The Rise of Tyranny?

It's interesting to note that the closer we become to Brexit, the more tyrannical the Government appears to be.

There seems to be no end of the clampdowns, the illegal lawsuits and the sheer ability of the elites to try and shut down dissenting views on Brexit and other globalist ideologies.

It's interesting to look at the actions of the establishment rather than the words.

For instance the crackdown on Julian Assange, the crackdown on Tommy Robinson and now the prosecution of James Goddard for supposedly harassing a politician.

The civil service and the Politicians in the UK have caught the European Elitist malaise. They think that they are overlords, rather than public servants. That we have no right to question their authority and that they know best.

This attitude is one that Anna Soubry (the politician James Goddard allegedly harassed) has in bucket loads. Having won an election allied to a party that initiated the Brexit referendum, the party that then went to the polls and was returned with a mandate to leave the EU, Anna Soubry took it upon herself once in power to do an about-turn and work to thwart the Brexit process.

That majority of voters that elected her as their MP seemingly were defrauded. They thought they got a pro-Brexit candidate, but instead go an anti-Brexit one.

Even when she decided to leave the Tories and joint the pro-Remain Change UK party, she stayed as an MP rather than stand on her pro-EU stance. She knows exactly where it would get her: the dole queue.

We now have Richard Hammond, the chancellor saying he will resign if Boris Johnson gets elected Prime minister. So what? Go and be damned: good riddance!

We also have Gina Miller coming back to the fray saying she will make a legal challenge against Boris Johnson to block a no-deal Brexit. Who is she to interfere with the will of the Government? This would be the second time and elitist billionaire has decided to spend some of their vast fortune hamstringing the Government over Brexit.

Never in my life have I seen such behaviour, such outright animosity against the will of the people. We voted to leave the EU and it's up to the government to come up with the goods. Deal or No-Deal.

The latest scare story is we are already in a recession thanks to Brexit. If we're in a recession, then the Euro zone must be in the toilet then, because we're several points better off than they are.

Yeah, let's ally ourselves to the toilet bowl economy of the EU. A brilliant suggestion.

This can only go on for so long before those that voted for Brexit and for freedom start to organise. The Remain side seem to have the money to be able to buy the legal side. But the Brexit side have manpower: the sort of manpower that forms armies and navies. The sort of Anglo-Saxon-swearing sorts that Countless Admirals and Generals have sworn by in times of crisis.

We fought for freedom in the Nineteen Forties. We may have to take arms again, against the tyranny of our own elites.

Updated to add:

If Gina Miller is successful in preventing the Government from Proroguing parliament, then the only other option would be a general election and either a reactionary semi-communist Labour remain government or a Brexit Party government.

If Labour get in Gina Miller might enthuse at a pro-Remain government getting in. I doubt she'd stay around in the country long once the swinging tax hikes for billionaires are brought in. Those of us at the bottom of the financial heap will have to put up with the shitty end of the stick while she swans off into tax exile...

If the Brexit party get in, then oh what glorious Karma!

Reporting Bans.

I just wonder: It's patently clear that the reporting restrictions on Muslim Rape Gang trials have the effect of hiding the true nature of the problem.

I get that reporting on such cases if there is a reporting restriction in place would fall foul of the reporting restriction. Me: 1, TR: 0.

But... what if you were to be more general. For instance if You said at Leeds there are currently 40 trials with reporting restrictions.... Oxford has 20, Telford has 100.... etc. (Those figures being plucked out of thin air as examples, and in no way are the true numbers, even if by some mad coincidence I've stumbled on the correct numbers)...

Now, would reporting on the number of restricted cases come under contempt laws? If there were no specifics about what the case was about? Just the fact that each court had x number of restricted cases?

If a website called MRG-watch or something similar was set up, then the public would be aware of the number of restricted cases. They could then investigate further if they wished to see what each case was about if the information was public before the restriction came into force.

It's just that no-one could report about the specifics of the case.

Or does Tommy Robinson's court case change that now? Especially does it mean that even the numbers of cases cannot be discussed? Because that seems to be the fallout from the TR case: that peeved Justices will change the laws to suit their case and you may fall foul of them if they deem you to have slighted their authority.

After all, even the Police were prevented from asking for information about an absconder from the Leeds trial because of the reporting restrictions (because there is no limitation on the restriction even if it's the Police wanting to bring one of the defendants to justice).

Just musing in the back of my mind, as you do.....

True Journalism is Dead.

Today a Certain Mr Yaxley-Lennon attends court for sentencing regarding his conviction for contempt of court.

Much has been said about the twisting of the defendant's words and the blindness to the law society's own written advice elsewhere, so I won't ramble on about that.

But it's a damning sight to see the ranks of the press outside the Old Bailey awaiting the sentence, press that should be investigating and highlighting the huge number of rape gangs that are at work across the UK.

If the press can conveniently ignore the 1400 victims in Rotherham alone, can they really ignore the convictions in Rochdale, Oldham, Newcastle, Oxford, Telford, Canterbury, Bristol, Aylesbury, Peterborough and more?

Can they ignore the several upcoming court cases?

The real scandal, the juicy news that reporters should be going after is the blanket reporting ban on the numerous cases across numerous towns and cities across the UK. How can the judiciary arbitrarily ban ALL reporting across SEVERAL court cases?

I understand the judiciary's line that if the huge number of cases came to prominence, it would pervade the public's consciousness and would start to prejudice juries against any Muslim man brought before the courts.

But the Police's own intelligence suggests there are hundreds more gangs in play right now.

Hansard (the UK Parliament's own publication) states that there could be grooming gangs in at least 73 other towns and cities across the UK, but that "data is incomplete".  https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2019-05-14/debates/349FA275-CB65-45C0-87C7-EE16D1FD1B0A/GroomingGangs. 

Just when will the UK press wake up and realise this story is HUGE? When will they come to terms with the fact that thousands of young girls have been and continue to be raped by these gangs? When will the press report this? When will the authorities be shamed into acting to positively stop this activity, rather than covering it up? Why are they not shining a light on this and making sure that young girls don't fall into the same traps? Is the female youth of today so worthless that nobody cares whether they are pimped and raped at a young age?

Just where are the feminists on this issue? Why are they not up in arms? The Muslim community is a shining example of a Patriarchal system: men have sway over women and the culture and attitudes of the Males in that community are the sort that feminists should be screaming from the rooftops to oppose. But silence.

Where are our Government on this issue? You can see from the Hansard report above that they are aware? But where is the publicity? Where is the viewable positive action in combatting the issue?

Currently there are several new court cases in the pipeline regarding grooming gang underage rape in Rotherham. There are a number of ongoing investigations that will lead to further new court cases. That's just in Rotherham alone.

Then there are also a number of further investigations around the country regarding those 73 towns and cities. Those are the ones that are known and there is data for.

It's quite possible given the known data and extrapolating out, that there will be a grooming gang in every town and every city that has a Muslim Male population. Without positive action in investigating the issue and collecting data and intelligence on the issue we can only surmise. But what we can say is there is no evidence to the contrary.

THAT's the scale of the issue that the press, the pro-female activists, Parliament, the judiciary, the establishment don't want YOU to hear about.

Now if journalists won't ask the question, ask yourself why that should be...….