Its been a few years now since the credit crunch and Gordon Brown was forced by his mates to hand over large wads of cash to stave off a huge recession.
But the thing is, we still had the recession, the prophecies of doom and gloom the banks used to leverage billions out of the government have still come to pass, so all in all, what did we the taxpayer gain?
Would letting the early failing banks go to the wall signalled to them a wake up call to be more prudent?
All I know is I'm suffering economically, while the rich get richer and not by the slimmest of margins can I see any benefit coming out of the bank bailout.
Is there anyone out there that can explain how I'm better off, or how worse off I'd be if we didn't pump billions into the bankrupt banks?
An explanation regarding the issue of anonymity and civil claims against the Savile estate. - The Trust and beneficiaries came into conflict with Natwest in its role as executor and personal representative of the Savile. In particular the Trust – w...
29 minutes ago