Conservative Members Forced to Hold Their Nose and Vote for Someone They Don't Like

 Well, here we go again. We've had several stitch-ups regarding Conservative leadership elections (Gove backstabbing Boris when Theresa May got elected was noteworthy), but this election goes above and beyond.

Conservative voters are being forced to vote for candidates that are clones of each other. They are from a political class of one authoritarian world government globalists that have more or less the same affiliations with the same supra-national organisations. The WEF stands large in this, but there are other less prominent connections.

We are now down to three candidates who are indistinguishable from each other. In fact I'd say that whoever you vote for in the end, this three will be the PM, chancellor and Home Secretary. Just in a different order depending on who gets the top job.

The candidates come from a certain clique or class in global politics: look at Justin Trudeau in Canada, Macron in France, anyone in one of the Top jobs in the EU. They speak in one voice, with no dissent. They are authoritarian and would gladly steamroller the ordinary citizens of their respective countries in order to further their globalist agenda. 

Sunak, Mordaunt and Truss. Not one of them is sympathetic to the plight of their poorer citizens. 

Net Zero will continue it's scorched Earth policy. 

Illegal immigration will continued unabated to supply global corporations with cheap labour and to keep wage costs down across industry. Mark my words the word "amnesty" will be appearing within the next 12 months to give illegal immigrants the ability to work, glossed over as an effort to reduce inflation and reduce the billion pound bill for putting them up in 4-star hotels. 

Inflation will not be tackled. Sunak as chancellor has failed spectacularly to get a grip on it to any visible extent. I remember when Gordon Brown got slated when inflation went close to 2%. Now it's more like 15% and Sunak gets off scot free. If there's any justice in this world, he should be pushed hard on his record as chancellor. "Unforseen" or "Extreme" circumstances are not an acceptable response. No matter how extreme the circumstances, a chancellor should have a toolkit of measures ready to deploy to mitigate anything that is thrown at him. Staring at the inflation figures like a Rabbit caught in car Headlamps is not acceptable.

Kemi Badenoch was the last "independent" candidate, the last gasp for ordinary Conservative voters. She went yesterday.

British Conservative MPs have delivered yet another stitch-up to the British people. 

Thanks a bunch. 

Globalists Target Farming

 In January os 2021 I posted this blog: Delphius' Debate: USA: Watch The farms (delphiusdebate.blogspot.com)

Where I expressed concern that farms were being bought out by large corporations.

Well, look what's happening now. In Sri Lanka a government has been toppled because of it's severe environmental restrictions. The Sri Lankan government banned fertiliser. Yes, it banned fertiliser use in farms. 

So yield dropped and farmers (and the people generally) revolted.

In The Netherlands, the Farmers are being teargassed for protesting against a government that is trying to bring in rules that limit nitrogen use. Banning fertiliser and also limiting livestock. That's strange, a government on the other side of the world doing exactly the same thing. It's almost like there's a plan being followed across the globe, like someone else is telling governments what to do.

I have said before that moves are afoot to corporatise the farms of the world. By banning essential things like fertiliser or limiting livestock numbers then the farms become unprofitable and ripe for the picking. Who will pick them up? Big corporations will. Big corporations will take them over and run them using their genetically modified crops that require less fertiliser. The move will be greenwashed around the globe as a triumph. 

Even those farms that hold out will eventually be forced to use the corporate GM crops as they will be the only ones approved by government. Available at huge cost no doubt. A cost high enough to bankrupt the private farms eventually. While the corporate farms get the GM goodies at preferential rates. It has to happen once the corporations get involved, because their whole reason for being is to maximise profits and remove competition.

I see what you are doing big corporations. I see what your end goals are you treacherous elites.

Reduce CO2 so that global yields will suffer, reduce nitrogen so they fall even further. Let the root of food production and the safety of the countryside fall into the hands of global corporations.

What could be scary about that?

What could be scary when you have no alternative then to swallow the corporate protein pill. 

What could be scary when food is limited or priced out of your reach?

Where do you go to eat if food is controlled by a corrupt cartel?

I can se far enough ahead to see what the farmers see already. A threat to the supply of food and along with it their livelihoods. 

This scorched Earth Environmentalism, backed by big business, corrupt corporations and corrupt government cronies need to be stamped out immediately.

I've said it before: Do these big businesses really have your welfare or the welfare of the world at heart? Do you believe that? Are you an idiot?

Globalism: The Short-Sighted Ideology

 I'm nearly 60. With that sort of maturity (I hate to say age, I'm still a teenager in my head) comes a certain perspective.

I tend to think more in strategic terms, rather than tactically. More long-term.

So to me, globalism seems very short-sighted, very tactical, very short-term. Why?

Well, because over the long term there will always be something that happens to eliminate the a short-term gain.

Hence we have the absolute global shitstorm after Covid. Something that we haven't recovered from six months or more after restrictions were lifted. Either countries are holding onto outdated medical advice and restricting travel and imports while other countries have opened up and are gobbling up the world's resources as their consumerist needs re-emerge.

During Covid, a lot of old container ships were scrapped. During the lull, companies preferred not to pay wages and mooring fees for hulls that were not earning. Instead they scrapped the least efficient ships and made their crews redundant.

Now we're all better and we want to buy stuff, there isn't enough capacity to bring it to us. So now instead of £1500, a 40ft container will cost £20,000 to £30,000 to ship from the far east to the UK. Supply and demand. You can't pay less because shipping it by rail across Asia would still be more. 

If what you're shipping is large and you can't get many of them into a container, that a massive price hike per unit. Even if you're shipping 30,000 items in that container, that could in effect be an extra £1 per unit on the landed price of the item. 30,000 items in a container: they can't be that big and by extrapolation that expensive. So you may have doubled the landed price per item of your product. 

Hence inflation. 

This is where Globalism falls down. Removing whole industries from countries and relying on a single country like China, or even a small handful of countries on the other side of the globe to make everything you consume is a risky strategy. Not risky for the manufacturer: they will move on to the next product, not risky for the shipper, they will just ship something else and still be paid, not risky even for the seller in the West: they just put the price up. It's the poor sap at the end of that supply chain that gets handed the shitty end of the stick. All the price increases get handed to the consumer. 

So Inflation.

Globalism also falls down when it comes to security. The Globalist mantra is we all trade together, so we can't go to war with each other. But look at what's happening in China: with vast amounts of money coming into the country for goods being shipped to the rest of the World, they are now investing that money in ever more capable military assets. They are not buying from abroad. They are making their own assets in-country. They can do that, because they have all the production capacity right there.

If the UK wanted to make a bespoke microchip in quantity in the UK, could it happen? I doubt it. Could we produce and supply ALL of our military assets in the UK? Nope, not a chance. 

Think we can? I'm sure all the chips in the electronics in our military kit are made in the UK. I'm sure the missiles our aircraft are armed with are made in the UK. I'm sure the sensors on the engines in our tanks and Army vehicles are not made in...China.

This is important. If it ever comes to a shooting war, logistics are key. EVERY general and field-Marshall in every historical war knows the importance of logistics. 

If the supply of sensors for our diesel engines or the supply of components to solder to our UK-made circuit boards dries up, then we cannot fight. 

Globalism hamstrings countries. It make them reliant on outside sources of supply. It works, until that source of supply is cut off by your enemy, or worse still your enemy is the source of supply. Or even of that source then becomes the sole source on the planet and increases prices.

Globalism doesn't work.