There are many conspiracy theories that are made out of the most tenuous circumstantial links. They can be explained away with detailed scrutiny.
However, the Dr Kelly affair is another animal entirely. His convenient death, after briefing against the government and the subsequent whitewash of an enquiry which delved non too deeply into the circumstances around his demise appeared to show there was something more to it than met the eye..
Now we find that his medical records and the results of his autopsy will be banned from public scrutiny for 70 years.
What purpose will hiding the truth serve? Not only that, but hiding it for so long? One theory is that its to protect his children from hearing the gruesome details of his demise, but if my father had died in mysterious and controvertial circumstances, I'd want to know the truth, gruesome or not.
No, the signs point to there being something worth hiding. Something so big that it needs to be buried in 70 years of history.
As there is something to hide, what is it? It may not be exactly the conspiracy people think it is: there be other reasons than his criticism of the government, there may be more to his life than we presume rather than his controvertial death, but given the way the multitude of circumstantial evidence keeps on piling up one can't help but think there is a conspiracy.
The serious prospect of Reform as viable opposition?
-
… and as such … govt.
Two ex-Tories discussing Reform, Miriam Cates current Tory … to be expected
… however … that does not negate the clear issues with...
3 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment