My Evolution of Covid. (Part 1).

I'm not going to delve into the details of the Covid enquiry, but I thought it would be a timely thing to look into my own memories of the timeline of Covid.

December 2019.

The first I had heard of Covid was December 2019 as far as I can recollect. 

That's when the first rumours of a massive outbreak in China spread onto the internet. Also that there was a "problem" in Italy. 

Interestingly, in October Wuhan China had hosted the World Military Games 2019 and in December, it was coming to light that several contestants had caught "a respiratory disease" of some sort. Still to this day, the authorities deny it was Covid 19. But you're talking about a tranche of people at the peak of fitness, so the infections wouldn't have made much difference to them. Covid19 is still a possibility.

The rumours about the October games and the infections started in December. Christmas 2019 was a veritable rumour-mill that something big was happening.

January 2020.

January started the rumours of BIG problems in China. New, huge hospitals being built at a fantastic rate and signs of large numbers of deaths.

Numbers of satellite photos swarming around t'internet. 

Also, word started to get out about big problems in Italy. Numbers of deaths climbing exponentially. I'm still convinced it was the number of deaths in Italy the panicked the UK government into the measures it took regarding lockdown. 

Italy officially recognise their first transmission of Covid to Italy when two Chinese tourists are confirmed to be infected. And strangely enough Wikipedia state that as ground zero (at least for detection of the virus anyway). And other clusters 

But strangely, the UK government didn't close the international borders at all.

Which brings us to....

February 2020.

This is the month where it gets real and Covid arrives in the UK. 

People staying in a Ski Chalet in Contamines-Montjoie (I kid you not) become infected. In this report the infection is reported as coming from a person that had flown from Singapore. The man then flew back to the UK and was then diagnosed as having Covid19.

So he infected a Ski Chalet load of people, A long-haul flight from Singapore and I imagine a short-haul flight from France. 

Now I'm not saying that person is the only person responsible for bringing the infection into the UK, but what I am saying is that if as I was aware of Covid by now for over 6 weeks, I'm sure the government were just as aware if not more (I would hope) of conditions in  China.

So why were international flights not stopped in January? Why was more not done to isolate and test people when they arrived in the UK?

February was also the month that Italy officially diagnosed Covid19 as being responsible for the outbreak of respiratory disease in that country.

Of course we now know that Covid had been in Italy since September at the very least and possibly as far back as August, thanks to this study of cancer patient samples.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but the study shows the sort of issue that was brewing in Italy and more widely in Europe, as it took time to identify the respiratory disease as Covid19. We now know it had been infecting people in Italy for months even before the information started coming out of Wuhan in December. It gives some context to the issue of China hiding the outbreak and trying to contain it whilst keeping it a secret from the rest of the world. So much so, that China restricted internal flights, buy continued to allow international flights.

A new, novel respiratory disease was attacking people in Italy, but no-one joined the dots to link it with Wuhan, because China wasn't releasing information. 

It took until February, some 6 months after the infection landed in Europe to confirm the infection was from Wuhan.

Anyway, all that aside, let's continue with February.

February sees more European countries identify small numbers of cases for the first time. Countries in the Far East continue to report large numbers of cases. It's clear that the Far East is the worst affected area, like with SARS. And in this early period the detection methods being used are exactly the same for SARS: monitoring the temperature of passengers queuing for flights and stopping those with temperatures from boarding.

But of course we now know that Covid19 has an asymptomatic phase, where the infected person doesn't know they are infectious so they are allowed to mingle in crowds and infect people.

Don't forget this is the initial strain of Covid19. So it's a big deal. It's a killer. This is some months before the less lethal Omichron variant emerges. If you get Covid during this period, you are highly likely to suffer serious effects and possibly die.

The Government start to issue advice that worked with SARS: wash your hands, use tissues and bin them, etc.

Early in February I started reporting about it: Delphius' Debate: The Gamechanger: Novel Corona Virus.

In which I stated the above and more. I did state that it seemed like Covid19 re-infected patients , so there was no natural immunity. And possibly the Government was seeing the reports I were seeing and thinking the same. Possibly that informed the lack of reliance on natural immunity as with other similar viruses. Who knows?

As an example of how rapidly things were progressing, two days later I felt the need to make another post: Delphius' Debate: Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) Update

Then 5 days after that, this post: Delphius' Debate: Corona Virus COVID-19 Government Not Helping.

Where I predicted what eventually became the furlough scheme. Basically if you want everyone to isolate, you needed to pay them to isolate. 

March 2020

March is when it went ballistic. Italy was reporting over 100,000 deaths in a month. I was posting every couple of days.

On the 3rd of March I was, as you can expect slightly downbeat: Delphius' Debate: Novel Corona Virus 2019: The Lack of Positive Action May Condemn us All.

A few days later on the 5th, it was finally admitted there was no stopping Covid19. I posted thusly: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19 Government's top Doictor admits it's out in the wild now.

I still made the mistake of lack of natural immunity, but I put that down to the initial strain of the virus which was so... virulent. 

What these early post do is illustrate the illusions around Covid19. The reports coming out of Italy were bad, those coming out of China even worse. Satellite images of plague hospitals being thrown up, of plague pits being dug for the dead, were not conducive to a rational train of thought. I for one, thought this was a bit too close to the apocalypse. 

On the 13th I was wondering why sporting events were still being held, given we knew the virus was spread through the air. How social gatherings hadn't been stopped. Given what happened later, you'd think the government were reading my posts at the time: Delphius' Debate: A Poor Response (To COVID-19)

On the 19th, the Bog Roll fiasco had well and truly kicked in. The mysterious and unexplained disappearance of toilet roll from supermarket shelves: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19: The Madness of Crowds.

On the 17th I was posting on how much o a brave little soldier I was for staying at work: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19: Working Against Medical Advice

On the 16th I was still poo-pooing herd immunity. Reports were still coming in of individuals being re-infected and also trying to predict the future: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19: The Current Expected Scenario.

The 16th warranted another post: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19: Blind Faith. where I reported that the numbers of infected were so huge, the government had abandoned testing people for the virus and just assumed anyone with flu-like symptoms had it and so they should isolate themselves. 

On the 24th, it was getting serious: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19: Gaps, I see Gaps everywhere..... but only with the government. Everyone else was taking advantage.

But the closure of pubs and some shops was a bit like bolting the stable doors. The horse had already arrived in the UK and no half-hearted closure could stop the spread now. 

Then it calmed down for a while, I didn't post until the 27th after getting ill: Delphius' Debate: COVID-19: More Gaps I did again hint at furlough and also that we would be paying higher taxes for a while to pay for it.

I think the end of March is a decent place to stick a pin in it for now. But as you can see from the posts from the first 3 months of 2020, the information being picked up from the Far East and Italy was not good. It was manic. In just three months, we had gone from a SARS-like virus in the far east, to a deadly virus on the doorstep. With reports of re-infections it showed information was still not correctly formulated, no doubt because of the secrecy of the Chinese, who were starting to exert influence on the World Health Organisation when it came to the world-wide response to Covid and the reporting of the virus. 

Scientists Dazzled at Speed of Unreality Increase.

Well, I called it last week. The increase in unreality detected during the budget has now spilled out into the mass media. 

Instead they determine that Rachael Reeves was lying to the public about the existence of a 20 Billion pound black hole. 

However, it's not lying if the person making the statements actually believes what they are saying. And here is where the scientific process comes in, to quantify how far the statements made by a politician diverges from actual reality.

Now we are in the era of the Reeves scale, maybe it requires a debate on how big the divergence can be, before a government is removed from office. 

After all, a government that is acting upon an alternative reality is not dealing with reality, the real problems that people unaffected by this "reality divergence" see on a daily basis. 

It's not dealing with an unproductive NHS, it's not dealing with excessive immigration, it's not dealing with shrinkage of the armed forces, it's not dealing with the increasingly authoritarian Police force.

Instead, the government inside the unreality bubble (let's call it a Blair field for convenience) are seeing nothing wrong with the Police, nothing wrong with immigration, there is no housing crisis, nothing wrong with the number of illegal immigrants now outnumbers the Army in numbers, believes that people on benefit require more money, despite them owning the very latest iPhone, getting hair, nails and lip fillers done thanks to the money they get by having 6 kids from different dads, and believe there is this huge black hole in the country's finances that needs plugging with our money.

The question is, how do you pierce the Blair Field? How do you inject reality into the bubble surrounding the government?

That may take scientists years to accomplish. I suspect it will take a great amount of power to pierce the Blair field. The rate of disparity between the reality inside the bubble and outside, means that a lot of energy is required for reality to enter inside the field.

It could however be sped up by the use of a process called a Coup. But it appears to be seen if things need to be that drastic. Also how the tools to instigate such a process could be organised in a reasonable amount of time.

This Week Saw New Levels of Political Unreality

Back in 2011 I reported that for the first time it was possible to measure the amount of divergence from actual reality and the emergence of alternate realities.

Here's the report: Delphius' Debate: Scientists Attempt to Finally Prove Alternate Realities.

Back then the divergence was measured in FemtoBrowns with the occasional peak measured in MilliBrons.

The amount of political divergence has been increasing over past 14 years. The first divergence level of a whole Brown, was measured literally the week after Labour got into power.

However, scientists report that after passing the Brown barrier, political divergence with reality has increased exponentially. Something predicted in unreality theory, but not detected until the past 18 months.

Scientists say that the divergence from actual reality is at such a huge level that they are measuring Browns to several powers. We are now living in the era of the PetaBrown.

This week, after discussions, a new unit of measurement was quantified: the Reeves. 

The Reeves scale Starts of at The PicoReeves, which is equivalent to one PetaBrown allows scientists to quantify the huge disparity between Labour's reality and actual reality.

The announcements around this week's budget have already produced divergence measurements of several hundred PicoReeves. 

It's hoped that this new scale will allow scientists to quantify the divergence throughout Labour's political tenure, but some scientists are sceptical. 

The rate of divergence after Labour's win in the election has increased exponentially and sceptics are already looking for the next measurement scale just in case.

The Quiet Slide into Tyranny.

Labour are at it again. Whilst championing the rights of certain demographics, they are quietly eroding the rights of the majority.

Back in the Nineties, the Blair government removed double jeopardy, the rule that the State could only prosecute you for a crime once. It forced the CPS to make sure the case was airtight against a defendant. But the ineptitude of the Police in gathering irrefutable evidence forced the Government to end the one-shot deal of double jeopardy, so that if necessary, the Police could come back and prosecute you again for the same crime. The rule was there had to be new evidence, but several cases, the definition of new evidence has been pushed and pushed. 

In fact in some cases, there really is no new evidence and it's just the same evidence presented in a different way. But each time the defendant's wallet is challenged (if you can afford to successfully defend yourself). Many cases running until the defendant's resources have run out and they cannot afford a successful defence. 

Not the "beyond all reasonable doubt" standard we used to expect. 

Talking of evidence, the standard of evidence itself has deteriorated. We now have successful prosecutions based on circumstantial evidence. Based on nothing more than statistical data, Nurse Lucy Letby was jailed for life for the murder of babies under her care.

Again, far and away from "beyond all reasonable doubt".

Statistics can be manipulated to say anything. 

In the Letby case there was no hard evidence. Just that she had been on shift when these babies died. No smoking gun, no vial of poison found in her pocket, no video of her hanging over a baby administering a lethal injection. Just statistics, that in all probability, she murdered the kids. Probability, or the probable, is not the actual. Far from the standard of beyond reasonable doubt. 

Blair's Labour government then removed the ability to receive legal aid, removing the ability of a huge swathe of "normal" people to defend themselves. Instead, Blair brought in the "No Win, no Fee" system, where the lawyers could argue in court to recoup costs. But of course convincing the lawyers to take on a case in the first place is a mission. After all, the no win no fee system is essentially an insurance type system. 

If there is a  good chance of winning, the lawyers will accept the case. If there is a 50/50 chance of winning, then unfortunately no capable defence for you. In actuality, if the odds of winning the case are lower than 60/40, then kiss your freedom goodbye. 

No Win, No Fee works when you are most evidently innocent. It doesn't work when the case gets murky, nuanced and ambiguous. 

Against all of this manipulation of the legal system, was the bastion of jury trials. Even if you couldn't get a proper defence team, even if the odds were stacked against you, if the evidence was ambiguous, if you could convince enough of your peers that you were innocent, or that the case was unreasonable, or malicious, the jury could find you not guilty.

There have been cases where the media have placed a defendant banged to rights, where it seems impossible to win, but the jury have seen something in the evidence that just doesn't sit right, or maybe they are not convinced the prosecution have made their case "beyond all reasonable doubt".

Whatever, the jury have acquitted the defendant, against all odds. 

However, this new Labour government are trying to remove that last bastion of common law, of Magna Carta: the right to a trial by a jury of their peers. 

Blair's labour already changed things up, where most small cases were held before a judge only. But there was the option for jury trial for smaller cases in some instances. 

Starmer's Labour wants to eradicate jury trials altogether for everything except the most heinous cases.

I just wonder what cases would be exempt from Jury trial? Would gang rape of white girls buy Pakistani men be only seen by a judge?

We've already seen with the Twitter post cases that judges are accepting their role in the state machinery with zealous glee. Sending people to prison for years, for an offensive tweet. Something where I'm sure a jury would rightly acquit a person.

But this is a step too far. The state becomes judge, jury and executioner. The state takes on the case and prosecutes, the judge is appointed employed and paid by the state, and the judge defines the sentence. 

The problem being that the judges are political appointees, they are activists, and not impartial. They are beholden to the state for their living. It leads to impropriety, or at the very least, the impression of impropriety in the legal system.

Otherwise I can see a situation where judges become the target of criminals. Either to blackmail, to entice or worse, to eliminate. It brings in the spectre of revenge. A judge can be seen as a target for retribution, whereas if you are convicted by your peers, it's hard for a single person to become a target. 

The process has done for you, not the person. Elimination the option of jury trials just buts judges at more risk. It puts defendants at more risk of unsafe prosecutions and puts the legal and judicial system at risk of being put into disrepute.

The eradication of jury trials must be prevented, at all costs.

M.I.5 Online Psy-Ops in Play.

I've been online for the best part of 40-odd years. If you think that's impossible, I was actually online at college back in the early Eighties in the days of teletype, using Open University servers.

Then came bulletin boards, accessed by modems from home. Oh, the convenience of technology. 

Then came UseNet, the online equivalent, accessed by internet connections, accessed on a pay-per minute basis.

I pre-date the World Wide Web and direct internet connectivity by decades when it comes to online usage.

Then the WWW came and as a tool for influencing the public, it was a game-changer. Don't get me wrong, Bulletin Boards and UseNet were hotbeds of conspiracies, but the World Wide Web brought those conspiracies into the mainstream, and with it the ability to manipulate various factions within the public.

Social Media has also had a huge part to play, crating "bubbles" of contact, within which ideas and opinions are kept in a feedback loop and extremely reinforced. During Covid, the intelligence elements went to work covertly manipulating groupthink in group chats and covertly requesting amplification of certain ideas and suppression of others. The latter only coming to light with the purchase of Twitter by Elon Musk.

Which is how we get the extremism of opinions today. Whether on the left of politics which has the most rabid, slavish adherence to their orthodoxy, akin to a cult. To now the right wing wokeist element, that are now adopting extremist opinions of their own.

The right have been slow adopters of the type of Zealotry of the left, because they opine a more lessez-faire attitude, and the condensation of extremist ideology has taken a lot longer to form. 

One thing I've witnessed from day one of the internet, are the activists cajoling and caressing opinions. They are not immediately obvious unless to spend some time online. The more you watch, the more you seen the patterns, the cadence of words, the similarities. Being a computer nerd also allows you insight others cannot access.

The more you see, the more you understand. The nudges of certain people to become what they become. The Karens, the Far-Left cultists. 

You can see over the decades, the cultivation of the groups. Especially during the Covid crisis, where they were activated unlike previous activations. Opinions went off the scale in favour of oppression and authoritarianism.

Government agencies were very active in shaping public opinion by activating these cultish groups in favour of government policy. The intelligence services not only activated the groups through their various agents and proxies, they also monitored the effects. Where there was opposition to government edicts, they were quickly identified and stamped upon. 

M.I.5 and the assets at G.C.H.Q. were mobilised in a massive push to induce, indoctrinate and activate the rabid mob in order to quell opposition.

If you ever wondered how and why it went so far, that's your answer. The biggest Psy-Op in living history. Bigger than the Psy-Op that became the war on terror. 

This was a worldwide activation, where governments, even those normally in opposition, worked together. Governments that had vested interest in not revealing the truth.

Europe needed to quell the panic created by the massive number of deaths in Italy. It needed to downplay the effects of the virus and the panic within European governments. Revealed by the stupid decision to keep external and internal borders open.

America needed to hide their involvement in the funding of research in China. Research America had made illegal within it's own borders.

China needed to hide the fact they were working on bioweapons using funding from America and also that there was a leak from their laboratory in Wuhan.

The biggest indicator of this were the edicts coming out of The World Health Organisation. Like some broken A.I. (like HAL from 2001) the messages and the actions of the WHO made absolutely no sense without the knowledge that in the background, major governments were applying pressure to act in their political interests. Not at all in the interests of the World's health. 

Since Covid, the government agencies have not stopped. The various intelligence agencies got a huge boost in funding during Covid and as with all government agencies, once they have a certain level of funding, they are unwilling to give it up. Hence we have the various Psy-Ops in play at the moment. The Far-Right, The Online Safety Act, yadda, yadda. 

Right now it will not stop. But it needs to stop. Government manipulation of online spaces needs to stop.

It got to ridiculous levels now, witness the OFCOM letters to 4Chan and other non-UK companies. They are believing their own Psy-OP. 

That really is the time to call it quits guys.

Budget: Threat to Tax Homeowners on the Value of Their Property.

I've just heard on the Radio, the latest stupid idea considered by Labour as part of the budget. 

Taxing homeowners on the value of their property (theresholds vary).

Let's say your house is worth a million pounds. How did it gain that value? Did it attain those lofty heights through some magic?

No , it gained value through government policy. It's government policy that has not provided the new hoses that are required in order to keep the price of houses down.

So the first point against this "Wealth Tax" is it's highly immoral for a government to artificially inflate the value of an asset (your house) and then once it attains a certain value, to tax you on it.

The second point is that most houses are subject to a mortgage. i.e. you are actually in debt to the value of the house. It's in effect a negative asset. So is the government really saying they are going to tax you on the debt you owe? 

Not only that, you don't actually own a house while it's subject to a mortgage. The Bank or Building Society hold the deeds of the house until the mortgage is paid off. 

So is the government really going to tax you on something you don't actually own?

Is the government going to tax the lender and the occupier pro rata on what percentage of the house each owns? As an example, if you've paid off 20% of your mortgage, do you pay 20% of the tax payable and the lender pay the 80%? Who is going to work that out? How much will it cost the government to employ extra people to work that out?

If the government accepts the above and only taxes houses that are owned outright, don't forget that all other houses have increased in price at the same rate. So for instance you bought a house 10 years ago at £500,000 and it's now worth £1 million, ALL the other houses in the area have increased in price at the same rate. 

So the COMPARABLE VALUE hasn't actually increased. Yes the monetary amount is higher, but that amount only buys you the same asset.

Again, is it moral for the government to tax something that hasn't actually increased in value compared to similar assets?

Now, you could argue that if you buy a house for 50K, spend 5K doing it up and you sell it for 100K, then there should be a tax on the profit. But there already is capital gains tax, or corporation tax payable on that.

I could go on and on about the immorality of such a tax, how it is unworkable, how it would be expensive to administer.

There is talk of local councils administering the scheme, basically reporting property values back to HMRC. But that's an extra burden on local government for which they are not being paid. 

I wouldn't be surprised if local councils refused to administer the scheme. And I would especially expect Reform councils to refuse to comply. 

I Don't Really Know Where to Go With This.

I've tried to write this article several times, but there is just so much that is wrong in the UK right now economically, that I just can't write it. I end up spearing off in different directions, trying to right the many wrongs in the UK economy. But a bit of advice for Rachael: increasing tax on workers is not the answer.

It's not just taxation that is wrong-headed. It's also regulation, legislation, government policy, foreign policy, the whole shebang.

The decades-long experiment supporting global corporations and the globalist elites has failed. It's failed on several levels, not least it has failed to improve the living standards of the population of the UK. It has failed to provide the stability and security that allows a country to thrive.

Instead global corporations have pitted us against the slums of Mumbai in the race for the cheapest labour source.

Global corporations cynically use our open borders to employ illegal immigrants on below minimum wage pay to provide services and maximise profit inside the UK.

This is not capitalism, the is corporatism, in hand with government. It's essentially the definition of Fascism. 

The West is essentially a huge Fascist state. We tried to detach ourselves from it in 2016, but the Fascists in our own government keep trying to drag us back. 

In Europe now, we are seeing laws that make it illegal to criticise politicians. People are being arrested for calling politicians fat. That's a whole other level of censorship and authoritarian control, above criticising the importation of murdering, rapist immigrants.

There needs to be a massive divorce from Europe. We were a bastion against Fascism in the 40s. We need to be a bastion against fascism again.

Instead of printing money that devalues the pound within our borders, we need to stop it. It only inflates the value of assets like houses, that are so inflated right now, no-one can afford them.

We need to stimulate small-medium size investment inside the UK. It won't happen if the Bank of England keep printing money and keep devaluing the pound inside our borders. It won't happen if Government policy makes starting up a business hideously expensive. It just won't happen. 

We need to discourage foreign investment in areas that are detrimental to society, especially foreign investment in UK housing stock. We need to severely penalise corporate landlords that own non-commercial properties.. 

We need a government that works for the interests of the UK. 

Foreign Aid? It should only be used if there is some strategic benefit in applying it. We should be selfish when spending it as other countries are. What do we get back for our money? If it's just a salved conscience, then it's a waste of money. We want; no, we should demand influence and power for our money. We shouldn't be investing billions for nothing more than virtue.

But really the economy needs a fundamental reset. We have lost the mega industry that employed thousands and that paid billions in corporation tax. The high street, the local retailers that served the community are a dying breed. 

The current model, based on old-world economics, only allows the collection of that lost tax revenue from what is left after the collapse of large industrial companies. I.e. the middle and working class. Taxation has not developed to cope with the on-line world. Revenue raised by transactions with UK citizens should be subject to taxation within the UK. Companies already pay VAT. Maybe raise VAT for online transactions, raise VAT for imported luxury goods. Or maybe raise a new tax for online transactions with companies outside the UK. 

That's the sticks. But what about carrots? Let's give tax breaks for companies that train UK citizens rather than import foreign labour. Let's scrap the IR35 tax rules, so the jump from PAYE to self-employed is easier. 

Lets give tax breaks for start-ups. Lets reward those that take risks and/or invest in the future of the UK. 

Let's start aspiring, and stop just existing.

The Next Tommy Robinson March - A Turning Point in History.

I hope to be at the next Tommy Robinson Unite the Kingdom March in London. God willing, I'll be there. 

I've a feeling that this will be a serious point in history, a turning point, a marker in the sand.

There will be enough of the right sort of people attending. Not extremists, but normal, ordinary citizens who would normally not be encouraged to march.

The next UTK march will be after the budget, after the government have lied yet again in order to stick their hand in our wallets. 

They will have lied yet again to rob those more prudent individuals of their savings. 

They will have lied yet again to get involved in the side hustles of ordinary folk.

They will have lied yet again in order to rob people of their pensions, of their future financial stability.

The next UTK march will the the genesis of the next general strike, the next protest against this insidious government, against their overbearing instinct to control the population via digital ID.

The only people supporting the government now are die-hard Communists. They don't know they are Communists, but their ideology is firmly rooted in the cultural revolutions of Stalin and Mao. They cling to the opinion that they are "just" Socialists, but those of us that know and have seen history, know they are not.

It's time for the workers of the country to wake up and to change from passive to active. Nothing illegal, but we can do thing legally that will hurt the government. We lose a days pay, but they lose a day's national income tax. That's a lot of money and it makes a statement of intent.

And we will watch with interest, the actions of the Unions supposed to support the workers of this country. We will see if they are on our side, or if they are captured by the globalist Communist elite.

It's About to Get Grim - The Budget.

Well, here we go again: a Labour budget. The news being leaked is not good. Hopefully the reality of the budget will be less impactful then the hype running up to it.

But Rachael's mismanagement has increased a 22 Billion Black hole to 50 billion in a year. That's more than doubled a figure that you could say the Tories took 14 years to accrue. 

The big, big, big problem is ideology. Labour think they can tax their way out of recession. They can't. No-one can, no-one has ever succeeded. 

While not technically a recession, we all know it really is. GDP per capita has fallen significantly and if it wasn't for the government importing masses of people, actual GDP would have fallen too, fulfilling the technical definition of a recession. 

Sadly the Labour government will stick to their ideology , the ideology that says they know better how to spend YOUR money. It's the arrogance of the left. They know better. The Communist Karens: they know better. The Ageing Trots: They know better.

They know better than all the experts, they are more virtuous than the working class that they hate vehemently. 

It's the same sort of totalitarian compassion that got us Hitler and Stalin. That's the sort of mindset that pervades the left. 

We WILL tax you to make the lives of illegal immigrants better. We WILL tax you to spunk money on some project in sub-Saharan Africa. And don't complain, because we haven't taxed you to the pointy you live in a mud hut. Yet.

It's the usually Communist collective rush to the bottom. No aspiration, only collective misery. We must all suffer, so that we can make the lives of the oppressed marginally more bearable. And we must be thankful as we are taxed to oblivion, because our privilege must be purged. 

he workers of the UK must pay and pay and pay, until we are all living in the same conditions as the third world. We are paid the same wages as the third world. Because the global corporations could quite easily source their staff in teh third wo9rld and pay those wages there. 

I've said before, globalisation requires us to accept the same wages here in the UK as those in the slums of Delhi.

Rachael is running scared. increasing a 22 billion black hole to 50 Billion is no mean feat. She fucked up in a major way and will continue to double down, because her ideology requires it. This is the Seventies replayed in the new millenia. The only thing going for her is that the public sector are this time the money-earners. But they are still quite militant. Especially the Junior Doctors, who don't yet have the ability to go private and rack in the cash. 

Binmen and street sweepers, all get a better wage than the hoardes of retail workers who now form the backbone of the UK workforce. 

But I for one hope there will be a call for a general strike. This is too much. Too many pre-election promises broken. If income tax is raised on the lowest paid workers, then we must stand together and strike. 

If You Can't Make a Profit Out of a Free Resource.....

No, I'm not banging on about the wind and solar farms (yet) but instead I'm talking about the charity shops that are now leaving the high street.

The Charities (of which the most Recent is Cancer Research) cite increased costs like wages (thanks to teh increase in minimum wage), increased staffing costs (thanks to the increase in Employer's N.I.), increased rents (thanks to greedy corporate landlords), and just harder trading circumstances overall.

But hang on, charity shops are given the items they sell in the shops for free, so how hard is it to make money out of a free resource.

Well, it's not about making money, but making enough money. Charities do get free stuff from donations, but a lot of charities also plug other stuff they buy, like charity cards, trinkets and accessories. So straight away they have stock costs. And like every retailer in the world, if your stock costs money, then it has to earn it's keep. If it's sat on a shelf for months, then it's not earning profit. The ideal scenario is a product arrives on a shelf or display and is instantly bought, making instant profit. 

Sitting on a shelf isn't earning. And Charity "tat" is more likely to stay on the shelf when times are hard. In times like these, you are scouring charity shops for cheap clothing. Not looking for tat gifts. 

With free stuff like donated clothes, there is a bit of leeway, because the item hasn't cost anything. But it still needs to sell and make money to keep the charity working.

Anyone who visits charity shops will have noticed the inexorable creep upwards in prices. Time was, a charity shop provided a cheap way to get reasonable clothes. But these days, the prices are close to (say) offer prices at Peacocks, or prices from the Chinese discount websites.

When charity shops sell used stuff at the same price as new stock on a sale rack, then the charity shop model starts to fall apart. People will just go buy new stuff. Unless you're in one of the affluent areas where the charity shop stocks high end designer items. The charity shop shopper's holy grail. 

So with retail rents increasing despite the reduction in businesses able to pay them, the charity shops are getting squeezed. Higher costs to run the retail side reduce revenue. 

At the other end, the administrative side hasn't reduced costs either. Staffing costs have increased thanks to Labour's policies and I don't see charity executives taking pay reductions to help out. We're still seeing charity bigwigs earning six figure salaries. Nice work if you can get it.

Sadly, even selling stuff they get for free can't keep up with increased operating costs and greedy board members. So sadly charity shops will be the next tranche of shops to leave the high street. 

I mean, if you can't make a profit selling free stuff, what does that say about the costs of doing business imposed upon them by government policy?

Which takes me on to the renewable energy sector... 

15 years of subsidies. You'd think that by now, using an energy source that costs nothing, they would now be making a profit. The technology would be mature enough and scaling would reduce costs, so renewable energy companies would be making a profit and delivering cheap energy.

Except no. The greedy companies got it written into their contracts that they would be paid just the same for their energy as fossil fuel produced energy. Thus maximising profits for shareholders.

Not only that, for every watt of renewable energy there is, we also have to have a fossil-fueled backup, in case the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. So we have to pay someone else to provide equipment to produce the same energy just in case, and pay them to sit idle, waiting for the moment to be called on to fill the gap.

So every watt of renewable energy generation equipment is paid for at least twice, with twice the installation costs: one for the renewable energy conversion and another for the fossil fueled energy conversion as back up. 

For every huge wind turbine spoiling the view off the coast, there is a gas turbine generator sat idle, waiting to be called upon if that wind turbine can't deliver.

Government policy makes it impossible to source cheap energy. The original idea of free energy being provided cheaply to the consumer has been bastardised buy government policy. 

That's why government should get involved in as little as possible. It always fucks it up.

The Vindictive State.

If you really want to know if the state cares about you, then here's some pointers.

Tommy Robinson, AKA Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has spent most of his adult life warning of the evils of Islamic ideology. From the mass rape of thousands of young working class girls, to the incompatibility between Islam and the enlightened Western World. Tommy has warned about all of it.

His reward? A vindictive state that has trawled through every aspect of Tommy's life and behaviour and punished him at every turn.

Now we have Ant Middleton, ex-SAS soldier, who will be running as a candidate for London Mayor for Reform. He has a good chance of winning. His reward for daring to challenge the state? He is being sued by the MOD for releasing aspects of his service in the SAS. 

Yeah, sounds pretty vindictive to me, as we know those who are favoured by the state face no repercussions.

Then we have the raft of jail sentences for those who dare to protest outside asylum hotels. Two more men have been sent down by a judge who already has form for being the heavy hand of Kier Starmer. 

The people have already awoken. They know that for decades, successive government's have conspired against them. 

All they need to do is figure out how to acquire the weapons with which to fight back. 

Nobody likes a vindictive state. 

I would hope that the CIA Head of House in London is acquiring the means to support the Christian side in the coming civil war in the UK. If he's not, he's going to need to eventually find a way to secure the British Nukes. Better get stuck in and get the network active now.

Fuck M.I..5 and M.I.6. Literally. And fuck James. Enough is Enough.

Our Prime Minister is Compromised.

Forget Trump and Russiagate, this is closer to home. Kier Starmer is compromised, from an intelligence standpoint.

Someone has the dirt on Starmer and is pulling the strings. 

The evidence is now mounting up, that there is a Chinese element to this kompromat.

First, we have out of the blue, the Chagos deal. Where we give away land and pay millions to boot. What is the money for? Who does it go to? But who gets to benefit the most? China! It's well known that China has influence with the Mauritius government, so China will have influence in the Indian ocean.

Now we have the Chinese spy scandal, quietly dropped to avoid compromising trade with China. 

Hmmm...

We have at least one Spy, actual Chinese spy in Parliament, nothing happens. They somehow leave the country and are only found out afterwards. Convenient.

Than we have the Chagos deal, brokered by Labour, being very beneficial indirectly to China.

Then the two Chinese spies in Parliament are somehow let off scott free after the Treasury blocked the release of evidence. Because they think it will affect trade between the nations. To be blunt, i don't think China would give a fuck about two naive idiots in Parliament. They wouldn't register on China's ability to do trade with the UK.

All the above affect the Labour party in Parliament. That's the UK Labour party forging strong links with and in turn being compromised by the Chinese Communist Party.

It's not going to take a great leap of imagination to imagine that there are Labour MPs, possibly including our Prime Minister, that have been compromised by Chinese intelligence services. There have been Chinese spies in Parliament for years now. They have been walking the halls, listening in, taking names and making notes. 

One of the great successes of Communist intelligence is human intelligence (HUMINT), that Western governments seem to have discarded and largely forgot. Western intelligence services tend to rely more on technology: eavesdropping, encryption, etc. The Communists still engage in personal surveillance, using humans to gather intelligence and if necessary compromise important assets and if necessary the odd kidnap or assassination too. 

I can't emphasise enough that there needs to be a huge clear-out of Parliament, to eradicate the compromised people. Not just in the House of Commons, but also in the Civil Service (we all know their foibles can lead to being compromised), ahem. And other positions of power.

There has been a 3 decade long assault on the principles of the United Kingdom from outside sources. Whather is by hostile countries or from Supr-National organisations. It's time we sloughed off teh dross and started to work for the United Kindgom and for no-one else. Time we started taking names and kicking ass...

Government Guilty of Hate Speech and the Greenlighting of Murder?

Over the course of the Labour Party Conference, there was a concerted campaign to smear Nigel Farage as the worst type of Human. He was Labelled Racist, Nazi, and David Lammy even stupidly said the Farage had flirted with the Hitler Youth, ignoring the decades of difference between the end of the Hitler youth and the birth of Farage.

Yes, David Lammy is to History what Diane Abbot is to mathematics.

The protestations and smears aimed at Farage, calling him the worst type of person would be able to be shrugged off as just words, except for one thing: Labour curtailed Farage's security detail just the week before they launched their ad hominem attacks. 

That's Labour's not just dirty, but abhorrent and despicable tricks: smearing Farage, a man who has already had a dozen attacks upon his person just after removing his security detail. 

It's almost as if (and I have to be careful here), that Labour are opening the door to attacks upon Farage whilst ramping up the rhetoric and hateful words against him. Labour are painting a target on Farage and allowing far-left fanatics to take a shot (possibly quite literally). 

The rhetoric has gone far past just hate speech, their actions reveal their despicable nature. It really looks like they are asking for someone to off Nigel. Of course if some fruit-loop leftist does the deed, the government can deny any link, despite their clear incitement.

But given the recent events in Manchester, that is not acceptable. Of course it was only a matter of time that thanks to all the anti-Jewish rhetoric from the left of politics and support for the Palestinian cause, some nutter (Islamic or otherwise) would feel emboldened to take a shot (or a stab) at a bunch of Jews., 

Again, the government is culpable in that they haven't toned down their own language and they haven't cracked down on the anti-Jew marches across the country supposedly in support of Palestine.

Most of us know the real truth behind the marches, but the government (including the previous Conservative one) have turned a blind eye and let the hate brew for several months, if not a couple of years now.

What did they expect to happen?

Given the above, it's quite clear the government is creating the hate for their own purpose and enacting legislation to prevent pushback. This is alarming.

Politics in the UK has been dragged down to another level thanks to the antics of the Labour Party. It's the politics of the third world, of South America despots, of Eastern European oligarchs. 

I thought we were better than this, but obviously not. Of course as soon as the right start to play the same game, the left call foul and shout loudly. 

I can't wait for them to be scraped into the bin of British politics and be done with the and their despicable gaslighting and abhorrent off-hand violence.

I hope that the old guard, the Tories, Labour and Liberals, the captured elites, the globalist sycophants are consigned to history once and for all and something good, independent, and FOR the good of the country rises from the cess pool that the previous parties have created.

On Digital ID

No, just NO!

Digital ID is so wrong on so many levels. 

The first being it's Euan Blair, Tony's son who is involved with the company that will be creating the Digital ID system. Yes, that Tony Blair whop wanted Id cards back in the Nineties and who was told to Fuck off by the population in a referendum (sound familiar?). Being an out-of-touch politician isn't a recent phenomenon.

Being an ex-IT contractor, I know the scale of teh project. To house all the data of all the people in the country is an extreme project. It's quite obviously beyond the capability of IT companies to do it quickly and on-budget. Not only that, it's beyond their capability to create a secure system that will withstand hundreds of thousands of enquiries  a day and at the same time keep it secure from the hundreds of thousands of illicit access attempts.

If we can't keep M.O.D. data secure, what hope for Digital ID? Even worse when it starts to combine not just identification, but other data. There have been a number of failed attempts to combine NHS data, benefits data, etc. This will be no exception.

From an intelligence standpoint, once your identity is in a single place, along with your medical data and any predilections you may have discussed with your doctor, along with tracking data, the tranche of data on you becomes a blackmailer's wet dream. 

Just let's say you are a politician who has a liking for young girls and you've checked onto a scheme in an attempt to cure your addiction. All on record. All together with payments, tracking, you name it. 

The government says it will be more convenient. Than what? Pulling a driving Licence out of a wallet?

More convenient than pulling a birth certificate out of a cupboard?

And history has warned us not to sacrifice freedom for convenience. When we do that, bad things happen to us.

So The Labour Party is Still Anti-Semitic?

The Labour government recognised the Palestinian State last night. 

That's right, they recognised a state that does not exist who's people call for the eradication of Jews.

So that'll be Labour being antisemitic again, supporting people that vehemently hate Jews and want to kill them.

This goes a lot further than the comments Corbyn made that got him kicked out of the party. 

Not in my name. Fuck the Palestinians, they cause issues wherever they end up.

And I'm sure that now the government recognise the Palestinian state, there will be a flood of migrants from that state into the UK seeking a new home here. That's more than likely the plan.

And what has happened in every country that has taken in Palestinian "refugees"? They tried to take over the country (even Muslim Countries) that gave them shelter. That's how grateful they were.

Safe to say I think it's a big mistake. I don't care how many other bloody countries have recognised the Palestinian State. Being a leader means being a leader, not an arsewipe hanger-on, craving favour with the rest of the world.

Not only that, but instead of lifting the UK up above the childish politics of the Middle East, we're actually involving ourselves in the mire.

The politicians in government haven't evolved their ideology past the student activist stage.

A very sad day for the UK.

3i/Atlas, The Ever-Changing Interstellar Visitor.

The third interstellar visitor (3i) to our Galaxy is throwing up a number of questions regarding interplanetary visitors.

Since it's detection and identification as an interstellar object, 3i has undergone several phase changes as it continues it's rapid journey through teh solar system.

Several of the changes have surprised scientists, who are trying furiously to pigeonhole the object as "Just a comet". 

First the object arrives in the solar system with a "coma", surrounded by gas. Initially the gas was identified as Carbon Dioxide, with a small amount of water vapour. With none of the Carbon Monoxide that has been seen with stellar object from our own solar system.

So it was different, but not by a magnitude. Say, 1 on the strangeness level.

It was also noted that the coma was produced further out from the Sun that is normal for stellar comets. That far out, the Sun wouldn't normally have the energy to sublimate CO2 from the surface of the object.

Then further observations noted the presence of nickel in the spectrum of light reflected by the object. Nickel is not unusual in the makeup of asteroids, but again with stellar asteroids it's generally combined with iron. The processes that produced the rocky fragments in our own solar system appear not to be able to produce one without the other.

3i/Atlas now rates a 2 or 3 on the strangeness level.

Initial observations made as the object approached the Sun show that the coma was not forming into the normal comet tail. In fact it was forming an "anti-tail", with the plume of gases and particles heading toward the Sun. After a number of weeks, the force of the Solar wind is now enough to start pushing the plume away from the Sun. but the anti-tail still exists, it's just the output of 3i/Atlas is being pushed away from the Sun after initially being directed toward it.

Strangeness level now at 4

Finally, the Spectrum of light emitted/reflected from the object has shifted from red to green. Not sure what process would cause that, but scientists explain it away by saying the object was coated in red interstellar dust and that the action of the solar wind has stripped the red coating and now the object is showing it's true colour.

Strangeness level now at 5

The latest issue is there are arguments about the amount of light and the type of light the object is emitting. Observations on the polarisation of the light suggests the light is not all reflected. Which means that somehow some of the light we are seeing from the object is actually emitted directly and not reflected. Nothing before has emitted it's own light as far as I'm aware. 

Strangeness level now at 6 or even 7

Out of a scale of ten, the object rates at least a 6 for strangeness. 

The problem is that not all of the observed effects can be explained by natural phenomena. Scientists are doing a great job of explaining what is happening to 3i/Atlas retrospectively, but no-one has predicted these changes. Which is, to me anyway, this object is so unprecedented.

All we need now is for the larger object to release or split into smaller objects that are captured by the Sun into Solar orbit, or worse still a collision course with the Earth. 

Or a course to one of the other planets, like Mars. 

Then we'll finally know it's the Alien mothership!

Charlie Kirk Assassination: The Psychopathy of The Left.

Charlie Kirk, the well known YouTuber who esposes moderate right of centre political views, has been killed. Details are sketchy at the moment and I've not had time to look into the details, but it is confirmed he is dead. For promoting moderate right of centre views on YouTube.

I've blogged a few time on how the left have become psychopaths. Their ideology is psychopathic. They claim that speech not aligned with their ideology is hate speech. 

That claim of hate, then excuses violence against their opponents, because they are hateful people right?

I'm going to blog on the amazing similarities with the "woke" ideology and Communism (it is Communism actually), but in this context, it's quite easy to see that the left have ramped up the phrase "political correctness" from the Nineties and Noughties, when it didn't gain traction to "hate speech" in the 2010s and 2020s, which has more impact. 

It's still the same innocuous speech as the Nineties, but the left have moved their objection to that sort of critical speech to now make it hateful (to them ideologically), make it offensive (to them ideologically), at which point they can claim some sort of violence against them. 

At which point they can then justify violence back.

Welcome to the Civil War. It starts with words, then one side converts those words to actual violence, to then claim justification for violence directed at their opponents.

It's a neat trick and it should have been stamped out in the Nineties, but the establishment have been captured by the same ideology. Thanks to organisations like common purpose that have taken leaders from all areas of power, who have then been indoctrinated with this Communist ideology (Without ever mentioning the "C" word, of course).

The indoctrinated have then gone out into their positions of power have run with the ideology and helped in the amplification of the notion that words are violence. 

And now a YouTube influencer lies dead. Killed no doubt by a radicalised kid that saw Charlie's words as violence and deserving of violence in retaliation, thanks to this psychopathic ideology.

A year ago we may have been mourning the death of a former President of the USA for exactly the same reasons and the exact same psychopathic reasoning.

If this isn't a warning that the ideology needs to be stamped out, I don't know what is. We cannot class words as violence. Words are the safety valve that avoids violence, that should allow reasoned discussion between opponents, that should allow opponents to have differing views but to accept those differences.

But Communists and their ideology cannot allow that. They want to control and eventually take power. So they absolutely cannot allow dissenting voices. Those who dissent will be shouted down, then silenced  and if necessary killed. It's that psychopathic in it's thinking.

Who Knew Being an AfD Politician Could be That Lethal?

It seems that a number of (currently 7) Alternative for Deutschland politicians have recently died. 

Very recently, very suddenly.

That's the news being broadcast by right-wing bloggers and vloggers on YouTube.

But the real news is that actually 16 politicians or political activists from various parties and groups have died in mysterious circumstances in Germany in recent weeks.

7 from The AfD.

One from the SPD

One from the Social democratic Alternatives 

One from the FPD

One from The Greens

One from the Animal Welfare Party

Then one each from the Free Voters, Referendum Party and a Voter's Group.

This is in the State of North Rhine-Westphalia. 16 political candidates in one German state. 

Interestingly looking at the Federal Sate election dates, NR-W is not due to have elections until Spring 2027, so the death of so many people so far away from the election is a bit of a mystery.

Statistically, this is not a coincidence, there is something else at play here. What that is, can only be speculation at the moment. 

Interestingly the overwhelming majority are centrist or centre-right leaning, but there are socialists amongst the dead. Whether the people weren't sufficiently left enough is anyone's guess.

But the large number from the AfD suggest that (if the deaths are not natural) that whoever did it is interested in centre-right and supposedly hard-right political activists.

I did say that Europe was in the grip of Communists and Communist ideology and this is straight out of the Communist playbook, offing your opposition.

I shall be watching Germany with interest. 

No Joke: The Stasi Infiltrated European Governments.

With the benefit of hindsight, was it a good idea to reunify Germany and to allow ex-Communists into positions of power in the unified Germany and from there wider Europe?

Because, since the reunification of the 90s, it seems that Communist ideology has infiltrated into the European political Elites. They may call themselves Socialists, or even Marxists, but they really are Communists. They uphold ideology well past the point of Socialism, they abhor Capitalism. That is the true capitalism of the middle class shop keepers of Europe. They are however in lock-step with the corporate totalitarian corporatism that destroys competition and uses any means to obliterate it.

As an example, name me one one right-wing member of the European parliament that is actually right wing. You can't. Those they label as far-right, we would have called conservative 20 years ago. Those they label as right-wing, are what we would have called middle of the road liberals back them. The whole spectrum of European politics has shifted massively to the left.

And it's all been since German reunification. The Communists have infiltrated and once in power, they have promoted those that are useful to the progress of their ideology. That's what they mean by being progressive. 

Not the progressive ideology of the typical liberal, what THEY mean by progressive is progressing the Communist ideology. 

That's how the words and the political lexicon have been changed by the Communists. Progressive means useful to the progress of their ideology. 

Over the past few decades, political policy in Europe has gone further and further to the left, past what people would call Socialism, past what most would identify as Marxism, towards Communist ideology. 

In Europe we see politicians outright lying to their constituents. Typical Communist activity, because they are so ideologically captured.

And that's what we see in the UK labour party. No longer Socialist, they are now more Communist in their ideology of totalitarian control. No freedoms for you. You will be controlled. Your thinking will be checked. You online posts will be monitored for dissent.

And it all started when the Berlin wall came down.

You could almost think it was planned. I mean, if you can't beat them, you may as well join them (and once joined, shift their politics massively to the left).

The Danger of Vague Legislation.

Way back, I argued against creating unbelievably vague legislation, or using legislation for purposes it wasn't designed for.

In 2010 I also argued about using the communications act for internet posts: Delphius' Debate: Think Happy Thoughts.... or Else

All I have to say on teh subject is in that post. I'd forgotten about it, but it has become quite prescient over the past 15 years.

I also argued against the unbelievably vague violent porn laws back in the Blair days, before this blog existed. The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act was so vague, it could, if applied in a particularly obtuse way, ensnare any publication. The wording of the act effectively prohibiting any publication the government or the Police deemed unfit.

The same argument was applied in the "Think Happy Thoughts" post from 2010. The Police at the time were hamstrung in prosecuting someone for a fake bomb threat, until after ( I assume weeks of trawling through legislation to find a way to prosecute him ) the Police decided to use the communications act.

An act that has now been twisted and bent and amalgamated with other legislation that what I said back in 2010 has come to pass with bells on. 

I fail to see how a post made in America, on an American website, by a foreign national can in any way be investigated by the UK police, let alone prosecuted.

If anyone in America failed to understand the dystopian nightmare unfolding in the UK, the Graham Lineham arrest is an abject illustration.

For one, it means that a foreign national of ANY country, if they make a comment online that falls foul of UK law, is then under threat of being arrested if at some point in the future they attempt to enter the UK. 

Let that sink in.

A citizen of a different country.

Making a post in a different country. 

Is now subject to UK law. 

The UK government now thinks it can Police the people of the world. How arrogant is that.

I would advise anyone from a country that upholds true free speech should not come to the UK. Because it could be that in the future, you may visit the UK and find yourself liable for prosecution for an intemperate tweet from decades ago.

Because that's the other thing: UK legislation has no time limit. There is no statute of limitations. UK law is unlimited from a timescale perspective. 

You could have even made the tweet before the UK legislation came into force, but that's no defence, because the legislation has no clause in it preventing prosecution for retrospective activity.

So being unaware of a law that has not been enacted yet is not a defence in UK law.

Is this the insanity of the UK judiciary, government and civil service.

I mean, if a foreign national, making a tweet in a foreign country is subject to arrest for breaching UK law if they set foot in the UK, what would that do to the tourist industry?

It's not hard to imagine someone controversial like Charlie Kirk, making a comment, or a post online that upsets a trans  activist. 

Charlie Kirk is an American citizen, making posts primarily in America. But he occasionally does make visits to the UK.

Is he now at risk of being arrested at a UK airport for those posts he made in his own country? 

How does that apply to more ordinary Americans? Are tourists that use X or Facebook at risk of arrest for intemperate or offensive (to some) tweets they made way back when twitter wasn't X?

That's how stupid UK legislation is becoming. They are trying to Police everyone everywhere for anything they have ever posted online. It's unworkable. And hugely arrogant.

The State is Now The Enemy of The People

There can be no denying it now. The State is the enemy of the people. It is using violence against those that speak the truth and do not adhere to government ideology.

When a dozen armed Police kick your door in at 6am for a tweet, that is state-sanctioned violence. Especially when a single ordinarily uniformed Policeman coming to your door would suffice.

When armed Police pick you up at an airport for hurty words, that is state-sanctioned violence.

When you are held at an airport for hours and interrogated for the umpteenth time, that is state-sanctioned harassment.

When the Police raid your house and charge you under terror legislation, where you have no right to silence, that is state-sanctioned harassment with menaces.

When the government explicitly state that they favour immigrants above those that already live, work and pay taxes here, there is a huge disconnect between the government and the people.

When the government actively persue policies that make the lives of it's citizens worse, then that is a blatant attack on the people.

When the government demand ever more taxes and give fewer and fewer services in return, all the while using the power of the state to compel payment, is that not indentured servitude or extortion?

The state is not your friend, the government are not your friend, the Police are not your friend. Hopefully if it ever came to the crunch the Army would be your friend and refuse to fire on it's own citizens. 

It's time we understood all of the above and acted accordingly.

Do not offer information to the Police. They are not your friend. Do not co-operate with them or offer them assistance in any way. 

We need large demonstrations, simultaneously, across the country. Some people can't afford to travel far, so to get the numbers, let's have demonstrations on the same day in multiple cities.

The next thing we need to do is organise a general strike. The unions are in the pocket of the big corporations. They will not help us nor will they support action against their friends in government. 

We need to be visible, we need to be loud and we need to push back against the tyrants in charge.

Hi Hi, Hi Ho, It's Off To The IMF We Go....

Talks are afoot within government regarding IMF involvement in the economic "recovery" of the UK.

Last time it took a brake new government fronted by Margaret Thatcher to pull us out of the IMF hole. Sadly she did it by asset-stripping the UK. 

Successive government's have continued her legacy, by closing down various institutions in order to save money.

This time we have no assets to sell, no money down the back of the national sofa.

Gordon Brown sold all the gold at the bottom of the market back in 1999, so we can't rely on that. The government has sold off virtually all the buildings it used to own.

This time the IMF involvement will not be short, nor sweet. It will be long-term, it will be ruinous for most, a-la Greece. The welfare gravy train is about to come to a shuddering halt. If you are on benefits, start honing your shanty-building skills. 

For homeowners, start to consider your options to liquidate your asset (house) and move abroad permanently. There will be a raid on the perceived wealth based on the value of your home.

For savers, start to look at buying gold. 

The list of measures the government are considering, look like a list of financial measures from a seventies banana republic. No taking money out of the country, taxing of minimal wealth, taxing heavily anything that makes money, taxing interest on savings and taxing the primary savings themselves. 

The list goes on. 

By 2028 the UK will look like a banana republic in virtually every sense.

I'm just wondering how far to the left the government will end up by then.

Comrades.

The Con Job Regarding Reducing the Number of Migrants in Hotels.

So, as I predicted, migrants are being taken from the 4-star hotels to be housed in the community.

I predicted that rents would go up, based on the government offering 5 grand a month per immigrant to landloards.

Well, the landlords have come up with a great scheme: the HMO (House of Multiple Occupancy).

This fulfils a number of government requirements: it gets the immigrants out of posh hotels and reduces the optics a bit and it also spreads the immigrants out into the wider community.

For the landlord, it's a win-win

If the landlord created normal flats, he'd only get two flats out of a four-bed house. The conversion cost would be more too: Introducing a second kitchen and bathroom, etc.

The HMO is a cheaper proposition. The lounge and the kitchen stay communal, and only the sleeping areas are private.

For the landlord, it's a win-win. A HMO is an easy conversion. The landlord buys 4-bedroom house, then all he has to do is put locks on the bedroom doors and stick some furniture in there and Bob's your uncle, HMO done. 

Apart from the planning paperwork, of course. But councils are under pressure to accept HMO applications and the government's push to relax planning red-tape is directly linked to the rise of HMOs and the opposition to them by local residents.

Also, the landlord only gets 2 rents from a 2-flat conversion, with rents restricted by market forces. So, say 2K per month per flat which is 4K. With the HMO filled with immigrants, the government is offering 5K per immigrant. Four immigrants at 5K each is a 20K income, which is 5 times more than "traditional" renting.

The thing is, that all the big 4-bed houses are in affluent middle-class areas. We all know those areas, where there are lots of big houses and lots of elderly people in them. 

All those big houses attracting inheritance tax. Tax that the families can't pay without selling the house. To rich landlords.

The problem for the government is opposition from local residents and planning authorities, which is why they are looking to "streamline" the planning process. It's not just for infrastructure projects, it's for lesser projects like HMOs that the government desperately needs to create in large numbers in order to reduce the optics of migrants in hotels. 

It also makes it more difficult to protest against migrants if they are dispersed into the community.

The risk for the government is alienating the middle class. Up until now, it's only the working class that have been affected, had their kids raped by immigrants.

But the risk is now that as the middle classes are affected, they won't be as amenable to the importation of illegals. 

So far, the middle class have been the bulk of the supporters of illegal immigrants. But that will change as more middle-class areas are affected. 

Ricky Jones Verdict Highlights the Infiltration of the Judicial System.

 Okay,

The Civil Service has been Infiltrated.

The Government both local and National has been infiltrated.

The Police Has been infiltrated.

The courts have now been confirmed to be infiltrated.

If not by actual people who see themselves as Communists, they follow the Communist agenda, they look after those that follow their ideology and the people they see as friends to their ideology.

They will not jail one of their own literally filmed in the act of incitement. That's if you deem calling for a crowd of people to slit the throats of Right-wingers incitement. And having to qualify what he actually meant in court, just means that the Clapham Omnibus definition of incitement was fulfilled. Most people would think he called for the crowd to do exactly as he asked.

Me personally, I think it's quite literally the definition of incitement. 

But we can now confirm the courts are bought, influenced, infiltrated by left-wing ideology. They protect the people they feel supports that ideology. 

God help Nigel Farage if he gets in, he's going to have to sack 75% of the apparatchiks of government. 

Civil Servants, Judges, senior and junior Police Officers, Armed Forces Officers. They will all have to go.

I have long since asked why the organisation Common Purpose wants to induct these very same people into sphere of influence. It's quite clear now that it brainwashes these people, it makes them slaves to the far left agenda. 

Attending a common purpose meeting or training course should be grounds for instant dismissal. 

I call on everyone that values a free and fair West, that wants to continue teh values of Western society to start banding together as a Bloc. We need strength in numbers. We need to leverage that strength against the powers that want to trample us underfoot.

Labour Loses a Referendum on ID Cards, Then Swamps the Country with Immigrants, to Which the Answer is... ID Cards.

Not Dark Yet, Currently waiting for the Dusk ;-}

I have a memory. Surprisingly good for my Age.

I remember the Blair Government having a Referendum on ID Cards. The country told him the Fuck off.

He then opened the floodgates for immigration, to "Rub The Noses of The Right In It".

Except, was that the only reason? 

Now we've had 30 years of unfettered immigration, we have actual terrorists walking our streets and every so often carrying out atrocities. We have hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants roaming the country working in the black economy. They are employed as delivery drivers by corporations that do not care who they employ. 

If they're not working illegally, they are raping young girls and sexually assaulting our woman and girls in public. 

Guess what?

The current Labour government's answer is... drum roll..... ID Cards! An answer to a problem they created 30 years ago. Some would say deliberately.

Yep, they want to impose digital ID cards on everyone. Despite not everyone having a digital device capable of holding the app, despite government's track record of data security being in the toilet.

The Ministry of Defence being the last victim of hacking. Yes, THAT Ministry of Defence, the ministry in charge of all of our military secrets, wasn't secure enough to prevent a data breach. And I hate to think of the conduits between the MoD and GCHQ and MI6 that could be exploited as a back door into our intelligence services, where the real secrets are.

And what will the purpose of these cards be anyway that cannot be done via alternative means like passports? Are we saying that driving licenses, passports, birth certificates, national insurance numbers, etc. Are all those systems being defeated so comprehensively we need another system entirely? 

Are the government admitting that the driver Licencing system, the Passport system, the Birth Certificate system and the National Insurance system are all so utterly compromised that they are unsuitable as systems for the identification of an individual? 

Remember when Driving Licences had pictures added so as to identify the driver on the licence? How well is that going then? With all the fake driving licences in circulation providing fake ID for the underage, and illegal immigrants. 

Remember when Birth certificates were produced manually and stored as card indexes? Remember when it took a couple of weeks to get a replacement Birth Certificate? Digitalisation has made the service quicker, but has also made the system easier to compromise. All you need to do is bribe someone at the registrar's office that knows the registrar's Used ID and Password and bingo, fake identity created.

Remember when National Insurance Numbers were allocated to you when you were just about to finish school and join the world of work? Remember how you felt as an adult? 
Not any more. At 16 you're still classed as a child by the government. Well, until this government decided to have a go at reducing the voting age. But there are plenty of companies doing knock-off N.I. cards.

If those systems are all compromised, then what would be different about the digital ID card system? What is to stop nation state actors from hacking into the system and creating official IDs for their operatives? Currently, with the current abysmal level of security, I would say there's nothing to stop them. 

Going Dark

Apologies to any readers. I am going dark for a while.

I can't say too much, but I will not be on social media for the next few weeks.  

That's all I'll say. 

 

Civil War? Yes, Possibly Before the Next Election!

I've listened to the various interviews of Professor David Betz and his theories regarding the risk of Civil War in Western Europe.

People push him for when things will kick off, but as he says, it's an impossibility to accurately predict the future.

But hey, I'll give it a stab. 

Before the next election, we will be embroiled in the first serious actions of what will turn out to be the Second Civil war in the UK.

There, I've gone and done it.

My reasonings are severalfold. The number of fighting age illegal, undocumented, unknown immigrant men in the UK outnumbers the totality of the UK Army.

The conduits that traffic people into the UK illegally, also smuggles drugs and guns. It's not reported in the media, but the boats don't stop at night. 

The areas where things will kick off have links to historical armed violence. 

UK intelligence is fully aware of the boats landing during the dark and their cargoes. Dealing with the landings is a bit of a tricky subject politically. Safe to say that if there was an outright firefight on a beach in the UK between the authorities and gun/drug runners, then there would be an overwhelming call to shut down the border. Also the Police would be massacred. The Army may prevail, but only if special forces are used. Hopefully they're already there on the coast scoping out night-time operations and reporting up the chain.

I'm not sure why Special Forces haven't been deployed already to just make a delivery "disappear" quietly in order to make a point.

Anyhoo, combine those points and we have, in the UK, the real risk there is a fairly well armed force of young Muslim men inside the UK at the moment. 

If an even moderately anti-Muslim party gets into power and starts to crack down in any significant way on the boats, the hotel migrants, the Burka, extremist Mosques, you can expect some pushback and for the armed uprising the start from the Muslim side.

Even before the election, if the risk is a party like Reform get in, then the tinderbox that is the UK will start to smoulder. The Muslim extremists won't wait to be pushed around, they have the ability to create mayhem, so they will create mayhem. Before the election, in an effort to sway the result.

Armed conflict ensues.

The other way is a bigger massacre than the Southport stabbings. Maybe a rampage by a dozen guys with knives in a shopping centre. That would then bring the white population out in protest in big numbers. Depending where the tinderbox ignites, tends to inform the ability to escalate. 

If the protests start in predominantly Catholic Liverpool, then the families there have ties to Republican groups in Ireland and weapons. If the protests start in Scotland, there are links to the Unionist extremists in Ireland and again, weapons. They know where the Kalashnkovs and FN Rifles are buried. 

Armed conflict ensues.

In East Anglia, I can see the Americans getting concerned if the hoardes descend on an American Airbase. And getting active to protect their citizens.

But, I'm convinced we'll see serious actions before the next election. The Muslims aren't going to sit around and wait for Farage to ban the Burka. If they do, and he does, that's just one more provocation that will get them to kick off. Whether Farage has a plan to deal with that, I don't know.

My advice? Be prepared. Make sure your door locks are firm and secure against attack. Have a plan to evacuate. If you are in one of the big cities where there's a large Muslim Presence, move outside it. 

The indications are it will happen. Sooner rather than later. Be prepared, be vigilant. Do not be a victim.

If you are a copper, I'm sorry. You will be the first target from both sides and you will not have the resources available to defend yourself. Get a different job. 

Children are Children. Until it Suits...

Back in 2023 the Conservative government removed the right of children under 18 to get married even with parental consent. 

Quietly, without much fanfare from the media.

Government decided it was a discrepancy that for most purposes, anyone under 18 should be classed as a child. Most other primary legislation enacted in the past few decades treated under 18s as kids.

So, no smoking, no drinking, no sex, no marriage. Adult life started at 18 as far as the government was concerned.

Until now.

Today, the government announced it would reduce the voting age to 16. So an under 18 doesn't have the capability to consent to sex, marriage, or to make an informed decision to shorten their life with drinks or fags.

But according to the government today, an under 18 can decide which political party to vote for. Because it suits. It suits the government because they think younger people will vote Labour. It's jerrymandering. 

Except.....

The Reform party is now the popular political party of under 18s thanks to their social media successes. 

Labour's plan to hold onto power may well backfire, spectacularly.

Afghan Importation and the Super-Injunction.

I first heard whispers about the unmarked aircraft arriving into the UK some time at the beginning of last year. Sadly it coincided with the death of my mother, so there wasn't much I could do to explore the phenomena.

I kind of forgot about it, just passing it off as yet another one of those things that happens. It was so long ago I've kind of forgotten if there was mention of any injunction. But to be honest, if we are saving Afghan interpreters that have helped our military and their families, we kind of owe a debt to them. I wasn't that bothered, and let it lie. 

It's sort of on the same level as allowing people from Hong Kong to enter the UK (after massive scrutiny to weed out Chinese Communist spies, of course).

I'm sure that the Afghans will understand the opportunity afforded them by the UK and make the best use of it. Their girls will have a better life and hopefully being on a UK military base and rubbing shoulders with ordinary UK squaddies will have given them an inkling of what potential there is here.

I have less tolerance towards illegal immigrants who have never contributed anything towards the UK, it's allies or it's military.

But, 6 (or 7) Billion pounds? really? Compare that to the amount of money expended towards helping house homeless UK squaddies and their families. Yeah.

That's really all I've got to say on the matter. 

The End of TV Personalities.

The Masterchef debacle shows that the age of human Television personalities is almost at an end.

Humans have faults, they may have said something in the past, done something in the past, that someone here, in the present finds offensive or objectionable.

The things is, if you look in everyone's past, there will be something, some closet Karen finds offensive. And to be brutal, I would have thought the intention of the offense laws was to deal with offense now, not decades in the past.

But here we are. Because the offense laws are not clearly defined, and don't have sensible limitations, we get to this point.

Someone says something in the past and somebody who wasn't even born back then so couldn't ever take offense at the time, can claim offense now, five, ten or twenty years later. 

It's now only a matter of time before we have North-Korean style TV presenters reading tightly from a script, fearing the most basic mis-quote. 

In the end, I bet TV execs can't get to Artificial Intelligence generated TV presenters. No humans allowed. No baggage, no history, no humanity. No problems.

This is why we need the huge reset I mentioned oh, 5 years ago or more. We need a bonfire of the leftist, globalist nonsensical legislation begun by Blair. Legislation so poorly drafted, so vague, so woolly, that it can be used as a catch-all. 

How can anti-terror legislation be used against journalists? Where is the justification? The legislation should have been clearly defined as to what constitutes terroristic activity, to justify arrest under those laws. Without justification everyone becomes a terrorist at risk of arrest under those laws.

But instead lazy legislators failed to include clear definitions, so anyone that writes articles against the government risks being stopped at the airport arrested and interviewed without the right of silence under anti-terror laws. When they have not committed any terrorist acts, have not planned them, supported them, or committed any precursor acts either. Just written articles in newspapers or the internet.

The same with the malicious communications act. What was supposed to stop heavy breathing calls is now being used to stifle free speech on the internet. 

Common sense has been thrown aside and lawyers cherry-pick legislation and manipulate the wording to grossly expand it's authority over what was intended.

The Supreme Court needs to be disbanded. No court should have legal power over a democratically elected government. By all means have the judges in the house of Lords, as it was back in the early Nineties, advising and tweaking legislation. But not the brick wall of the Supreme Court where the biases and mores of the Judges gets to override the wishes of the people.

Burn it all I say. All the laws enacted since Blair need to go and a sensible set of legislation, crafted with care with clear definition needs to be put in it's place. 

Starmer's Immigration Sleight of Hand.

So, Starmer has negotiated a method to return illegal immigrants back to France?

Er, No, he hasn't.

The one-in-one-out policy, despite the positive spin in the headlines, and the media is not a repatriation scheme. 

It refers to Britain sending back immigrants that have used people smugglers and instead accepting immigrants selected by France in their place one-for-one that have not been people-smuggled.

Starmer's logic being it will stop the people smuggling gangs by removing the business of the boats.

But we are still accepting hundreds of immigrants per day! We're just swapping the ones smuggled in boats for ones chosen by France.

Also there's now an incentive to France to pull back from the beaches and let the people smugglers have free reign, because the more illegals arrive in Britain on boats, the more immigrants France will be able to swap. 

And will France be prioritising their sweet and safe immigrants, or will they be prioritising their undesirables? I can guess what the answer to that will be.

The other ludicrous policy is that the UK can return 50 immigrants a day back to France, when more than that arrive in each boat. The boats carry 80 immigrants at a time.

Starmer is a retard. More than that he's a retarded pussy that gets fucked over by every single person he meets. I assume he was bullied at school. He's the very much that type of person.

A doormat. 

A doormat with welcome to illegals on it.

Just Who is in Control of The UK?

The shambles in Parliament the other day over the Government's welfare reforms are another indication that the Government of the day aren't really in charge of the country. 

I mean we vote them in and they have ideas about what policy changes they want to make, but when it comes down to it that policy doesn't actually materialise.

I mean, who would have thought a LABOUR government would trash the winter fuel payments? Who thought they would go on to try and push through welfare reforms in order to cut welfare payments?

Then we had the spectacle of Rachael Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the front bench crying.

We've seen this play out before. With Brexit, we had years of successive attempts to either ignore or reverse the referendum.

We had it with Liz Truss as well.

We also had it with Boris During Covid. The pandemic protocols set out before Covid were rapidly thrown out the window once civil service "advisers" got involved. 

So, what is going on?

The Civil Service. It has now departed from advising the government of the day, to being the de-facto government. 

That's why you get, despite changes at the top of political policy, ideology, identity, and personality, the same polices enacted by "Government" (Big G).

So that's why you get the Labour party trying to cut welfare, why you get the Tories trying to increase it. Why you get different ideologies enacting essentially the same policies.

The civil service is now the government. No matter what you do, the unelected officials in the civil service control policy and legislative progress.

The supreme court is always going to side with the civil service, even against the government. So successive government's will be blocked from changing policy, as they have been ever since Tony Blair (that wrecker of British constitutionality) created institutions like the Supreme Court without separation of the executive and legislative processes. 

You can't have a Government unable to institute policy they have been voted into power to enact.

But we are where we are and Rachael Reeves ran head-first into the brick wall of the civil service hegemony. Hance the tears at PMQs. Kier Starmer the sociopath has a more legalistic head on his shoulders and I assume has a more pragmatic and less enthusiastic attitude to the road blocks put in place thwarting government policy.

God help Reform when they get in power. There has to be a wholesale bonfire of Blairist encumbrances put upon the business of government. I wish them well and hope they have a thumping majority so they can enact primary legislation to gut the civil service, disband the supreme court, remove ourselves from the ECHR and other such organisations that deign to put themselves above an elected government.  

The Rudder is Lashed in Place and The Boat That is The UK is Heading Straight For The Rocks.

Okay, so in the previous governments voted into power, we had leaders that set a course for the rocks. Yes, we were quite a way away and there was time to vote in a new Captain to turn the ship around. 

The crew voted for Boris, who was co-opted by a Siren and he went all Eco-Loony. It's amazing the power a vagina has over an ex-public Schoolboy.

Then the Tory faithful voted Liz Truss to be the next disruptor. She found out the ship's wheel on the bridge wasn't actually connected to anything and the officers were ignoring the votes of the crew and eventually threw the Captain overboard.

Now brave Sir Kier tried to reform welfare. He's in the wrong party for that. And he's in the wrong version of the wrong party to boot. A party filled with Neo-Communists will not vote to end the fleecing of the slightly less poor to fund the poor.

And so the ship that is the UK continues to serenely sail towards the rocks. 

There are no savings from welfare to be had. The Labour party has seen to that. Government borrowing continues to rise, national debt continues to rise and the repayments on those debts continue to rise. 

There is no IVA process the government can use to renegotiate the terms of their loans. Inflation cannot reduce the severity of the debt. 

So what is the next step for the government?

There are very few options. National government doesn't control local spending, like potholes. There isn't much to save there anyway. 

We've cut the armed force back past the point they make an effective fighting force. 

The rear savings can be had in the cost of Whitehall itself. The various ministries, the quangos, the think-tanks and all the associated clutter that has over the decades accreted onto the hull of the good ship UK

All those barnacles of bullshittery need to be scraped of the hull and cast to the Ocean depths. Leaders do not need focus groups, they do not need fake charities to massage public opinion. They know what needs to be done and they inform the officers and crew in no uncertain terms that's what will be happening, that will be the course we set, those are the commands of the Captain and he expects them to be carried out. No mutiny from the officers, no dissent. 

We can save money, but it takes a leader, a confident leader to take advice from experts, form an opinion and chart a course away from the rocks. It takes a leader to eschew public opinion, to sack the focus groups and think-tanks to not care what people think about them and just do what needs to be done.

Kier Starmer is not that leader. He is tied to an ideology, a extreme socialist ideology, he does not contain the mental capacity, the acuity and flexibility of thought to turn himself away from the rocks, let alone convince the crew to turn the ship around. He does not have what it takes to lead this country away from the rocks.

I've seen the future. It consists of road blocks, rifles and fights for survival as areas fight for resources as the country collapses. The preppers need to prep, the planners need to plan. The supporters of the Judeo-Christian status quo of UK governance need to start making plans on how to support that ideology and keep it dominant within the UK.

They need to start making contacts now, need to make support plans now, to stockpile equipment now. 

When the collapse of the UK comes, it will be swift. The people outside the UK with a vested interest in keeping it the way it is need to have all their ducks in a row so that when it starts to go pear-shaped, there will be people in the UK with information on where the weapons are, how to access them and who to distribute them to. 

Literally the assets need to be in place inside the UK before it goes bad, or they need to be no more than a day away from being shipped into the UK.