Christchurch Shooting: Totally Avoidable.

I've been advocating for some years on this blog about talking about the issues surrounding Islam, immigration and the lack of integration into Western society. I have predicted for years that without inclusive dialogue, niches will open allowing extremists to exist on both sides of the debate.

The lack of debate and an agreed consensus has brought about the widening of the division between left and Right, Christian and Muslim. The wider the divide gets, the more insular each side becomes.

To the point that eventually the "other" side becomes dehumanised, at which point they become fair game for violence. Not that I'm advocating violence, just that the current climate makes it more likely now and further into the future, unless we get a grip on this and the debate is opened up and everyone has a say.

The real people to blame are those that close down debate. The Far left and the devout Muslims.

The leftists that are so inclusive they fail to understand what Islamic ideology is political as well as religious, the leftist feminists that fail to understand that Islam would crush feminism, the gay people that support Islam, that fail to understand gay people are being hung in the name of Islam.

The devout Muslims that refuse to adapt: The ones that refuse to accept that Britain is their home. The ones that stand apart. The ones that class Western Society as evil. The ones that reject inclusivity. The ones that fail to reject the more extreme teachings of the Koran. The ones that drum up dissent when a gay teacher tries to provide an inclusive curriculum. The ones that condemn apostates. The ones that would fight against British soldiers in foreign countries. The ones that put the Muslim world community ahead of their local community, those that lie in wait to do us harm. The ones that vote en-masse as they are told by Imams.

Our government, that kowtows to Gulf State money and shuts down dissent, Our government that actively harasses anyone that speaks out against Islam, Our government that allows Saudi preachers to enter the country uncontested to preach hate against our society.

The debate has to be had and it has to be had freely and publicly. Islam cannot be protected as it is, allowed to spread hate as it is, allowed to continue uncontested as it is. The Left have to stop shutting down debate. The government has to stop shutting down debate and harassing those that try and throw light on the issue.

The beheading of Lee Rigby should have been enough to start the debate. The rape gangs of Rotherham should have started the debate. The rape gangs of Leeds should have started the debate. The rape gangs of Oxford should have started the debate. The rape gangs of Telford should have started the debate. The rape gangs of Bristol should have started the debate.

The murders in Christchurch Should. Start. The. Debate.

The debate has to be had, or the alternative is violence. Up until now, the violence has been from the Muslim side. More and more you'll see it from the opposite side as well, the disenfranchised that feel not listened to, that see violence from the other side and see their view effectively winning. Where will the government act? Where will it stop? Until we are all consumed in a civil war?

Will it stop when Muslims are attacked? When the left start to be attacked? Will it stop when the government is attacked?

It certainly hasn't  started when ordinary citizens (of all faiths and ethnicities) have been attacked by Muslims.

Debate has to start on how we address the issues of a society within that stands apart.

It may be that the elites in government think the Muslims are useful to provide the votes and muscle to implement policy. They are wrong. Like bringing up an orphan Tiger, once it gets big enough it will see you as prey and turn on you.

How Islam Wins at Politics.

I've seen many posts on many blogs and videos about the so-callled special protection for those of the Muslim faith. It's true that a Muslim minority appears to get preferential political treatment. But you have to understand the cause to understand the effect.

You'll hear that the Labour party favour Muslims to a pathological degree, because they rely on Muslim votes and to an extent that's true.

But you need to understand Islam first before you can understand how it can subvert Western laws with impunity, how it can garner political support far in excess of the numbers in the general population.

The first thing to understand is Islam is not a religion, or more accurately not merely a religion. It is many things; it is an ideology, a way of life, it is all-encompassing. It is a good Muslim's duty to embrace Islam in all aspects of his or her life.

This affects the way Muslims view politics. If you take the rule that is is a good Muslim's duty to involve Islam in all things, then you start to understand how Muslims have a greater affect on politics far in advance of their actual numbers in society.

It is a good Muslim's duty to vote for another Muslim if there is one to vote for (especially if the other options are non-Muslim) or failing that the most Muslim-friendly candidate.

No matter how mad, bad, right, wrong..... if the candidate favours Muslims or is a Muslim then Muslim voters understand it is their duty to vote for them.

Now then, given that the average voter turnout in the UK can be as low as 59%, That means that thanks to our first past the post election system candidates only need to get just over half of that to win. So candidates can win elections even if only 30% of the population vote for them.

Now, imagine a block of people in your constituency that vote en-masse in a particular way. They are a useful boost to your chances of getting elected when they start to approach 10% of the local population. When they approach 20% they can virtually guarantee your election and when they approach 30% you lock out any other candidate. Christians? Jews? Atheists? Socialists? Liberals? Don't need 'em. In fact if you are a Muslim candidate and sound moderate, some of the non-Muslim fools will actually vote for you.

You cannot lose because any other candidate has to garner the support of 30% of the population just to get parity. While you are certain of your 20 or 30 percent block vote, your nearest rival is busy herding cats doing deals trying to get the rest of the population to vote for them.

That's why in any situation in local or National politics, the Muslim block vote gets preference on policies. It's how a Muslim population can punch above is weight when it comes to politics. It's why Theresa May wears a headscarf in Mosques, it's why supposedly pro-feminist Labour candidates put up with addressing gender-segregated audiences.

Now then, comes the big question: How do you deal with that bias in the voting system?

I'm not going to deal with how the political elites see the Muslim block-vote as a usefull ally, that's maybe for another time. Especially as to how dangerous it is to underestimate it and just think of it as just a voting "trend". Until it bites them on the arse and they can do nothing about it.

The UK: Sponsors of Terrorism

Not for nothing has the UK become a focal point for American anti-terror operations. They know full well the Islamic Ghettos of the Midlands spawn a whole army of young men, ready to die fighting against the very country that gives them shelter and support in the name of Islam.
Fundamental Islam has twisted and warped these men until they will kill without remorse, without sorrow, without any thought for themselves, their families, their country.

We have anecdotal evidence of British Muslims working against our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, of UK-funded medrassas used as fronts to train our young Muslims.

Until now, the righteous would read this and start bleating "racist". But no more. There is a change in US foreign policy and its allowing us to work with foreign governments to unearth proof now that so-called charities that are funded in the UK send British Muslims abroad to train to work against their own nation.

This report proves that medrassas abroad are being used to train UK Muslim men, effectively sponsoring terrorism.

The multicultural project has to come to an end. Its now time that allowing a state within a state, allowing Sharia law to be used instead of Her Majesty's courts is stopped in its tracks.

We are One Nation, with One Goal, One Purpose. Those who work inside the country to subvert the rule of law and the nation should be dealt with severely. It cannot be sugar-coated, it cannot be brushed aside under the guise of religious tollerance: Is Treason, pure and simple.