Liverpool Bombing: Don't Let the Security Services Tell You They Didn't Know.

I did mention on my post about the murder of Sir David Amess MP that I'd heard on the grapevine weeks ago that a terror attack was imminent. I can't for obvious reasons go into why I know that, or how I had that information. 

I do also know that there is a credible threat of a set-piece terror attack involving more than one person. The sort of attack I've been warning against for the best part of a decade. 

I will still attend Christmas Markets this year, but I will be more vigilant than usual as the Mrs browses the stalls. 

Sadly the credible threat that the security services hope to neutralise with the use of armed Police at Christmas Markets will not stop the terrorists. Not unless every market or shopping mall has airport-style security at the entrances. 

A bomber would be happy taking just half a dozen people with him (or her: the threat of a female suicide bomber is very real) and to do that it only takes a split-second. Plod with guns can't react to that. 

So be wary out there people!

This is a public service announcement.

Anyway, now to the point of this post: the security services knew in advance of the threat in Liverpool. They knew very quickly who he was and it's now been revealed that he was purchasing bomb-making equipment as far back as April. 

You can't tell me that a person known to the security services (don't give me the bullshit he wasn't of concern) was allowed to buy bomb-making equipment for the best part of a year. I assume he mustn't have tested his skills because the bomb was thankfully a dud. But still the security services had ample intel and time to do something about it. But they didn't.

So ask yourselves: Why Not?

Terror in Liverpool: Rise of a Hero and Expectations of Bullshit Bingo.

 Okay, here we go again... yet another terror attack, this time in Liverpool, comes just weeks after the stabbing of MP Sir Davis Amess.

First off, lets congratulate the Taxi driver for his presence of forethought. Instead of driving his passenger to his intended target, he drove him to the Hospital. An area with few people around on a Sunday and also the best place to receive first aid should the worst happen. The driver David Perry is a brave and intelligent man.  He should if there is any justice, be awarded the George Medal.

Now the Bullshit Bingo bit. Points will be awarded for the following phrases: "Known to Intelligence Services", "Known to the Police", "Islamist", "Muslim", "Immigrant", "Asylum Seeker", "Refugee".

Apparently the authorities already know the identity of the exploded and charred remains in the back of the taxi. Therefore there's a very good chance for followers of bullshit bingo to score points on the first two phrases above. 

Yet nobody asks the question: If he was known to the security services, how was it he could build a viable bomb? How could he source such items if he was under surveillance?

UPDATE. Less than 24 Hours have passed and the Bullshit Bingo delivers. The bombing suspect is a Muslim (Ding!) Syrian Immigrant (Ding!) Refugee (Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding!).  There is a rumour that he had converted to Christianity. I doubt the concept of Taqiyya is understood by the do-gooders that "Enzo"* the virgin-seeker conned.

No word of whether he was known to the security services, but within hours they knew his identity, had raided at least two addresses across Liverpool and had arrested a further three suspects. Bomb-making equipment has been found. Rumour is there were raids in other parts of the UK connected to the bombing.

Luckily his bomb didn't fully detonate. Thankfully not the first time a Muslim Virgin-seeker had failed to make a viable bomb. There's a lot of variables in bomb-making that thankfully the amateurs recruited by extremists haven't quite got a handle on. 

Primers and detonators are simple stuff. We used to make them in Science Labs at school back in the 70's when that sort of stuff was in science books. But initiating the explosion of the main explosive charge is a bit more involved that stuffing a detonator in a block of plastic explosive like in the movies.

Anyway, bullshit bingo continues. Add phase 2: "Mental Health", "victim", "radicalised", "Duped", "Not a (true) Muslim", "not representative".

Enjoy counting.

* I suspect when asked for a new "Christian" name "Enzo" was the model of Ferrari Mr Al Swealmeen envisioned receiving from Allah along with his virgins in  the afterlife.

The Left's Disturbing Use Of Children.

 Greta Thunberg (when she was a kid) was the most egregious use of a minor by the left, being paraded across the World and made to lambast World leaders over climate change.

What Greta has gone through could be classed as child abuse: indoctrinated about the threat of climate change to the point of hysteria, then paraded across the World, missing her education. Hopefully as an adult she'll realise how she's been abused and sue the pants of everyone involved.

But it doesn't stop there. It seems every left-leaning project HAS to involve children, no matter what it is. It puts children on a pedestal and makes them feel special, exactly the sort of grooming that rape gangs put kids through.

But in showbusiness, which we know is left-leaning, there are countless films or characters in films that are a bit questionable. The most obvious would be "Lolita", but it's still happening today. The latest MCU offering the "Eternals" film has a character that is supposedly hundreds of years old, so with adult sensibilities, but stuck in a teen's body. It's a Paedo's wet dream. It's questionable at best and sickening at worst. 

It's easy to see why the Left have no problem with the rape of children by Muslim grooming gangs, because their ideology aligns. 

A Google search for Paedophiles in Labour Party shows numerous occasions where Labour have courted controversy. From members of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) joining Labour, to Labour councillors turning a blind eye to the abuse of Children in care and the rape of children by grooming gangs.

The left support children having medical procedures without parental knowledge. Whether it be birth control or abortions... the left say it's all fine and dandy for minors to go through these adult procedures without parental knowledge if necessary. It shows they are cool with kids having sex. 

The Left raise children to be equal in status as adults. But that's the gateway to child abuse. Because an ideology that puts kids on the same footing as adults has no compunction about treating them like adults in a sexual way. 

I've yet to hear a Leftist say that kids should be kids. Or that parents should have the final say over what happens to their kids. That in itself is telling of the ideology that drives them. The left could argue that parents are oppressing their children by having control over them, but that's just another gateway argument to child abuse.

Over the years I've become convinced that the Leftist Ideology is Evil. In the literal sense. It eschews a Sociopathy that to a normal, balanced person looks deranged. 

The left promotes or hides child abuse, it raises children to the equal status of adults, it changes its opinion on a subject even in mid-sentence, it can argue that black is white, it is racist against a single race whilst simultaneously calling that same race racists without any self-awareness.  It openly assumes support from certain ethnic and racial groups, which in itself is racist.

I would never, ever, vote for a Politician from the left. NEVER, EVER.