What's Going on With The Farage Back-Pedalling?

Well, it was good while it lasted. Nigel Farage was a beacon for Judeo-Christian politics.

Past tense. I say was, because I saw his responses on the Winston Marshall Show on YouTube. You need to watch it, seriously, you do. I don't know how Winston got Farage to say the things he did, but it's quite shocking.

Basically, I believe Farage has been nobbled. I believe he's been given "the talk". You know, the talk where you're informed that the Muslim Gulf States have so much money invested in the economy that if you fuck about with Muslims in the UK, they'll nuke us financially by pulling all their money out. 

Financial collapse will ensue, government bonds will be worthless and the whole house of cards that is the Banking, Financial and corporate system will collapse.

Having a Muslim donor doesn't help the accusations of undue influence either.

In the Winston Marshall Interview, Farage clarified his stance on illegal immigration. Basically he will stop all immigration both legal and illegal. He will stop the boats arriving. But the chilling thing is what he said about immigrants already here. He said there was not much he could do. 

Also he said that Muslims already here should integrate, but if they didn't, they should be deported. Essentially like the German Rules that insist new immigrants learn the language. 

Excuse me?

We are spending millions of pounds a week housing illegal immigrants, they have come to the UK and if we let them in, if we give them asylum or have an amnesty scheme, that's it. Millions of Muslim men in the UK. Not only that, at some point they will be eligible to bring their families into the UK as well. 

He also added the kicker that the Muslim population increasing at 75% every 10 years. Although that will change exponentially as numbers grow. He said that if we alienate the Muslims, we will lose. 

By the rules above, we will lose anyway! Christians (those that don't convert to Islam for convenience) will eventually become a minority in the UK. We will lose whatever happens, as long as the status quo or close to it is kept.

So what happened to the Farage of a month ago? The Farage that wanted to stop the boats, end immigration for a period and deport all the illegal immigrants? 

Or was that just us mis-hearing him? Maybe he was a bit ambiguous and really didn't want to deport all the illegals after all? All the guff about leaving the ECHR in order to gain control of our borders and who we can and can't deport.

I think Farage needs to clarify his comments and do it quick. Is he referring to illegal immigrants who have already got here, or is he referring to deporting legal immigrants? 

I'm concerned. I have said before on this blog when we had the UKIP split diluting the political vote that I thought Farage was a distraction for the right. Someone who talks the talk, but has no intention of carrying it out.

Right now, as it stands, be under no illusion Farage knows that at some point, the UK will become a Muslim country. Now if you want that, if you want your children and grandchildren to be Muslim, to be controlled by that regressive ideology, then You are not with me.

This is something I've been saying for about a year now. The people that have any success in UK politics dance with the devil. They already need the Muslim vote to win elections. They dance around and say nice words, but what it boils down to is they are evil. They are happy to condemn their daughters and granddaughters to becoming second class citizens. Because you can be damn sure that once Muslims take over this country they will not keep our Judeo-Christian standards, morals and rights. 

Human rights? Gone.

Women's Rights? Gone.

Religious rights? Gone.

Freedom of Religion? Gone.

Freedom Of Association? Gone

Freedom of Expression? Gone.

Freedom of Sexuality? Gone.

Gay Marriage? Gone.

I cannot express how evil I believe these people to be. Not Muslims, but the people that are not Muslims and are happy to continue down this path to the 8th century. 

Islam has not had an enlightenment, it is not progressive, it will not retain the social, legal and moral freedom that we have currently. Islam is like the terminator, it absolutely will not stop trying to overthrow the infidels. 

And that's where I part from Farage. If he thinks that Muslims will integrate and stop trying to assert the primacy of Islam, then he is very much mistaken. He may think that eventually it will become the will of the people in the UK because we will eventually be majority Muslim. 

That's the Middle-Class viewpoint that annoys me. A shrug of the shoulders and allowing an alien ideology to take over the country, an ideology that is not moderate, that takes over your whole life, that will not make allowances for minority rights.

But it will only take over because we let it. 

I suppose it depends on whether you feel the rights, morals, standards and legal practices we have in teh West at the moment are worth fighting for.....

Government Try to eradicate Fossil Fuels Cars Early.

 In the budget, the Government changed the company car tax rules to eradicate fossil fuel cars. Petrol and Diesel cars will attract a large tax bill for anyone running a fossil fuelled company car 

Electric company car drivers will get a better deal, essentially promoting electric cars exclusively and making it totally impossible to run a fossil fuelled company car.

But why are the Government using the company car tax rules to promote a particular type of vehicle, especially when we have been here before and it failed so spectacularly?

Yes, I remember the Diesel debacle, where the previous Labour government gave preferential tax rates to Diesel company car owners. So much so there are very few used petrol-engine cars from that era.

And we know what happened to Diesel don't we? It fell out of favour when government was tasked with improving air quality and it was found that Diesels produced high levels of Nitrous Oxide.

Government should not be social engineering our use of vehicles, because it always ends in tears.

Instead, lets the market decide. Id electric cars are so good, then they shouldn't need a subsidy, shouldn't need tax breaks and shouldn't need preferential treatment at the hands of the government.

If electric cars were cheap enough, had enough range, were economical, and were significantly cheaper to run than fossil fuel cars, we would  all be using them. 

But electric cars don't match the hype. The range is not even close to that advertised, charging can be expensive if you are travelling across the country on business, charging can also take longer, so who pays the employee to sit around at a charging station?

No, electric cars along with all of the Net Zero nonsense needs to stand on it's own two feet. It needs to provide cheap energy (as we were promised), it needs to provide it reliably, in quality, when it is required. 

It shouldn't need government subsidies. 

Identifying Covert Marxist Organisations or Articles

I've just put up a link to a page that gives you instances of words and phrases that identify organisations and articles that are trying to influence you or others.

An organisation called "The Council for Eradicating International Poverty" would raise several red flags for me.

Another Called "The Progressive Liberal Outlook Centre" although the title sounds innocuous and pretty nondescript, would also cause me to raise an eyebrow. 

Interestingly a search of the above title doesn't bring up an organisation, but a set of links discussing the different between progressive and liberal, of centre-left politics. Close Google, but no cigar.  But it does indicate the use of those words in combination is exclusive to the Left.

Words like progressive, liberal, common, community, poverty, all communicate and identify certain meaning to those in the know. Those not educated about these things (most of us) would not even consider them to have alternative meaning, or signalling allegiance to an ideology.

On their own, the words may well convey their original meaning because even the right discuss these topics, but used in conjunction with other words in the list, you are looking at Marxist ideology.

Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) therefore is a Marxist ideology red flag. 

It has nothing to do with Diversity, Equality (Replaceable with Equity by Marxists to hide meaning) or Inclusion. DEI means lowering standards to allow those of a certain characteristic to be included in an organisation or group without any merit. It's a Marxist ploy to weaken an organisation. 

Also group identifiers are a key Marxist red flags. Council, Community, International, Global, attempting to signify (wrongly) that a large group or a majority uphold the findings or the ideology of the organisation.

If you look carefully, the core Marxist organisations don't practice DEI, but they tell other organisations to practice it. If they do, they pay lip service: the placements are carefully selected to place the person without any real authority. Of course the Left consider the group more important than the individual, so control is almost always by committee with a limited number of figureheads that rely on the unqualified attendees to just go along with the flow. 

The more you delve into the world of the left and the weasel-words they use, it becomes fascinating and you can readily identify the ideology behind think-tanks, activist organisations, general groups, charities, etc.

The more you look, the more you find. It's concerning there are so many actively influencing government policy both local and national, or corporate decisions. 

Anyway, I will add to the list as more covert words are identified.