The Rise of The Communist State.

Right now, we are in an authoritarian state. 

You cannot say words that are contrary to the government narrative, lest you be locked up for several years.

God (or is it Allah?) forbid you mention anything disparaging against our wonderful Muslim life-enrichers, bringing us blessing from abroad and a new way of understanding how the world outside the relatively safe Western countries behaves. 

If you get any traction and generate a following, if you get popular, you are instantly attacked. Several people have risen in prominence and then been vehemently attacked in the media. All the media, all towing the same line, spouting the same rhetoric in order to silence you.

And if that doesn't work, then the next step is lawfare, employing activist judges that will do the bidding of the government and the various attack-dog agencies to first scare you into submission and then to actually jail you.

You can't deny there are now a number of people that have gone through the process above. It's no longer random, it's quite obviously a playbook used to silence the effective communicators that dare to speak against the sate-controlled narrative.

I said to start that we are in an authoritarian state, but where is this leading? I've already mentioned that I think the Woke ideology has it's roots in Marxism, but what's the next step?

Well, Marxism begets Communism. And we are damn close to that.

Paul Hitchens already mentioned he knows Kier Starmer and his ilk and that Starmer is even further left than Jeremy Corbyn. Corbyn is a genuine Socialist old Duffer, well-meaning but ideologically left of Socialist. You might say Marxist.

But Starmer is another creature entirely. He's a committed Marxist, that we know. So was Tony Blair. But how deep does the Marxist ideology run with Starmer? Well, I'm beginning to think Starmer is a Communist.

Just his mannerisms, the way he speaks and the way he forms policy. Does anyone believe that the Cabinet is consulted when Starmer makes speeches? Does he consult Parliament at large? 

Of course he doesn't. He's a dictator. He's an authoritarian, committed to the use of the full force of the law towards his perceived enemies. Hence the crack-down on the Southport protesters. 

Starmer just couldn't comprehend that the working class should have a grievance against government policy, or even less that they should air that grievance in public.

Starmer is a Stalinist: his first instinct is to remove the resistance to his ideology. He'd shoot the protesters if he could get away with it, he'd eradicate them from existence. As it is, sending them down for a decade is as good as he can do.... at the moment. Due to the limitations of the law, there are limits on the power of the activist judiciary to follow his lead. 

But don't think that will be the case forever. 

Freedoms will be eroded and catastrophes will be exploited to bring in even tighter laws. 

We will sleepwalk into Communism. 

I feel that the leaders of Western Europe  are captured by Communist ideology. As I said, they may not think they are Communist and they certainly won't call themselves Communist. But it plain to see that the crackdowns on freedom in Europe, the restrictions on criticism of the sate and the superstate of the EU are indicators we are heading that way. 

I long suspected that the unification of Germany was like a Trojan horse, in that we let ex-Communist East- Germans into leading positions. Their ideology has poisoned the well of European freedom and fraternity. 

We are now governed and edicts come from on high to serve external masters. The requests do not come from the people, they are instead imposed from above.

The only requests from the proles that get accepted are those that lead to more restrictions. Have you noticed that? Not one request from the people to be more free or for less government intrusion has been accepted or ratified into legislation by our government., for a very long time; Decades possibly I'd like to make that broader by saying Western European governments, but I'd hope that somewhere there's a request for more freedom from the common people that was acceded to by one government in Western Europe at some point in the past 30 years...

Yeah, I can't think of one either. Which is extremely worrying.

The Great Replacement : UN Policy, Not a Conspiracy Theory.

Okay, let's just sit down and think for a minute. How would you end wars? I mean, really end wars, for good?

You might think that getting everyone in the world to trade with everyone else would create an interdependence between nations and reduce the tendency to go to war. But nah, it's been proven all globalism does is push down wages and reduce employment in developed nations as the corporations seek to employ the world's cheapest labour in order to maximise profits in a borderless trading world.

So if that doesn't work, what else?

Why not import all the people of the world into your country? That way you break down the sense of nation, of country, of patriotism. That way, the people won't go to war because there's nothing to go to war for. 

And that's the crux of the UN's replacement migration strategy. It also serves to maintain a reducing population. 

If you were an insane person, it would appear completely logical. It would also appear logical to a Communist who has no religious commitments, no sense of community or country and only serves an ideology. 

Once again I am saying that our institutions, both national and global, have been captured, not by "woke", or socialism, which are terms designed to hide the true nature of the ideology.

I've often used Marxist to describe it, but I now feel that there is only one ideology that has the power, presence and capacity to capture institutions on this scale: Communism.

I suspect this has been a decades-long process, but we know that the Oxbridge set were infiltrated by Communism. Some of the most famous Communist spies came out of English universities.

There are also reports of universities accepting Chinese money from the Chinese Communist Party. To what ends these funds are being donated is unclear, but it does create an air of suspicion, a lingering thought that something must be being asked for in return for donations, or some influence is being applied. And you can bet the products of that influence, our educators and civil servants are now in charge of future minds and future government policy.

In future, I will not use the term "woke", nor "Marxist". I will use the term Communist to describe the globalist, internationalist agenda that is being foisted on us by up on high against our wishes.

Rachael From Accounts Digs Deeper.... into Your Pocket, While Gaslighting You.

So, according to Rachael Reeves, you will be paying less this year than last year. 

A blatant lie, straight out of the pages of 1984. The truthspeak is we are all better off, just as council tax goes up (which Kier Starmer promised wouldn't), energy prices go up (which Kier Starmer promised wouldn't go up), Vehicle Excise Duty goes up (which we knew Labour would add to electric cars - don't forget Net Zero isn't about emissions), Employer NICs go up, so they employer fewer people so it's harder to get a job, then finally as part of her lovely, warm, friendly speech yesterday, Rachael announces that she's cutting benefits to people that can't find jobs because employers aren't employing because the cost is higher... 

Yeah, it's a fucking mess. Created by an imaginary economist with dodgy qualifications. 

So, if you believe Rachael is an economist and isn't from Accounts or Customer Service or whatever department she actually worked in, then believe you'll be £300 better off next year. 

I've a bag full of pixie dust to sell you along with a box of magic beans.

But the leftist idiots will still continue to think the Labour party is the party of welfare and support for the weak, despite their actions. Oh no, the Tories are the nasty party! Really? Did the Tories axe the winter fuel payment? Is it the Tories putting up VED and pricing personal transport out of the reach of the poor? Are the Tories forcibly reducing welfare payments whilst simultaneously shrinking the number of available jobs?

In order news, it looks like Labour is doubling down on their luvviness for the religion of "peaceful" suicide bombers and an overt over-friendliness with cousins and under-age white girls, the Muslims.

It seems the price of the Muslim bloc vote getting Labour into power is yet more Muslims in positions of power Good luck with that Labour. 

You know what happened to the Lebanese Socialists that helped the Muslims rise to power, don't you? And the Iranian Communists that helped the Muslims, and the Iraqi socialists that helped the Ba'ath party gain power? In fact what happened to every socialist organisation that facilitated the Muslims to rise to power? They were all killed by the Muslims when they were no longer required and posed a credible opposition.