Covid-19 Data Whistleblower Arrested in New Zealand.

Last week I watched a video on YouTube. It was a documentary including Barry Young, a statistician with a health authority in New Zealand.

He explained that New Zealand was uniquely positioned to provide accurate data on the efficacy of the Covid vaccines, along with death rates. The data was compelling, drilling down even to how many injections were administered by each Covid-19 vaccinator and the death rate of the people vaccinated by each vaccinator.

Staggeringly, there were some people administering the Vaccine that had a 25% death rate. Now that's not clear if it's the vaccine batches administered that are responsible, or poor training of the person administering the vaccine. But he did have more data on each vaccine batch and the death rates associated with each batch.

There was a staggering amount of detail in the data. 

It's important information that should be out in the public domain. Considering it will help in the future to inform health administrators of future pandemics, it really should be out there in the public domain so that various scientists can look at the data.

Barry Young should be praised for brining this important and accurate data to light, but instead he has been arrested. I take it they don't have protections in New Zealand for whisleblowers, or maybe it just depends on how embarrassing the data is to the government.

He has appeared in court charged with a data breach. 

I'm sorry that Barry has had to go through this, but looking at the data it was important to highlight it. 

Interestingly, the YouTube video is now unavailable.

Liz Gunn, the lady interviewing Barry Young is now fearing she will be arrested to. She is effectively on the run.

Sadly they are really trying to restrict the release of accurate data that shows that Covid vaccines are not safe. Interestingly the data also showed that the training of the vaccinators may have contributed to the problem.

But without accurate data we cannot be informed and we cannot debate the issue. 

Why is it being covered up?

What is "Populist"?

 "Populist" has been used as a derogatory term for the past decade, but what is it exactly?

It's listening to the population (The popul bit of populist: literally "of the population"), it means exactly whet democracy was supposed to do: have the politicians listen to the people that vote for them.

If populist is being used as a derogatory term, the people using it as such are not democratic. Instead they are authoritarian. Otherwise why would they use it as a slur?

Just remember when people use populist to slur someone, hat they are actually saying is "I support authoritarianism and reject democracy".

That is all.

Has The Time Come to Form a New Standing Army of the People?

It seems that the Police do not like the working class. It seems the Government don't like the working class, it seems that the working class have lost the political landscape. 

The views of the working class are not represented in Politics, despite Government relying on the working class to provide their sons and daughters to fill the places in the Armed Forces to do the fighting and dying on their behalf.

Has the time come to boycott the Armed forces and stop our kids joining?

Has the time come for the working class to form a standing army, to protect themselves from the predations of the Police and others? 

I think the point has arrived that it's pretty clear that the working class are actively being supressed. Politically, and physically so we cannot air grievances by protesting. 

As governments only seem to respond to violence or threats of violence, should an working class army be formed that (a) protects the working class from the Police, at a equal or more aggressive level and with more manpower than the Police can muster?