that are party to one or both of these instruments.

The convention, as stated above, disallows the receiving state from instantly returning the asylum seeker, or refusing entry to the country. We have to receive them.

The next point is that under the Convention, asylum seekers are granted certain rights, by law (because they are part of the convention we signed up to).

So, asylum seekers as stated, have the right to housing, education, medical care, etc.

Again, under UK law, ordinary citizens have no such "rights". Which is why funds and services are given to asylum seekers before ordinary citizens.

So when politicians say that asylum seekers aren't at the head of the queue when it comes to housing. They are lying. The 1951 Convention give those asylum seekers the right to housing. A right that you don't have. So they get put in housing before you and your family, who have lived here since birth and have been on the housing list for decades.

It's also why preferential medical services are provided to Asylum Seekers. That's why they get access to a Doctor nurse and dentist with almost private standards of care. You don't get that, because the government aren't forced to provide it to you by law. But asylum seekers...

This is the loophole exploited by traffickers. EVERYONE that arrives in a dinghy instantly claims asylum, whether they are fleeing a war, persecution or even if they are not. 

I'd say they aren't, given that France, the last country they came from, isn't some bomb-ravaged craterscape.

But, that's the mechanism they exploit.

But now here comes the double-whammy of the European Convention on Human Rights.

This is the law that we signed up to that affords even criminals the right to family life. So for instance we already have to house asylum seekers, but the ECHR now makes it law that we can't just put them anywhere, we have to consider their family. By family, that's their extended family of cousins, aunties, etc. In other words we have to put them all together. By law. Creating an enclave for them. Even wondered why they all appear in a single area? Now you know.

We can't say "we've found a suitable house for you in Scotland". They have rights. The right to live with the other 34 members of their family that have come across in a rubber dinghy. 

While we are considering their asylum application, if the rights they have don't give them enough, if they go out and steal stuff, it's the ECHR that stops us saying "Sorry mate, but by stealing you have proved you're not the type of person we would like to accept into our country" and deport them. 

First, the process takes so long that it gives them time to find some desperate fat ugly bird, have sex with them and have a kid. And then instantly the asylum seeker gains family ties to the UK through the poor sprog born in this country. 

Just to interject, there is a correlation that most fat ugly birds are left-leaning politically, so that's a driver for why they would want a never-ending stream of "boyfriends" from Somalia. 

Of course there are only so many fat ugly birds, the supply is limited. the desperation of the asylum seekers mounts up. Their instructions are to have sex with a girl in the UK and get her pregnant. 

So we get desperate asylum seekers trying to shag any girl or woman they see. Possibly a driver for the massive number of rapes we are seeing perpetrated by them. That's not to make light of the crime of rape. But if you are from Somalia and you've been told the gravy train absolutely relies on you getting a British girl pregnant, it is your primary mission to avoid being sent back to your shithole country, then you're gonna do the deed with anything bar a corpse. Finesse, courting, charm, all go out the window. 

And anything old enough to get pregnant is fair game too.

Shag the bird, get her pregnant, make sure she doesn't have an abortion (tell her it's against your religion or something) and has the kid and then you are set for life with those welfare payments you and your 34 cousins can send to your gangster Gran back home.

This just scrapes the surface of the drivers and legislation involved.

But if anyone says that asylum seekers don't get preferential treatment, our better treatment, or are prioritised above normal citizens, then  tell them they are talking bollocks. They are, because it is the law.