What's Going on With The Farage Back-Pedalling?

Well, it was good while it lasted. Nigel Farage was a beacon for Judeo-Christian politics.

Past tense. I say was, because I saw his responses on the Winston Marshall Show on YouTube. You need to watch it, seriously, you do. I don't know how Winston got Farage to say the things he did, but it's quite shocking.

Basically, I believe Farage has been nobbled. I believe he's been given "the talk". You know, the talk where you're informed that the Muslim Gulf States have so much money invested in the economy that if you fuck about with Muslims in the UK, they'll nuke us financially by pulling all their money out. 

Financial collapse will ensue, government bonds will be worthless and the whole house of cards that is the Banking, Financial and corporate system will collapse.

Having a Muslim donor doesn't help the accusations of undue influence either.

In the Winston Marshall Interview, Farage clarified his stance on illegal immigration. Basically he will stop all immigration both legal and illegal. He will stop the boats arriving. But the chilling thing is what he said about immigrants already here. He said there was not much he could do. 

Also he said that Muslims already here should integrate, but if they didn't, they should be deported. Essentially like the German Rules that insist new immigrants learn the language. 

Excuse me?

We are spending millions of pounds a week housing illegal immigrants, they have come to the UK and if we let them in, if we give them asylum or have an amnesty scheme, that's it. Millions of Muslim men in the UK. Not only that, at some point they will be eligible to bring their families into the UK as well. 

He also added the kicker that the Muslim population increasing at 75% every 10 years. Although that will change exponentially as numbers grow. He said that if we alienate the Muslims, we will lose. 

By the rules above, we will lose anyway! Christians (those that don't convert to Islam for convenience) will eventually become a minority in the UK. We will lose whatever happens, as long as the status quo or close to it is kept.

So what happened to the Farage of a month ago? The Farage that wanted to stop the boats, end immigration for a period and deport all the illegal immigrants? 

Or was that just us mis-hearing him? Maybe he was a bit ambiguous and really didn't want to deport all the illegals after all? All the guff about leaving the ECHR in order to gain control of our borders and who we can and can't deport.

I think Farage needs to clarify his comments and do it quick. Is he referring to illegal immigrants who have already got here, or is he referring to deporting legal immigrants? 

I'm concerned. I have said before on this blog when we had the UKIP split diluting the political vote that I thought Farage was a distraction for the right. Someone who talks the talk, but has no intention of carrying it out.

Right now, as it stands, be under no illusion Farage knows that at some point, the UK will become a Muslim country. Now if you want that, if you want your children and grandchildren to be Muslim, to be controlled by that regressive ideology, then You are not with me.

This is something I've been saying for about a year now. The people that have any success in UK politics dance with the devil. They already need the Muslim vote to win elections. They dance around and say nice words, but what it boils down to is they are evil. They are happy to condemn their daughters and granddaughters to becoming second class citizens. Because you can be damn sure that once Muslims take over this country they will not keep our Judeo-Christian standards, morals and rights. 

Human rights? Gone.

Women's Rights? Gone.

Religious rights? Gone.

Freedom of Religion? Gone.

Freedom Of Association? Gone

Freedom of Expression? Gone.

Freedom of Sexuality? Gone.

Gay Marriage? Gone.

I cannot express how evil I believe these people to be. Not Muslims, but the people that are not Muslims and are happy to continue down this path to the 8th century. 

Islam has not had an enlightenment, it is not progressive, it will not retain the social, legal and moral freedom that we have currently. Islam is like the terminator, it absolutely will not stop trying to overthrow the infidels. 

And that's where I part from Farage. If he thinks that Muslims will integrate and stop trying to assert the primacy of Islam, then he is very much mistaken. He may think that eventually it will become the will of the people in the UK because we will eventually be majority Muslim. 

That's the Middle-Class viewpoint that annoys me. A shrug of the shoulders and allowing an alien ideology to take over the country, an ideology that is not moderate, that takes over your whole life, that will not make allowances for minority rights.

But it will only take over because we let it. 

I suppose it depends on whether you feel the rights, morals, standards and legal practices we have in teh West at the moment are worth fighting for.....

Government Try to eradicate Fossil Fuels Cars Early.

 In the budget, the Government changed the company car tax rules to eradicate fossil fuel cars. Petrol and Diesel cars will attract a large tax bill for anyone running a fossil fuelled company car 

Electric company car drivers will get a better deal, essentially promoting electric cars exclusively and making it totally impossible to run a fossil fuelled company car.

But why are the Government using the company car tax rules to promote a particular type of vehicle, especially when we have been here before and it failed so spectacularly?

Yes, I remember the Diesel debacle, where the previous Labour government gave preferential tax rates to Diesel company car owners. So much so there are very few used petrol-engine cars from that era.

And we know what happened to Diesel don't we? It fell out of favour when government was tasked with improving air quality and it was found that Diesels produced high levels of Nitrous Oxide.

Government should not be social engineering our use of vehicles, because it always ends in tears.

Instead, lets the market decide. Id electric cars are so good, then they shouldn't need a subsidy, shouldn't need tax breaks and shouldn't need preferential treatment at the hands of the government.

If electric cars were cheap enough, had enough range, were economical, and were significantly cheaper to run than fossil fuel cars, we would  all be using them. 

But electric cars don't match the hype. The range is not even close to that advertised, charging can be expensive if you are travelling across the country on business, charging can also take longer, so who pays the employee to sit around at a charging station?

No, electric cars along with all of the Net Zero nonsense needs to stand on it's own two feet. It needs to provide cheap energy (as we were promised), it needs to provide it reliably, in quality, when it is required. 

It shouldn't need government subsidies. 

Identifying Covert Marxist Organisations or Articles

I've just put up a link to a page that gives you instances of words and phrases that identify organisations and articles that are trying to influence you or others.

An organisation called "The Council for Eradicating International Poverty" would raise several red flags for me.

Another Called "The Progressive Liberal Outlook Centre" although the title sounds innocuous and pretty nondescript, would also cause me to raise an eyebrow. 

Interestingly a search of the above title doesn't bring up an organisation, but a set of links discussing the different between progressive and liberal, of centre-left politics. Close Google, but no cigar.  But it does indicate the use of those words in combination is exclusive to the Left.

Words like progressive, liberal, common, community, poverty, all communicate and identify certain meaning to those in the know. Those not educated about these things (most of us) would not even consider them to have alternative meaning, or signalling allegiance to an ideology.

On their own, the words may well convey their original meaning because even the right discuss these topics, but used in conjunction with other words in the list, you are looking at Marxist ideology.

Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) therefore is a Marxist ideology red flag. 

It has nothing to do with Diversity, Equality (Replaceable with Equity by Marxists to hide meaning) or Inclusion. DEI means lowering standards to allow those of a certain characteristic to be included in an organisation or group without any merit. It's a Marxist ploy to weaken an organisation. 

Also group identifiers are a key Marxist red flags. Council, Community, International, Global, attempting to signify (wrongly) that a large group or a majority uphold the findings or the ideology of the organisation.

If you look carefully, the core Marxist organisations don't practice DEI, but they tell other organisations to practice it. If they do, they pay lip service: the placements are carefully selected to place the person without any real authority. Of course the Left consider the group more important than the individual, so control is almost always by committee with a limited number of figureheads that rely on the unqualified attendees to just go along with the flow. 

The more you delve into the world of the left and the weasel-words they use, it becomes fascinating and you can readily identify the ideology behind think-tanks, activist organisations, general groups, charities, etc.

The more you look, the more you find. It's concerning there are so many actively influencing government policy both local and national, or corporate decisions. 

Anyway, I will add to the list as more covert words are identified.

Trump Victory and Time to Assess The Democrat Reaction.

 Well, it's been a few days now and there has been enough time to assess the scale of the Trump victory and the reaction of the leftists to the enormity of the win.

So for starters, Trump has won the Presidency, the Senate and the house. A complete and unmitigated thrashing of the Democrats. Unprecedented in modern times. The American voters refused to turn out for a party that hates the country they live in, a party that would happily replace American voters with immigrants from outside the country. 

It's the same scenario playing out here in the UK except we have just elected the equivalent of the Biden regime here.

So, that's the win. A complete and undeniable win.

Leftists are now wondering why people didn't vote for Harris. The go-to reason of racism won't wash. Because analysis shows that the Black vote left the Democrats in droves. In fact everyone left the Democrats. 

There is now a realisation around the 2020 election that 18 Million votes disappeared from the Democrat vote between 2020 and 2024. If you look at graphs, this year's Democrat vote looked to be essentially the same as 2016 and previous years. 2020 was an aberration. An 18 million vote aberration. 

Some Democrats are realising that just maybe there was something fishy going on  in 2020.

Some hard-core Democrats are wondering why people voted for a better America and didn't vote Democrat to signal their virtue despite the current regime raising inflation, cutting jobs and wages and poorly handling the Covid crisis.

Nope, screw virtue, Americans voted for a leader that had a proven track record of prosperity, a leader FOR Americans and Americans.

If it wasn't for Democrat legal interference, Trump may have got a lot more done under his last presidency. The American public have given Republicans a full house politically, it's now up to Republicans to not screw things up. We'll See.

I do wonder though, if the tentacles of the big corporate donors will turn some Republicans against Trump. True Republicans need to clamp down on dissent. I'm sure some will not like Robert Kennedy Junior and Tulsi Gabbard joining the Trump administration, but Trump is intelligent enough not to make the mistakes of his previous term. He will not tolerate people that cannot do the job and instead plot against him. This time Trump has put together  an affirmative team that will get on and do the job independently of the President. 

Musk, Kennedy and Gabbard all have the leadership qualities to be able to run with their various portfolios independently of Trump, This administration will be many-headed and harder for the Democrats to attack. 

Of course the left could go full batshit bonkers with their accusations, lawsuits and smears, but who would believe them other than the hair-dyed Marxists? After all even activists have a limit.

But we'll see in the fullness of time how things turn out. Trump has to get to January without being successfully shot. I have visions of his inauguration and walk to the Whitehouse looking more like the film the Gauntlet with snipers behind every bush on Pennsylvania Avenue. 

Trump Wins, Liberal Heads Explode..

Donald J Trump is the 47th President of the United States of America. By a significant margin. 

Not only that, the Republicans have taken the Senate and may possibly win the House of Representatives as well.

This is a wholesale rejection of the Democrat political machine, a machine that was about as corrupt and manipulative as a political machine can be. 

Right now I'm listening to American liberals saying they hope against hope that Trump isn't the monster the Democrats machine and the American Media painted him to be. But, if he isn't would they change their view on the Democrat Media publicity machine? I have a feeling that's a nope. They'd still believe the lies being fed by the Democrat Disinformation Departments.

Despite him already being President and doing nothing much to upset the political status quo, the rhetoric of Trump being a fascist, a monster and criminal, have hyped up the hysteria amongst the liberal hive mentality. It seems t5hese people are as easy manipulated as you can get. Say "Jump!" and I'm sure they will oblige, right over the edge of the cliff.

I'm glad Trump won. It is good for America and the American economy. It is good for America in the Worldwide Political Sphere. 

Except in the UK. 

I'm relishing the discomfort in the Labour government ranks at the moment. Especially the discomfort around the Foreign Minister, David Lammy, who has on several occasions verbally abused Trump, calling him quite nasty names. And of course words are violence according to the Left, so I look forward to Lammy being booted out of the position he is ill-suited for and someone with a wiser head put in place.

After all, can you really expect the Americans to work with someone who so clearly despises their Commander-in-Chief?

Anyhoo, I just hope that there are no more pot-shots at Trump. He won, he won by a massive margin and a significant majority of Americans want him to be their President.

And I really hope the Democrat party reject the corrupt clique that has taken over the party. The Clintons and Obamas and the Epstein Survivors club need to be kicked out of the party and the Dems need to get back to their liberal roots. 

I now look forward to Trump releasing the Epstein client list and the prosecutions to begin. After all, in order to protect their interests, someone got at least two shooters to have a go.

That should be a treasonous act in itself.

I can imagine that there are plumes of smoke emanating from FBI headquarters today as evidence of the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up is destroyed, evidence of the FBI involvement in the various malicious prosecutions of Trump, the evidence surrounding the raid at Mara Lago and what instructions were given to the assault team and finally the Epstein client list.

If I were Trump, I'd be in there like a Rat up a drainpipe investigating the various departments of the FBI that were involved in the egregious anti-Trump activity at the behest of the Biden administration.

Multiculturalism is Failing and The Government Know it. They Fear You Realising it Too.

There is a row currently around the Southport stabber.

It's now come to light that not only did he commit the atrocity in Southport, he had downloaded an Islamist terrorist training manual, had actually created and had a quantity of the deadly poison Ricin.

Yet the murder of 3 kids and the maiming of many more in Southport is still being classed by the Government as "just" murder. The other offences and evidence as far as I am aware have not been taken into consideration and the charges against the guy have not yet (as far as is in the public domain) been upgraded to terrorist incidents. 

Why is that?

Given that Grandads and Grandmas in Southport shouting the odds at Police were dealt with with the full force of the law and maximum sentences, where are the Government on the Southport Stabber?

Running away like pussies it seems. Avoiding making any comments, closing down debate in the house of commons. 

At the very least, there should be a debate on how extremism is taking the children of first generation immigrants and radicalising them. 

The Southport incident isn't the first time a child of first-gen immigrants has been radicalised.

Shamima Begum, the poster child of the Left, was a child of immigrants. She went to Syria and joined ISIS. Whilst there she did unspeakable acts and supported many more directly.

The Manchester Arena bomber was the child of immigrants, killed 22 people. 

One of the 2017 London Bridge Van Attacker was a son of immigrants.

The 2019 London Bridge Stabber killed 2 people was also the son of immigrants.

I could go on. What motivates the children of immigrants to become violent radicals?

Is multiculturalism failing? Is it failing the children of immigrants who refuse to integrate into UK society? By not integrating, are they denying their children the ability to bacome part of UK society? Do they actively prevent them from doing so?

There are dozens of cases of girls brought up in UK immigrant families, being married off to men in foreign countries. There are dozens of incidents of honour killings, where girls have wanted to integrate, date and even marry men from the UK, but have been prevented by their families from doing so and in extreme ceases killed for doing so.

Marrying boys off to foreign girls, bringing the girl in from a foreign country, completely unable to speak English and integrate into UK society. Totally reliant on her in-laws, unable to communicate with anyone outside the family. 

There are just a couple of aspects of the divisiveness of the current ideology of multiculturalism. 

It's under these sort of lifestyles, where young adults are not able to integrate, where they have no sense of belonging, that can foster the sense of resentment towards the country that houses them. The apparent oppressiveness of the family and the deliberate control of the young adults, the refusal to allow them to integrate into Western society.

It's these sorts of pressures can that create psychopaths. 

In the West we all know about the smothering mother and the psychopathic tendencies that can be created. 

In immigrant families you can multiply that several fold.

But multiculturalism is a pillar of government ideology. It's clung to as close as a bible is by a Mid Western American.

Government believes, it devotes faith into the mantra that multiculturalism is a successful ideology.

Yet, we all too often see the failings. 

Not only the stabbings, the bombings, the kids going off to fight for armies in direct conflict with our own and lately the calls for genocide of Jews . 

But the failings of multiculturalism are causing a rise in the opposing side. If the government thinks the far-right is on the rise, what is causing it?

If immigrants integrated, there would be no pressure to protest. No opportunity to "other" them.

If immigrants integrated there would be no animosity.

If immigrants allowed their sons and daughters to marry across religious and societal divides, there would be no divide to speak of and exploit.

But no, it's the continued division, the isolation, the refusal to integrate that creates the extremism on both sides. 

And it's the realisation of all of this that the Government cannot, must not allow to become mainstream commentary. 

Hence why any and all commentary on the Southport stabber, whether he is a terrorist and what the government knew when they called protesters (who have since been found out to be correct) as spreading disinformation. The government must have known about the Ricin, must have known about the terrorist documents. 

The only sketchy detail is whether the stabber has embraced the Muslim faith or not. Downloading ISIS material doesn't make you a Muslim. It does make you a terrorist. 

But the current atmosphere of mistrust between the public and the government tends to suggest that if the government went balls-deep in making him out to be a Christian Choirboy, then it's a pretty good bet he's actually converted to become and Islamic Extremist.

The question is when the government knew. Especially for those convicted of misinformation. Because it seems it was not misinformation and the government knew full well it wasn't even before the prosecutions began.

Those in jail are now political prisoners, ideological martyrs, imprisoned for telling the truth the government didn't want told. 

Multiculturalism is not working, it will never work, it is a flawed ideology. It creates extremists. That is what the government don't want you to find out and understand.

My Budget Response

There is one truism in Financial Politics: 

You cannot tax your way to prosperity.

It seems Rachel Reeves has forgotten that, or maybe she's never heard it, or maybe she's just ignoring it.

Not only have the OBR refused to back up the claim of the £20Bn black hole, what we got in the budget was more tax and spend. Piggy banks were raided in order for the Government to fund pet projects.

An Office for Value for Money is being created, more civil service jobs. Another Chairperson on a fat six figure salary no doubt, a few board members on lesser salaries and a team under that.

So much for saving money.

All I can see from this budget is the chancellor has minimised the affect on your pay packet and avoided raising fuel duty (which I'm sure would have caused a riot), but has done some creative raiding of savings to then redistribute to various funds and pet projects.

Unfortunately the chancellor has ignored the truism at the start of this blog. Taking money from interest on savings, or wherever and then using that money elsewhere will not grow the economy. And we need to be growing the economy, because without that pressure, it will continue to shrink. We need investment from outside the government to come in and increase cash flow. 

Right now we are at rock bottom in manufacturing capacity. Sure, we have a few specialist industries that can sell goods outside the UK, but they are not enough. The city of London is an unreliable source of revenue. Dividends can go down as well as up.

We need something inside the UK that people outside the UK will invest in and/or buy for themselves. Spinning the same money round the economy by creating an ever-increasing number of retail outlets cannot grow the economy.

The Small Nuclear Reactors in development at Rolls-Royce are the sort of thing that we need to nurture. We need to be adopting those reactors within the UK in order to develop the technology.

We need to be looking at alternative nuclear energy solutions. Thorium Reactors could be a viable solution using fission. The dream of fusion is just that: a dream, always 10 years away, as it has been for the last 4 decades.

Yet I don't see investment in anything as substantive as this in the budget. It's all pie-in-the sky stuff, nothing tangible. Of course the tax take isn't tangible. That's very real.

Increase in Minimum Wage Will Cause Ceiling Crash

The increase in minimum wage is welcome; If we're able to keep our jobs that is.

After all putting all the economic heavy lifting on small business employers isn't really a wise move. The SMEs are already struggling and those that are not one-man-bands will struggle to employ people with the rise in minimum wage coming after a rise in employer's National Insurance.

I suspect the unemployment rate will increase come the spring. 

But I foresee another unintended consequence of the rise. The crash into teh ceiling of lower management levels.

For instance the wife is a senior care assistant. She is in between the normal care assistant and the care manager.

The new minimum wage equates to just over 25K. My wife erns less than that. The care assistants under her also earn less. So I don't expect their employer to increase the care assistants to 25K and then increase the wife's salary pro-rata. 

They are all going to hit the limit and clump around the minimum wage. Under those circumstances, how are employers going to remunerate those that do a higher-spec job than the base workers? 

What would be the point of being low-level management if you're getting paid the same as an ordinary worker?

At the bottom end, the new minimum wage will sweep up a lot of positions where there will be no differentiation wage-wise.

There will be no incentive to progress, no reward for doing a better job, or moving to management. Under those circumstances, how do you motivate the workforce? 

It's no wonder we are becoming so unproductive. You have the option of sitting at home on benefits and getting everything paid for you. As long as you don't have debt and no expensive vices, you can life a comfortable life if you are careful. If you go out to work, you get minimum wage which won't cover rent etc. but if you do somehow manage to get the system to work for you and you somehow can afford to pay rent, you'll then find there's no progression because employer's can't afford to differentiate between operatives and managers with different pay scales.

There's the so-called glass ceiling for women trying to move up in management positions, but this is the working-class brick ceiling. The inability of employers to continue to differentiate lower levels on a pay basis. 

They may have to start introducing increased holiday terms, thereby reducing productivity even more. Although to be fair, maybe managers could be at work less. 

We really are circling the drain when it come to productivity. 

UPDATE: 

It seems that employers that had the inside scoop to the Treasury's plans were ahead of the curve. My son-in-law works for Euro Car Parts. They made all of their branch managers redundant yesterday including him. I assume they've factored that they can spread the salaries of the branch managers across the lower wage tiers to pay for the minimum wage rise. 

Not a painless payrise for some.

I predict this will not be the last instance of this sort of activity. If employers are forced by law to pay ordinary workers what they would normally pay management, why would they employ managers? The managers will go and the ordinary workforce will have to take on those roles to keep up productivity and/or the wages costs the same.

What is a "Working Person"?

 Kier Starmer has changed his party's manifesto pledge not to increase National Insurance to they will not increase working people's National Insurance. 

A subtle change and in essence what it mans is that Employer's N.I. will increase. Employee's N.I. MAY not increase.

I say may, because I'm not sure what Starmer and his cabinet define as working people is necessarily what most working people think is a working person.

We've all seen before Labour talk about working people, but what they mean is those on benefits.

Or they've meant Public Sector workers.

The concept of workers in the private sector like the majority of people, those of us earning just above minimum wage, those of is with no disposable income and struggling to pay the bills don't seem to compute when it comes to Labour.

The signals are that there will be a slew of increases in indirect taxation in the budget. How that doesn't affect "working people" and make things even harder I don't know. I don't think Labour could explain that one either.

But hey, no increase in direct taxation!

But how many people will be unable to run a car and continue their jobs if road tax increases and insurance tax increases and fuel duty increases? The triple whammy for drivers that will send people off the road. How will the government collect their projected increase in tax if the very poor give up their cars and just don't pay these taxes?

Government need to really understand that people that run cars are not rich and cannot be expected to pay these ever-increasing taxes. They need to look towards the people that can afford an increase in tax. Those funnelling money abroad, those corporations that pay no tax even though they transact with UK residents, those that have bought or are buying up large swathes of the UK property and corporate market.

Caveats to Cover Lies.

The chancellor Rachael Reeves says that working people's pay packets will not be affected by the budget.

Yeah, but every fucking thing else will be. Every single indirect tax will be leveraged.

Fuel duty, car tax, the usual easy targets, cigarettes and alcohol, pension tax, airport tax, the whole gamut will be run. 

The cash couch that is the UK will be turned over and shaken to extract the maximum amount of spare cash. 

The people that won't be affected? The rich elites, the globalists and the rest of the people sucking this country dry.

Rachael Reeves is being economical with the truth. Working people are going to be fucked seven ways sideways. 

Reparations

Historically, my family has never been wealthy, we have never owned slaves, nor benefitted from them.

So why should me or my family pay any reparations? 

It's not the government, it's the taxpayer footing the bill, the majority of which never benefitted from slavery in any way. 

In fact a significant minority of families didn't come to the country until fairly recently, so why should they pay reparations?

The whole thing is a nonsense, stirred up and promoted by grifters that want money.

If reparations are to be paid, how far back should it go? Do I have a claim against France for the conquest of the country and the take-over by the Normans? 

Do I have a claim against the Scandinavian countries for the Viking takeover of the North of Britain? I'm sure the Vikings killed Britons and took many as slaves, so where's my money?

Do I have a claim against Italy for the Roman conquest, people who certainly took and profited from British slaves?

If those claims look stupid and incredulous, so do the claims made against a slave trade that died out 200 or 300 years ago.

When Will People Reealise: For Muslims it's Islam First, Everything Else is Secondary.

I can't stress enough how most of the Middle-Class get the issue of Muslims and Islam completely wrong.

They think the Islamic Ideology won't impact them. They think that "most" Muslims are moderate and are not a threat to the Christian Way of life in the UK.

I cannot stress how wrong-headed that is.

This report of a Muslim female Police officer spouting Islamic hate and actively conversing with a member of ISIS is but one example of how wrong the middle class are about Muslims and Islam.

There are hundreds, probably thousands of others out there in high-profile jobs that think the same way. They may say one thing and appear moderate in public, but amongst friends or in the Mosque it's another thing entirely.

If Kier Starmer wants to plug that black hole, how about issuing a tax on Mosques? Especially the Mosques that are financed from outside the UK by the Gulf States. The mosques that generally have imported Imams, with radical anti-Western views, with radical anti-feminist views, and especially anti Judeo-Christian views.

It's these engines of non-assimilation that stop the Muslims from integrating. The Imams remind them of their duty to impose the supremacy of Islam over their lives, over EVERYTHING and EVERYONE including the rest of us.

If ever there was a hotbed of hate speech, it's these mosques. But of course just saying that I assume would be classed as hate speech these days. But you do have to ask, where does this Muslim supremacy mindset come from? Who exactly is telling the children of immigrants that they MUST uphold the "true" Muslim way of life and refuse to integrate? 

I know where it comes from, but the government don't have an answer for it.

I do. Ban Imams from countries outside the UK.

Tax those mosques paid for by entities outside the UK.

Make unannounced/anonymous checks on mosques to see if they are issuing speech that conflicts with Western values. 

After all, the Christian Church has had to modernise to conform with Western Sensibilities over the decades, so why are we not demanding the same from Islam?

If necessary, we may have to have a reformation of the Islamic Religion like we did with Henry the 8th and Christianity. We might have to set up a Mosque of England religion, that replaces the current mosques with a more moderate, Western-allied version of Islam. All the other Mosques would be closed down. 

If necessary we need to start the reform ourselves, if we want to save the UK.

Labour: Stop Blaming the Tories, it's Getting Old Now.

The latest tranche of early releases from Prison have offered some controversial images for the government, as we see pictures of prisoners being picked up from Prison in luxury cars like Bentleys.

Hardly the image of "Crime Doesn't Pay".

And yet again, Labour say it's the fault of the Tories. 

I'm sorry, but you've been in power long enough to implement schemes that would avoid these images. You could by now have rented prison ships that would be docked at our ports, you could have repurposed MOD camps, you could have tasked a firm to come up with a completely new low-category secure facility made out of portakabins. You do know you can stack them up three high at least, don't you?

There are any number of things Labour could do to mitigate the situation, but:

Like a petulant child, they want to have a bit of theatre, have a flounce to prove the point. 

Except, like a parent watching a petulant child throw a tantrum in the middle of a supermarket, or do something stupid to make a point, I don't care. 

I want prisoners to be in prison. You've had 4 months to sort it out and you haven't. Instead you are making a scene. 

Labour, you are shit at government. 

Stop acting like kids and start leading. 

Or is all we are going to see of this term of government one flounce after another, one scene after another and bad governance?

I suspect the latter, because two-tier Kier is no leader in my eyes. He doesn't even give off any leadership vibes. 

He seems the sort of person that forms a committee just to tell him how many sugars he should put in his coffee. 

He doesn't look even remotely capable of making a single unilateral leadership decision.

So far he's looked like a middle-class parent faced with a truculent toddler, you know the sort: can't deal with someone that argues back. I've seen that face in so many supermarkets as the kid argues and screams from isle to isle. The "What do I do?" face. 

Identifying Waste in Government

Here's an idea for the Government if they are trying to save costs : create a small team of people that are placed in jobs in government departments for a short while who then report back to officials on the working practices, waste and efficiency of the department. 

A bit like the "Undercover Boss" series, but obviously without the boss working in the department. 

I'm sure a decent job agency can pull up a few qualified people that they can place into departments as moles.

I have a feeling there is massive waste in Whitehall and the fat could be trimmed without affecting the operation of the department.

Of course there's the unions to battle with if the staff reductions are required immediately. But you can trim the fat through natural processes like retirement. And there's nothing cushier than a civil service pension.

The evil of the virtue Signallers.

I've come to the conclusion that virtue-signallers are evil. Pure Evil.

In the case of those that support mass Muslim immigration, why would they condemn the females of the UK to being second-class citizens when the Muslims take over the country? 

I mean, pride is a sin and being proud to signal your "virtue" above your neighbour so you can show off, is not a virtue, if you are condemning future generations of women to effective slavery under a Muslim regime.

Signalling your support for "trans" women is not a virtue if by allowing men into female spaces women are being raped or sexually abused or violently assaulted.

Signalling your support for climate change and net zero is not a virtue if you are condemning the poor to poverty and risking them freezing to death because they can't afford heating in the winter.

Signalling your support for equality is not a virtue if your are actually promoting Communist ideology which is a provably evil ideology. 

These are just a small number of instances where people, including quite religious people (who should be aware of the risks of temptation and the sin of pride) think that they are doing good, but are instead doing evil.

I've come to the conclusion that all virtue-signallers are evil. They will profess their chosen "good deed" at the expense of others. Whether today or tomorrow, they are condemning others to poverty, slavery or death just to prove to their neighbour that they are better in some way. 

And we all know the road to Hell is paved with good intentions....

Great Replacement Theory: Far-Right Racist Trope, Conspiracy Theory, or Fact?

As above.

Just what do you call the falling of indigenous birth rates and an ever-increasing importation rate of people from everywhere else in the world?

Because whether planned or just by sheer incompetence, the government is allowing hundreds of thousands of people from everywhere else in the world into the UK. Mainly Muslims.

You can call it a conspiracy theory all you want, but the facts from the various government agencies are there for all to see.

At current rates, the UK will cease to be a Christian country in no more than two decades. Luckily I'll be dust by then, but my children? Grandchildren?

And why would the do-gooder virtue-signalling middle-class condemn their daughters and grand-daughters to a life as a second-class citizen? 

I think it's a very selfish attitude to ignore the implications for future generations so you can signal how virtuous you are to the rest of the world. 

I expect the global corporations to be cynical and just want the workforce replaced with cheap labour. You can kind of understand it's in the corporate interest to maximise profits.

But the virtue-signallers? I just don't understand. What do they get out of it? There's no monetary gain, the only benefit to backing the flooding of the UK with Millions of Muslims is just in the moment to can self-servingly appear holier than your neighbour.

It's an evil philosophy: that you would condemn generations of females relatives to effective slavery just to make yourself look good in the eyes of your neighbours. It's sick, and twisted.

It's Not the Weight, It's the Attitude...

The News that the Government is to start a pilot scheme offering weight loss drugs to unemployed people to enable them to get back into work.

Sadly, I predict the scheme will be a failure. 

The reason is that there are plenty of skinny people on the dole and their lack of weight hasn't enabled them to get into work any better than an overweight counterpart. 

It's not the weight that is the issue, it's the attitude and the benefits system itself.

If you want to work, you'll go out and find work. Whatever it is. Not all of us can do physical jobs, but even the disabled can get a job in a call centre because of access rights legislation.

The other block to getting a job is the cost to work. When you are on benefits, everything is provided for you. Your rent is paid, you get dole money every fortnight and life is relatively easy, if a bit cash-poor. 

If you then get a job, you instantly lose the payment of rent. You have to re-apply with no guarantee that your rent will be paid. 

If you take a minimum wage job, you lose benefits and then have to pay tax. If the minimum wage is the absolute minimum the government says a person should be paid, why isn't it a tax-free salary? That would instantly boost the salary straight away. It just seems immoral to start clawing back tax from the most disadvantaged wage earners.

The whole system drops you like a stone. There is no support, no easing you into work. It's like jumping off a cliff emotionally and psychologically.

It's that transition that needs to be addressed, not the weight of the people. 

The cynical part of my brain does wonder if this is part of some conditioning process. You know, to make being overweight and unproductive a morally poor choice. Fat-shaming.

I can see a future if everything comes to pass like assisted suicide where the paths cross and if you are on the dole and consuming too much and getting fat, you'd be offered weight-loss drugs or else it's off to the boneyard with you. 

Of course if the option is take the drugs, be productive and work for peanuts against being rendered down for glue or Soylent Green, that may just motivate a proportion of the dole bums into working.

But there's always a hard core of institutionalised generations of unemployed.... 

The Power of the Gulf State Investment Funds.

I've blogged a number of times the amount of power the Gulf State Investment funds (GSIF) wield within the UK. They own a significant proportion of the UK through various funds and companies. Through those investments they wield an incredible amount of power and influence.

It's in the news that DP World, the owners of Tilbury Port pulled 1 Billion pounds of investment in the port over comments that the Labour Party have said regarding P&O Ferries, another company owned by DP World.

The row has now been settled and DP World have agreed to continue as previously planned, but this is the first time that the power GSIFs hold over the UK Government has become mainstream.

I don't know how to put it, but the words I commit to the ether here on my blog are not random musings of some nutter. I have analysed and watched in practice the things that I blog about.

The normal person doesn't understand the machinations of government going on behind the scenes. And to be honest, I don't understand all of them. I do know the various areas I've investigated though.

But do believe me when I say that globalism has not benefitted this country at all. It has benefitted those that seek to exploit the people at the bottom of the pile. But it has over the decades made the lives of those at the bottom of the social scale a whole lot worse. Now it's affecting the middle class, you can see the likes of the Reform Party making headway against the mainstream parties, but do they truly understand the reasons for the demise of this country over the decades? 

We need to get back to a closed shop. Earn money here, pay tax here, don't want to pay tax here? Invest here. Start to contribute to the country and you'll be allowed to take a small portion of the profit out of the country.

Do you work here and send all your money to your family in another country? Tough. You'll get taxed on it as badly as I'd tax a company stripping assets here and sending the proceeds abroad.

We need to stop the money leaving this country. We need to start making things here, investing profits here, improving the lives of workers here.

Setting Up a Narrative: Tyranny In Action.

The latest news is that that MI5 is saying that Russian spies are trying to create mayhem on the streets of the UK.

I assume this is a direct reference to the recent riots.

I also assume this is another attempt to de-legitimise the protests, now that the "far-right" narrative has largely failed to gain traction because it's patently obvious the people involved weren't far-right and they actually had legitimate concerns.

The independent media in the form of blogs and videos has largely debunked the far-right narrative. Those of us that are working class saw through that straight away. It could be us on the streets if kids in our town were murdered.

The government and media then went on to try and make Tommy Robinson some far right arch villain, directing the riots from abroad. Except it's quite clear on his videos, if you care to look, that he was doing no such thing and was advising against violence as it plays into the hands of the corrupt government.

So the latest narrative is (in an attempt to gain some sympathy from the working class) that the rioters weren't far right (as we all are aware), but instead they were pawns in some 3D chess game between Putin and the West. Or Iran and the West. Or something. If they were innocent pawns, why are they serving maximum sentences in jail. Or is this now some way to wind back the narrative once the lawsuits and appeals start winning for unlawful arrests and imprisonment?

Yeah, try again MI5. If the rioters were duped by anyone, it was the Policemen dressed up in dark clothes wearing facemasks that directed the riots towards the migrant hotels and started kicking the doors in. 

The real reason why Tommy Robinson is now such an existential threat to the authorities is he's learned and adapted to their tactics. There may have been a time when he would have been kicking the doors in and having a good old scrap himself. But that was back then. 

Nowadays, Tommy has learned to protest peacefully, he has learned to Police those that attend the peaceful protests so that they remain peaceful. During the last two protests, he has banned facemasks, so that those causing trouble can be identified. 

Lo and behold, no violence. Because the undercover Police that would have been geared up and pretending to harass the Police, so the Police could start to charge in and make arrests, have been neutralised.

If you don't believe what I'm saying there are videos of various protests where you get someone threatening Police (as you would in a training exercise) but never getting battered or arrested, but the people beside them are arrested.

If the Police go in and snatch people, they will have the optics of snatching clearly peaceful protesters. So the authorities now have to make up some new excuse to de-legitimise the protesters. They are  not patriots, they are acting on the orders of Russian spies. If you join them, you are siding with Russia, Iran or some other country we don't agree with.

Tommy is due to come back into the UK any day now. He's cleverly stayed away from the UK as the authorities feverishly try and come up with a reason to hold him under terror laws or some such.

Terror laws that were used to hold Tommy at a port before he left the UK. Terror laws that have been used against reporters reporting the truth about the Israel-Gaza conflict. Basically terror laws that have been used against anyone not adhering to the government narrative. 

Ignore political differences, the people held under terror laws would I assume not like each other's viewpoint. But look at the common denominator: the government. Both sides conflict with the government narrative and so have to be silenced. 

That is tyranny, right there.

As an aside, were the machete-wielding Muslims that turned out when it was said that there were going to be 100 far-right protests Russian patsies? 

Was the Pakistani guy that spread the rumour that the guy that killed the kids in Southport was a Muslim a Russian Patsy? 

Really, MI5? Is this the best you can do? 

Who is Sue Gray and How Is She Involved in Both Tory and Labour Governments?

 Sue Gray has come from the Civil Service to firstly condemn Boris Johnson for "Partygate" and then was included in the Labour government as a special advisor on more money than the Prime Minister.

She's now resigned, but been given a lower salary (but still very well-paid) job elsewhere in government. Nice and cushy.

But the more I see of the posts she's been appointed to the more I wonder if she's a WEF minder. You know, there in the wings making sure the PM toes the WEF line and if they think about going against the WEF some scandal will emerge.

I mean, we had the wobble the other week with rumours of super-injunctions going wild round the internet and I just wonder if that was a shot across the bows (politically) of Kier Starmer.

I seems a coincidence that a week later she's gone. 

There are no coincidences in politics.

I wonder if her instructions to the PM were a bit to much too soon for the government to stomach. 

Yes, we've had the cutting of the winter fuel allowance, but I do wonder if Sue Gray was pushing the government for more cuts. 

I predict that if Starmer has pushed back against the WEF then within the next two weeks, the government and Starmer in particular will be heavily briefed against, think Liz Truss.

Super-injunction be damned, I suspect there will be a leak in another country about Starmer. I also suspect Angela Rayner will also come under pressure.

The Labour cabinet come across as a bunch of clueless middle-management types, completely out of their depth when it comes to running the country. Do they look like competent professionals to you? 

My message to Starmer is this: It's now or never, you either have balls or you don't. Start issuing international arrest warrants for those that are attempting to coerce the government into actions against the British public. It's nice being part of the club, but as you are finding out, membership is by the most tenuous of threads. 

I know the names, but without the sort of evidence you can supply, I would be sued into oblivion if I mentioned or even hinted at a name. Kier, you will have written logs, email communications and call recordings. Time to be a man and cast the cloak of corruption aside and do the decent thing.

Labour are Now Officially a Danger.

The handing over of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius shows a distinct lack of self-awareness or an awareness of what they signify in the wider scheme of things.

Right now Kier Starmer has signalled that the Labour party is happy to give up territory that the UK owns across the world.

The Chagos handover is not only a signal that Starmer hates Britain and British history, that he fails to understand it. It also is a poke in the eye for relations with America. You know our tenants on Diego Garcia, that we gave a lease to. A lease that is now under threat.

Not only that, relinquishing the islands also send signals to those countries that have historic claims to territories we acquired during times of war or have fought wars over.

The Falklands are a prime example. Why, for instance, would the UK hold onto the Falkland Islands and South Georgia, islands at the other end of the world?

Because they are a strategic resource, that's why. The sea around the Falklands provides much more in revenue than it does (currently) cost to hold onto. However that may now change, given the Labour government's signalling it's willingness to give away strategic territory.

Yes, the Chagos Islands are (were) a strategic resource. Diego Garcia is a  landing strip in an Ocean that would cost billions to Police without it. It has become a jumping-off point for Middle-Eastern operations. It is as important as the airfields on Cyprus. 

So yet again, territories held by the UK around the World come under scrutiny by those that understand their importance. Forget historic claims, we won them (usually) pretty fairly as spoils of war or some other way. Tough on the people that got beaten, but they've been ours for centuries now. Well before the creation of the United Nations. 

Only someone that is hideously crippled by the stigma of imperialism would fail to see the significance of these chunks of rock we own around the world.

Labour, Less Like a Car Crash, More Like a Motorway Pile-Up

I refuse to comment on "SausageGate", mainly because I think it and other gaffes in the speech were at best an example of an amateur at work, at worst a deliberate ploy to distract from the rest of the speech.

The Labour tenure has been marked by one balls-up after another.  "Car-Crash-Kier"? I don't think so. It's like standing by a motorway on a foggy day and hearing the screech and thud as yet another car joins the pile-up.

Screech, Thud - The initial crash happens when Labour announce the scrapping of the winter heating allowance.

Screech, Thud - Another car joins the heap when Labour announce inflation-busting pay rises for their Union mates. So we knew why the pensioners have to suffer.

Screech, Thud - Millions are announced for foreign Aid to stop climate change. Er, it's warm in Africa for a reason, Kier. And not global warming. Where it is on the Globe might be a clue.

Screech, Thud - Kier announces that people will be locked up and maximum sentences delivered for mean tweets. Hardly a public menace, nor a public priority.

Screech, Thud - Kier announces that prisoners will be released from Jail early in order to make way for those despicable hurty-word people.

Screech, Thud - We get the ClothesGate scandal, which escalates into an admission the PM is the biggest freebie-grabber in history. He's closely followed by Angela Rayner. Just what is the price all those clothes, glasses and holidays? What favours will be called in? 

Screech, Thud - It's reported that prisoners are instantly re-offending because they don't have anywhere to go to after the botched release programme.

Screech, Thud - Did I say botched? Now we find out that the wrong prisoners have been released by mistake. Some serious offenders. The Police are trying to collect them back up - If they can find them, that is.

The pile-up continues to grow. I've missed some points, I'm sure. And there will be more to follow very soon.

It's almost like the people in the Cabinet don't know what they are doing. I just wondered if they were selected and hired for their ability or something else. I'm including the Prime Minister himself in that list. 

It doesn't look like ability came up in the job interview, does it?

So what's the something else? The ability to take orders from other organisations and people? Party Donors? Freebie-Buyers? Supra National organisations like the WEF? Just how did Kier get the job when he's do fucking useless at it? Or anyone else in the cabinet?

My prediction is that the budget will fleece ordinary people and will not harm rich people. Another car hurtling down that foggy motorway...

Labour Budget: Are we Being Gaslighted?

All I heard from Rachael Reeves was exactly the opposite of what she's planning to do. 

I can understand the braying crowd of supporters taking in the aspirational sunny uplands speech, but those more cynical amongst us know what's coming.

Some of us also know what's being said in the meeting rooms of the Labour party. It's not good.

I've always said the Labour party is the party of jealousy. It made a switch from that in the first months of the Blair presidency, but then it slipped back to type.

Now there's no mask. They are going after those people they see as legitimate targets. Undeserving, unproductive pensioners were the first in the crosshairs.

Reeve's speech mentioned the closing of non-dom loopholes. Really? You're going to bugger things up for your biggest donors? Yeah, I don't think so.

Like I said, I feel like I'm being gaslighted. Labour talk a good talk, but you know damn sure that what they say will not be what they do.

Trump Shooters, Some Thoughts....

The first shooter was given a prime location, close to the President, a mere hundred yards away. The security was so lax it was pitiful and the shooter fucked it up, grazed the President's ear and shot the people behind him, killing one.

The second shooter was given a prime location, prior knowledge of Trump's location, a location easily accessed because the secret service only secured the immediate location of Trump, The shooter set up defensive screening with ceramic tiles (whether they would have made a difference is arguable), but he gave away his position by sticking a barrel if a rifle through a chain link fence. Spotted thankfully by the secret service on their forward sweep of the area.

So, given all the above, there seems to be at least the suspicion that people are being given knowledge of the President's whereabouts, knowledge of areas that provide a clear shot, motivation to get into position to make the shot and to take the shot when they have the opportunity.

Reading between the lines and looking at the evidence, it's hard to believe these are two random nutjobs.

Possibly the second actual nutjob is a smokescreen for the original planned operation to make it look like random nutjobs are taking pot-shots at Trump. 

UPDATE:

The latest shooter appears to have flown from Hawaii to Florida, acquired a rifle that had the serial number filed off and drove to the place the President would be playing golf.

Hmmm......

They Really Want Him Dead. Trump Assassination Attempt Number 2

So, yesterday there was yet another assassination attempt on Trump. It failed this time because the secret service were sort of on the ball and swept the area before Trump played that hole, but even then he was a matter of a few hundred yards away. I assume the shooter didn't have a clear shot and didn't have a clue about sniping, luckily. He left the barrel of his rifle out in plain sight. Something a professional shooter wouldn't do.

But I have to ask: what is motivating these people? What is causing people to have a pop at Trump? 

You have to ask if the Democrats are stoking up the tension by saying Trump is a threat to democracy, or he's going to become a dictator. Under those circumstances some lunatic lefty would see it as his or her duty to take out Trump, to keep democracy safe. 

The rhetoric has to stop, or be toned down. Trump isn't a threat to democracy, what he is a threat to are the corrupt legislators and judges that conspired together to try and bring him down before he could even become the nominee for President. 

I'm sure that when he becomes President, Trump will be going after those that abused process and the law to try and stop him and when that failed, bankrupt him and when that failed, spun him as some Fascist dictator that will lock the USA down tight. All he needs are a few targeted lawsuits that get to discovery and then all the emails and meetings to plot against him will become public knowledge.

That's as long as the people involved are alive to sue or criminally prosecute. The Democrats have a habit of  cleaning house in a most violent way. The body count is not insignificant.

I do wonder how exasperated the people organising these rifle-toting nutjobs are getting. All the expenditure of getting two useful idiots in the right place at the right time with the right guns and they still fuck it up. But maybe the plan is now to have a number of nutjobs lined up at various venues between now and November pointing guns at Trump in the hope that at least one is successful. Even if they're not, what's the betting that the Biden administration pulls the plug on the election because it's too dangerous for the nominees? What if they put a blanket ban on Assault rifles or long rifles of any kind just while the election happens, and then forget to undo the ban afterwards?

Thank the stars they're not employing professionals. Thanks the stars they can't employ professionals, because pros would know how to keep evidence and a trail of evidence in play just in case. They may even turn against the plotters. 

I do wonder how long the suspect will stay alive, given previous history. The interesting thing about this attempt as the assailant is alive, there seems to be a trail of evidence online showing him to have been radicalised against politicians (a nutjob), and he's a nutjob that got hold of a rifle (food for the anti-gun lobby). 

Cronyism.

Both sides are guilty of doing it. The bastards do it because they can get away with it. There's not a jot we can do as voters until the next election. 

All the fuckwits that voted Labour, this is what you get: more of the same shit the other side did.  

That is all.

GET THEM OUT! GET THEM OUT!

Journalism is an Act of Terrorism??

I now know of three journalists that have been arrested under the terrorism act in the UK.

The first is Tommy Robinson who although not known as a journalist, is still making journalism on the topic of extremist Islam in the UK.

The second is Richard Medhurst, an independent journalist covering the war in Gaza.

The third is Sarah Wilkinson, also covering the war in Gaza.

But what do they have in common? After all, I doubt you'd be hearing Richard or Sarah singing the praises of Tommy's viewpoint, nor vice-versa. So what is the common denominator?

These are three people that are independently reporting on news that is inconvenient to the Government's managed narrative.

Managed narrative? I hear you ask. Well, the narrative that the government tell the media to report. 

I can't emphasise that today's news is a carefully curated collection of media pieces, managed to steer your opinion in a certain direction.

This is not news, this is propaganda, or even worse, it's mind manipulation.

The question is why are such disparate reporters being arrested under terror legislation?

What specifically is it in the legislation that the Police are using that they can't get any other way.

Tommy Robinson has gone into great detail about his arrest and the Police seemed very interested in the information on his phone. They especially were interested in who was funding Tommy.

I do wonder if the same applies to Richard and Sarah. 

The common thing is all three are briefing against the government narrative. I may not agree to support the Palestinians, but I can see that adverse information coming out of Gaza would be damaging to the government narrative about that area. 

But the use of terror legislation in these cases is a massive overreach. Phones, computers and documents have all been confiscated in these cases to be interrogated by the Police. To what ends? What will they do with the information? This isn't a fishing exercise to support Mossad. The inclusion of Tommy rules that out.

However, there is third party at large that the government would really like to be at the centre of this contra-narrative briefing: Russia.

They would quite like for there to be a nugget of information somewhere all all of these journalists devices that point to a state actor and Russia is the current bogyman.

I think that they wanted to blame Russia for the disinformation regarding the Southport stabbings, until it was inconveniently revealed to be a Pakistani man in Pakistan saying the stabber was a Muslim. 

And this is where it comes to the nub of the question: this is about control of information, not just locally, but globally. 

But I hope, with the inclusion of Richard and Sarah, that people will begin to understand it not the side you are on the matters to the government, they will abuse legal process to intimidate you whatever your political viewpoint. This is not about left or right. 

This is now a clear sign of extra-democratic forces trying to control a narrative, to convert the news into propaganda, to spoon-feed you a curated view of the world, so you begin to think how they want you to think.

How Does Mass Migration Benefit the Poor?

Genuine question to anyone that supports, or advocates for mass migration: How does it benefit the poor?

I can't see any mechanism whereby the mass immigration of immigrants benefits the poor of our society.

How does it benefit the 16 year old starting to get on the job ladder?

How does it benefit the 20-something wanting to buy a house?

How does it benefit the middle-aged poor person?

Where, in the great scheme of things does mass migration benefit the poorest in society? 

It's a genuine question I'd love someone to answer. 

Show me where mass immigration of unskilled people is a benefit, a help, a positive to the working poor of this country.

Because I'd like someone to explain why the working poor of this country don't have a legitimate grievance against mass immigration.

Kier Starmer's European Wishlist No More Than That: A Wish-List

 Kier Starmer has tried to flesh out what he mans by a "reset" with Europe. 

Apparently he will negotiate closer links with Germany and the German Market (not just for Christmas, of course). But there's a big fly in the ointment: The European Commission.

As those of us opposed to the EU and the level of interference it has in internal affairs of member states, Germany cannot unilaterally agree treaties or trade agreements with countries external to the EU.

So, how will Two-Tier Kier get round this conundrum?

I suspect we will see yet another anti-democratic move but Kier's Government and he will start to forge closer ties with the EU. After the majority of the country voted to leave, with all the consequences that have happened thereafter.

I don't know if you've noticed, but the poor working class have not been that impacted by leaving the EU, but the middle and upper classes have. The Polish Nannies have fucked of back to a prosperous and safe Poland, where they can now earn decent wages and don't have to put up with some entitled upper-middle-class family throwing them breadcrumbs.

The middle class can't just get on a Eurostar now. Their seamless access to Paris and St. Moritz has been interrupted by the oiks that voted leave.

That's why they despise Nigel Farage. He's the arch instigator of making life a bit harder for the upper middle class. As if earning six figure wages wouldn't somehow cushion the blow. 

They need to understand the everyday struggle to survive on a sub-35K wage. It would shock them to the bone.

I'm convinced this is another anti-democratic move by a far from democratic leader of the Labour party. 

His instinct is control and enforcement. He has the legal mindset that makes everything adversarial.

He is dangerous. He reacts like a parent with a wilful child. We are not children. We are not sheep. We will not stand for the upturning of a democratic vote. 

We will not put up with it two-tier Kier. Mark my words.

Labour: The Party of Communists and Crackpots. DO NOT VOTE FOR THEM!

 Well, what can I say about the Labour party other than what I've already said? 

Er, plenty. Kier goes to Ireland and calls them all a bunch of racists for not wanting Muslims in their country.

Are you shitting me Kier? Ireland, a country that up until 20 years ago was involved in some of the most brutal sectarian violence ever seen. And that was just between two factions of the same fucking religion, you absolute fucking moron Starner.

Of course they won't want the forced importation of a third religion, no more than they Catholics wanted the forced importation of Protestants.

They have form. Violent form. They have a history of getting a bit shooty and a bit bomby in order to protect their culture and religion.

I'm sorry, but the Labour party is done. I will not vote for them. Ever. 

If you are in Ireland, if you are in Scotland, if you are English Working class, you need to understand the Labour party is not FOR you, it is AGAINST you.

Either way, if you are a member of the groups above, vote Labour you are voting against your own interests. Why would you do that? Are you particularly thick or masochistic?

The Labour party is full of Communists and Crackpots. It is run by people that take orders not from the voters or the working class that they previously relied on. Instead they take orders from organisations outside the country and from groups that vote en bloc.  that at worst want Western Democracy to fail, to be replaced by some Communist authoritarian state, at best they don't care about the importation of Millions of Muslim immigrants that will end up in some Religious authoritarian state. 

STOP VOTING LABOUR. 

Labour do not support the working class. 

(They would rather jail then=m than listen to their grievances. And when has Labour done anything for the working class in the past 30 years?)

Labour do not support pensioners.

(Otherwise why would they instantly abolish the heating allowance? Why are they now talking about raising the pension age and taxing pensions?)

Labour do not support Christians. 

(They rely on the Muslim block vote to win elections, so they will always side with the Muslims).

Labour to not support Democracy. 

(In a democracy you are free to protest, you are free to criticise the government, but no longer).

Labour do not support free speech. 

(Well, the evidence is people getting locked up for tweets or retweeting things someone else said. Crazy).

Labour do not support free political debate. 

(How can you criticise anything if the law makes causing offense a criminal act? Someone, somewhere will take offense).

Labour do not support freedom of assembly. 

(They are jailing protesters that were at protests peacefully, that did not commit any violence, just because someone else in the protest did).

Labour do not support the rights of workers. 

(otherwise why have zero hours contracts not been abolished as quickly as the heating allowance?)

Labour are racists.

(They hate the white working class with a venom that is clear to see in online posts).

Is Islamophobia Real?

A Phobia is an "irrational fear" of something. 

For instance spiders, or crossing bridges. Given the inherent safety of bridges and the inability (in the UK) of spiders doing you serious harm, then you'd call those irrational fears.

Islamophobia refers to an irrational fear of Muslims. I don't fear all Muslims. I have Muslims in my family. 

I do however fear a certain type of Muslim, who has designs on taking over my country. That is not an irrational fear. It is very rational. I fear the UK being taken over by a group that will set women's rights back 200 years. A group that will end free speech. A group that will end religious freedom. Those are not irrational fears. Those are things that have happened in every single country that turned from Christian to Muslim. 

Those Muslims have already harnessed the Muslim block vote to influence UK politics. Now all political parties are in thrall to the Muslim requirements. To do otherwise is to commit political suicide.

Without the Muslim block vote you cannot win elections.

The main political parties are now in debt to the Muslims, in many ways. They have to side with the Muslims on everything.

I rationally fear for the future of my country. I have seen others subsumed by the Islamic ideology. Others too have a rational fear of Muslims and Islamic ideology in general. If it gains primacy in this country, then it will set the many rights and freedoms we have back centuries. 

Magna Carta? Gone.

Women's rights? In the dustbin.

Freedom of speech? Gone.

Religious Freedom? Ended.

Maybe those in power don't give a toss, maybe they think they have the money to move away when the shit hits the fan. Maybe they think they can buy power and influence. 

All I know is that the political class in this country have only one goal: winning at all costs. If that means they are in bed with the Muslims, it seems, so be it. If that means the country becomes less safe, less tolerant, less free, so be it. The goal is power. At all costs, including the lives of the majority.

Yeah, that's not an irrational fear.

Two-Tier? It's all About Who has the Bigger Stick.

We know there are two tiers to everything in this country, not just Policing. It's provision of services, Welfare, housing... the list goes on. You name it, the White Working class, so privileged by the colour of their skin (by the far-left) are put to the back of the queue.

The reasons are many-fold. Whether it's the UK signing up to various international treaties that make the government support refugees and immigrants with statutory instruments, to their own ideology that still thinks the immigrants are somehow oppressed in the UK.

I have started to see moderate commentators explain that the far-left see any minority as oppressed and therefore put them on a pedestal, enshrined in law, so that they get a leg up.

This is the equity (rather than equality)_ doctrine, where the oppressed get more stuff, more help, more of everything in order to make up for their misfortune at being a minority.

But I always reduce human nature to the parenting model. Would you favour one child over another? Would you give one child more of everything? What do you think that would do to the relationships in the family?

It would quickly become dysfunctional. 

The child that gets less would resent the child that gets more AND it would resent the parents for being so unfair. 

The child that gets more will be so full of himself and feel so emboldened, because he's the chosen one, the favourite. He would resent the other child, but would also not respect the parents because he expects ever more preferential treatment. 

In a functional family, the parents are always fair. Each child gets equal resources, equal time, equal love. They are taught to share and not to be mean. 

And that is where government are going wrong with their treatment of communities and their feeble excuses to explain it all.

Equality means equality. No matter if you agree with the community, you must treat each one with equal measure. No preferential treatment even with the pressure from treaties. Everyone gets the same help up the same ladder. If a treaty means an immigrant has statutory rights, then the incumbent population must also have the same rights enshrined in law. 

Similarly, if one community has limited rights, then the rights of the other community should also be limited.

You don't play favourites. That way only lies a bloody mess, in every term of the phrase. 

Right now, the government is not parenting even-handedly. One community is getting preferential treatment. Mainly because it is carrying a bigger stick than the other. 

The Muslim community carries advantages that form the stick: It votes as a block, so has more influence on winning or losing elections. It acts as a single mass: if you harm one Muslim, you have the whole local community to answer to. The Muslim countries of the Gulf own quite a lot of our land, companies and our national debt. They have friends in high places with big wallets.

If you were a parent with a psychotic kid with a big stick and a few hundred mates willing to back him up, would you let him beat up the other child? Take things from the fridge without permission? Demand more pocket money? Well, according to government, their answer is "you betcha!". 

That's the mountain the white working class have to climb.

They have to find some way to equalise the playing field, otherwise they will continue to be oppressed. 

The ballot box has long since failed to save them. They have voted for support for 30 years, but none has been forthcoming. Not since Margaret Thatcher has the white working class had any government do anything FOR THEM. 

John Major didn't. 

Mr Major started the decrease in living standards.

Tony Blair didn't. 

In fact he started the preferential treatment of one child over the other.

Gordon Brown didn't. 

But to be fair to Gordon he gave the kid's pocket money to his banker mates down the pub and pissed it up against the wall. So that's akin to equal treatment, if you class equal misery as equality. 

David Cameron didn't. 

And witnessed the one time the oppressed child lashed out when they had the only opportunity to voice their angst, when we voted for Brexit, against the wishes of that unfair parent, our government. Effectively we did something to piss the neighbours off to get attention.

Teresa May didn't. 

In fact Teresa tried to placate the neighbours and ignored both kids while she tried to get in the neighbour's good books again.

Boris Johnson didn't 

Despite promising much and delivering very, very little.

Rishi Sunak didn't.

Rishi was very much the Dad parachuted into a dysfunctional family. He had a WTF look on his face the whole time.

And now Kier (Two-Tier) Starmer actively beats the oppressed child and makes them submit to the spoiled one. 

How do you think that will work out Kier? 

I fear it will work out very badly. 

At some point the oppressed kid will act up. He will do something outrageous in order to get attention and highlight his plight.

Never forget it is the white working class that stock your armed forces with bodies. We know where the weapons are, we know how to use them. Think it will end well, when the oppressed child really gets angry?

You ain't seen nothing yet Kier. 

You've got 5 years to get this parenting lark right Kier. Use the years wisely and do not every, just sit back and do nothing.

Kier Stalin, the New Authoritarian Generalissimus of The UK, Fails to Keep us Safe.

Kier Stalin, the new authoritarian Prime Minister of the UK, our new UberParent, the one whose first reaction was to give the working class a good spanking to keep them in line, just lost the argument today.

An 11-year old girl and a 34-year-old woman were both stabbed by a single assailant in Leicester Square in London this lunchtime.

Keir's attention and focus on the low-hanging fruit, the easy targets, much like Blair did back in the day and I assume Kier as his time as head of the CPS did, has blinded him to the reality of the situation.

Right now, people on the streets are scared. they are concerned. They are not protesting for some obscure reason, some imaginary bogeyman you can dismiss as you would with a child.

People, real people, including children, are getting stabbed on our streets on an almost daily basis. 

What does Kier do about knife crime? Does he fast-track the stabbers? Does he fuck!

Instead he goes for the easy targets, the grandmas, the online shitposters, the people not backed up by a knife-wielding mob.

I tell you Kier, the measure of a true leader is to make the lives of those you are supposed to lead better. If you are a general then your soldiers are given every opportunity to survive. 

A poor general sends his soldiers into suicide missions.

A good PM makes the lives of the people of the UK better. He does now cow them by authoritarian edict. He leads by example. He takes them with him happily, he does not use an army to beat them into submission. He does not make their lives ever more controlled, so their relief from the interference of government is smaller and smaller.

Sort out the machete-wielding thugs Kier. Those are the thugs you should be concentrating on. Fast-track them to jail.

The New Peterloo imminent?

The recent riots and protests have reminded me very much of the Peterloo Massacre. Not the massacre itself, but the tensions that brought about the massacre.

The Wikipedia entry is here if you want to read more: Peterloo Massacre - Wikipedia

After the Napoleonic Wars, there was a slump in textile manufacture, so people were laid off and those still employed had their wages cut. Additionally the Corn laws kept the cost of bread artificially high. Two pressures that forced the workers and the non-workers into abject poverty. 

Peterloo is actually an area of Manchester city centre originally called St. Peter's Field, now modern day St. Peter's Square.

The boroughs around Manchester had no political representation. Remember, this is the time of the rotten boroughs and when "one-man-one-vote" had yet to come into being. 

The boroughs of Manchester, Salford, Bolton, Blackburn, Rochdale, Oldham, Ashton-Under-Lyne (my home town) and Stockport had no political representation at all.

So rightly the people of those boroughs and others felt they had no way of bringing about political change.

So they organised and activated. They started printing flyers and started mass demonstrations. The demonstrations would it was hoped, put political pressure on those that did have a vote (wealthy landowners) to bring about change in the law and some relief for the working class. 

Two years earlier, the "blanketeers" a group of workers carrying blankets for comfort marched on London in an attempt to highlight their plight. But to no avail. The demonstrations gathered pace and became larger.

The elites didn't like the working classes organising (much like today they realise the power of the working class and especially fear the numbers - the working class far outweigh any other).

So the decision was made that the demonstrations had to be suppressed.

Hence why the Cavalry charged the crowd of 60,000 in St. Peter's Field with their Sabres drawn, killing 18 and injuring many hundreds more.

The fallout of the massacre was many-fold. It was a pivotal moment in UK political history.

The first being the formation of the Manchester Guardian newspaper, which then went on to become the Guardian. Sad to say they have last their roots in the support of the working class, because they are the one calling the marginalised people of the North "Far-right" and "fascists". 

The other thing that happened was the creation of the six acts. (See the Wiki).

Proving that history repeats itself, one of the acts was the Misdemeanours Act, which sought to increase the speed at which people could be prosecuted by removing bail and increasing the speed of court proceedings. 

Sound familiar to the haste in which yesterday's batches of protesters were convicted and sentenced?

The Seizure of Arms Act was just that: it allowed the authorities to enter a property and seize any arms found therein and additionally arrest the owner.

The Seditious Meetings Act sought to regulate meeting over 50 people by requiring the permission of a magistrate or Sherriff.

The other parallel with today is the attempt back in 1819 to regulate the flow of information and the suppression of the production of flyers and information provided in opinion pieces by newspapers.. 

The Newspaper and Stamp Duties Act put a stamp duty on newspapers, increasing the cost so that the workers may not afford them. Publishers were also required to post a bond, for if they ever transgressed the act.

Back then the printing press was the information medium, today we have the government talking about internet suppression laws, misinformation and disinformation laws.

So much changes over the years, but so much stays the same. 

It's all about supressing the working class. 

The Labour party directly descended from the Manchester slums described by Engels some 25 years after the Peterloo massacre. Those ides promoted by Engels and Marx, the Socialist doctrine, is the cornerstone of the Labour party. A party now playing the part of the rotten politicians of the Peterloo era, supressing and arresting the working class that have a legitimate grievance against the government.

I can't begin to express the fear that the establishment have regarding these protests. The scale and the number puts the fear into them just like it did back in 1819. 

Are we back to 1819? It's very similar.

We have a government artificially raising prices through government policy, that they could, if they had the will change and reduce prices. We're back to the era of the corn laws and inflated prices thanks to direct government intervention to raise, not lower prices.

The poor are suffering thanks to direct government intervention. If the net zero policy and all the associated taxes and tariffs associated with that policy were removed, the pressure on the poor would be reduced. Energy would be cheaper, fuel would be cheaper, cars would be cheaper (and less complex), the list goes on. If po9licy on housing and the pressures on house prices were changed, the poor would have a better chance of buying a house.

But it seems an influential minority outside of the democratic sphere, the United Nations and the World Economic Forum amongst others seem to be driving economic policy to the detriment of the people in this country.

So the poor are angry. They are angry because they see successive governments deliberately making their lives harder. They also see successive governments making the lives of those coming from outside easier. 

So, they will protest. And protest. And Protest. They have protested for years with no change in the political will of successive governments. They are now resorting to the only thing government really responds to.

And the government, the Socialist I will remind you, the Socialist government of this country has acted in the thuggish way of the Whigs and Tories of 1819 and started to fast-track people through the courts. Exactly like 1819. The government have also started to talk about limiting or censoring the internet. Just like the government of 1819 when they put a duty on newspapers, to put them out of the reach of the poor.

We have come full circle. The Peterloo massacre heralded in the Socialist movement, what movement would be heralded in by this uprising of the poor?

 

Labour Councillor Calls for Throats to Be Cut. How The left Have Abandoned Their Roots.

A Labour councillor has been suspended from the Party after calling protesters in the North Racists and calling for their throats to be cut.

He shouldn't just be suspended, he should be having his door sawn in half, kicked in and should be immediately arrested by the Police for hate speech.

Or is calling for the killing of so-called far-right people acceptable?

I thought calling for the killing of any group of people would be a hate crime.

Like the so-called far right Sam Melia was jailed for two years for distributing supposedly hateful stickers.

This will be a true test of hate speech laws and their application.

I fear I already know the outcome.

How the Left have lost their roots. Originally the left were the champions of the oppressed working class, now they have abandoned the still oppressed working class. To excuse this abandonment they have invented the fallacy of "white privilege". Yeah all you folks that get substandard housing, poor education, poor health outcomes, poor work opportunities are in fact better off than people in your country just by the colour of your skin. 

It's a fiction made up to allow the university educated champagne socialists to distance themselves from the workers and the class the left historically supported.

Now additionally because the working class don't think the same as the internationalist Marxists that dominate the left nowadays, they further label them racist, fascist, far-right.

The left are posh scumbags, elitists. They are more like the fascists that took over Germany, they think they are better than everyone else, better than everyone that thinks differently to them.

Two Tier Policing: Evidence a-plenty and now it Goes Mainstream.

In this Telegraph article there's a clear indication of the two-tier Policing now in place in the UK and Kier Starmer's support for it. And if the Telegraph is saying it, you can pretty much say the cat is out of the bag and the evidence is clear.

The classic was this interview:

Now tell me, what is the difference between the disorder on both sides? On both sides, the majority protest peacefully, only the minority cause disturbance. So why is the Muslim side treated different than the non-Muslim side? Why do the Police hide from one side and the other side is met with riot gear and batons?

How is it that one side can openly display large bladed weapons in public when anyone else can be arrested and charged?

Why, if the Police do their work without fear or favour, did they not deploy when cars were attacked and the pub was attacked as it shows in the video? 

But as the Telegraph article at the start of this blog says, the difference in Policing or the two sides is stark. Despite the protestations of Senior Police and the government, the difference is plain for all to see. 

Government continues to bend the knee to minorities. It's now beyond a joke. But the question is: why? This has gone beyond virtue signalling, it's gone beyond pandering to an oppressed minority. The Muslims of Great Britain are not oppressed. Actually the truth appears far from it.

Why exactly are the Government not stepping in to Police these riots fairly? Especially when this then fans the fear of a two-tier country. 

In my next blog, I'll tell you exactly why. It's all to do with money. LARGE sums of money. And Supra-national organisations and treaties past governments signed up to.

People's Courts?

No not the hasty overnight sessions to put away the obstreperous working class.

No I'm asking the question: If Muslims can have a parallel Sharia law and court system, why can't the working class? Why can't we have kangaroo courts as well? Sauce for the Goose and all that.

Why can't we impose the death penalty in our courts? Why can't we start stringing up the class traitors of the Labour party? Why can't we declare the Police and Government officials enemies of the people?

Worked for the French, worked less well for the Russians. Maybe we can find our own way.

Vive la Revolution!

Civil War?

Are we in a De Facto Civil War? We may be in the beginnings of it, that's for sure.

We have the working class population, devoid of a voice in Parliament, downtrodden for 30 years, finally rising up and making their dissent known. The government are using the Police as an Army to crush the rebellion. The Police at this point are not Policing by consent, they are being used to crush riots and dissent like the Army would have been 200 years ago.

The Police are armed like an army, they have the resources of an Army.

The people have nothing.

And above it all the Parliamentarians, the Elites stand, failing to understand, failing to represent the clearly disgruntled masses.

No words of sympathy, of calm from our Prime Minister. Only threats.

That's the nature of where we are now. We are in the beginnings of a civil war. 

We tried at the ballot box, we gave the Tories an 80-seat majority. They failed to follow the will of the people.

Now we don't care about votes. We've seen the other side make threats and the government runs scared. 

We can make threats and cause violence too. If that's all the government understands, then that's what the government will get until our demands are met.

More on Kier's Misreading of the Room

I didn't have time to go into any depth on my previous blog because I was away and had to do it on my phone.

But Kier Starmer is seriously misreading the room and the mood of the nation if he thinks he can square up to the working class protesters now protesting against the misdeeds perpetrated by Muslims.

The murder of the Kids in Southport was the last of many violent incidents perpetrated by immigrants or children of immigrants. The stabbing of the senior Army officer days before was a copycat of the murder of Lee Rigby. 

The authorities say he was a Christian, just like the Muslim-turned Christian chemical attacker that was still given a Muslim burial. The authorities haven't hard of Taqiyyah.

We've had the bombing of the Manchester Arena that killed dozens of kids and adults. We've had multiple stabbings and again just after the kids were killed in Southport, we had mobs of youths with machetes running riot in Southend. Unchallenged by the Police I might add. No riot cops there.

We've had decades of child rape by Muslim gangs, unchallenged by the authorities. Largely Labour authorities I might add.

So what is the difference?

It is the fact that Muslims can amass a larger an better armed mob? Is that what the working class protesters have to do to get satisfaction?

Do the working class have to form a block vote that Labour can use to win elections? Would that then lead to the protection afforded to Muslims by government?

The working class have had enough. They have been stitched up and ignored by successive local and national governments. At least the Tories sounded like they wanted to limit the influx of Muslims, which kept the working class hopeful. Labour is openly waving the immigrants in, wants to do more for them and labels their own voter thugs, Good move Labour..

Keep doing what you are doing Kier, keep fucking about and you'll find out. You'll find out what the majority working class can do. 

The IRA only won when they started to cause significant financial damage to the government. Once the mob finds that out... what then? What if the mob cost Kier more than his Gulf State backers? 

What happens if tax offices are burned? Benefit offices? What if they go for targets that are funded by national government and not local government? What if they target Border Force offices, Customs and Excise offices? No skin off My nose as they're not funded by council tax. That's national government stuff.

Oh, and the hotels housing migrants you've underwritten for any damage the immigrants might do? Does that include damage by a furious mob? Is that why you were so shit-scared the other day, because the mob attacked a hotel? If the mob starts burning down hotels that national government then has to pay to rebuild, how many would it take to bring you to the table?

Just what happens Kier, when the mob get organised? Start to understand the game?

What happens when the working class have no other recourse to get your attention? What happens when the working class refuse to join your Army, your Navy? 

No wonder you're all considering conscription. We'll all fuck off to abroad then. 

What will you do when you Muslim friends demand their pound of flesh? Will you hand the country over? Will you hand over our nukes? 

Just what will you do Kier?

America is watching, watching very closely.

Do Not Provoke a Desperate Man.

So, Kier Starmer's response to the current unrest is to try and crack down and say "You'll regret taking part". 

Oh really Kier, and how do you expect to enforce that?  By putting the people in jail? Have of them are on benefits and would love getting hot meals effectively for free.

The people are desperate. They have voted in numerous governments who have not respected the wishes of the people voting them into office. You push back harder and they will riot harder. The working class are probably just one social media contact away from access the proper weapons like guns.

Test my theory if you'd like.

The troubles in Ireland were only ended by dialogue. It's time to start talking Kier, and listening. Or else things could get a lot worse.

Attack the Symptom, Not the Cause.

Keir Starmer and the rest of the establishment have come out attacking the "Far Right" over the unrest in Southport and outside Downing Street.

They've even resurrected the EDL from some mass grave somewhere. I thought that had long since died a death.

Nope, the far right are bad people for venting their frustrations at yet another stabbing attack, by yet another brother of the religion of Islam. 

The public are quite rightly venting their frustration at what seems like an inability of the Police to protect the public and in this latest case the most vulnerable members of the public: children from harm at the hands of an Islamic extremist.

I say extremist, but as regular readers know I make no distinction between moderate Muslims and the so-called extremists. The only difference is the lengths they will go to to become a better Muslim.

The people "rioting" in Southport have had enough. They have had enough of the disrespect from the Muslim community, they've had enough of the rape of their daughters, they've had enough of now the murder of their daughters. They've had enough of the protection of Muslims given by the establishment.

They want equal treatment. They want protection for their community by the Police, the same as the Police protect the Muslims. They want respect from the establishment, the same as the establishment respects the Muslim community. 

If the government, the Police and the other authorities cannot provide that respect and protection, then it's fair game for the people to take matters into their own hands. If you won't do it, it falls to the people themselves to do what the authorities are unwilling to do. 

The government are playing a deadly game here. They are ostracising the majority of people for the votes of a minority. 

If a government protects and actively supports a minority over a majority and the government hold all the weapons and all the power, who is the oppressed class?

The government are just labelling a group of concerned working class people as far-right in order to dismiss their concerns. Because frankly, the government are shit scared of doing anything about it. 

Muslims own 20% or our economy or more, they own stakes in all our large corporations, they buy a lot of our expensive weapons, they own our ports, fund our Universities, own a lot of our most expensive property, they have bought a lot of our national debt. What do you think happens if the Muslims of the Gulf States take a disliking to our government's policies? For instance if we actually started publicising the rape gangs and the stabbers and the anti-Western Mosques? What would happen if they started to remove their money from the city, sold all their expensive houses, removed funding from our Universities? The country would collapse financially. That's the driver of the influence right there.

Lets be clear about this: the Muslims of the Gulf states hold more sway on Downing street and the Houses of Westminster than the majority of the voters in this country. That's the level of corruption we are dealing with. The government the establishment, they are all OWNED BY THE MUSLIMS. They don't sound oppressed to me, so why are the far-left supporting them?

That is why the ordinary people of the country are labelled "far-right". It's just a label that allows the government to ignore them, do nothing and instead suck up to their Muslim extortionists.

Let's be clear here. The points the protesters in Southport are protesting about is a majority viewpoint. Protection, safety, fairness, even handed policing without favouritism; these are not far-right goals. These are the goals of the majority. 

If you slander the people of Southport in this way, you slander the majority of the country.

Lucky for you Mr Starmer that you have just won an election. You have time in office. You have the backing of the Police and their power. But mark my words, you may not see another term. 

If the majority get angry enough to get organised, you'll have a big fucking problem. You won't see another term in office and we will put someone in power who looks after OUR interests, cares about OUR fears and will actively deal with OUR problems.

If you ignore us, we will take matters into our own hands. We removed a King and by God we can and will remove a Parliamentarian.

Fuck you Kier Starmer.

Start attacking the symptom, not the cause. Start attacking the Muslims that hold extremist views. Deport them, refuse them government services. We do not want them here. If they rape or murder our people and our children, remove them from this country. Have some balls. You were a lawyer, get the legislation in place to allow it. Remove these murdering bastards. I want them gone.

I want the Muslims who hate this country gone too. If they will not join us and integrate, then they should be gone. I do not want Muslim enclaves, or ghettos where a Muslim can live and work apart from the mainstream. I want those that will not integrate to rightly feel unwelcome. End the provision of interpreters. Remove those that outstay their visas. Remove those that commit crime. Time limit asylum visas. 

Support the majority and not the minority.