I watched Some Interesting Videos This Week.

I watched a few interesting videos this week. 

The first was on Theo Von's channel and featured John Kiriakou as a guest. He was asked about 911 and if it was preventable and if America had prior knowledge. I have a lot of time for John, I like his analysis and he basically talks the talk. You can't get much more authentic: he was jailed for whistleblowing on illegal CIA activity. So provably CIA ands not some Walter Mitty wannabe.
The link is to a short clip from the video. I might watch the full video this weekend.

His answer ties in very nicely with my analysis. He mentioned the al-Saud connection and the funding of terror plots by high-level individual in Saudi Arabia. He did say that the CIA never got to interrogate the individuals, they all mysteriously died days after America flagged them up to the Saudi Government as persons of interest. So they couldn't be interrogated and implicate the Saudi Government?

But this is where it gets murky, because you have private individuals with immense wealth bestowed to them by the state, funding (supposedly privately) terrorist organisations that support the extremist Wahabbi sect of Islam (that is the Islam of Saudi Arabia). In John's words, there was no smoking gun. But you know that it's just a set-up to avoid a direct link between the Saudi government and international terrorism. That money won't be moving without approval from someone.

And that's where the link is with my story about the assault on the compound in Afghanistan that went a bit pear-shaped on the night of Operation Rhino, the parachute drop into Afghanistan.  I'm convinced the senior Taliban and al-Qaida figures that were at that compound were meeting with individuals from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and possibly one other Gulf state to discuss matters of funding and the impending political situation regarding America and the imminent arrival of ground troops in strength (special forces had been in Afghanistan for weeks prior).

I believe that's why the (normally lightly armed) compound was so well armed that and why the defence of that compound was so fierce. As the West train the Saudi army amongst others, I would love to talk to someone that was at the compound that night and hear if they got "Western vibes" from the fighters inside the compound.
It's still coming to light the number of casualties from that particular operation that night. Initially The Yanks said one person injured, the tally has now risen to half a dozen injured as the truth slowly came out. But the real figures on casualties have yet to be made public. 

But, it's nice to see correlation kind of leaching into the public domain. 

The second video was on Chris Williamson's channel, he interviewed Ex_seal DJ Shipley. DJ has some unorthodox ideas about the war with Iran and how to solve the Iran problem. It involves nukes. 

Which is my take on things. If I was PM, I'd be ruthless. The advantage of being a sociopath. 

Iran is a problem because the leadership is dispersed and hard to hit with conventional weapons. The only solution is to eradicate the leadership by eradicating whole cities. Do you want to win the war or not? War is fought using any means necessary to win. There is no second place, no compromise.

If I was fighting the war, I'd be dropping tactical nukes along the Iranian and Yemeni coast to eliminate the missile and drone launch sites. I'd drop a nuke on each launch site after they had launched. It removes the launch site and any supporting infrastructure and personnel around the site. 

If I'd been PM during the time of 911 and I'd found out that Saudi individuals flew the planes into the Twin towers and that Saudi individuals were financing the Taliban and al-Qaida? I'd be having a serious talk with the Saudi government on how it would be a pity if Mecca disappeared in a mushroom cloud. And that I would lose zero sleep over it's loss. 

I might not need to do it, but I'd make damn sure the person I was talking to believe I would do it.

Which make you think that's the game Trump is playing. Except I don't think the death cultists in Iran believe him, or are that bothered. They're continuously push the boundaries, as they always do. 

If I were Trump, I'd target something far enough away from civilians, something important to the regime. possibly one of their facilities to make nukes, or ballistic missiles. And I would nuke it. A small tactical nuke. Just enough to make the place unusable for a couple of decades. 

The Israeli Atrocities: Coming to a Western Country Soon.

I blogged when the US pulled out of Afghanistan that we had a ready-made army here in the UK of Extremist Muslim sympathisers and that we had better watch out that the arms left behind in Afghanistan don't find their way to Western shores.

What I didn't predict was Hamas getting a shitload of the weapons and attacking Israel. I thought Israel had one of the best security services in the world. I thought their intelligence services were up there with the best. They had infiltrated various Muslim extremist organisations to various levels, so knew what was going on outside their borders.

So I thought.

Then last weekend happened. Several thousand Hamas psychopathic idiots lost their life while slaughtering unarmed Israelis. 

If Brits have been killed my response would be the mother of all disproportionate responses. I'd nuke Gaza. Just a small tactical one to vaporise the Hamas leadership and send a message: do not fuck with me. Or the soft option which would be to carpet-bomb the place. And thank me for being merciful. If we can trace the weapons back to their source, then the conduit must be eliminated and every town along it flattened.. I don't truck with the people that shout about women and babies being killed. Hamas exists in Gaza because the population allows it. The population is culpable for any killing perpetrated by Hamas. Just like those supporters of Palestine also say Brit civilians are legitimate targets because of their support for Israel or the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Or Israeli civilians are culpable for the actions of the Israeli government. 

If I had my way there would be zero tolerance. 

The same should now be happening with the Muslim immigrants: if they have arrived here without documents, we must assume their intentions are not honourable and we give them one option to be returned to their home country. Otherwise they will be returned to a country of our choice. Get flown home or have a fucking long walk. Your choice.

I have no time for the bleeding heart do-gooders that say we must do more to help the immigrants. You mean the standing army that has landed on our shores over the past few years, refuses to accept our way of life and refuses to integrate?  The people that would happily take up arms and cause atrocities?

I just hope to God that the arms from Afghanistan don't find their way into Europe and especially the UK. Because if they do, then there will be a bloodbath. 

We have no standing army able to respond to or contain thousands of heavily armed men like the Hamas attack. Our Police would be inadequate against such a force. 

Just how long would it take to respond with overwhelming force if even a few hundred armed men appeared on the streets of one or more of our towns or cities? You cannot imagine the loss of life that would occur if dedicated, psychopathic, armed extremists raided towns across our country. I say towns because there are enough undocumented men in this country aligned with the likes of Hamas to be able to attack more than one town simultaneously. In numbers that the Police could not compete with.

City Centres, Shopping Malls, Christmas Markets and Large public gatherings must be considered at critical risk after the Hamas attack on Israel. To do otherwise would be foolhardy.

Don't say I didn't warn you. 

Afghanistan.

Well, what can I say about this clusterfuck of a situation, other than it was entirely predictable. The past 200 years of history has proven that the Brits, the Russians and now the combined Western World can't tame that country.

I'll explain later why Afghanistan can't be tamed, but first let's pause an remember all of those men and women that lost their lives, or who were badly injured whilst on duty in that fly-blown, sandbox of a country. It's those people and their families that I have sympathy for today. Just what did they die for? Just why were our soldiers permanently maimed? To what purpose? 

Twenty years and several lives later and Afghanistan is returning to the status quo. 

The country cannot be tamed, because there are not enough people in the country to police every inch of it. The country is a disparate set of towns, separated by hundreds of miles. Armies can disappear into the wilderness and because they have no uniform, can travel at will around the country. When necessary they can form into organised groups and attack in force, only to melt into the wilderness again afterwards.

The other thing to understand is the Taliban, like other Muslim extremist groups, are actually looked on as more pious, more Muslim and therefore less pious Muslims can't resist them. Because to do so would be to go against a group that follows the teachings of Allah to a more extreme degree. The Taliban are better Muslims than those that have been corrupted by the West's values. Those the West call moderate Muslims, the favourite kind of Muslim for the Media.

It's exactly the same here in the UK with extremist Muslim groups and the child rape gangs. That's why they can flourish within the Muslim community. The extremists are following the Koran more accurately and to a more extreme degree than the lax Muslims that are "moderate". 

In the Muslim world, the extremists will always win out. It's built-in.

And so Afghanistan slips back to extremism. The Western World has failed, due to a lack of stamina. 

The sad thing is that we are now more at risk at home too. The extremists are here on our soil. Once Afghanistan and Iraq fall back to their default positions, the training camps will start up, the networks in the West will be activated. 

Emboldened by these "victories" you will see more atrocities on Western Soil. 

Mark My Words.

Who will be next to try their hand in Afghanistan? China maybe? There are resources to be had there and the country is virtually empty. China has no compunction about the excessive use of force in order to quell insurrections. The type of force required to win in Afghanistan. Although to do that, China would need to neutralise Pakistan. 

Both countries are nuclear powers, although I do have doubts about the effectiveness of the the Pakistani nuclear deterrent. I'd put money on China to win that bout if it came down to it.

So, let's see what happens next. Although we do need to grow balls and defend our borders and step up internal security. Not the creepy all-seeing security that makes criminals of everyone. But security forces targeted at those that would cause atrocities in this country.

Right now there are enough ex-Taliban fighters and sympathisers in the UK to cause an atrocity on the level of the Mumbai attacks. Just think what damage a group of gunmen could cause in a crowded London shopping street? Or (and the extremists have form for this too) a crowded shopping Mall? 

A handful of heavily armed fighters could kill hundreds of civilians. 

My advice is to avoid large shopping centres, especially in London and Birmingham for a while.

Those people we pissed off in the first hours of the invasions of Afghanistan, the people I've blogged about before will come for revenge.

Terror Attacks and the Link to "Operation Enduring Freedom" in Afghanistan

On the news in the past fortnight is a foiled Islamic terror attack in Australia and numbers of people killed in Islamic terror attacks in Spain.

Now you may think the two countries are unrelated, but if you look at the list of countries that have contributed men and materiel to Operation Enduring Freedom, they are right there on the list.

I've said before there is more to these attacks than meets the eye and the only way to solve them is to identify the source of the funding and the ideology that puts these people into the mindset that killing civillians is okay.

I very much doubt that some nutjob looks on Wikipedia and decides unilaterally to start operations against all the countries that contributed to operations in Afghanistan. It's got to be someone with a close personal link to that country and has suffered as a direct consequence of those actions. It's also someone rich enough to provide or with links to others that can provide funds to bankroll the terror networks in each country.

So by way proving a theory, I'm putting up the list of countries involved with operation enduring freedom and you can see which countries especially smaller ones have been victims of terror attacks in recent years.

Okay, some countries are unstable and terror attacks started before we got involved in Afghanistan, but it makes uncanny reading as you go through.For instance Sweden, normally quite neutral and passive in terms of warmongering, has suffered Islamic attacks recently.

It also outlines the idiocy of taking in so-called migrants from the areas where we are fighting the self-same people. How is it we're fighting insurgents in Afghanistan but at the self same time taking in Afghani "migrants" who could well be those self-same insurgents we're fighting in their home country.

None of the policy surrounding Islamic terror makes any modicum of sense whatsoever. One the one hand we are occupying a country in an attempt to prevent terror from being exported from that country, but we're allowing the very same people into our countries as migrants from a war we created and who could be the people laying IEDs for our troops over there....

And the liberals and far left actively denounce anyone that points out this stupidity....

Anyway, here's the list of countries involved in Afghanistan:
                                                                       

1 Afghanistan                                       

2 Australia                                           

3 Armenia 

4 Azerbaijan

5 Bangladesh                                        

6 Bulgaria

7 Belgium                                             

8 Bosnia and Herzegovina                    

9 Canada                                              

10 People's Republic of China              

11 Republic of the Congo

12 Cyprus                                              

13 Czech Republic                                  

14 Denmark

15 Egypt                                               

16 Estonia

17 France                                               

18 Georgia

19 Germany                                           

20 Greece                                              

21 Hungary

22 India                                                 

23 Iran                                                  

24 Ireland

25 Italy                                                  

26 Japan

27 Kuwait

28 Kyrgyzstan

29 Latvia

30 Lithuania

31 Macedonia

32 Malaysia

33 Montenegro

34 Netherlands                                       

35 New Zealand

36 Norway                                             

37 Oman

38 Pakistan                                           

39 Poland

40 Portugal

41 Qatar

42 Romania

43 Russia

44 Slovakia

45 Slovenia

46 South Korea

47 Spain

48 Sudan

49 Sweden

50 Switzerland

51 Tajikistan

52 Thailand

53 Turkey

54 Turkmenistan

55 United Arab Emirates

56 Ukraine

57 United Kingdom

58 United States of America

59 Uzbekistan
60 Finland

Finland is out of sequence because it isn't on the list of countries participating in Op Enduring Freedom, but because of the stabbings this weekend I checked and yep... their military has operated in Afghanistan, so they've been tagged onto the end.

What Has Sweden Done to Deserve This?

What has Sweden ever done to deserve a terror attack of their very own, a number of people being killed yesterday in a truck attack?

Well, despite allowing in thousands of Islamic migrants that is.

Unless it's because of the 900 or so troops deployed to Afghanistan as part of task force 47 and the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Mazar I Sharif.

But maybe allowing thousands of migrants into your country that may feel some affiliation to those people they see as oppressed by you may not have been the smartest move.

That's despite you "only" being part of a rebuilding force.

That's despite whatever you think that Islam is a "just" religion and not also a political ideology.

In fact if you start to look at the less publicised countries involved in Afghanistan as part of ISAF, then a pattern emerges. Canada, Sweden, Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Italy, Norway, Finland, and to a lesser extent Luxembourg, Romania, the list goes on.

Look at this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Security_Assistance_Force and look at the list of participating nations.

Now tell me there isn't a very strong link. Maybe someone in Afghanistan holds a grudge. Someone with the ability and money to organise and finance a large number of people. As the only major source of revenue in Afghanistan at that time was Opium, then I'd hazard a guess that's where the source of the grievance lies.

Whatever.

It's all down to lone wolves and religion.

Maybe looking at the countries that haven't had their own Islamic terror attack may shed some light on the issue. Where were't they and what weren't they involved in?