Note the spin on this story: the headline says the Chinook was damaged, which it was. But then it was deliberately destroyed in order to render it useless to the enemy...
So why wasn't the headline "Chinook Destroyed in Afghanistan"? Was it because destruction instantly makes the public know we're another helicopter short? As opposed to damaged, which signifies an ability to repair the helicopter.
Note the report goes on to say another Chinook suffered the same fate previously, so we're two Chinooks down.
The price of those cheap American Black Hawks we were offered a while back might start going up soon. Once we become desperate and will pay anything to replace our helicopter fleet, whats to stop the price going up?
UPDATE:
Defence of the Realm has the story too and basically agrees with my comment to Pavlovs Cat that its an indicator of how hostile the environment our forces are working in in that area. Although I'm not convinced the options DOTR promote for replacements are up to scratch.
Eventual FEMA style camps going up
-
... to confine dissidents, with the Nightingales.
Was going to run the Dover pics of Danny Tommo’s lads but it’s a known
known on many sites and opinion is...
13 hours ago