Who is Sue Gray and How Is She Involved in Both Tory and Labour Governments?

 Sue Gray has come from the Civil Service to firstly condemn Boris Johnson for "Partygate" and then was included in the Labour government as a special advisor on more money than the Prime Minister.

She's now resigned, but been given a lower salary (but still very well-paid) job elsewhere in government. Nice and cushy.

But the more I see of the posts she's been appointed to the more I wonder if she's a WEF minder. You know, there in the wings making sure the PM toes the WEF line and if they think about going against the WEF some scandal will emerge.

I mean, we had the wobble the other week with rumours of super-injunctions going wild round the internet and I just wonder if that was a shot across the bows (politically) of Kier Starmer.

I seems a coincidence that a week later she's gone. 

There are no coincidences in politics.

I wonder if her instructions to the PM were a bit to much too soon for the government to stomach. 

Yes, we've had the cutting of the winter fuel allowance, but I do wonder if Sue Gray was pushing the government for more cuts. 

I predict that if Starmer has pushed back against the WEF then within the next two weeks, the government and Starmer in particular will be heavily briefed against, think Liz Truss.

Super-injunction be damned, I suspect there will be a leak in another country about Starmer. I also suspect Angela Rayner will also come under pressure.

The Labour cabinet come across as a bunch of clueless middle-management types, completely out of their depth when it comes to running the country. Do they look like competent professionals to you? 

My message to Starmer is this: It's now or never, you either have balls or you don't. Start issuing international arrest warrants for those that are attempting to coerce the government into actions against the British public. It's nice being part of the club, but as you are finding out, membership is by the most tenuous of threads. 

I know the names, but without the sort of evidence you can supply, I would be sued into oblivion if I mentioned or even hinted at a name. Kier, you will have written logs, email communications and call recordings. Time to be a man and cast the cloak of corruption aside and do the decent thing.

Kier Starmer's European Wishlist No More Than That: A Wish-List

 Kier Starmer has tried to flesh out what he mans by a "reset" with Europe. 

Apparently he will negotiate closer links with Germany and the German Market (not just for Christmas, of course). But there's a big fly in the ointment: The European Commission.

As those of us opposed to the EU and the level of interference it has in internal affairs of member states, Germany cannot unilaterally agree treaties or trade agreements with countries external to the EU.

So, how will Two-Tier Kier get round this conundrum?

I suspect we will see yet another anti-democratic move but Kier's Government and he will start to forge closer ties with the EU. After the majority of the country voted to leave, with all the consequences that have happened thereafter.

I don't know if you've noticed, but the poor working class have not been that impacted by leaving the EU, but the middle and upper classes have. The Polish Nannies have fucked of back to a prosperous and safe Poland, where they can now earn decent wages and don't have to put up with some entitled upper-middle-class family throwing them breadcrumbs.

The middle class can't just get on a Eurostar now. Their seamless access to Paris and St. Moritz has been interrupted by the oiks that voted leave.

That's why they despise Nigel Farage. He's the arch instigator of making life a bit harder for the upper middle class. As if earning six figure wages wouldn't somehow cushion the blow. 

They need to understand the everyday struggle to survive on a sub-35K wage. It would shock them to the bone.

I'm convinced this is another anti-democratic move by a far from democratic leader of the Labour party. 

His instinct is control and enforcement. He has the legal mindset that makes everything adversarial.

He is dangerous. He reacts like a parent with a wilful child. We are not children. We are not sheep. We will not stand for the upturning of a democratic vote. 

We will not put up with it two-tier Kier. Mark my words.

Voices from the Past in Politics

It's interesting that various voices from past governments keep cropping up or even worse, getting jobs in current governments.

Notwithstanding Kier Starmer, who is a left-over from the Blair government (why anyone who identifies themselves as of the left would vote for anyone that had anything to do with that government I do not know). But I digress. Starmer is a voice and an ideology from that government. He's in charge and it's hard to argue that things will be different under him.

We'll get the same Globalist, don't care about the poor guy policies that Blair instigated back in the Nineties. I will not vote for Starmer or a government run by him, because I know that government will not work in the interests of the people that vote it into power. It will be instead favour corporate sponsors and supra-national undemocratic organisations.

The Tories are no better. They've just brought "Blair Mk2" David Cameron back into the cabinet. Another globalist, who is now foreign secretary. A soothing voice for the globalists after the wobble of Liz Truss being voted in by the Tory party members. Truss was dispatched by the media with suspiciously extreme haste in order to anoint another globalist in the form of Rishi Sunak.

So we now have David Cameron back on the News, telling us we need another war. In a replay of the Libya playbook, we're now bombing the Huthi rebels in Yemen. And we know how well that went for Libya, the West and David Cameron. It wasn't the spectacularly successful military campaign the media made it out to be.

Of course the dark horse is Blair himself. The globalist warmonger-in-chief with the dodgy dossier is still around, every so often popping up and giving his opinion. As if we needed his advice.

I just wonder, why can't these people slip into retirement quietly? There used to be in the past an unwritten rule about making comment about current government policy. In other words keeping quiet.

This is just one more indicator of the globalist elites and how they rule over us, rather than governments ruling FOR us. 

I'm really sick of it. I'm sick of hearing their voices, sick of their policies that favour global corporations, sick of their endless warmongering that benefits no-one, sick of their endless virtue signalling at the expense of the people that put them in power.

Scum...

 Yes, Angela Rayner, the MP for my old home town and her calling the Tories "Scum". Exactly the rabid, partisan rhetoric that put me off Labour when I lived up there. This type of Labour member are literally lunatics, there is a group madness amongst them that make them vehemently oppose anyone that doesn't agree with their viewpoint.

I'd had enough of them back in the Michael Foot era. 

To be honest, the Labour party are scum for not providing a credible opposition to the Tories and letting them romp away with the election and giving them a huge majority. 

Had Labour been a bit more moderate, they might have taken more seats and been able to provide an opposition. But Labour is rife with people that are so thick, so blinkered, so vitriolic , so out of touch and so far to the left that no-one will vote for them.

A classic example of this was the Kier Starmer interview yesterday when he was asked if the phrase "Only women have a Cervix" is transphobic. Here's a hint Kier: It's not. It's actually a statement of scientific fact.

But hey, let's not let science get in the way of ideology eh?

This is the sort of Leftist Lunacy that is losing Labour votes. Supporting the misogynistic take-over of the female space by the male-to-female trans lobby is wrong-headed. But that's Luney Labour for you. 

Consider this for a second: Starmer can't say that only females have Cervixes. What else is he hamstrung by ideology over?

Would he oppose China? Would he sever our relationship with the USA, would he take us out of NATO? With nutters like these in the party, absolutely anything is possible and it's no wonder no-one will vote for them.  

Nobody wants a rabid dog.

 

Hartlepool and Labour: A Crisis of Ideology, Not Leadership.

 So Hartlepool is waking up to being represented by a Conservative MP for the first time in 50 years.

This should put a massive shockwave through the Labour party and knock some sense into them. But from what I'm hearing, that's not the case. The hard left are blaming Kier Starmer for the loss of the seat without one iota of introspection. 

The problem isn't Kier Starmer per-se (although he has that Blairesque air about him: instant dislike for many). 

The main problem for the Labour party are the people beneath Keir and their ideology, the rabidly lefty loons that have not idea how hated their policies are by the working class. In fact the working class would rather vote Conservative than Labour at this point in time, rather kill their first born than vote Labour.

The reality is that the Conservatives (to the disdain of traditional Tories) have occupied the centre-left of politics. Unfortunately, Labour from their far, far left position still see the Tories as far-right. Any sane person can see the reality, but Labour are failing to see it. The far-left loonies will also do their damndest to prevent any move of Labour policy towards the Tories. QED they are F**ked.

The majority of the Labour party neither understands the working class it is purported to represent, nor does it espouse policies that resonate with them. Labour have lost the working class vote. I put "working" in italics to emphasise the problem.

If you are working, paying taxes and trying to make something of yourself, then the Labour party have nothing to offer you. Except higher taxes, mad policies, more intrusion into your life, etc.

They do however have lots to offer the non-working class, like illegal immigrants and those out of work on benefits it seems from their many interviews. They have lots of policies for the pink or blue-haired, lip-pierced university types. They have lots of policies for minorities (there's a clue there why you keep losing).

They also have lots of "Woke" policies that should really stay on University campuses rather than be Government policy. More intrusion into your private affairs, the inability to have free discussion, the cancel culture that pervades the left, the inability to debate, the inability to see inequality, the list goes on.

The ideology that cannot debate with anyone that votes Conservative. The ideology that cannot understand why a working class person would do such a thing. The ideology that cuts them off . The ideology that cannot change. The ideology that hates Britain. The ideology that hates British people. 

If you want change, real change Jess, if you want Labour in power Jess, then resign. Because you, your ideology and people in the Labour party with the same ideology are the problem. 

Yes, the working class want the Labour party to change, but you are not the change they want.