Sinister Moves Afoot Regarding Legislation Changes.

The recent announcement that the government had just repealed the Vagrancy act has got my Spider Senses tingling.

I've blogged before that despite protestations from the lefties, people who claim asylum have rights given to then by the UN charter on refugees. 

The government of the country they claim asylum in has a statutory duty to provide housing , etc. The things we're already seeing like hotels, HMOs, etc.

As I have blogged previously, there is no such statutory obligation when it comes to housing people that already live here. So who do you think gets the home and who gets made homeless? 

One of the big failings of government was the failure to introduce legislation to make the statutory legislation apply to all. I assume no-one thought that the amount of immigration would impact the availability of social housing and that there would be plenty of housing supply for all. How Naive.

Removing the vagrancy act removes the pressure on councils to house homeless people. Those homeless people being the people with no statutory rights granted to them regarding housing, i.e. you and me. 

Now, add to the mix the rumour that a government led by Andy Burnham is looking at a land tax, that is taxing you a percentage of the value of your house instead of council tax. While it may make it cheaper for some people, for others it makes it a damn sight more expensive. 

It kills charities like Omaze overnight, because winning a million pound mansion will instantly incur a tax liability higher than the average wage.

At the moment, if you don't pay council tax, you get the bailiffs knocking at the door to take goods. But your home is relatively safe. It would take years to rack up a debt large enough to require the sale of your dwelling to pay off.

What's the chances that any new legislation that introduces the land tax changes the way the government claim the money back for non-payment? What are the chances that the changes the rules to say if the new tax is on your property, rather than payment for services, the remedy for non-payment would be seizure of your property? 

You see where this is going? Yep, more people homeless and less pressure on councils to house them. They're getting ahead of the game.

And don't get me started on how the government can charge a tax on an asset you don't own. If you have a mortgage, the house is not yours until it's paid off. The bank or building society hold the deeds. So technically the owner is the bank. 

I bet if the bank got charged the property tax, you'd get it lumped on your lap with a nice administration fee stuck on top...

This is the WEF plan writ large. The government is now making a move to make land grab, a grab for property, YOUR property. 

Remember the outcome has always been, you will own nothing, forget the bit about you will be happy, they don't care.. Happiness has nothing to do with it. You will become a slave, a cash-cow. You will work for board and food and you will be grateful in the new socialist utopia. No foreign holiday, in fact no travel outside your 15-minute city. That would be a bourgeois idea.

The unproductive will be culled. The government are well on the way to introducing that assisted dying legislation. Once it's in place, it won't take much to make it mandatory for the unproductive in society. 

I've a feeling someone has already done the maths on what happens when A.I. takes 90% of the jobs and what you do with the masses of unemployed. 

And if you don't think that's the way the road is leading, you're worse than an idiot, you are a grade A moron.