The Soros Model: How Mass Protests make Millions.

Okay, here's the guide on how I believe George Soros has changed the game regarding stock market exploitation.

Hopefully once you read this, you'll understand why over the past 10 years we have witnessed more activism and larger and more forceful and effective protests in the West.

First off, lets look at natural fluctuations in the stock market. Those natural fluctuations are exploited by everyone and it takes a very keen person to jump on those fluctuations and make any money. But there are people that do it.

But it takes billions of dollars to make a big profit. Sure, there are organisations that can spread the money around so they eventually make a profit, but it's a long-term game and the risks are high. And there's only a very few organisations and even fewer individuals who have the cash to be able to make the spread and profit from it.

But what if you could influence the market and set your ducks in a row in order to profit before you instigate that influence? You could make sure your funds are in the right place and with the right nudge you can make sure things go your way and maximise profits.

If you can influence the market and you have prior knowledge all you need to do if you invest Billions is to make a a 0.1% change in certain stocks and you make millions. Fairly risk-free. No insider trading laws breached. All the influence comes from outside. Even if you fund the organisations causing the chaos, making the moves, you only provide the funds, they work independently (Yeah, right, even when you "donate" several hundred thousand) and you have no influence.

And that's where I think the game has changed. It's moved from spreading funds to make profits on natural fluctuations, with the minimal profits and maximal risk that comes from that, to actively creating the fluctuations and making sure your funds are in place before you create the disruption in order to minimise risk and maximise profit.

It's like insider trading, but instead using outside forces to create stock market fluctuations. Deniable, almost untraceable (and even if it is traced, with no direct connection deniability rules).

So, let us do a mental exercise. You are a billionaire, with enough money to spread over the stock market and make money. You have so much money you can actually influence the stock market by moving funds. But that's a pretty obvious mechanism and people are quite quickly going to keep a sharp eye on where your funds are being placed.

Eventually the risks go up, the profits go down as everyone piles on to your gravy train.

So, you come up with an alternative. You set your funds up in a way that maximises profit and minimises risk if the stock market moves in a certain direction. All you have to do is cause it to move in that direction once the funds are in place. As you are the first in

Then, you use outside agencies to create the circumstances that causes the stock market instability and it moves in the direction you want and you make maximum profit with minimum risk.

Enter a certain Mr Soros, who I personally believe to be using the various agencies he funds like Extinction Rebellion and Black Lives Matter to cause the instability he requires.

Right now we are experiencing a time where the instability will only get worse unless the government steps in and quashes it.

We cannot have individuals stirring up protests and riots and flouting the rule of law and generating instability just to create profit. Whether they do it directly, or by the use of agents provocateur, influencing the economy and government policy by mob rule needs to be outlawed.

The government needs to investigate these organisations like extinction rebellion and black lives matter. How they are funded, where the funds come from, how those funds are being used and how the leaders of those organisations are being influenced.

BLM Protests Shills for Soros

Okay, lest call the Black Lives Matter Protests what they are: They're paid-for protests raised in an attempt to suck in media support and provide political destabilisation.

The same goes for the Extinction Rebellion protests of last year. Paid-for protests that got full media support in order to sway political opinion.

Not only media support: The Police are quite happy to turn a blind eye when extinction rebellion do a little damage like spraying fake blood over a government building, or dig up turf an plants outside another (obvious criminal damage).

But woe-betide you if you are on the "wrong-think" protest. Are you pro-Brexit? Are you pro-veterans? Are you Pro-Tommy Robinson?

Then it's kettling for you m'lad. Should you digress from perfect behaviour for one nanosecond, you get hauled off to chokey by the Police.

Hassle a pro-Brexit MP? Yep, prosecution is the eventual outcome.

But be pro-the environment, pro-communist, pro-Brexit, Pro-Globalism, be Pro-Black Lives Matter, then you can cause untold amounts of criminal damage, vandalise any number of monuments, even throw a bronze statue in a river and the Police will stand idly by.

Ask yourself why?

Why are certain protests allowed to get away with it and others aren't?

Why are those protests that are allowed to get away with it the ones that are funded and by whom?

Start to look at George Soros' open society foundation, look at the other institutions he funds and see how many dots you can join. I see a fair number.

Then look at the interaction with these proto-Communist globalist agenda type organisations and then their links to Common Purpose. Then you start to see why the Police (Common Purpose infiltrated) stand back at certain protests, but attack other (non-Soros Funded) protests.

If you can't join the dots, can't follow the breadcrumbs, if you are one of the protesters being manipulated into causing damage, if you are one of the Police Officers being told to hang back, if you are one of the reporters pushing the narrative, I feel sorry for you.  You are being used.

All he has to do is fund the leaders, the agent-provocateurs, the activists, the ring-leaders. The rest, the willing sheep just ride along. They are the ones that get arrested.

In America there's now a call to abolish the Police. Really? What do you think will replace it? A free-for-all? A crime-free nirvana? NO!

You will get the Army. You will get Martial law. You will get the establishment boot on your neck. You will lose freedom. Goodbye America.

Soros thrives on instability. It's what he's good at. In previous times he would make millions reaping the rewards of naturally-occurring instability, or slippages of the stock market. Now it seems he or his organisations have moved to funding organisations actively causing instability.

The protests and the riots are a win-win for Soros. If the riots themselves cause instability both social and political, that's a win. If the protests cause a second wave of COVID-19 cases, the instability that causes is also a win. The uncertainty wave after wave of covid cases causes to the economy and the stock market is enough to make Soros millions. It only has to waver a few points and he's profiting.

Sadly the rest of the world has to burn to make his money. Not that he has even cared about that.

Anti-Democracy: The Pressure Fabricated Outside Democracy

We all (hopefully) know what a Non-Governmental Organisation or NGO is.

If you don't they are generally general charities, health charities, media outlets or political organisations that "advise" government on areas of special interest. They may be funded entirely by charitable donations, they may be funded by private donations, they may be funded by the UK government, or they may have a mix of any or all of the above.

If you do a Google search for Non-Governmental organisations, you'll get a list of the most lovely and benign organisations going. But you'll not get a list of the most influential NGOs. Not the ones that can click their fingers and watch the government ask how high would you like us to jump.

For instance Oxfam. They work outside the government and take donations from private individuals, but government may fund them in times of crisis to provide aid. They are a foreign company and so are outside the remit of the charities commission. They do however have an arm that campaigns and lobbies/advises government on aid and poverty.

The thing to note is that Oxfam has moved beyond charitable works and providing aid and now invests time and money in political lobbying.

Not just Oxfam, but the RSPCA, RSPB, The Qulilliam Foundation, HopeNot Hate, Common Purpose, etc.

There is a huge strata putting pressure on the government on behalf of special interests, mainly in direct conflict with the democratic will of the people. Just look at Brexit.

Hope Not Hate snapped their fingers and Tommy Robinson  was almost instantly removed from Facebook and Instagram. That's quite a lot of influence. Not that they really needed much to Ban Tommy. I just think HNH just provided the excuse.

This is typical of many NGOs, where the political aspect is now a large part of the organisation. In fact there are many NGOs where their remit is "education" and "political lobbying" and "advising government".

I put those attributions in inverted commas, because those labels are not strictly true. There are many NGOs that seem to have an impressive amount of leverage on government and MPs and Civil Servants in Ministerial departments pay an inordinate amount of attention to what they say. They also have an inordinate amount of influence amongst private companies too.

There are many NGOs that are politically active. They produce reports that governments and private companies act upon. It's amazing though how the government and these NGOs work in collusion. For instance an NGO may produce a report that then they use to put pressure onto government and then the government produces some for of legislation to address the "problem" the NGO has highlighted. Totally outside the democratic process: the people didn't ask for the legislation, didn't want it, but it gets pushed through anyway. It is never a part of any manifesto that is voted on, nor do MPs go back to their constituency parties to get a consensus. Just as with Tommy Robinson's banning, the NGOs provide the impetus and the excuse for the actions of government. Action that the public have not asked for.

It's all one jolly circular, anti-democratic club: require the legislation, get an NGO to provide a report providing positive bias, get the media to create positive pressure and then the government enacts legislation. Without ever seeing a manifesto or a democratic vote. Cosy.

However, this influence is outside of the democratic process. Decisions are being made by government based on information and political pressure not from the Demos: the people, but instead organisations outside the democratic sphere. Just as with the EU we have no way of voting these influencers into or out of power.

They are just there, funded by god knows who. The George Soros funded Open Society Foundation (quite an innocuous title) is one such NGO (amongst other George Soros funded NGOs) that has a quite incredible amount of influence due to it's incredible amount of funding. It has influence in government, with newspapers, TV and other media, news outlets and other NGOs. Not just in the UK but across the West.
What they say is taken as gospel and regurgitated almost word-for-word by the media. Any report they publish directly influences rather than advises government.

This outside pressure on government is what is putting the anti-democratic pressure on government.

It's what has changed government policy from Brexit meaning leaving the EU AND the Customs Union AND the Single Market that we were promised before the referendum, to Brexit means a deal, the backstop, and staying in the Customs Union at all costs.

The people didn't ask for a deal. They didn't ask for Brexit to be thwarted by a backstop. They voted for the thing we were promised before the referendum: OUT of the EU, OUT of the Customs Union and OUT of the Single market.

This pressure outside of democracy has to be pushed back. It's the beginning of Fascism. We cannot elect these "influencers" in or out of office. Once a government has been elected, these influencers have 5 years to ply their trade.

Currently that trade is shutting down free speech, shutting down the public's ability to inform other members of the public about the affects of the undue influence these organisations have on our lives.

The pressure and the collusion between Twitter, Facebook, Google, YouTube amongst private media companies and the BBC, Sky and other media outlets the deplatform, un-person, smear and lie, all at the behest of undemocratic Non-Governmental pressure groups has to be resisted on all sides of the political spectrum, before we ALL lose our democratic voices.

This is not a left/right thing, even though the left has been co-opted to do the dirty work of the Fascists.

This is a democracy thing, it's a free speech thing, IT'S A FREEDOM THING!

I believe in the honesty of to Demos, the people, the population. They make more honest and rational decisions than any politician or political activist group.

The Brexit referendum proved the point: that the people wanted out of the globalist anti-democratic EU. They public at large have a great sense of fair play and honesty and they saw the EU as anti-democratic and dishonest.

The public are fast understanding the anti-democratic pressure that is influencing government against their best interests. The public are calling "it" the Elite.

Hopefully they will wake up and realise that the status quo in government has to change in order to effect change. People need to stop voting for the same old political parties that listen intently to the anti-democratic Elitist message. Instead we need to start voting for something new, something untainted by the Elite.

The list of organisations founded or funded by George Soros is staggering, especially when you see how many times they pop up in the media to be quoted, or to front a spokesperson, or have produced a report highlighted by the media. Those few organisations are in the forefront of the anti-democratic process.

Here's the list thanks to Wikipedia:

Founded or helped to found

• Open Society Foundations
• New America

Supported

• Black Lives Matter
• Best for Britain
• European Movement UK
• Scientists for EU
• Media Matters for America
• Center for Public Integrity
• Human Rights Watch
• Priorities USA Action
• American Bridge 21st Century
• America Votes
• Millennium Promise