The evil of the virtue Signallers.

I've come to the conclusion that virtue-signallers are evil. Pure Evil.

In the case of those that support mass Muslim immigration, why would they condemn the females of the UK to being second-class citizens when the Muslims take over the country? 

I mean, pride is a sin and being proud to signal your "virtue" above your neighbour so you can show off, is not a virtue, if you are condemning future generations of women to effective slavery under a Muslim regime.

Signalling your support for "trans" women is not a virtue if by allowing men into female spaces women are being raped or sexually abused or violently assaulted.

Signalling your support for climate change and net zero is not a virtue if you are condemning the poor to poverty and risking them freezing to death because they can't afford heating in the winter.

Signalling your support for equality is not a virtue if your are actually promoting Communist ideology which is a provably evil ideology. 

These are just a small number of instances where people, including quite religious people (who should be aware of the risks of temptation and the sin of pride) think that they are doing good, but are instead doing evil.

I've come to the conclusion that all virtue-signallers are evil. They will profess their chosen "good deed" at the expense of others. Whether today or tomorrow, they are condemning others to poverty, slavery or death just to prove to their neighbour that they are better in some way. 

And we all know the road to Hell is paved with good intentions....

Great Replacement Theory: Far-Right Racist Trope, Conspiracy Theory, or Fact?

As above.

Just what do you call the falling of indigenous birth rates and an ever-increasing importation rate of people from everywhere else in the world?

Because whether planned or just by sheer incompetence, the government is allowing hundreds of thousands of people from everywhere else in the world into the UK. Mainly Muslims.

You can call it a conspiracy theory all you want, but the facts from the various government agencies are there for all to see.

At current rates, the UK will cease to be a Christian country in no more than two decades. Luckily I'll be dust by then, but my children? Grandchildren?

And why would the do-gooder virtue-signalling middle-class condemn their daughters and grand-daughters to a life as a second-class citizen? 

I think it's a very selfish attitude to ignore the implications for future generations so you can signal how virtuous you are to the rest of the world. 

I expect the global corporations to be cynical and just want the workforce replaced with cheap labour. You can kind of understand it's in the corporate interest to maximise profits.

But the virtue-signallers? I just don't understand. What do they get out of it? There's no monetary gain, the only benefit to backing the flooding of the UK with Millions of Muslims is just in the moment to can self-servingly appear holier than your neighbour.

It's an evil philosophy: that you would condemn generations of females relatives to effective slavery just to make yourself look good in the eyes of your neighbours. It's sick, and twisted.

It's Not the Weight, It's the Attitude...

The News that the Government is to start a pilot scheme offering weight loss drugs to unemployed people to enable them to get back into work.

Sadly, I predict the scheme will be a failure. 

The reason is that there are plenty of skinny people on the dole and their lack of weight hasn't enabled them to get into work any better than an overweight counterpart. 

It's not the weight that is the issue, it's the attitude and the benefits system itself.

If you want to work, you'll go out and find work. Whatever it is. Not all of us can do physical jobs, but even the disabled can get a job in a call centre because of access rights legislation.

The other block to getting a job is the cost to work. When you are on benefits, everything is provided for you. Your rent is paid, you get dole money every fortnight and life is relatively easy, if a bit cash-poor. 

If you then get a job, you instantly lose the payment of rent. You have to re-apply with no guarantee that your rent will be paid. 

If you take a minimum wage job, you lose benefits and then have to pay tax. If the minimum wage is the absolute minimum the government says a person should be paid, why isn't it a tax-free salary? That would instantly boost the salary straight away. It just seems immoral to start clawing back tax from the most disadvantaged wage earners.

The whole system drops you like a stone. There is no support, no easing you into work. It's like jumping off a cliff emotionally and psychologically.

It's that transition that needs to be addressed, not the weight of the people. 

The cynical part of my brain does wonder if this is part of some conditioning process. You know, to make being overweight and unproductive a morally poor choice. Fat-shaming.

I can see a future if everything comes to pass like assisted suicide where the paths cross and if you are on the dole and consuming too much and getting fat, you'd be offered weight-loss drugs or else it's off to the boneyard with you. 

Of course if the option is take the drugs, be productive and work for peanuts against being rendered down for glue or Soylent Green, that may just motivate a proportion of the dole bums into working.

But there's always a hard core of institutionalised generations of unemployed....