There is a row currently around the Southport stabber.
It's now come to light that not only did he commit the atrocity in Southport, he had downloaded an Islamist terrorist training manual, had actually created and had a quantity of the deadly poison Ricin.
Yet the murder of 3 kids and the maiming of many more in Southport is still being classed by the Government as "just" murder. The other offences and evidence as far as I am aware have not been taken into consideration and the charges against the guy have not yet (as far as is in the public domain) been upgraded to terrorist incidents.
Why is that?
Given that Grandads and Grandmas in Southport shouting the odds at Police were dealt with with the full force of the law and maximum sentences, where are the Government on the Southport Stabber?
Running away like pussies it seems. Avoiding making any comments, closing down debate in the house of commons.
At the very least, there should be a debate on how extremism is taking the children of first generation immigrants and radicalising them.
The Southport incident isn't the first time a child of first-gen immigrants has been radicalised.
Shamima Begum, the poster child of the Left, was a child of immigrants. She went to Syria and joined ISIS. Whilst there she did unspeakable acts and supported many more directly.
The Manchester Arena bomber was the child of immigrants, killed 22 people.
One of the 2017 London Bridge Van Attacker was a son of immigrants.
The 2019 London Bridge Stabber killed 2 people was also the son of immigrants.
I could go on. What motivates the children of immigrants to become violent radicals?
Is multiculturalism failing? Is it failing the children of immigrants who refuse to integrate into UK society? By not integrating, are they denying their children the ability to bacome part of UK society? Do they actively prevent them from doing so?
There are dozens of cases of girls brought up in UK immigrant families, being married off to men in foreign countries. There are dozens of incidents of honour killings, where girls have wanted to integrate, date and even marry men from the UK, but have been prevented by their families from doing so and in extreme ceases killed for doing so.
Marrying boys off to foreign girls, bringing the girl in from a foreign country, completely unable to speak English and integrate into UK society. Totally reliant on her in-laws, unable to communicate with anyone outside the family.
There are just a couple of aspects of the divisiveness of the current ideology of multiculturalism.
It's under these sort of lifestyles, where young adults are not able to integrate, where they have no sense of belonging, that can foster the sense of resentment towards the country that houses them. The apparent oppressiveness of the family and the deliberate control of the young adults, the refusal to allow them to integrate into Western society.
It's these sorts of pressures can that create psychopaths.
In the West we all know about the smothering mother and the psychopathic tendencies that can be created.
In immigrant families you can multiply that several fold.
But multiculturalism is a pillar of government ideology. It's clung to as close as a bible is by a Mid Western American.
Government believes, it devotes faith into the mantra that multiculturalism is a successful ideology.
Yet, we all too often see the failings.
Not only the stabbings, the bombings, the kids going off to fight for armies in direct conflict with our own and lately the calls for genocide of Jews .
But the failings of multiculturalism are causing a rise in the opposing side. If the government thinks the far-right is on the rise, what is causing it?
If immigrants integrated, there would be no pressure to protest. No opportunity to "other" them.
If immigrants integrated there would be no animosity.
If immigrants allowed their sons and daughters to marry across religious and societal divides, there would be no divide to speak of and exploit.
But no, it's the continued division, the isolation, the refusal to integrate that creates the extremism on both sides.
And it's the realisation of all of this that the Government cannot, must not allow to become mainstream commentary.
Hence why any and all commentary on the Southport stabber, whether he is a terrorist and what the government knew when they called protesters (who have since been found out to be correct) as spreading disinformation. The government must have known about the Ricin, must have known about the terrorist documents.
The only sketchy detail is whether the stabber has embraced the Muslim faith or not. Downloading ISIS material doesn't make you a Muslim. It does make you a terrorist.
But the current atmosphere of mistrust between the public and the government tends to suggest that if the government went balls-deep in making him out to be a Christian Choirboy, then it's a pretty good bet he's actually converted to become and Islamic Extremist.
The question is when the government knew. Especially for those convicted of misinformation. Because it seems it was not misinformation and the government knew full well it wasn't even before the prosecutions began.
Those in jail are now political prisoners, ideological martyrs, imprisoned for telling the truth the government didn't want told.
Multiculturalism is not working, it will never work, it is a flawed ideology. It creates extremists. That is what the government don't want you to find out and understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment