The Next Tommy Robinson March - A Turning Point in History.

I hope to be at the next Tommy Robinson Unite the Kingdom March in London. God willing, I'll be there. 

I've a feeling that this will be a serious point in history, a turning point, a marker in the sand.

There will be enough of the right sort of people attending. Not extremists, but normal, ordinary citizens who would normally not be encouraged to march.

The next UTK march will be after the budget, after the government have lied yet again in order to stick their hand in our wallets. 

They will have lied yet again to rob those more prudent individuals of their savings. 

They will have lied yet again to get involved in the side hustles of ordinary folk.

They will have lied yet again in order to rob people of their pensions, of their future financial stability.

The next UTK march will the the genesis of the next general strike, the next protest against this insidious government, against their overbearing instinct to control the population via digital ID.

The only people supporting the government now are die-hard Communists. They don't know they are Communists, but their ideology is firmly rooted in the cultural revolutions of Stalin and Mao. They cling to the opinion that they are "just" Socialists, but those of us that know and have seen history, know they are not.

It's time for the workers of the country to wake up and to change from passive to active. Nothing illegal, but we can do thing legally that will hurt the government. We lose a days pay, but they lose a day's national income tax. That's a lot of money and it makes a statement of intent.

And we will watch with interest, the actions of the Unions supposed to support the workers of this country. We will see if they are on our side, or if they are captured by the globalist Communist elite.

It's About to Get Grim - The Budget.

Well, here we go again: a Labour budget. The news being leaked is not good. Hopefully the reality of the budget will be less impactful then the hype running up to it.

But Rachael's mismanagement has increased a 22 Billion Black hole to 50 billion in a year. That's more than doubled a figure that you could say the Tories took 14 years to accrue. 

The big, big, big problem is ideology. Labour think they can tax their way out of recession. They can't. No-one can, no-one has ever succeeded. 

While not technically a recession, we all know it really is. GDP per capita has fallen significantly and if it wasn't for the government importing masses of people, actual GDP would have fallen too, fulfilling the technical definition of a recession. 

Sadly the Labour government will stick to their ideology , the ideology that says they know better how to spend YOUR money. It's the arrogance of the left. They know better. The Communist Karens: they know better. The Ageing Trots: They know better.

They know better than all the experts, they are more virtuous than the working class that they hate vehemently. 

It's the same sort of totalitarian compassion that got us Hitler and Stalin. That's the sort of mindset that pervades the left. 

We WILL tax you to make the lives of illegal immigrants better. We WILL tax you to spunk money on some project in sub-Saharan Africa. And don't complain, because we haven't taxed you to the pointy you live in a mud hut. Yet.

It's the usually Communist collective rush to the bottom. No aspiration, only collective misery. We must all suffer, so that we can make the lives of the oppressed marginally more bearable. And we must be thankful as we are taxed to oblivion, because our privilege must be purged. 

he workers of the UK must pay and pay and pay, until we are all living in the same conditions as the third world. We are paid the same wages as the third world. Because the global corporations could quite easily source their staff in teh third wo9rld and pay those wages there. 

I've said before, globalisation requires us to accept the same wages here in the UK as those in the slums of Delhi.

Rachael is running scared. increasing a 22 billion black hole to 50 Billion is no mean feat. She fucked up in a major way and will continue to double down, because her ideology requires it. This is the Seventies replayed in the new millenia. The only thing going for her is that the public sector are this time the money-earners. But they are still quite militant. Especially the Junior Doctors, who don't yet have the ability to go private and rack in the cash. 

Binmen and street sweepers, all get a better wage than the hoardes of retail workers who now form the backbone of the UK workforce. 

But I for one hope there will be a call for a general strike. This is too much. Too many pre-election promises broken. If income tax is raised on the lowest paid workers, then we must stand together and strike. 

If You Can't Make a Profit Out of a Free Resource.....

No, I'm not banging on about the wind and solar farms (yet) but instead I'm talking about the charity shops that are now leaving the high street.

The Charities (of which the most Recent is Cancer Research) cite increased costs like wages (thanks to teh increase in minimum wage), increased staffing costs (thanks to the increase in Employer's N.I.), increased rents (thanks to greedy corporate landlords), and just harder trading circumstances overall.

But hang on, charity shops are given the items they sell in the shops for free, so how hard is it to make money out of a free resource.

Well, it's not about making money, but making enough money. Charities do get free stuff from donations, but a lot of charities also plug other stuff they buy, like charity cards, trinkets and accessories. So straight away they have stock costs. And like every retailer in the world, if your stock costs money, then it has to earn it's keep. If it's sat on a shelf for months, then it's not earning profit. The ideal scenario is a product arrives on a shelf or display and is instantly bought, making instant profit. 

Sitting on a shelf isn't earning. And Charity "tat" is more likely to stay on the shelf when times are hard. In times like these, you are scouring charity shops for cheap clothing. Not looking for tat gifts. 

With free stuff like donated clothes, there is a bit of leeway, because the item hasn't cost anything. But it still needs to sell and make money to keep the charity working.

Anyone who visits charity shops will have noticed the inexorable creep upwards in prices. Time was, a charity shop provided a cheap way to get reasonable clothes. But these days, the prices are close to (say) offer prices at Peacocks, or prices from the Chinese discount websites.

When charity shops sell used stuff at the same price as new stock on a sale rack, then the charity shop model starts to fall apart. People will just go buy new stuff. Unless you're in one of the affluent areas where the charity shop stocks high end designer items. The charity shop shopper's holy grail. 

So with retail rents increasing despite the reduction in businesses able to pay them, the charity shops are getting squeezed. Higher costs to run the retail side reduce revenue. 

At the other end, the administrative side hasn't reduced costs either. Staffing costs have increased thanks to Labour's policies and I don't see charity executives taking pay reductions to help out. We're still seeing charity bigwigs earning six figure salaries. Nice work if you can get it.

Sadly, even selling stuff they get for free can't keep up with increased operating costs and greedy board members. So sadly charity shops will be the next tranche of shops to leave the high street. 

I mean, if you can't make a profit selling free stuff, what does that say about the costs of doing business imposed upon them by government policy?

Which takes me on to the renewable energy sector... 

15 years of subsidies. You'd think that by now, using an energy source that costs nothing, they would now be making a profit. The technology would be mature enough and scaling would reduce costs, so renewable energy companies would be making a profit and delivering cheap energy.

Except no. The greedy companies got it written into their contracts that they would be paid just the same for their energy as fossil fuel produced energy. Thus maximising profits for shareholders.

Not only that, for every watt of renewable energy there is, we also have to have a fossil-fueled backup, in case the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. So we have to pay someone else to provide equipment to produce the same energy just in case, and pay them to sit idle, waiting for the moment to be called on to fill the gap.

So every watt of renewable energy generation equipment is paid for at least twice, with twice the installation costs: one for the renewable energy conversion and another for the fossil fueled energy conversion as back up. 

For every huge wind turbine spoiling the view off the coast, there is a gas turbine generator sat idle, waiting to be called upon if that wind turbine can't deliver.

Government policy makes it impossible to source cheap energy. The original idea of free energy being provided cheaply to the consumer has been bastardised buy government policy. 

That's why government should get involved in as little as possible. It always fucks it up.