The Soros Model: How Mass Protests make Millions.

Okay, here's the guide on how I believe George Soros has changed the game regarding stock market exploitation.

Hopefully once you read this, you'll understand why over the past 10 years we have witnessed more activism and larger and more forceful and effective protests in the West.

First off, lets look at natural fluctuations in the stock market. Those natural fluctuations are exploited by everyone and it takes a very keen person to jump on those fluctuations and make any money. But there are people that do it.

But it takes billions of dollars to make a big profit. Sure, there are organisations that can spread the money around so they eventually make a profit, but it's a long-term game and the risks are high. And there's only a very few organisations and even fewer individuals who have the cash to be able to make the spread and profit from it.

But what if you could influence the market and set your ducks in a row in order to profit before you instigate that influence? You could make sure your funds are in the right place and with the right nudge you can make sure things go your way and maximise profits.

If you can influence the market and you have prior knowledge all you need to do if you invest Billions is to make a a 0.1% change in certain stocks and you make millions. Fairly risk-free. No insider trading laws breached. All the influence comes from outside. Even if you fund the organisations causing the chaos, making the moves, you only provide the funds, they work independently (Yeah, right, even when you "donate" several hundred thousand) and you have no influence.

And that's where I think the game has changed. It's moved from spreading funds to make profits on natural fluctuations, with the minimal profits and maximal risk that comes from that, to actively creating the fluctuations and making sure your funds are in place before you create the disruption in order to minimise risk and maximise profit.

It's like insider trading, but instead using outside forces to create stock market fluctuations. Deniable, almost untraceable (and even if it is traced, with no direct connection deniability rules).

So, let us do a mental exercise. You are a billionaire, with enough money to spread over the stock market and make money. You have so much money you can actually influence the stock market by moving funds. But that's a pretty obvious mechanism and people are quite quickly going to keep a sharp eye on where your funds are being placed.

Eventually the risks go up, the profits go down as everyone piles on to your gravy train.

So, you come up with an alternative. You set your funds up in a way that maximises profit and minimises risk if the stock market moves in a certain direction. All you have to do is cause it to move in that direction once the funds are in place. As you are the first in

Then, you use outside agencies to create the circumstances that causes the stock market instability and it moves in the direction you want and you make maximum profit with minimum risk.

Enter a certain Mr Soros, who I personally believe to be using the various agencies he funds like Extinction Rebellion and Black Lives Matter to cause the instability he requires.

Right now we are experiencing a time where the instability will only get worse unless the government steps in and quashes it.

We cannot have individuals stirring up protests and riots and flouting the rule of law and generating instability just to create profit. Whether they do it directly, or by the use of agents provocateur, influencing the economy and government policy by mob rule needs to be outlawed.

The government needs to investigate these organisations like extinction rebellion and black lives matter. How they are funded, where the funds come from, how those funds are being used and how the leaders of those organisations are being influenced.

BLM Protests Shills for Soros

Okay, lest call the Black Lives Matter Protests what they are: They're paid-for protests raised in an attempt to suck in media support and provide political destabilisation.

The same goes for the Extinction Rebellion protests of last year. Paid-for protests that got full media support in order to sway political opinion.

Not only media support: The Police are quite happy to turn a blind eye when extinction rebellion do a little damage like spraying fake blood over a government building, or dig up turf an plants outside another (obvious criminal damage).

But woe-betide you if you are on the "wrong-think" protest. Are you pro-Brexit? Are you pro-veterans? Are you Pro-Tommy Robinson?

Then it's kettling for you m'lad. Should you digress from perfect behaviour for one nanosecond, you get hauled off to chokey by the Police.

Hassle a pro-Brexit MP? Yep, prosecution is the eventual outcome.

But be pro-the environment, pro-communist, pro-Brexit, Pro-Globalism, be Pro-Black Lives Matter, then you can cause untold amounts of criminal damage, vandalise any number of monuments, even throw a bronze statue in a river and the Police will stand idly by.

Ask yourself why?

Why are certain protests allowed to get away with it and others aren't?

Why are those protests that are allowed to get away with it the ones that are funded and by whom?

Start to look at George Soros' open society foundation, look at the other institutions he funds and see how many dots you can join. I see a fair number.

Then look at the interaction with these proto-Communist globalist agenda type organisations and then their links to Common Purpose. Then you start to see why the Police (Common Purpose infiltrated) stand back at certain protests, but attack other (non-Soros Funded) protests.

If you can't join the dots, can't follow the breadcrumbs, if you are one of the protesters being manipulated into causing damage, if you are one of the Police Officers being told to hang back, if you are one of the reporters pushing the narrative, I feel sorry for you.  You are being used.

All he has to do is fund the leaders, the agent-provocateurs, the activists, the ring-leaders. The rest, the willing sheep just ride along. They are the ones that get arrested.

In America there's now a call to abolish the Police. Really? What do you think will replace it? A free-for-all? A crime-free nirvana? NO!

You will get the Army. You will get Martial law. You will get the establishment boot on your neck. You will lose freedom. Goodbye America.

Soros thrives on instability. It's what he's good at. In previous times he would make millions reaping the rewards of naturally-occurring instability, or slippages of the stock market. Now it seems he or his organisations have moved to funding organisations actively causing instability.

The protests and the riots are a win-win for Soros. If the riots themselves cause instability both social and political, that's a win. If the protests cause a second wave of COVID-19 cases, the instability that causes is also a win. The uncertainty wave after wave of covid cases causes to the economy and the stock market is enough to make Soros millions. It only has to waver a few points and he's profiting.

Sadly the rest of the world has to burn to make his money. Not that he has even cared about that.

Are our Police Politically Motivated?

According to this article http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7918326.stm Lib Dem MP David Howarth thinks so.

There are plenty of people in the UK that already know the Police have been increasingly politicised over the years. It started with Maggie's crushing of the miners and continued with greater pace under Labour.

The demanding of new powers by the Police (Headed by ACPO Ltd) and the puppydog rolling over of politicians and granting their every whim has got us to this stage.

It should be for the politicians to put forward new laws and the Police to enact them as public servants, it shouldn't be for the Police to request their own self-serving legislation.

Now the Police are tooling up for a "summer of rage". They expect a glut of protests by activists all over the country, taking advantage of public anxiety and getting people out onto the streets.

It mustn't happen. If protests happen at all, they should be peaceful and within the law. That way, the establishment is denied any reason to bring even more legislation into play. Its even hinted that "middle England" will take to the streets. I do hope so; those middle classes need to see and feel for themselves the monster they and the media that panders to them has created in the para-military Police we have today.