The End of TV Personalities.

The Masterchef debacle shows that the age of human Television personalities is almost at an end.

Humans have faults, they may have said something in the past, done something in the past, that someone here, in the present finds offensive or objectionable.

The things is, if you look in everyone's past, there will be something, some closet Karen finds offensive. And to be brutal, I would have thought the intention of the offense laws was to deal with offense now, not decades in the past.

But here we are. Because the offense laws are not clearly defined, and don't have sensible limitations, we get to this point.

Someone says something in the past and somebody who wasn't even born back then so couldn't ever take offense at the time, can claim offense now, five, ten or twenty years later. 

It's now only a matter of time before we have North-Korean style TV presenters reading tightly from a script, fearing the most basic mis-quote. 

In the end, I bet TV execs can't get to Artificial Intelligence generated TV presenters. No humans allowed. No baggage, no history, no humanity. No problems.

This is why we need the huge reset I mentioned oh, 5 years ago or more. We need a bonfire of the leftist, globalist nonsensical legislation begun by Blair. Legislation so poorly drafted, so vague, so woolly, that it can be used as a catch-all. 

How can anti-terror legislation be used against journalists? Where is the justification? The legislation should have been clearly defined as to what constitutes terroristic activity, to justify arrest under those laws. Without justification everyone becomes a terrorist at risk of arrest under those laws.

But instead lazy legislators failed to include clear definitions, so anyone that writes articles against the government risks being stopped at the airport arrested and interviewed without the right of silence under anti-terror laws. When they have not committed any terrorist acts, have not planned them, supported them, or committed any precursor acts either. Just written articles in newspapers or the internet.

The same with the malicious communications act. What was supposed to stop heavy breathing calls is now being used to stifle free speech on the internet. 

Common sense has been thrown aside and lawyers cherry-pick legislation and manipulate the wording to grossly expand it's authority over what was intended.

The Supreme Court needs to be disbanded. No court should have legal power over a democratically elected government. By all means have the judges in the house of Lords, as it was back in the early Nineties, advising and tweaking legislation. But not the brick wall of the Supreme Court where the biases and mores of the Judges gets to override the wishes of the people.

Burn it all I say. All the laws enacted since Blair need to go and a sensible set of legislation, crafted with care with clear definition needs to be put in it's place.