Not long ago I postulated that the Man Made Global Warming Scam, the World Health Organisation's ramping up of the Swine Flu Epidemic and the push for GM crops were all examples of big corporations manipulating political agendas for their own ends. Certianly I posulated that the Public Bodies that require the services of Global Corporations seem to have too cosy a relationship.
EU Referendum is getting a rep for collating data on and exposing these cosy relationships, as tesified by the dogged investigation of R K Pachauri and the incestuous Climate Business created around him.
Now EU Referendum has exposed a new incestuous relationship via the Institute Of Science in Society: It seems that there is proof stacking up of a very close relationship between the WHO, some of their experts/advisors and the Big Pharma Corporations that benefiit from the contracts issued by the WHO. In other words, an incestuous relationship just as bad as the global warming one.
I'm sure there will be others. GM Crops were pushed as the next big thing for agriculture, with lots of benefits and no side effects. But is that really true. Our own common sense told us that adding an insecticidal gene into an edible plant may not be a good idea, both from the perspective of the beneficial insects that visit those crops (like bees), and the eventual consumers (us). Well, it seems that despite the protests that GM crops are safe to consume, they aren't. I just wonder what the real effect is on pollinating insects?
I'm sure there will be more cosy relationships exposed between members of global public organisations and big corporations. The thing is, how do we sanction these unelected global beaurocrats if they cross the line?
The serious prospect of Reform as viable opposition?
-
… and as such … govt.
Two ex-Tories discussing Reform, Miriam Cates current Tory … to be expected
… however … that does not negate the clear issues with...
2 hours ago
Lol, that video really has cult status, the number of times its been used!
ReplyDelete