Head of The American Secret Service Not Fit for the Post.

Kimberly Cheatle, the current head of the American Secret Service has gone on record saying that the roof where the Trump shooter fired from had too steep an incline for secret service staff to be positioned on.

She went on to say the slope of the roof was too much and too dangerous for snipers to be positioned on.

Yet the snipers protecting Trump were actually positioned on a different sloped roof, with a steeper incline.

So either she's deliberately lying, doesn't know what she is talking about or has been mis-informed. Either way, it doesn't look good for her. Better not to open your mouth and wait until you have all the facts. 

A simple "I don't know why security staff weren't placed on the roof" would suffice. But here we are again, some clueless staffer has been dropped into a position she has no clue about. And instead of deferring to experts or people with experience, she just shoots her mouth off as though what she is saying is the truth.

It may well be that the roof is not designed to bear the weight of a person and was rejected on that basis, but the slope was not a factor. But again, brainless Kimberly should really have got her facts straight before speaking to a national news outlet. However I don't think that weight was a factor either, because there are pictures of half a dozen officers on the roof "securing" the body of the shooter. So it could bear the weight of at least that many.

In her world and her management team, I'm sure her arrogantly stupid suggestions become policy, but unfortunately when it comes to the real world, outside the management bubble, she loses all credibility.

Clueless, Ill-Prepared, inexperienced, arrogant, I'd wager that she was all of those and more.

For her own sake she should resign, before she stuffs another Jimmy Choo in her big fat overpaid and underqualified gob. 

More on the Trump Shooter.

Some interesting snippets around the 20-year-old shooter that very nearly killed Trump.

First, the left are making big noises about him being registered as a Republican. It means nothing. Many people in the US are registered as one thing, but vote another way. In fact, in 2018 a lot of Democrats registered as Republicans deliberately. 

The shooter allegedly had links to Antifa. No real confirmation yet on that and possibly there won't be any confirmation, Antifa being such a nebulous organisation.

Apparently the kit he had cost a lot of money, possible a few thousand dollars. One has to ask how a 20-year-old got the money to invest in such equipment. How those sums of money being invested in a rifle didn't arouse suspicion with his parents. Or was there an outside influence at play?

The ladder that the shooter climbed was supposedly already placed there. Now I've not seen pictures of whether it was a fixed ladder, or a portable ladder that just happened to be set up on that building on the day of Trump's rally. If there was no fixed ladder then the security detail might have not bothered securing the roof because a previous sweep of the area showed the roof wasn't normally accessible. But somehow it had been made accessible on the day. And this 20-year-old who just happened to be radicalised enough to want Trump dead, just happened to turn up to the rally, just happened to come across an unsecured rooftop within clear sight of the stage with a means of easy access, and just happened to have all his sniper gear with him and just happened to take advantage of a roof top that was unsecured on the day of the rally and just happened to be able to get off a few shots before the security services retaliated with prejudice. What are the chances eh?

The security services have some questions to answer, mainly the amount of time they allowed the shooter to get into place and set up ready for a shot. I would assume the Police marksmen had him in their sights. Word is, the government snipers weren't given the go-ahead to shoot. Possibly they have to wait for the shooter to shoot first? In that case shouldn't standard operating practice be to secure the possible target (Trump) first, then assault the shooter, secure them and then ask questions. But it seems the Trump security details weren't given notice of the shooter, they didn't remove him from the stage or deploy ballistic shields to protect him whilst he's removed to the armoured vehicle parked at the side of the stage, 

Instead, the SOP seems to be not to notify the stage crew, dither about a bit watching the guy with a rifle crawl the length of a building, keep informing some central control about the situation, not get clearance to fire unless fired upon, yadda, yadda... You get the picture. Hardly the picture of the super-efficient and overly protective secret service we've come to expect. I assume the B or C team were on shift that day?

Trummp Assassination Attempt: Lack of Self-Awareness from the Left is Staggering

 Only the day before the assassination attempt of Trump, Nancy Pelosi was saying that only a couple of days ago that Trump was a danger or a threat to America. I can't remember if she went as far as to say he musty be stopped at all costs, but funnily enough that video on YouTube has disappeared.

Biden has already been quoted as saying pin a target on Trump.

Of course they say the comments are now being taken out of context. Yeah, the left, the people that take EVERYTHING out of context, even jokes. Have a taste of your own medicine, fuckers!

That sort of language has only one message. take Trump out. If we can't do it politically, if we can't do it legally, then help us and take him out in the literal sense.

Much is being made of the shooter being a registered Republican, however there were a number of Democrats in the last election that registered as Republicans and then voted Democrat. It was their way of skewing the polls and raising expectation in the Republican camp. They think it's a clever deception. Just like anything the left does, it's just plain childish.

But it's always interesting that the Left gaslight the right by saying it's all the right's fault, that the right are violent, that they use hurty words. The left use words like the right should be "crushed", or "obliterated", or worse.

The violence and the violent rhetoric always comes from the left.

It has to stop.

The left need to start living up to their own expectations of others. If they reckon words are violence, then violent words should not be uttered by them. To do otherwise is hypocrisy.