When did it become fashionable for Governments to bash the poor? It seems with every new policy that the poorest in society are most adversely affected.
Plastic bag tax, insurance premuim tax, all have a disproportionate affect on the poorest in society.
Mimimum wage created a race to the bottom, only surpassed by zero hours contracts (a construct created soley to bypass minimum wage legislation).
Those on minimum wage still have to pay tax. You'd think that those on the lowest pay would be free from tax, but they still have to pay.
In work benefits like tax credits means even the lowest paid workers without kids have to subsidise the wages of everyone else with kids through the taxation system.
The squeeze on the benefits system in general, from re-assessment of disabilities, the bedroom tax, to PIPs (which is supposed to "save" or take away billions in benefits)
Now the ostensibly socialist (although authoritarian might be a better word) SNP have successfully fought to bring in minimum pricing for alcohol, the "save" the poor from themselves. I wonder if the bars in the Scottish Parliament are exempt? Hopefully not, MSPs are not exactly the poorest in society are they? That would be rather hypocritical wouldn't it?
Policies initiated by successive governments that purported to be helping the poor. Well done there guys! Not exactly redistribution of "wealth" if the non-wealthy are the ones paying more, is it?
Every time a government tries to help the poor in whatever guise it comes, you can be rest assured that government is no friend of the poor and the policy will do exactly the opposite of what the government says is the object.
And Why Should It Have?
-
Oliver and his publisher, Penguin Random House UK (PRH UK), have conceded
to Guardian Australia that *no consultation with any Indigenous
organisation, c...
11 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment