So with all of this disruption and destruction of statues, of anything linked to slavery (might as well nuke Bristol, Liverpool and London then), is it me, but all I'm seeing is a bunch of privileged middle-class white students destroying images, icons and other things that are important to Afro-Caribbean heritage.
For instance those few African or Caribbean heritage people that can trace their roots back to being slaves (if you can't move on after 2 centuries and four or more generations), should be able to look at a statue of a slave-trader and say "that's part of our heritage, we were enslaved but we beat slavery and moved on.."
But thanks to those white kids erasing everything with slave connotations, where will people of slave heritage actually be able to see their heritage?
It's almost as if the people were erasing anything of Scottish heritage in England, or anything of Welsh heritage.
If the people that were worst affected by this were doing the pulling down of statues, or asking for them to be removed, then I can understand it. But the people loudest and proudest at the protests are the most white, the most privileged, university graduates.
Maybe we need to lump these people in with Holocaust deniers: the people that would deny, or erase swathes of history from the landscape for ideological reasons.
We need tose icons, those landmarks, that history. Not only to show where we were back then, but to show how far we have come, to give those people directly affected some history, some sense of where they have come from.
And Why Should It Have?
-
Oliver and his publisher, Penguin Random House UK (PRH UK), have conceded
to Guardian Australia that *no consultation with any Indigenous
organisation, c...
2 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment