Hang On, Who's in Charge Here?

I see in the News that the chancellor is receiving criticism for not informing the markets about his mini budget. Excuse me, but who is in charge here? Is it the government or the markets? Is it the Government or the Globalists? Is it the Government or those with huge financial interests?

Why should he inform the markets? He's in the government and wouldn't tipping the markets off before his announcement constitute insider trading or leaking information prior to a budget, which is also a no-no?

After all if he only informed certain parts of the market, couldn't they gain an advantage, having prior knowledge? If the treasury had informed one trading firm and another an hour later, the trading firm with an hour's prior knowledge could make a killing in that hour until the whole market had caught up. An hour is a very long time in these technological times. 

Billions are made on making fractions of a percent profit over billions of pounds. Just a few minutes of advance warning can provide such an advantage that a trading house could  could earn a substantial amount of money.

It's yet more nonsense to bash the Truss cabinet with. 

I think the globalists really wanted Rishi Sunak as the PM and are continuing to press for "their man" to be in place to do their bidding instead of working for the people of this country.

If that isn't proof of outright corruption in UK politics, I don't know what is.

Secondary to this is the fact that the Labour party are also pushing this mantra. In lock step with the anti-worker globalists. I say shame on the Labour party. It shows that if you voted them into power instead of the Tories, you'd just get more of the same globalist corruption and the workers of this country would be screwed for an additional 5 years.

Vote for someone else for fucks sake. Not the Tories, not Labour, not the traitorous Liberals nor the Fucking disastrous Greens.

Do not believe the globalist agenda that everyone not supported by them is a fascist.  It's such a worn out cliché just like "Far-Right" or "Extremist" that it's almost a badge of honour these days. 

Vote Reform. Do what Sweden and Italy have done. Vote for the anti-woke anti-globalists if you know what's good for you. I'd say vote UKIP, but unfortunately I doubt they have the funds to mount a decent campaign at the next election.

If it comes to it vote for your local independent candidate. Someone who isn't a professional politician. Even the least best option puts a career globalist-supporting politician out of a job and puts a normal person in parliament in their place, giving a decent paying job to one of us, someone who deserves it.

The Great Reset in Motion.

I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories, but the Great Reset as Defined by Klaus (you will own nothing and be happy) Schwab. but I'm thinking about how you could "own nothing" and be grateful.

Well, it's looking like energy prices will continue to go through the roof and now with rampant inflation, interest rates are certain to go the same way.

At which point, governments will be trying to prop up the system by borrowing billions in order to plug the gap between affordability and actual costs.

You can't normally bankrupt Western economies, but you can make the situation untenable for them. You can make borrowing so expensive that the interest rates on any more loans would be eye-wateringly expensive to service.

At that point the country effectively become bankrupt as it cannot continue to service it's debts.

And then strides onto the landscape, a saviour: what form it will take is currently speculation, but I assume it will be a global mega-corporation.

It will buy up assets that people will willingly give in order to shed their crippling debt burden.

For instance, let's say interest rates go up to 20 or 30%. What dos that do to mortgages? It makes them unaffordable. It's like paying off a half a million pound debt with credit-card-like interest rates. 

As an example lets say a global corporation comes along and says it will buy your house below market value and you can continue to live in it and pay rent. You pay a single easy payment per month and you get your room, board and utilities supplied. If the corporation is cash-rich enough to buy the house outright and then make money in the form of rental, then why wouldn't it? You'd be out of a hole, the corporation gets a perpetual repayment on their investment with hopefully minimal maintenance. You wouldn't own a home but you be grateful to release yourself from the massive debt burden you've been artificially saddled with. 

Global corporations are getting as powerful as medium-sized countries. So why wouldn't they use that financial power and effectively take over massive tracts of land? Buy up farms, control food production. Buy up houses and control the population.

I've already blogged about the lady that was refused a wood-burner installation by her housing association, so what's to stop this global corporation determining what you can and can't do under threat of being homeless? Buy products from these companies, not any competitors. Use this much energy and no more, monitored by the corporate-installed smart meter. Don't own a vehicle, travel by public transport to keep your carbon usage low. Or else eviction. 

I'm not sure I'd be happy in a Schwab-led dystopia. It would be more of a nightmare.

But then I'm sure I'd be classed as one of the deplorable, the undesirables, the people that refuse to comply and live a corporation-led life. I'd be one of the first wave of undesirables cleansed from the planet, on the way to the Post-Reset Utopia. 

Lefty Snowflakes Up in Arms That Italy has Voted a Right-Wing Party into Power.

As we speak Jeremy Vine is prattling on about how bad it is that Italy has voted a supposedly "Far-Right" party into power in Italy.

So what? At a basic level, the BBC have no right to criticise a country that has voted a party into power during democratic elections. 

At a basic level, that is what the people of Italy have declared is their wish. The rest of you can fuck off with your criticism and your baseless smears. Give the party and their female leader (the first female leader in Italy incidentally) a chance. 

Is it because she rejects the current leftist globalist narrative? Is it because she rejects the EU? What is it exactly that makes her democratic election into power so heinous?

Who are you to criticise? 

As it is at the moment anyone slightly to the left of Stalin is considered "Far-Right" by the leftist loonies on the internet, at the BBC and in the Guardian. 

The more you read the various articles, they eventually moderate from "Fascist", "Far-right", to "Hard-Right" or "Right-of-Centre". Indeed "Hard-Right" could describe Margaret Thatcher. Was she a fascist then? 

The nonsense that is peddled about politicians that don't fit the leftist, globalist agenda is close to obscene. In every Western country the agenda is the same: divisive, corrupt, pitting minority groups against each other in order whilst reducing Policing to cause continual chaos so that they can manufacture the legislation to crack down on the population. 

Eventually the population will see through the veil and the lies and as with Italy, start to vote for parties that reject the globalist agenda, reject incessant immigration, reject the capture of the left by huge global corporations. 

They will start to vote for parties other than those supported by the globalist media, corporations and NGOs. 

But, the important thing is they are elected democratically. That is the will of the people. Tough luck if it doesn't align with your values, or political ideology, that's what the majority have voted for. 

Democracy. Live with it. Or are you saying "something should be done" about populations voting "far-right" parties into power just because you don't like them? Because if you are, then what you are advocating is tyranny.