I Called it: MODs Lack of Air Defences in Clear View.

Well, the Iranian attack on Akrotiri Airbase has shown, in clear view, the lack of Air Defences at UK airbases.

I predicted this last year: Delphius' Debate: British Military Wargamers Panic About Lack of Anti-Air Assets in the UK.

I also predicted that the only option we would have would to be deploy Type 45 Destroyers in the path of any incoming air threat, because that's the only assets we have capable of air defence. We have no land-based air defence assets capable of taking out drones.

Today HMS Dragon, a type 45 Destroyer, leaves Portsmouth headed for Cyprus. A multi-billion pound asset, designed to defend a carrier fleet, sent to defend an island against drones that cost hundreds of thousands of pounds. 

A single Sea Ceptor missile costs around two million pounds. 

This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut. 

The MOD really needs to get on the case procuring a cheap, reliable air defence system capable of defending against drones. 

Ideally a layered system, with small, cheap guided missiles providing longer range defence, then for close in work, we can have laser weapons mounted on mobile units (so they are not set in fixed, attackable positions) that can be moved around an airfield. 

There are already systems available that can intercept ballistic missiles. Luckily the UK is too far away from Iran to be concerned with those (although it's not beyond the Iranians to develop the facility to launch missiles (say) from a beached ship).

But again, it would be prudent to look at procuring an air defence system capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, because we will require a defence against them eventually. 

And the 6 type 45 destroyers we have won't protect the UK indefinitely. They can't defend two carriers at sea and the UK as well, all at the same time. 

The UK and it's military bases at home and abroad are inadequately defended. It's time that changed in response to the increased threat from cheap drone-type threats.

Where Next for the Muslim Bloc Vote?

Labour lost the Muslim Bloc Vote (MBV) and therefore lost the Denton & Gorton by-election. 

The MBV landed with the Greens and they won. The interesting thing is that Labour didn't really see it coming. They were still pandering to Muslims during the campaign.

You have to ask why they didn't see it. Were they lied to by the Muslim community?

The reasons for the desertion is clear. Starmer the Sociopath doesn't care who he pisses off. He'll quite easily lock up a concerned mother posting on X. He's pissed off the pensioners, the freedom lovers, the wealthy and the poor, but he's also pissed off his main voting bloc. 

When it comes to Muslims, he's had the Police raiding the money laundering fronts like barbers. It's not been made very public, but quietly there have been big raids in some areas where it's got too fucking obvious to ignore. When every other shop is a barbers, there's no way they're doing 100Ks worth of business. 

So the Police go in, with dogs and not only do they find cooked books, they find drugs. There's always a sub plot, be it drugs, under the counter baccy or whatever. 

But the raids have got so big, the criminal gangs that run the Islamic community have disassociated themselves from Labour. 

The real threat of a grooming gang enquiry has also ruffled some feathers. Mainly because huge numbers of Muslim men were involved, include clan leaders. It's unacceptable that they would be investigated. They are above the law, in their eyes.

So, the MBV has switched to the Greens. Time was, the main focus of Green Party policy was whether we were recycling enough. Now, it's all about Gaza, a war that has nothing to do with the Denton and Gorton constituency. There are no major arms factories supplying Israel located there. There are no airfields launching strikes into Gaza there. 

But that's the Green party's main focus in Denton & Gorton. 

Green party policy has morphed into pro-Islamic rhetoric, because it bestows them votes. 

And yet Green Party supporters say that there has been no shift towards being an Islamic party. So where were the Green policies during the by-election? Support for a Tram link from Manchester City Centre through Reddish to Gorton and Denton? Support for Andy Burham's re-invention of bus operation with Bee Network buses?

Nope. Gaza, Gaza, Gaza. 

Restore Britain has a hard task ahead. 

Denton and Gorton Result in one Word.

Predictable.

I blogged previously about Labour and the Greens scrabbling for Muslim votes. 

We know the Green party did an advert entirely in Urdu. They won. That's what it takes now. It's a game-changer. And a warning.

The Muslim vote know Labour are done and they have switched to the Greens. The Greens are the party with the best pandering to the Muslim bloc vote. The Greens have realised that capturing the Muslim bloc vote ensures success.

There should be no doubt now that UK politics is a sectarian battlefield. Sectarianism has reached the House of Commons. The Greens were voted in for no other reason than they pandered to the Muslim vote.

In seats like Denton and Gorton, the Christian indigenous vote has to come out massively and decisively in order to defeat the Muslim bloc vote, otherwise they lose. The numbers are so finely balanced.

I heard people in interviews saying they wouldn't vote. Well, good luck with that. Because you'll get a what you deserve, something that doesn't serve your interests. You'll get a council that installs Muslim officials, (eventually) Muslim MPs, and eventually you'll get nothing, because it will all be diverted to the Muslims. I've seen it happen. 

This is the battleground Restore Britain has to fight on. It has to unite the non-Muslim vote. 

Importing ex-Tories, as Reform have done is not the answer. Straight away you have lost the ex-Labour vote. 

Restore Britain has to be clean of Toryism, cronyism, and has to resist the urge to allow the taint of past political mistakes stick. 

Restore Britain needs to be a new broom, a clean broom, sweeping away the previous malaise. 

Colonialist BBC

Well, strike me as confused. The dear old befuddled, BBC, the proto-Communist broadcaster with the leftist of left leanings, actually produces websites in colonial languages. 

I thought it was a joke at first, but no. 

The BBC actually go to the trouble and expense of translating articles and publishing them online on separate websites. Not only that, they translate to colonial languages, like African pidgin English. 

Another is BBC Afrique, which translates to African colonial French. 

Have a look at Domot - BBC News Pidgin

and Accueil - BBC News Afrique

In fact the BBC, through the BBC World Service, supply web articles and more in the following:

Pidgin, Hausa, Yoruba, Igbo, Afaan Oromoo, Amharic, Somali, Tigrinya, Gahuza, Bengali, Dari, Gujarati, Marathi, Nepali, Pashto, Punjabi, Sinhala, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu, Burmese, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese, Azerbaijani, Kyrgyz, Polish, Russian, Serbian, Ukrainian, Uzbek, Brasil, Mundo, Persian, and Turkish.

And as far as I'm aware, we are paying for that through our TV licence.

The thing that gets me, is why? I understand that the government may want to get the British side of any story out there, but why are we paying essentially for propaganda?

I spy a saving there, unless someone can give me a bloody good financial reason not to just cut the lot.

UK Has Become an Organised Crime State.

Much has been said about Venezuela being a Narco-State and that directly related to the kidnap and extradition of Maduro by the US authorities.

But something akin to that has happened in the UK. 

The UK would collapse if it wasn't for the revenue from organised crime and organised crime is deeply intertwined with the political elite.

Let me explain.

It's common knowledge that the many Turkish barbers that have sprung up in the last 10 years are fronts for money laundering.

It's common knowledge that the many Nail Bars that have sprung up in the last 10 years are fronts for money laundering.

Along with the Kebab shops that are fronts for grooming gangs, or the hand car washes that are staffed by illegal immigrants, there is always an illegal aspect to these businesses.

In fact they are probably the ONLY businesses that have sprung up in the last 10 years that survive the current climate in the high street. In fact most of the successful businesses in the last 10 years have been fronts for illegal activity in some form or other.

Because you need to be bent in order to survive. No legitimate business can make enough profit to pay rent, business rates, and taxes and at the same time comply with all the required legislation placed on businesses. 

And then there's the direct illegal activity: drug distribution, illegal tobacco; you name it, it's going on.

Our high street is a hotbed of organised crime. 

So is the property market. It's long been a way for organised crime to launder their profits. 

The political parties have donors or MPs that are involved in this organised crime matrix, so local and national government policy is shaped by this, to favour the organised crime laundering operations. 

Ever higher business rate, ever higher rents, basically government is squeezing legitimate business out of operation. It's come to the state of affairs that only fronts for illegal activity can afford to operate.

That's no way to run an economy. 

The economy should be run in a way that encourages legitimate business to thrive, so anyone can have a go and try and rune a business, to be their own boss. 

Right now the financial and regulatory framework disincentivises the creation of new businesses, and instead benefits established large businesses that can afford the overheads, or illegal front businesses that see the expenses as a cost off laundering money.

Then we get to the revelations that local and national government officials, Police and members of the judiciary are involved in child sex trafficking rings, or grooming gangs. 

Yet more evidence of organised crime within the establishment. 

The whole thing is just an organised crime racket. Those that benefit from the racket are ok. Those of us that aren't involved are just getting by.

As the US set a precedent with Maduro, if evidence could be found that our own government is involved in illegal activity, surely the precedent has now been set and our own government can be removed?

Warning: Terrorist Incident Alert

The risk of a terrorist incident in the UK is currently at an all-time high rate. 

It seems Rupert Lowe has rattled the Hornet's nest and there may be a show of force by the Islamic side in response to Rupert's "I don't care" rhetoric regarding remigration. Especially due to the rapid take up of membership. Restore Britain actually poses a threat to the Muslim Brotherhood. 

Just be careful out there.

Hopefully MI.5 is on the case, although reports are it's difficult working through the endemic wokeness of the higher-ups. 

Epstein and Scientists Shows It Wasn't About the Sex.

While the media focus on the sex predators that visited Epstein Island, it's interesting to note there were a bunch of very noble scientists that attended Epstein parties in the US.

Now, you may ask what Epstein wanted with scientists?

Well, it's a bit like the UK intelligence service back in WW2. They put a bunch of Luftwaffe pilots up at some huge country house, feed them well and let them talk. While every inch of the house is bugged.

Eventually the pilots became so comfy, they started discussing Luftwaffe secrets. 

It's the same with Epstein and the Scientists. Feed them well, give them alcohol and let them talk shop. After all one scientist loves to talk to another. It's very rare a scientist gets to talk to a peer, someone that understands their research. And from their conversations, you get insider information. 

What are the next big things in science that are about to go to market? What are useful scientific discoveries to other nations? 

Useful information if you are a broker. You can invest before the hordes push up the price.

You can use the information directly if you haven't used it already, or you can sell it. 

Epstein was an intelligence asset. He gathered intelligence from everyone. Guests were shmoozed so they could produce useful information.

That's the prime goal of the Epstein Operation: useful intelligence.

The paedophilia was incidental. I really believe that. It wasn't just that Epstein provided it, he provided it because that's what the uber-rich want. 

You get scientists to talk with good food, a bit of alcohol and providing someone who understands the science for them to interact with.

You get the uber-rich to talk by providing every perverted service they are used to receiving. 

Either way, you are getting the target into their comfort zone in order for them to elicit information. You're not browbeating them, they are offering the information because they are in a zone where they feel able to elicit that information. That information could just be who is in the close network of the perv you are shmoozing. But that gives you more targets to shmooze, more information, evidence of a larger network, evidence that it exists. And with that, it can be compromised, cajoled, captured.

That's why I believe Epstein isn't the end. Kids go missing around the world all the time, and if the Epstein files and my own personal experience are to be believed, those kids end up being tortured and raped (or even worse) for the entertainment of the uber-wealthy. The royalty of Europe, the old money, the secret societies.

The uber-wealthy have huge estates where the evidence can be buried, where they have big enough buildings to entertain and still not be overlooked. 

They own huge swathes of land, islands, estates. They control whet happens on that land. They are also wealthy enough to destroy the majority of people on this planet. 

They own private armies, have personal security, if they are not Royalty already, they have the wealth of royalty. They have all the trappings. 

Their perverted practices are not stopping any time soon. I think they were happening before Epstein and they continue after Epstein. He just provided a new venue for the entertainment.

It Didn't End With Epstein

The internet is awash with more new revelations about Epstein every day. Now we're getting to reports of child torture. 

I've already disclosed in a post I wrote back in 2021 I was approached years earlier by someone through a BDSM chat online if I would torture kids. Of course I refused. You don't say yes to some random weirdo on the internet asking you on yahoo messenger if you'd actually torture kids.

That was in late 2006, not long before Epstein went to jail the first time. The indictment for that conviction was in 2007. 

The timing makes me wonder if the Epstein "club" had got word they were burned and was looking for new staff around that time to set up anew.

The initial investigation into Epstein that led to his prosecution started in 2005. The grand jury convened in 2007. He was prosecuted in 2008. 

That's what makes me think that there is a connection. 

It also makes me think that this wasn't  some random weirdo and there were efforts to set up a new club in the UK if Epstein got badly burned. In the end, he served just 13 months and the media never picked up on the extent of the crimes being committed by Epstein and his club. It was back to business as usual. Ish.

I just wonder if that new club was set up after he did/did not kill himself. I wonder if the same acts are still carrying on somewhere else and theres a new Epstein facilitating it all.

A Solution to the Reform/Restore Conundrum.

I have a fix for those people that are conflicted about whether to join Reform or Restore Britain (with apologies to Ben Habib). 

The easy solution is to Join Restore Britain, because Rupert Lowe has proved himself to be nothing but honest and straightforward. A true Brit with grit and gumption. His policies go further than Farage's Reform and are what the country requires.

There are three years to go, but if Restore don't get the traction before the next election, then vote Reform. 

Just a Quick One on The Denton and Gorton By-Election..

It seems both the Labour party and the Green party are scrabbling for the Muslim block vote. There are videos online with both trying their best to convince Muslim voters to vote for them. 

Of course it depends on whoever makes the best, most generous offers to the Muslim community. Not necessarily bribery, but it's quite reasonable for the Muslim community to ask, "what's in it for us?"

Which they are able to ask and are entitled to ask. That's the power of a bloc vote.

Which is why I think it will be closer than most think. The Muslim bloc vote has been powerful in Tameside for a long time, close to 3 decades.

The result will be interesting. Will Labour and Tory voters both jump on the Reform bandwagon as a way of sticking two fingers up to the power of the bloc vote? 

Now voters have a chance to upset the status quo, will they take it? 

I'll Be Gone a While.

I have to do my thing again. 

Back in a while. 

If you see anything, it wasn't me, alright?

On The Dark Lord, Peter Mandleson.

Keir Starmer is trying to load the blame for appointing Perter Mandleson as Ambassador to the US firmly at the door of.... Peter Mandleson.

Despite warmings from intelligence services about the nature of Mandleson, and his past transgressions and his relationship with Epstein, Starmer went ahead and appointed him. 

Starmer's excuse was that Mandleson lied. In  his speech, Starmer said Mandleson continually lied when questioned and when asked to pinky promise he was telling the truth and nothing would go come back to bite Kier, it seems that Mandleson had his fingers crossed behind his back all the time. 

As if Starmer doesn't lie and deflect all the time. It's Standard Operating Practice for Labour, it seems.

It's like watching a bunch of schoolkids running the country. 

"Peter promised he never bullied other kids, and he would be a good boy, but he lied, Miss..."

Fuck. These are the people running the country. 

I should have put a bet on that vote of no confidence.

Although I bet the odds of Starmer being out by the end of the year wouldn't have been worth a bet.

On Algorithms

Just recently I've been directed down, or shown some interesting rabbit holes conspiracy-wise. On the internet, that is. Literally in the last couple of days, things have gone a bit bonkers with the links and stuff that Facebook, YouTube and the like have started showing me. 

Now, of course some of the shit I look at and say online might bring one to conclude that's the sort of thing that might push me over the edge and radicalise me. But I'm a bit more complex than that. 

But I can see how, if you're not savvy to this sort of attempt at manipulation, you could be going down some very dark paths. 

The thing is: Is it algorithms guiding your path and it's all a result of zeros and ones doing their thing, or is it human manipulation?

And why all of a sudden? Literally, this week. 

I know I've been up North over the weekend and scarily for some people I've been in the exact area where a hotly contested by-election is to be held. 

But this week, most of my usual favourite watch list stuff has been replaced. 

Makes you wonder if my phone was close to another phone and someone put two and two together and got five. 

But it does show you there is a huge element of manipulation going on when it comes to the content the algorithms offer up to you and the information that's collected in the background doesn't always produce a benign result like showing you more of the content you like.

There seems to be a hint at manipulation with this latest tranche of content. Obviously so. Someone or something is using hobnail boots and isn't at all subtle. 

On Reform's Chances in the Denton and Gorton by-election.

I was up in t'North at the weekend. It being the 2nd anniversary of the passing of my mother. We visited her grave and also did some shopping in Denton.

Talking to friends and relatives, you'd think that Reform would romp away with the seat. 

However, I know the Northern voter. They're the sort of person that would vote for a pig in a wig wearing a Red Rosette (cue Angela Rayner jokes). 

So things aren't as clear cut as the National polls would suggest. 

I do perceive a sense of frustration with Labour and especially the complete inability to move the political pointer to any shade other than red. Most thinking people would vote Reform, just because they are a hail Mary in an attempt to break the Labour monopoly that has allowed corruption to flourish in the North with little or no pushback.

Just look at the lack of enquiry into the rape gangs. Labour councillors have been implicated by various low-level informal enquiries. Councillors that have now gained high office as MPs. 

No wonder Labour are reluctant to investigate.

Anyway, I will look with some interest upon the by-election. 

On the Epstein Files...

The first observation is that Bill Gates is fucked (not in the biblical sense this time) but the financial sense.

If Melissa Gates didn't already know what was going on and divorced him for that, then the new Epstein revelations should ensure a lawsuit ensues.

The second observation is: how the hell can the people in the Epstein files tell us how to live our lives? They are most powerful, yet the most depraved people in existence. How can they claim the moral ground to tell us all what to do?

I mean, I've done my bit of semi-public pervery, but I don't force people to lead pious lives under threat of arrest and prison.

ANYONE holding high office mentioned in the Epstein files and that has provably had extramarital sex, or sex with a minor, should immediately resign from office or be forced out of office.

First UK scalp is Lord Mandleson. But I just wonder who else still in place in the Labour hierarchy is mentioned in the Epstein documents? Who else will  be tainted by the debauchery on the Island? Is anyone else in Parliament mentioned?

Still no confirmation of who was benefitting from the Epstein operation. It doesn't have the smell of a CIA operation. The whiff is distinctly of Mossad, although there could be a curveball in there and it turn out to be Russia or China. Both are equally evil and up to the task of running an operation like this.

I mean, why would Mossad compromise an ally? Or for instance a member of our Royal Family?

That still doesn't make sense to me. Other than they are influencers, and may allow Mossad access to more influential figures, but I'm scratching my head as to why they would do that to an ally. Especially going to the lengths they went to and the numbers of people involved.

The 4D chess answer is that it was Russia or China posing as Mossad running the operation. But that's a bit of a stretch.

We already know that China directly finances academics in our universities. They seem to prefer the direct approach.

 

The Evil of the Left in America.

People are getting into a shouting match about the latest shooting by ICE Agents in America. Let's be clear. If the woman that was pushed didn't intervene in the ICE operation, if the guy that was unfortunately shot didn't intervene in the ICE action as well, then he would be alive.

The left want these people to be killed. To prove a point. That is how evil they are. The left are whipping up tensions, agitating activists to get involved and directly confront ICE agents, with as seen, possibly lethal consequences. 

If the left backed off, If they stopped whipping up people to impede federal agents from doing their duty, then at least two people would be alive today.

But no, the left want the tension, the agitation, the aggression, so ICE agents will make mistakes and someone will get shot. 

They can't have people peacefully protesting and just holding placards at a safe distance, because that doesn't meet their requirements. 

And isn't it typical of the Left that they whip up tensions in other people, so it's other people that get shot, not the people at the top?

her Tory Defection to Reform.

With the Defection of Suella Braverman to Reform, I just wonder what the likelihood is of enough MPs moving to set Reform up as the opposition. Are we likely to see Nigel across the Isle sparring with Kier at PMQs instead of Kemi?

Could enough Tories defect before the next election I wonder?

Thoughts on WEF Guff...

I've been struck down with ManFlu since the middle of last week. Most of Social media was awash with the World Economic Forum and the Donald wanting his slice of Greenland. 

But in the dim dark corners, were a few talks by CEOs of technology companies. Including surprisingly, Elon Musk. I thought he was no friend of the WEF.

I was interested in what the various "experts" had to say about A.I. and robotics. 

Now, I know what my thoughts on the two are, but I was interested to see what they were predicting. 

Nothing but sunny uplands. Even if the A.I. and robots did all the jobs, all it would do is free us from the drudgery of everyday work.  

Except, there was no discussion of the mechanism of how that would come about. If there was any discussion, it seemed uneasy, stilted and very careful. 

You could see the WEF-class see the use of A.I. and robotics as a utopia, where robots would supply their every need. Unwavering, unchallenging, unquestioning, loyal, protective, servile robots. I imagine It's something like a Romanesque idyl, with robot slaves feeding the elites with grapes, whilst they recline on chaise lounges.

But if you have an A.I. and robot workforce, how do you feed the peasants that have been displaced from the job market? All those inconvenient, unworthy, unproductive, people.

Well, the real, stark answer that guests on the various panels avoided saying out loud is: you don't. 

Those of us that understand what's coming is that every A.I. and every Humanoid Robot introduced needs to be treated as a human worker from a Social Welfare aspect. So every company and every individual using these tools needs to pay as if they are employing an actual human. Thus the government should impose a tax similar to national insurance for each unit in use.

But then the fear is that will impose a drag on development. Any tax imposed on this new technology would reduce the ability of corporations to use it, and we all know that corporations get their way, so you can see that there is a very high chance that the scenario isn't Sunny uplands and huge benefits of cheap robotic labour for those of us at the bottom of the pile. The future is redundancy in the starkest meaning of the word. Not just from the job market, but from society.

I mean, the experts did say that some form of universal credit scheme should be introduced, with no detail on how that should be financed. I'm sure in the minds of the CEOs, the idea would be that someone else finances the payments to the plebs.

But this is where the intellectual pygmies of the WEF always falter: very lofty ambitions, without doing the deep dive into the implications and eventual outcomes. 

I for one am appalled every year by the WEF and what I hear coming out of it. 

Their original idea was to have a global workforce. Which then depressed wages across the globe as corporations moved work to the cheapest workforce.

Then there have been various cover stories like climate change in order to smokescreen what is actually going on, which is the de-industrialisation of the West. 

Than they had the great idea of bringing the cheap workforce into the West to depress wages for jobs that couldn't be offshored. Which has led to mass immigration and with it the societal change of the West. 

Now, the great idea is to scrap all that and go for a digital workforce. With the unsaid outcome that the majority of people without independent wealth starve to death.

Such nice people, the WEF people.

Oh, and while we're on the subject of the WEF, what was with all the old ladies in leather? Lots of power dressing going on by the ladies. Looks to me as a sign of insecurity. 

On the Raising of The Military Service Reservist Age to 65

It's ridiculous. But an acceptance by the government that the size of the military has shrunk too far.

There are many posts on Facebook espousing the fact that the government did it to themselves: by doing down Britain and country as a concept, by making out that Britain is evil, it has put off a generation of youngsters from joing.

But that's not the real reason. 

I can have some sympathy with the fact middle-class youth have been brainwashed, but there are still swathes of the working class that understand loyalty to family, community and country. 

The left might hate the opinions and actions within the many council estates around the country, but those are the people the middle class rely on to do the fighting and dying in order to keep them safe. 

But even that isn't the reason. 

Silently, the number of illegal immigrants, men of fighting age, has risen above the number of personnel serving in the UK armed forces. You now have a block of fighting age men, allied to a single cause, a single religion, a cause and religion that opposes the very country that offers them a bed. 

There is now an army within the country, that outnumbers the ACTUAL Army of the UK. 

That has sent alarm bells throughout the halls of the MOD. Just what are they supposed to do if this imported army starts to rebel, to declare areas of the country independent of UK law? How would the government enforce UK law in that case?

They don't have the manpower to commit to such a task. Unless....

On Iran...

Sadly, I don't have much intel on the uprising in Iran. The Middle East has not been my favourite place and the wife still fails to understand why I find the whole region erm, displeasing.

She still wants me to visit family in Bahrain, but even with a sweetener of watching a Grands Prix I am inclined not to go. Steadfastly inclined.

Not that I can go into detail why, but I don't like the heat and sand.

We did visit Dubai, the city state being quite impressive, if you have the money to imbibe the lifestyle.

Anyway, I do feel that the Iranian uprising will go the way of Warsaw. People will be urged to rebel, with very little support from those who urge it. 

America has made big noises, but with little application. I don't see US Special Forces being committed to Iran to help destabilise the regime there. 

Israel may, but more likely may not help the revolution along. Because they know all too well that when it comes to Islamic revolutions, what comes out of them is usually not freedom, democracy and tolerance towards non-Muslim nations. 

Better the devil you know... 

Pssst! You Didn't Hear it Here, But Starmer May be Gone by The End of The Year.

Rumblings are that the latest Starmer U-turn (on Digital ID) is straining (if not yet breaking) the Camel's back of the Labour party.

Basically, the Labour faithful are being asked to got out into the public and justify the latest Starmer scheme against what turns out to be pretty solid and sensible criticism, only to have Starmer go "Oh Yeah" and do an about-turn three months later. 

Let's not forget that the whole government machine has been on-side with the government since September when he announced it. So all policies since then have been guided by the fact that Digital ID will be a reality. Then Poof!, it's gone. 

That's millions of pounds of government and civil service effort wasted. 

Let that sink in. The government that has raised the tax take to a historical high, is simultaneously wasting said tax hikes at an eye-watering rate.

The Labour faithful have had enough. 

Enough of the in-out, in-out shake it all about nature of Starmer's announcements. Too many kites flown, too much money wasted,  too embarrassing. 

Rumblings are that there will be at least a challenge for the leadership. 

Some are going further and threatening a seventies-style vote of no confidence. Because, for the good of the country this cannot continue and if what we have seen of the last 18 months is Labour's policy and a change of leader is just more of the same, then it may as well go. 

The thinking is, trigger an election now, while Reform is not fully fleshed out and let them fail spectacularly when they are voted into power. Then the next election will reinstate the status quo and signal the end of the public's experiment with alternative parties.

This is my warning to Reform: stop being the cult of Nigel. Get a credible shadow cabinet team in place and in the mind of the public. Let us see who is going to be in the positions of power so we can judge their character. NOW. 

Get the policies and actions ready NOW. 

Then if Labour trigger a snap election, you'll have a team ready to walk into power and start to dismantle the globalist charter started by Tony Blair. Eradicate the restrictive political straightjacket he placed on Parliament and let's get back to the freedom and accountability we had back in the 1990s.

Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart Illustrating my Point Perfectly.

I just saw this short in YouTube. Two seriously deluded old duffers completely missing the point and reinforcing my point that the political elite in Europe see themselves not as an ally of America.

It just reinforces the opinion of the Trump administration that Europe isn't the steadfast ally it used to be. 

They're actually talking about putting troops on Greenland in order to protect it from the Americans. Yeah, using tech that the Yanks make unserviceable at a moment's notice? 

Good Luck with that.

This rhetoric surprises me, because Rory Stewart was in the Military. He should know the realities of Warfighting and should know better given his tenure in the Foreign Office and his proximity to military intelligence..

But both are committed Socialists. They live in the Socialist bubble. They are indicative of the thinking inside the Political Elite in Europe. Utterly ideologically captured.

"OrangeMan Bad" therefore they are willing to scrap a decades old alliance against Russia, go to war with what should be an ally. I'm beginning to think they really prefer Communism to Capitalism.

This is what happens when the Left swing too far to the left. People that stay in the middle of politics suddenly look like the extremists. But it's the far left that have moved to extremism, not the moderates.

America is sat there scratching it's head asking why Europe is turning into a Socialist authoritarian shithole.

What's Going on With Greenland?

The media make Trump out to be some cartoonish despot intent on ripping Greenland from the hands of poor Denmark.

The slightly more informed make out that this is an attack by Trump on NATO and the alliance.

In reality, there's a lot more in the background going on.

The main reason for Trump's claim on Greenland, is it's of huge strategic significance in the North American geographic area. It provides land for bases that America uses to defend itself against the Russian threat.

Under normal circumstances, Greenland under Danish control is a friend to the Americans and gladly accedes to any requests for land for American requirements.

Trump's claims reflect the breakdown in the relationship between American and the European Elites.

It's quite clear that the European political class is no friend of Trumps. 

We have seen it with the comments by David Lammy and other European political leaders. The European political elite is staunchly socialist (Communist) in it's political outlook (the reasons for which I've already blogged about) and hate Trump. 

Trump is airing in public in his typical way that he regards Europe not as a political ally. He regards Denmark and their leadership not as political allies also. He's stating that if the attacks on Trump, America and American companies (especially tech companies) and the First Amendment continue, he will use American force to "stabilise" the Greenland situation.

Right now, Greenland under Danish control is not considered as an allied administration by the Trump government.   

What does America do when it sees effectively hostile forces in close proximity? It neutralises them. Greenland is fast becoming the new Cuba.

All I'm hearing at the moment on the media is that Europe must band together against America. 

Bad Move guys.....

And just think, if Europe succumbs to the Muslim influx in 10 or 20 year's time, all the nukes, all the weapons, territory and manpower that Europe possesses will be in alignment against America. By then NATO is just a note in a history book anyway. 

Trump is just ahead of the curve.

Why Asylum Seekers Get Preferential Treatment

 ,,, And if you think they don't, you are an idiot.

I have commented on many post on X, YouTube regarding asylum seekers getting preferential treatment when it comes to housing, and why that is the case, and I think I need to flesh it out here to sort of put a pin in it, so to speak.

Anyone who says asylum seekers don't get preferential treatment is delude, lying, or just plain misinformed. Our government has, by the treaties it has signed up to, given asylum seekers statutory status, which means legally they are bound to provide services to them. Where no such statutory duties exist for normal citizens born here.

The first, is the 1951 Refugee Convention:

Core principles of the 1951 Convention

The core principle of the 1951 Convention is non-refoulement, which asserts that a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom.

The document outlines the basic minimum standards for the treatment of refugees, including the right to housing, work and education while displaced so they can lead a dignified and independent life. It also defines a refugee’s obligations to host countries and specifies certain categories of people, such as war criminals, who do not qualify for refugee status.

In addition, it details the legal obligations of the States that are party to one or both of these instruments.

The convention, as stated above, disallows the receiving state from instantly returning the asylum seeker, or refusing entry to the country. We have to receive them.

The next point is that under the Convention, asylum seekers are granted certain rights, by law (because they are part of the convention we signed up to).

So, asylum seekers as stated, have the right to housing, education, medical care, etc.

Again, under UK law, ordinary citizens have no such "rights". Which is why funds and services are given to asylum seekers before ordinary citizens.

So when politicians say that asylum seekers aren't at the head of the queue when it comes to housing. They are lying. The 1951 Convention give those asylum seekers the right to housing. A right that you don't have. So they get put in housing before you and your family, who have lived here since birth and have been on the housing list for decades.

It's also why preferential medical services are provided to Asylum Seekers. That's why they get access to a Doctor nurse and dentist with almost private standards of care. You don't get that, because the government aren't forced to provide it to you by law. But asylum seekers...

This is the loophole exploited by traffickers. EVERYONE that arrives in a dinghy instantly claims asylum, whether they are fleeing a war, persecution or even if they are not. 

I'd say they aren't, given that France, the last country they came from, isn't some bomb-ravaged craterscape.

But, that's the mechanism they exploit.

But now here comes the double-whammy of the European Convention on Human Rights.

This is the law that we signed up to that affords even criminals the right to family life. So for instance we already have to house asylum seekers, but the ECHR now makes it law that we can't just put them anywhere, we have to consider their family. By family, that's their extended family of cousins, aunties, etc. In other words we have to put them all together. By law. Creating an enclave for them. Even wondered why they all appear in a single area? Now you know.

We can't say "we've found a suitable house for you in Scotland". They have rights. The right to live with the other 34 members of their family that have come across in a rubber dinghy. 

While we are considering their asylum application, if the rights they have don't give them enough, if they go out and steal stuff, it's the ECHR that stops us saying "Sorry mate, but by stealing you have proved you're not the type of person we would like to accept into our country" and deport them. 

First, the process takes so long that it gives them time to find some desperate fat ugly bird, have sex with them and have a kid. And then instantly the asylum seeker gains family ties to the UK through the poor sprog born in this country. 

Just to interject, there is a correlation that most fat ugly birds are left-leaning politically, so that's a driver for why they would want a never-ending stream of "boyfriends" from Somalia. 

Of course there are only so many fat ugly birds, the supply is limited. the desperation of the asylum seekers mounts up. Their instructions are to have sex with a girl in the UK and get her pregnant. 

So we get desperate asylum seekers trying to shag any girl or woman they see. Possibly a driver for the massive number of rapes we are seeing perpetrated by them. That's not to make light of the crime of rape. But if you are from Somalia and you've been told the gravy train absolutely relies on you getting a British girl pregnant, it is your primary mission to avoid being sent back to your shithole country, then you're gonna do the deed with anything bar a corpse. Finesse, courting, charm, all go out the window. 

And anything old enough to get pregnant is fair game too.

Shag the bird, get her pregnant, make sure she doesn't have an abortion (tell her it's against your religion or something) and has the kid and then you are set for life with those welfare payments you and your 34 cousins can send to your gangster Gran back home.

This just scrapes the surface of the drivers and legislation involved.

But if anyone says that asylum seekers don't get preferential treatment, our better treatment, or are prioritised above normal citizens, then  tell them they are talking bollocks. They are, because it is the law.