How Can the World Health Organisation Be Trusted with The Pandemic Treaty?

 Ah, I love it when quite obvious points come about from related items, that are then totally unreported by the Mainstream Media. 

Let's take two examples. 

A couple of days ago, Parliament debated the "Pandemic Treaty" proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) that would compel governments that sign the treaty to be subservient to the WHO on all aspects of health in the event of a new pandemic.

Also a couple of days ago the FBI finally came out and said the Covid-19 pandemic did come out of a lab leak in Wuhan.

Now the two points above wouldn't be controversial if they were unrelated. But we are talking about the World Health Organisation. An organisation that fell in line with Chinese propaganda relating to the Covid-19 pandemic hook, line and sinker. 

So much so, that the WHO proposed exactly the same measures around the world that had been implemented by the Chinese. The WHO which for so long, bought Chinese propaganda that there wasn't a major viral outbreak in Wuhan until it was abundantly clear that there was a huge outbreak in China, China couldn't cope and the virus spread across the globe in weeks. 

We now know that the Covid-19 virus was in Italy around the end of August 2019, well before the WHO announced the pandemic and way too late to save hundreds of thousands of Italians. 

Had the WHO been on the ball, there would have been a global shutdown of travel, they would have advised on the quarantining o China from the rest of the world until they got the virus under control.

But the WHO are completely compromised by the Chinese government and are apparently corrupted by them. It came to light that several senior individuals in the WHO were in cahoots with the Chinese government and also the Western backers of the research in Wuhan.

So, when it comes to making Western governments subservient to the WHO when it comes to global pandemics, do you really trust the WHO to do the right thing? Do you really think they are a wholly scientific organisation who have the health of the globe at the core of their being, or are they a politically corrupt organisation? 

I know what my opinions are. 

Do you think they are fit to advise governments on health policy let alone compel government action? 

I know what my opinions are on that as well. 

Globalism and globalist control need to be resisted. At best they become sclerotic and prevent the quick response to threats and other aspects of life.

The WHO were slow to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic, gave bad advice on how to deal with it. How will the advice they give any good or any better during the next one? Will it again be tainted by politics rather than science? Will the investigation into the source of the next pandemic be obfuscated to the same degree as the Covid-19 one?

We cannot and must not put government policy, government responses and national resources in the hands of an unelected, politically corrupt and morally bankrupt organisation. 

The failure of the WHO to adequately manage the Covid-19 pandemic has shown they are unfit to take control of sovereign nation states under the pandemic treaty. We must not sign it and be bound by any of it's requirements.

An independent nation can work more quickly, with more focus that any supranational global organisations. We shouldn't need to be told to close our borders. We should be able to close them independently of anyone else. We should also have the ability to protect those borders robustly in the event of another global pandemic.