Civil War?

Are we in a De Facto Civil War? We may be in the beginnings of it, that's for sure.

We have the working class population, devoid of a voice in Parliament, downtrodden for 30 years, finally rising up and making their dissent known. The government are using the Police as an Army to crush the rebellion. The Police at this point are not Policing by consent, they are being used to crush riots and dissent like the Army would have been 200 years ago.

The Police are armed like an army, they have the resources of an Army.

The people have nothing.

And above it all the Parliamentarians, the Elites stand, failing to understand, failing to represent the clearly disgruntled masses.

No words of sympathy, of calm from our Prime Minister. Only threats.

That's the nature of where we are now. We are in the beginnings of a civil war. 

We tried at the ballot box, we gave the Tories an 80-seat majority. They failed to follow the will of the people.

Now we don't care about votes. We've seen the other side make threats and the government runs scared. 

We can make threats and cause violence too. If that's all the government understands, then that's what the government will get until our demands are met.

Civil War.

Right now there is a war going on within the UK. It's not reported, it's not on the radar of the mainstream media, and only those with any political nous really understand. 

Nigel Farage gets it, Suella Braverman gets it, other Conservative MPs are slowly realising it. Especially after last night's commons fiasco.

We are at war between forces outside the democratic process and the general public.

Let's look at a timeline:

Boris Resigns and the Conservative party request applications for party leaders.

The selection process starts and it's apparent that there are two sides: The globalists, working on behalf of global corporations and Supra-national organisations and the party membership.

The Globalists control the contest and it's whittled down to a choice of The Globalist candidate (Rishi Sunak) and the least strong membership candidate (Liz Truss).

Liz wins, but from day one she's hamstrung as the globalists brief against her constantly. The media, complicit in their globalist support also start on the Liz-hating.

Liz is installed and selects a chancellor with similar views. Together they put together a budget that would (a) save the majority of the public from serious energy costs and (b) reduce costs for small businesses. 

But in a miscalculation, or a deliberate misdirection from the globalists in the party, she also cuts the tax for rich people. They give her the policy that they then use to beat her with. And with that they took away control of the Parliamentary Party from her.

Within weeks her chancellor was gone. The globalist-supporting Jeremy Hunt is installed. Days after that, Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary that actually deported some Albanians that arrived by dinghy last week, was ratted out and resigned. 

There's chatter about whether she resigned deliberately because of pressure from the globalist wing of the party, or that Liz Truss was told to give Suella the option. But it's quite clear from her resignation letter that she wasn't happy with the effective coup that was going on within the party to usurp the wishes of the membership.

Within hours another Globalist, Grant Shapps is installed and in his acceptance speech he mentions Liz Truss zero times and Jeremy Hunt at least twice. Now we know who he's giving thanks to and who actually has power in the cabinet.

Then we have what some might say is a deliberately engineered farce last night in the commons. 

Tory MP Charles Walker was almost in tears last night in an interview. Listen to his words carefully. He's talking about Parliamentary Party members who engineered this situation. The people that ensured the final candidates would be the globalist that the membership wouldn't vote for and the membership candidate that the globalists could control or sideline. Sadly by calling for Truss to resign, he's playing into the globalist's hands.

Nothing about the Conservative party currently is about the National Interest. Instead it's serving vested interests, globalists that want a cosy atmosphere to work in, they want competition stifled and Brexit neutered. 

Hence why the raise in Corporation Tax was re-introduced by Hunt. The big corporations want no competition. They hate small businesses taking even a fraction of their business. They killed something that would have helped small businesses across the country. As little as it was, it was something to help.

Global corporations have tax breaks, or the option of paying corporation tax in a different country, so it doesn't affect them. But it does make it harder for small-medium UK businesses. 

The budget support for energy prices for two years took a lot of pressure off people. With it now ending in April thanks to Hunt, the uncertainty for ordinary people is back. Another fear for the globalists to exploit.

Right now the globalists have the upper hand. They have Jeremy Hunt in place as Chancellor and they have Rishi Sunak in the wings.

If Truss resigns, they could just install Rishi as leader in some sort of concocted second-choice option, or Hunt could slide over from number 11 to number 10 and be caretaker leader. But then they could say it's too close to an election to spend months on a leadership contest, so either becomes de-facto leader of the party. 

Either way the globalists win and the ordinary people lose. They have played the political game well. 

But if enough Conservative MPs defected to Reform, then there could be a case to promote Reform as the true, new home of Conservatism and to get Tory party members to vote for them instead of the globalist Tories.

Hopefully that will happen and the war has a chance of swinging back in favour of the ordinary person and the globalists will lose control.

Here's hoping.

Prorogation is deemed unlawful in Scotland

Not sure how it affects the British Parliament in Westminster, but a Scottish court has declared the prorogation of Parliament unlawful.

They say that are convinced the prorogation was for the "improper purpose of stymying Parliament".

Completely ignoring the fact that Prorogation happens every year at conference time anyway and the extension to allow the Queen's speech is a mere four days. I bet her Madg' isn't impressed one of her courts is playing fast and loose with the constitution, the government's intent and context.

But then again, Scottish courts have a habit of ignoring context and making up the intentions of defendants. Re: Count Dankula.

Interesting: does that mean all the Scottish MPs can return to Parliament to sit and twiddle their thumbs while the English MPs stay away as commanded by the Queen?

This really is the mother of all constitutional fuckups.

So really, what this all says is: you can vote for anyone you want, but if someone has the money to pay the court costs, they can stymy any government voted into power and even worse reverse the democratically voted intention of the population.

Okay:

I want the details of where I can find a bunch of guys that know how to operate challenger tanks and where the ammo is stored. They also need to know where the small arms are and their ammo. I want a people's army. No fucking about, I want heavy armour and I want a properly equipped Army.

We may need to go to war with these cunts. A proper, fighting war....

Indeed we need tanks on the Westminster lawn.

Democracy only works with the consent of the losers. They have refused to consent. It seems now is the time to enforce democracy.